Background: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is defined as infection that occurring within 30 days after surgical procedure or within a year of implantation of prosthesis. Surgical Site Infection can happen in up to 30% of surgical procedures and records for up to 14% of Hospital Acquired Infection (HAIs).
Aim of the Study: The aim of this study was to assess levels of nurse’s Compliance; knowledge and practice regarding prevention of surgical site infection Guidelines and identify the barriers facing nurses’ compliance with surgical site infection prevention Guidelines.
Design: Cross sectional descriptive study design self-reported survey. Settings: Data was collected from surgical departments from selected Menoufia Governorate Hospitals, Egypt.
Sample: A large convenience sample of 450 nurses was selected. Initially 600 questionnaires were distributed, of which only 400 returned completed, a response rate of 66.6%.
Tools: was comprised of the: 1) Pre-designed structured questionnaire to assess nurses’ socio-demographic characteristics’ and Nurses’ knowledge, 2) Likert-scale: to assess nurses’ compliance, nurses’ practice and nurses’ barriers facing nurses with surgical site infection prevention guidelines.
Study period: The study was conducted from July to November 2019 in the selected hospitals.
Results: nurses’ compliance mean scores were in low level with a mean of 13.01, it is clear that most of the nurses have poor knowledge, most of the nurses have poor practice about surgical site infection, concerning the most barriers of compliance facing nurses with surgical site infection prevention guidelines, were lack of a professional model, having no enough time, and some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities.
Conclusions: Nurses working in the surgical related wards reported a low level of knowledge, practice and compliance regarding the prevention of surgical site infection guidelines. The most barriers of compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines that reported by nurses were, lack of a professional model, nurses do not have enough time, and some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities.
Recommendations: Evaluation of nurses’ and hospitals’ application of the guidelines is important to improve the quality of care. Education and training program should be conducted to improve nurses’ knowledge and practice in some areas using evidence-based practice.
Surgical Site Infection Compliance Knowledge and Practice1. Introduction
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most preventable hospital acquired infection (HAI) related with any surgery [1] [2]. SSI is defined as infection that occurs within 30 days after a surgical procedure or within a year of implantation of a prosthesis. SSI can happen in up to 30% of surgical procedures and records for up to 14% of HAIs [3]. It was reported a huge weight in terms of patient morbidity and mortality and costs to healthcare around the world due to Surgical site infections (SSIs) [4]. The fundamental danger of contamination is microorganisms (viral or bacterial) entering surgical incisions. The development of SSIs depends upon on virulence, bacterial load, and the patient’s ability to withstand infections [5]. Transmission of microorganisms can be minimized through following evidence based guidelines for prevention of transmission of them, including the aseptic technique. Hand washing techniques in pre-operative aseptic strategies consist of a number of factors such as preliminary hand washing, method of rubbing, drying of hands, wearing an operating gown, and wearing sterile gloves. One of the factors that affect the success of hand washing is the degree of compliance with the recommended standard procedures [6] [7].
Prevalence study found that wound contaminations after surgery represent SSIs happen in 2% - 5% of patients experiencing surgical procedure extending from 160,000 to 300,000 cases for each year in the US, [8] [9]. SSIs are related with delayed term of hospitalization, readmissions, re-intercessions, changeless incapacity or even passing [10].
Throughout the literature, SSIs were associated with factors including advanced age, malnutrition, metabolic diseases, smoking, obesity, hypoxia, and immune-suppression. Moreover, factors like application of skin antiseptics, preoperative shaving, antibiotic prophylaxis, preoperative skin preparation, inadequate sterilization of instruments, surgical drains, surgical hand scrubs, and dressing techniques were among the most frequently reported risk factors [11] [12]. The most critical issue in preventing surgical site infections is the entire and absolute compliance of health professionals with the recommendations in the guidelines [13] [14].
