RETRACTED: Ownership Property, Product Market Competition and Auditor Choice

Abstract

Short Retraction Notice

There are substantial issues in the manuscript.

This article has been retracted to straighten the academic record. In making this decision the Editorial Board follows COPE's Retraction Guidelines. The aim is to promote the circulation of scientific research by offering an ideal research publication platform with due consideration of internationally accepted standards on publication ethics. The Editorial Board would like to extend its sincere apologies for any inconvenience this retraction may have caused.

Editor guiding this retraction: Prof. Olivier Boiral (Editorial Board Member of JHRSS)

Please see the article page for more details. The full retraction notice in PDF is preceding the original paper which is marked "RETRACTED".

Share and Cite:

  

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
[2] Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L. (1983) Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 613-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467051
[3] Choi, J.H. and Wong, T.J. (2007) Auditors’ Governance Functions and Legal Environments: An International Investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24, 13-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1506/X478-1075-4PW5-1501
[4] Chan, K.H., Lin, K.Z. and Mo, P.L.L. (2006) A Political-Economic Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Auditor Switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 21-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-6394-z
[5] Wang, Q., Wong, T.J. and Xia, L. (2008) State Ownership, the Institutional Environment, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 112-134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.04.001
[6] Marciukaityte, D. and Park, J.C. (2009) Market Competition and Earnings Management. Available at SSRN 1361905. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1361905
[7] Chow, C.W. (1982) The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences. Accounting Review, 57, 272-291.
[8] Defond, M.L. (1992) The Association between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and Auditor Switching. Auditing, 11, 16.
[9] Francis, J.R. and Wilson, E.R. (1988) Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. Accounting Review, 63, 663-682.
[10] Hart, O.D. (1983) The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 366-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003639
[11] Nickell, S.J. (1996) Competition and Corporate Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 724-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/262040
[12] Leventis, S., Weetman, P. and Caramanis, C. (2011) Agency Costs and Product Market Competition: The Case of Audit Pricing in Greece. The British Accounting Review, 43, 112-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2011.02.005
[13] Bushman, R.M. and Smith, A.J. (2001) Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 237-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00027-1
[14] Harris, M.S. (1998) The Association between Competition and Managers’ Business Segment Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 111-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2491323
[15] Botosan, C.A. and Stanford, M. (2005) Managers’ Motives to Withhold Segment Disclosures and the Effect of SFAS No. 131 on Analysts’ Information Environment. The Accounting Review, 80, 751-772. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.751
[16] DeAngelo, L.E. (1981) Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
[17] Li, F., Lundholm, R. and Minnis, M. (2013) A Measure of Competition Based on 10-K Filings. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 399-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00472.x

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.