^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

^{1}

This work deals with determining the optimum thickness of the lamella wafer of silicon solar cell. The (p) base region makes up the bulk of the thickness of the wafer. This thickness has always been a factor limiting the performance of the solar cell, as it produces the maximum amount of electrical charges, contributing to the photocurrent. Determining the thickness of the wafer cannot be only mechanical. It takes into account the internal physical mechanisms of generation-diffusion-recombination of excess minority carriers. They are also influenced by external factors such as temperature and magnetic field. Under these conditions, magneto transport equation is required to be applied on excess minority carrier in lamella base silicon solar cell. It yields maximum diffusion coefficient which result on Lorentz law and Umklapp process. Then from photocurrent, back surface recombination velocity expressions are derived, both maximum diffusion coefficient and thickness dependent. The plot of the back surface recombination calibration curves as function of lamella width, leads to its maximum values, trough intercept points. Lamella optimum width is then obtained, both temperature and magnetic field dependent and expressed in relationships to show the required base thickness in the elaboration process.

The manufacturing architecture silicon solar cells evolves to improve photovoltaic conversion efficiency, at lower cost [

Many architectures have been achieved, such as, monofacial solar cells (front or rear illumination), bifacial (simultaneous illumination both sides), vertical junction (series or parallel), in order to absorb maximum incident flow and generate excess minority carriers allowing to be collected, before undergoing recombination (in the bulk or on surfaces) [

Lifetime (τ) [

Quality control of manufacturing solar cell is done by measuring these parameters, under light optical excitation [

However solar cell base thickness (H) is a geometric parameter to consider, compared to minority carriers diffusion length, to ensure a high probability collection of photocreated carriers [

The vertical multi-junction silicon solar cells (VMJ) [^{+}) who drives them back, thus reducing the distance to be covered (SVMJ) [

Our study is interested in the lamella thickness determination, through the new expression of recombination velocity at the back side. This allows extending the life of minority charge carriers in lamella and promotes the solar cell performance, under the effect of both external magnetic field and temperature.

^{+}-p-p^{+}) joined together with metallic (Al) contacts. Incidental illumination occurs parallel to junctions i.e. space charge region plane (SCR) [^{+}) produces the back field effect, that induces excess minority carriers back surface recombination velocity (Sb), that straugths back them towards the junction (SCR) and thus avoids their recombination [

from the junction (front side of the base). The base is a thickness H lamella, seat of rear electric field (p-p^{+}). The Oz axis, gives the illumination sense and depth z, place of creation of monority charge carriers in solar cell. The magnetic field which plays a deflecting role (Lorentz law) on minority charge carriers,is perpendicular to the plane (O, x, z), i.e., along Oy axis.

Excess minority carrier’s density δ(x), generated on the abscissa x and at depth z, in the base of solar cell in steady regime, undergo the law magneto-transport, presented through the following continuity equation [

∂ 2 δ ( x , z , B , T ) ∂ x 2 − δ ( x , z , B , T ) L * 2 ( B , T ) + G ( z ) D * ( B , T ) = 0 (1)

Diffusion length L * ( B , T ) minority carriers in the base of solar cell under magnetic field B at temperature T is:

L * ( B , T ) = τ ⋅ D * ( B , T ) (2)

D * ( B , T ) The diffusion coefficient of minority carriers in the base under influence of temperature T and the magnetic field B applied is given by the relation [

D * ( B , T ) = D 0 ( T ) [ 1 + ( μ ( T ) × B ) 2 ] (3)

where D_{0}(T) is the diffusion coefficient versus temperature T, in the solar cell without magnetic field. It is given by the Einstein-Smoluchowski [

D 0 ( T ) = μ ( T ) × k b × T q (4)

With µ(T) is the minority carriers mobility temperature dependent in the base and expresses as [

μ ( T ) = 1.43 × 10 9 T − 2.42 cm 2 ⋅ V − 1 ⋅ s − 1 (5)

q is the electron elementary charge.

k_{b} is Boltzmann’s constant given as: k_{b} = 1.38 × 10^{−23} m^{2}∙kg∙s^{−2}∙K^{−1}.

The generation rate of minority charge carriers generated at depth z in the base is modeled and expressed by the following relation [

G ( z ) = ∑ i = 1 3 a i exp ( − b i z ) (6)

The coefficients a_{i} and b_{i} are obtained from the tabulated values of the radiation.

The solution of magneto transport equation is given by the following expression of the minority charge carrier density as:

δ ( x , z , B , T ) = A 1 cosh ( x L * ( B , T ) ) + A 2 sinh ( x L * ( B , T ) ) + ∑ i = 1 3 K i ( B , T ) ⋅ exp ( − b i z ) (7)

With

K i ( B , T ) = a i × L * 2 ( B , T ) D * ( B , T ) (8)

The previous relationship is fully defined, by determining the coefficients A_{1} and A_{2}, using base boundary conditions, what are junction (SCR) and back side:

1) At the junction (n^{+}/p), x = 0, it is given by [

∂ δ ( x , z , B , T ) ∂ x | x = 0 = S f D * ( B , T ) δ ( x , z , B , T ) | x = 0 (9)

