_{1}

^{*}

The variation of the temperature of the solar cell subjected to the incident global solar radiation along the local daytime in relation to its efficiency is studied. The heat balance equation is solved. The solution revealed that the cell temperature is a function of the maximum value of the daily incident global solar radiation
*q _{max}*, the convection heat transfer coefficient (

*h*), the optical, physical and the geometrical parameters of the cell. The temperature dependence of the short circuit current

*I*, the dark saturation current

_{sc}*I*, the open circuit voltage

_{o}*V*, and the energy band gap

_{oc}*E*characterizing a Silicon solar cell is considered in evaluating the cell efficiency. Computations of the efficiency concerning operating conditions and astronomical locations (Egypt) as illustrative examples are given.

_{g}Heating a solar cell subjected to the incident global solar radiation affects its photovoltaic performance [

Solar energy can be converted into electricity are termed as the photovoltaic devices or solar cells. At present this solar cell is the most important long-duration power supply for satellites and space vehicles. Solar cells have also been successfully employed in small-scale terrestrial applications. Due to this the study of the efficiency of the solar cell with the aim to increase its value has aroused the interest of many investigators [

The efficiency ( η ) is a measure of the cell performance which depends on many parameters. Many of such parameters are temperature dependent.

The performance of a solar cell is determined by parameters as a short circuit current I_{sc}(T) and open circuit voltage V_{oc}(T). It has been shown earlier that I_{sc} increases with increasing the temperature whereas open circuit voltage V_{oc} decreases with increasing the temperature.

The aim of the present work is to find theoretically the temperature field within the solar cell considering different optical, physical, geometrical conditions. The temperature functional dependences of the cell parameters V_{oc}, I_{sc} and the efficiency are also taken into consideration.

In sitting up the problem it is assumed that solar radiation of irradiance q(t) W/m^{2} is incident on the front surface of the solar cell, where it is partly absorbed and partly reflected.

The absorbed quantity is Aq(t), where “A” is the absorption coefficient at the front surface of the considered cell. The heat diffusion equation is given in the form:

S A a b q ( t ) − S h θ ( t ) = S ρ l c p d θ d t (1)

where:

θ ( t ) = ( T ( t ) − T O ) , K is the excess temperature of the cell relative to the ambient temperature T O , S (m^{2}) is the area of the cell front surface, h (W/m^{2}∙K) is the convection heat transfer coefficient at the front surface, l (m) is the all layer thickness, ρ (kg/m^{3}), c_{p} (J/kg∙K) are density and the specific heat of the solar cell material respectively.

Equation (1) can be written as:

d θ d t + a θ ( t ) = B q ( t ) (2)

where,

a = h ρ l c p and B = A ρ l c p

Equation (2) can be solved using the integrating factor [

θ ( t ) e ∫ 0 t a d t = ∫ 0 t B q ( t ) e ∫ 0 t a d t (3)

q(t), (W/m^{2}) is the irradiance of the incident solar radiation given in the form [

q ( t ) = q max ( 1 t 0 ) 2 ( 1 t d − t 0 ) 2 t 2 ( t d − t ) (4)

where:

q_{max}, W/m^{2} is the maximum irradiance of the incident solar radiation;

t 0 = ( t d / 2 ) ,is the mid time between sunrise and sunset in hours;

t d = ( t s − t r ) ,is the length of the solar day given as:

t d = 2 15 cos ( − tan ϕ tan δ ) [

where:

ϕ ,is the latitude and δ is the solar declination angle given as:

δ = 23.45 sin 284 + n 365

t_{r}, is the sunrise time in hours;

t_{s}, is the sunset time in hours;

And “n” is the day of the year (1 ≤ n ≤ 365) starting from 1 January.

