[1]
|
Adams, J. E. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum: Teacher networks and curriculum implementation. New York: Teacher College Press.
|
[2]
|
Baek, R., & Barab, S. A. (2005). A study of dynamic design du-alities in a web-supported community of practice of teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 161-177.
|
[3]
|
Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing and online professional development community. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, and J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the ser-vice of learning (pp. 53-90). Cambridge, UK: Cam-bridge University Press.
|
[4]
|
Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 37-61.
|
[5]
|
Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Franscisco: Jossey Bass.
|
[6]
|
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9-13.
|
[7]
|
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249-305.
|
[8]
|
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Car-negie Cooperation.
|
[9]
|
Day, C. (1987). Profession-al learning through collaborative inservice activity. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Educating teachers: Changing the nature of pedagogical knowledge (pp. 207-222). New York: Falmer Press.
|
[10]
|
De Jong, O. (2007). Trends in Western science curricula and science education research: a bird’s eye view. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6, 15-22.
|
[11]
|
Dori, Y. J., & Barnea, N. (1997). In-service vhemistry teachers’ training: The impact of introducting computer tech-nology on teachers’ attitudes and classroom imple-mentation. International Journal of Science Educa-tion, 19, 577-592.
|
[12]
|
Fine, C. S. (1993). CAWP On-Line: Enhancing collacoration through technol-ogy. In G. Davies and B. Samways (Eds.), Tele-teaching (pp. 239-248). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishers.
|
[13]
|
Galanouli, D. C., & Murphy, A. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of ICT-competence training. Computers and Education, 43, 63-79.
|
[14]
|
Heller, J., Daehler, K., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. (2012). Differential effects of three professional developments models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 333-362.
|
[15]
|
Jones, D. (1997). A conceptual framework for studying the relevance of context to mathematics teachers’ change. In E. Fen-nema and B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers in Transition (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erl-baum.
|
[16]
|
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve stu-dent achievement. New York: Teacher College Press.
|
[17]
|
Putman, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4-15.
|
[18]
|
Richardson, V. (1992). The agenda-setting dilemma in a constructivist staff development process. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 287-300.
|
[19]
|
Rodrigues, S. (2006). Pedagogic practice integrating primary science and elearning: The need for relevance, recognition, resource, reflection, readiness and risk. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15, 175-189.
|
[20]
|
Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, A. (1993). LabNet: Towards a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
[21]
|
Smith, M., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systematic school reform. In S. Fuhrman and B. Malen (Eds.), The Politics of Curriculum and Testing (pp. 233-268). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
|
[22]
|
Stolk, M., De Jong, O., Bulte, A., & Pilot, A. (2011). Exploring a framework for professional development in curriculum innovation: Empowering teachers for designing context-based chemistry education. Research in Science Education, 41, 369-388.
|
[23]
|
Tekerek, M., & Ercan, O. (2012). Analysis of teachers’ attitude towards Internet use: Example of chemistry teachers. Creative Education, 3, 296-303.
|
[24]
|
US Department of Education. National Center for Educational Statistics (2000). Internet access in US public schools and class-rooms:1994-1999. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
|
[25]
|
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|