Although the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) is a great deal higher in low- and middle-income nations in contrast to high-income countries, SSIs are nevertheless a common motive of infection in high-income international locations [15]. Clearly, better SSIs prevention is needed. Preventing SSI requires a multifactorial strategy as the increasing improvement of antibiotic resistance makes it essential that the operating room (OR) is free from infection as possible [16].
Wound contamination can be prevented by implementing certain guidelines from the nurses and other health care workers that minimize the risk of SSIs. Actions such as all staff complying with Preventing SSI guidelines including hygienic practices and correct cleaning of the OR between operations are examples of measures that can reduce SSI load in all health care facilities [17].
There is a general agreement that up to 60% of SSI would be reduced by applying sufficient counteractive action and checking nurses compliance with SSI [15] [17], since sets of measures (or “packages”) have exhibited a decrease in SSI rates [18] [19].
As most SSIs are avoidable [20], all details preoperative, intraoperative and post-operative care should be investigated and evaluated to make certain high-quality practices are evidence-based. Prevention of SSI is a balance between harm, cost, and patient value [15]. Surgical patients, who meet many fitness care specialists on their perioperative period, rely on OR nurse to provide advantageous care as properly as to make sure the prevention of SSIs. That is, OR nurses are accountable for enforcing hygiene and aseptic principles in the OR to stop and limit the spread of infections. In addition, OR nurses are responsible for perioperative care together with different professionals in the crew [21].
Nurses play a major comprehensive role and span of continuum care in preventing surgical site infections. Therefore, they can modify SSI risk factors in their daily practice such as improper hand hygiene and skin preparation, in order to prevent SSI. [7] [8]. Many sets of guidelines in this area have been proposed in the past decade by the organizations working in the area of SSI prevention, such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [22], WHO, [23], and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). [24]. However, adherence to the recommended best practices according to the guidelines for SSI prevention remains low among nurses [22] [24]. Multiple studies have reported that proper practices for the prevention of infection among nurses have been affected by some barriers, such as Lack of knowledge, resources and SSI preventive guidelines, lack of direct leadership involvement, lack of dedicated time for implementation of the improvement activities, lack of dedicated time for training and education, poor access to supplies in support of identified and agreed action, poor communication, lack of awareness of the need to address the problem, lack of data to support and track improvement efforts, non-attendance or non-compliance with educational activities, absence of local standard operating protocols (SOPs) or an implementation manual for SSI prevention [9] [24].
1.1. Significance of the Study
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant clinical problem that affects the quality of health care outcomes globally, particularly in developing countries. This infection can have serious impacts including: prolonged hospital stay, reduced quality of life, increased mortality, additional cost for patients and their family, and rising health care cost. In Egypt, a little nursing research has been done to assess the level of nurses’ compliance, knowledge and practice regarding surgical site infection prevention guidelines and investigating the correlation among them, as well as, identifying the barriers facing the nurses to comply with guidelines of SSI. All over the world, the use of SSI prevention guidelines is supported by scientific research. However, In Menoufia Governorate in Egypt, the extent to which nurses implement these guidelines in surgical departments is still unclear. Therefore, there is a standing need to provide all Menoufia hospitals with written guidelines for nurses, patients and other health care employees to gain knowledge and practice regarding surgical site infection prevention (SSIs). Moreover, it might generate attention and motivation for further researches into this area.
1.2. Aim of the Study
The aim of this study was to assess levels of Nurse’s Compliance, knowledge and practice regarding prevention of surgical site infection Guidelines and to identify the Barriers facing nurses’ compliance with surgical site infection prevention Guidelines.
1.3. Research Questions
1) What is the level of Nurses’ knowledge regarding prevention of surgical site infection Guidelines?
2) What is the level of nurses’ practice regarding prevention of surgical site infection Guidelines?
3) What is the level of nurses’ compliance with surgical site infection prevention Guidelines?
4) What are the barriers facing nurses’ compliance with surgical site infection prevention Guidelines?