The solution is obtained as the form [

θ ( t ) = B t d 2 [ ( t 2 a − 2 t a 2 + 2 a 3 ) − 2 a 3 e − a t ] − 2 B t d [ ( t 3 a − 3 t 2 a 2 + 6 t a 3 − 6 a 4 ) + 6 a 4 e − a t ] + B [ ( t 4 a − 4 t 3 a 2 + 12 t 2 a 3 − 24 t a 4 + 24 a 5 ) − 24 a 5 e − a t ] (5)

Equation (5) represents the temperature of the considering cell after an exposure time “t” along the solar day time.

The efficiency ( η ) of the solar cell is defined as the ratio between the maximum power P max ( = F F V o c I s c ) , generated by a solar cell and the received power P_{in} as follows [

η = F F I s c V o c P i n (6)

P_{in} (W/m^{2}) is the input total solar power received by the solar cell;

V_{oc} is the open circuit voltage which is given as [

V o c = K T e ln ( I s c I o + 1 ) (7)

where:

K ( J / K ) is the Boltzmann constant, T ( K ) is the cell temperature (e = 1.6 × 10^{−19} Coulomb) is the electron charge, I o (amp/m^{3}) is the reverse saturation current and its dependence on temperature is revealed through the following equation [

I o = ϵ n T γ e − E g K T (8)

where:

ϵ = 179 amp / K 3 ⋅ m 2 for silicon solar cell [

E_{g} is the energy band gap. The dependence of energy band gap of a semiconductor on temperature can be described as [

E g = E g ( 0 ) − α T 2 T + β (9)

E_{g}(0) is the energy band gap of the semiconductor at T ≈ 0 K ;_{ }

For silicon E_{g}(0) =1.16 eV [^{−14} eV∙K^{−1} and β = 1100 K.^{ }

Which are constants for each semiconductor material [_{sc} is short circuit current given as [

I S C = Q ( 1 − R ( T ) ) ( 1 − expel ( μ l ) ) e n photons (10)

where:

Q is the collection factor, R(T) is the reflection coefficient at the front face of the cell and its value is given as [

R ( T ) = 0.322 + 3.12 × 10 − 5 T (11)

μ is the attenuation coefficient and is value given as [_{ }

μ = a exp ( T / T S ) (12)

where:

a = 3.17 × 10 4 m − 1 ; and

T S = 346 K , l in meter is the thickness of the solar cell,

n_{photons} is the number of photons with energy greater than the band gap and for simplicity its value for a given temperature T at a certain local daytime is given as:

n photon = q ( t ) / E g (13)

The silicon solar cell is considered with dimensions (5.5 cm × 11 cm × 0.35 cm) is considered [

ρ = 2280 kg / m 3 , c p = 840 J / kg

The hourly incident global solar radiation q(t) (Equation (4)) is considered for Egypt [_{sc}, I_{o}, and V_{oc} corresponding to each value of T at a certain time “t” are determined.

Hence the efficiency “η” of the cell as a function of the solar local day time “t” is estimated for considered location.

For Egypt (July) [

q_{max} = 1045 W/m^{2}, t_{d} = 14 hours, t_{r} = 0 hours, t_{0} = 7 hours.

Different thickness l = 10^{−3}, 3 × 10^{−3}, 5 × 10^{−3} m are considered at h = 1 W/m^{2}∙K, A = 0.7.

The obtained results are given in

Different cooling conditions h = 3, 5, 10 W/m^{2}∙K are considered at thickness l = 10^{−3} m, A = 0.7 the obtained results are given in