2) At back surface (p/p^{+}), x = H, it is given by [

∂ δ ( x , z , B , T ) ∂ x | x = H = − S b D * ( B , T ) δ ( x , z , B , T ) | x = H (10)

Sf is excess minority carrier junction recombination velocity. It has two components, one defines the operating point, thus, it is imposed by the external load resistor, and the other is the intrinsic recombination velocity, which is related to the solar cell shunt resistance in electric equivalent model [

Sb is back surface recombination velocity (x = H), where there is an electric field (p/p^{+}), allowing repel the minority charge carriers towards junction (n^{+}/p) and avoid their back side recombination [

The excess minority carriers collected through junction give photocurrent density Jph obtained from the following Fick relation:

J p h ( S f , H , z , B , T , S b ) = q ⋅ D ⋅ ∂ δ ( S f , H , z , B , T , S b ) ∂ x | x = 0 (11)

Solving Equation (12), leads to two expressions of excess minority carrierback surface recombination velocity in the base as, Sb_{1} and Sb_{2}:

∂ J p h ( S f , H , z , B , T , S b ) ∂ S f | S f ≥ 10 5 = 0 (12)

S b 1 ( H , B , T ) = − D ( B , T ) ⋅ s h ( H L ( B , T ) ) L ( B , T ) ⋅ ( c h ( H L ( B , T ) ) − 1 ) (13)

S b 2 ( H , B , T ) = − D ( B , T ) L ( B , T ) ⋅ t h ( H L ( B , T ) ) (14)

The maximum values of diffusion coefficient as a function of optimum temperature for different values of magnetic field were determined by comparisons of two different methods according to relationship [

D max ( B ) = 2.1 × 10 5 [ T o p t ( B ) ] − 1.58 (15)

Other authors, using the same approach, proposed in 3D study or in frequency modulation the following expressions:

Optimum temperature depending magnetic field [

T o p t ( B ) = 2.56 [ 1.43 × 10 9 ] 2 B 2 4.85 (16)

Maximum diffusion coefficient as a function of cyclotronic frequency for different values magnetic field [

D max ( ω , B ) = 1.717 × 10 6 [ T o p t ( ω , B ) ] − 2.065 (17)

These relationships show that the choice of values of parameters like the temperature, the magnetic field and the frequency must obey certain conditions for obtaining solar cell good performance.

In

For each value of maximum diffusion coefficient, the optimum thickness H_{op} of base is determined by projection on abscissa-axis of the intercept point of Sb_{1} and Sb_{2} curves. Thus the different values are presented in

_{op}) as function of maximum diffusion coefficient.

We note that lamella optimum thickness increases linearly according to maximum diffusion coefficient. Considering the best fit, we can write the following relation:

H o p = a ⋅ D max + b (18)

The constants a and b are respectively the slope and the ordinate at origin of line. We get the following equation:

H o p = 0.00012 D max + 0.01430 (19)

_{op}) versus magnetic field.

The best fit gives the following modeling equation for mean curve in the form:

H o p ( B ) = − 3.4 × 10 3 B 3 + 9.7 × 10 3 B 2 − 10 B + 0.018 (20)

The base optimum thickness decreases depending on the applied magnetic field. Indeed, when the magnetic field increases, mobility and diffusion of minority carriers decrease with the increase in the intensity of Lorentz force slowing down the movement of charge carriers [

_{op} as a function optimum temperature.

B (Tesla) | 0.0003 | 0.0004 | 0.0005 | 0.0006 | 0.0007 | 0.0008 | 0.0009 | 0.001 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Optimum temperature (Kelvin) | 254.7 | 286.6 | 313 | 336.5 | 361.4 | 381.9 | 401.0 | 418.8 |

D_{max} (cm^{2}/s) | 33.368 | 28.173 | 24.66 | 22.202 | 20.259 | 18.757 | 17.561 | 16.548 |

H_{op} (cm) | 0.0161 | 0.0156 | 0.0153 | 0.0149 | 0.0147 | 0.0146 | 0.01445 | 0.0143 |

The average curve modeling equation is in the form:

H o p ( T ) = − 3.2 × 10 − 11 T 3 + 7 × 10 − 8 T 2 − 4.5 × 10 − 5 T + 0.024 (21)

The lamella optimum thickness H_{op} decreases according to optimum temperature. Indeed, when the temperature is high, the phonons are excited and material resistivity decreases with Umklapp processes [

This thickness optimization technique plays an important role in the case of vertical solar cell junction, which uses low quality materials, whose minority carriers have low diffusion lengths. It makes the back surface recombination velocity at (p-p^{+}) more efficient by a judicious choice of lamella thickness.

That’s why, the two expressions of back surface recombination of excess minority carriers are required to determine the lamella optimum thickness for different values of diffusion coefficient as a function of optimum temperature for different magnetic field values. So the different relationships found justify the choice of the lamella optimal thickness either as a function of temperature or magnetic field. Consequently these results can be used as a tool for selecting lamella elaboration process.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Faye, D., Gueye, S., Ndiaye, M., Ba, M.L., Diatta, I., Traore, Y., Diop, M.S., Diop, G., Diao, A. and Sissoko, G. (2020) Lamella Silicon Solar Cell under Both Temperature and Magnetic Field: Width Optimum Determination. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications, 12, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.4236/jemaa.2020.124005