[1]
|
J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, Eds., “Quantum Theory and Measurement,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1963.
|
[2]
|
J. von Neumann, “Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955.
doi:10.1063/1.3061789
|
[3]
|
T. F. Jordan, “Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics,” John Wiley Sons, New York, 1969.
doi:10.1119/1.1975255
|
[4]
|
A. M. Gleason, “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space,” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 6, No. 6, 1957, pp. 885-893.
|
[5]
|
H. Everett, “Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 29, No. 3, 1957, pp. 454-462. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454
|
[6]
|
B. S. DeWitt, “The Many-Universes Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” In: B. d’Espagnat, Ed., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
|
[7]
|
D. Finkelstein, “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics,” Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1965, pp. 621-637.
doi:10.1111/j.2164-0947.1963.tb01483.x
|
[8]
|
J. B. Hartle, “Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1968, pp.704-712. doi:10.1119/1.1975096
|
[9]
|
N. Graham, “The Measurement of Relative Frequency,” In: B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham, Eds., The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973.
|
[10]
|
R. Geroch, “The Everett Interpretation,” No?s, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 617-633. doi:10.2307/2214880
|
[11]
|
E. Farhi, J. Goldstone and S. Gutmann, “How Probability Arises in Quantum Mechanics,” Annals of Physics, Vol. 192, No. 2, 1989, pp. 368-382.
doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90141-3
|
[12]
|
H. Stein, “The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Many Worlds or None?” No?s, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 635-652. doi:10.2307/2214881
|
[13]
|
A. Kent, “Against Many-Worlds Interpretations,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol. 5, No. 9, 1990, pp. 1745-1762. doi:10.1142/S0217751X90000805
|
[14]
|
T. Endo, “Verification of Born’s Rule by a Quantum Mechanical Meter,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 308, No. 4, 2003, pp. 256-258. doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00083-5
|
[15]
|
C M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack, “Quantum Probabilities as Bayesian Probabilities,” Physical Review A, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2002, pp. 1-6.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022305
|
[16]
|
M. Redhead, “Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism,” Claredon Press, Oxford, 1989. doi:10.1119/1.16032
|
[17]
|
R. W. Spekkens, “Contextuality for Preparations, Transformations, and Unsharp Measurements,” Physical Review A, Vol. 71, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1-17.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052108
|
[18]
|
W. H. Zurek, “Environment-Assisted Invariance, Entanglement, and Probabilities in Quantum Physics,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 90, No. 12, 2003, pp. 1-4.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.120404
|
[19]
|
M. Schlosshauer and A. Fine, “On Zurek’s Derivation of the Born Rule,” Foundations of Physics, Vol. 35, No. 197, 2005, pp. 197-213. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1941-6
|
[20]
|
D. Deutsch, “Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Vol. 455, No. 1988, 1999, pp. 3129-3137.
doi:10.1098/rspa.1999.0443
|
[21]
|
W. H. Zurek, “Probabilities from Entanglement, Born’s Rule from Envariance,” Physical Review A, Vol. 71, 2005, pp. 1-29. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052105
|
[22]
|
W. H. Zurek, “Entanglement Symmetry, Amplitudes, and Probabilities: Inverting Born’s Rule,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106, No. 25, 2011, pp 1-4.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.250402
|
[23]
|
C. M. Caves, “Notes on Zurek’s Derivation of the Quantum Probability Rule,” 2005.
http://info.phys.unm.edu/caves/reports/ZurekBornderivation.pdf
|
[24]
|
U. Mohrhoff, “Probabilities from Envariance?” International Journal of Quantum Information, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2004, pp. 221-230. doi:10.1142/S0219749904000195
|
[25]
|
H. Barnum, “No-Signalling-Based Version of Zurek’s Derivation of Quantum Probabilities: A Note on Environment-Assisted Invariance, Entanglement, and Probabilities in Quantum Physics,” 2003.
arXiv: quant-ph/0312150
|
[26]
|
H. Barnum, C. M. Caves, J. Finkelstein, C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack, “Quantum Probability from Decision Theory?” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Vol. 456, No. 1997, 2000, pp. 1175-1182.
doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0557
|
[27]
|
S. Saunders, “Derivation of the Born Rule from Operational Assumptions,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, Vol. 460, No. 2046, 2004, pp. 1-18.
doi:10.1098/rspa.2003.1230
|
[28]
|
D. Wallace, “Everettian Rationality: Defending Deutsch’s approach to probability in the Everett interpretation,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2003, pp. 415-438.
doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00036-4
|
[29]
|
W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, Einselection, and the Quantum Origins of the Classical,” Reviews of Moder Physics, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2003, pp. 715-775.
doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.715
|
[30]
|
W. H. Zurek, “Quantum Darwinism and Envariance,” 2003.
arXiv: quant-ph/0308163
|
[31]
|
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu and F. Lalo?, “Quantum Mechanics,” Hermann and Wiley, Paris, 1977.
|
[32]
|
N. Zettili, “Quantum Mechanics, Concepts and Applications,” Wiley, Chichester, 2001.
|
[33]
|
W. Greiner, “Quantum Mechanics, An Introduction,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.
|
[34]
|
A. Galindo and P. Pascual, “Quantum Mechanics I,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83854-5_2
|
[35]
|
M. Kuczma, “An Introduction to the Theory of Functional Equations and Inequalities,” Birkh?user, Basel, 2009.
doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8749-5
|
[36]
|
J. J. Sakurai, “Modern Quantum Mechanics,” Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 1994.
|