shifted time t, hr. | T, K | ||
---|---|---|---|

l = 10^{−3} m | l = 3 × 10^{−3} m | l = 5 × 10^{−3} m | |

0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

1 | 21.5 | 0 | 6.4 |

2 | 111 | 11.7 | 40.1 |

3 | 250 | 106 | 108 |

4 | 405 | 230 | 205 |

5 | 548 | 363 | 316 |

6 | 656 | 483 | 426 |

7 | 714 | 573 | 520 |

8 | 716 | 620 | 583 |

9 | 660 | 617 | 608 |

10 | 554 | 563 | 591 |

11 | 412 | 467 | 534 |

12 | 257 | 341 | 445 |

13 | 116 | 208 | 339 |

14 | 26.5 | 96.4 | 239 |

shifted time t, hr. | T, K | ||
---|---|---|---|

h = 3 (W/m^{2}∙K) | h = 5 (W/m^{2}∙K) | h = 10 (W/m^{2}∙K) | |

0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

1 | 12.3 | 8.44 | 4.52 |

2 | 50.1 | 32 | 16.2 |

3 | 101 | 62.9 | 31.1 |

4 | 153 | 94.2 | 45.7 |

5 | 198 | 121 | 57.6 |

6 | 229 | 139 | 64.9 |

7 | 242 | 146 | 66.4 |

8 | 236 | 141 | 61.7 |

9 | 211 | 126 | 51.2 |

10 | 170 | 100 | 35.9 |

11 | 120 | 69.7 | 17.5 |

12 | 67.2 | 38.2 | 0 |

13 | 23.4 | 12.5 | 0 |

14 | 1.15 | 0 | 0 |

in

Different absorption coefficients A = 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 are considered at l = 10^{−3} m, h = 3 W/m^{2}∙K. The obtained results are given in

The variation of I_{sc}, V_{oc} for the case:

l = 5 × 10^{−3} m, A = 0.7, h = 1 W/m^{2}∙K are computed and are illustrated in

The obtained results revealed that I_{sc} increases with increasing the temperature and vic versa.

Moreover, the dependence of the efficiency of the considered solar cell on the thickness l, are clarified.

The efficiency at: h = 1 W/m^{2}∙K, A = 0.7 and thickness l = 10^{−3}, 3 × 10^{−3}, 5 × 10^{−3} m is computed and is illustrated in Figures 6-8.

The obtained results reveal that: The cell temperature decreases as the transfer coefficient for cooling increases, also it decreases as the thickness of the cell increases while it increases as the absorption coefficient “A” at its front surface increases. This is because when “A” increases the value of the solar power absorbed by the cell increases.

Moreover, the short circuit current I_{sc} increases with increasing temperature and vice versa. This variation may be attributed to the fact that for most semi-conductors, as the temperature increases, the energy band gab decreases [

shifted time t, hr. | T, K | ||
---|---|---|---|

A = 0.6 | A = 0.7 | A = 0.8 | |

0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

1 | 10.6 | 12.3 | 14.1 |

2 | 42.9 | 50.1 | 57.2 |

3 | 86.4 | 101 | 115 |

4 | 131 | 153 | 175 |

5 | 170 | 198 | 226 |

6 | 196 | 229 | 262 |

7 | 208 | 242 | 277 |

8 | 202 | 236 | 269 |

9 | 181 | 211 | 241 |

10 | 146 | 170 | 194 |

11 | 103 | 120 | 137 |

12 | 57.6 | 67.2 | 76.7 |

13 | 20 | 43.4 | 26.7 |

14 | 0 | 1.15 | 1.31 |

Equation (7) reveals that the behavior of V_{oc} with temperature is controlled by two factors k T e and ln ( I s c I o + 1 ) . The first factor suggests a linear relation on (T) while is relation deviated due to the presences of the logarithmic function ln ( I s c I o ) grows slowly with T than the function k T e .

V_{oc} has weak dependence on “T” than I_{sc}.

The temperature of the solar cell subjected to incident solar insolation increases with local day time and passes through a maximum value then it decreases gradually toward sunset. The cell parameters V_{oc}, I_{sc}, and the efficiency η are functions of the cell temperature with different degrees.

The efficiency η of the cell decreases with the cell temperature in general. Thus cooling, the solar cell is recommended.

The open circuit voltage V_{oc}, is less dependent on the temperature than the short circuit current I_{sc}.

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Shaban, S.S.M. (2020) The Solar Cell Parameters as a Function of Its Temperature in Relation to Its Diurnal Efficiency. Optics and Photonics Journal, 10, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4236/opj.2020.101001