2. Methodology2.1. Design
A cross-sectional descriptive study, design self-reported survey was conducted.
2.2. Setting
Data was collected from surgical departments from selected Menoufia Governorate Hospitals: (Menoufia University Hospital, Shebin El-Koom Teaching Hospital, Quwesna Central Hospital, Berkt El-Saba Central Hospital, Ashmoon General Hospital) as they represent a capital of big town in Menoufia Governorate-Egypt.
2.3. Sample Size Estimation
In this study, it is used the Raosoft sample size calculator [25]. in which, margin of error was 5% is a common choice, confidence level was 95%, the population size, 20,000, the response distribution was 50%, the recommended sample size was 377 which calculated electronically based on the Raosoft sample size calculator. A large convenience sample of 450 nurses was selected to compensate for the expected low response rate and uncompleted questionnaires. The participants were from Shebin El-Koom University Hospital (175 participants), Shebin El-Koom Teaching Hospital (130), Quwesna Central Hospital (45), Berkt El-Saba Central Hospital (30), Ashmoon General Hospital (20). Initially 600 questionnaires were distributed, of which only 400 returned completed, a response rate of 66.6%. Respondents were different genders, age, and years of experience.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a significant clinical problem that affects the quality of health care outcomes globally, particularly in developing countries. This infection can have serious impacts including: prolonged hospital stay, reduced quality of life, increased
2.3.1. Inclusion Criteria
Staff nurses;
Nurses who will voluntarily participate and give consent.
2.3.2. Exclusion Criteria
Head nurses;
Student nurses;
Nurses who will refuse to participate in the study.
2.4. Tools for Data Collection
1) Pre-designed structured questionnaire was designed by the researchers in Arabic language after reviewing of the related literature. This tool was comprised of the following sections:
a) Section 1: Nurses’ socio-demographic characteristic as regards their age, gender, educational level, working experience and attended surgical site infection prevention guidelines training programme previously.
b) Section 2: Nurses’ knowledge: to evaluate the nurse’s knowledge regarding application of surgical site infection prevention guidelines [26]. This part also was designed by the researchers based on literature review, which contained another 22 multiple choice questions,
Scoring System: the correct answer was given a score of one and the incorrect a score of zero. The total score of knowledge ranged between 0 - 22. Levels of knowledge as the following: Low = 0 to 7.3, Moderate = 7.4 to 14.6, and High = 14.7 to 22.
2) Likert-scale: It consisted of:
a) Part 1: Likert-scale to assess nurse’s compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines. It was designed by the researchers on the basis of the published and updated guidelines on prevention of surgical site infection from the WHO Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines, (2016) [26]. This tool consisted of 9 items, of Likert-scale scores (never = 1, sometimes = 2, and always = 3) to measure nurses’ compliance with the guidelines. Scoring System: The score of nurses’ compliance ranged from 9 - 27, levels of nurses’ compliance as the following: Low = 9 to 15, Moderate = more than 15 to 21, and High = more than 21 to 27.
b) Part 2: Likert scale to assess Nurses practice: regarding surgical site infection prevention guidelines. This part was adopted from Sickder et al., (2014) [27] contained another 10 questions in which responses were answered in a 3-point Likert scale (never practiced, sometimes practiced, and always practiced). Responses range from 1 to 3. The higher scores will indicate higher level of practice, Levels of practices: Low = 10 - 16.6, Moderate = 16.7 - 23.3 and High = 23.4 - 30.
c) Part 3: Likert Scale to assess Nurses’ Barriers facing nurse’s compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines. It consisted of 11 items [26]. Questions in which responses were answered on a 3-point Likert scale (Disagree, Undecided and Agree).
2.5. Procedure for Data Collection2.5.1. Study Period
The study was conducted between July to November 2019 in the selected hospitals.
2.5.2. Approval to Conduct the Study
An official letter was issued to the directors of Menoufia Governorates Hospitals, Egypt.
2.5.3. Protection of Human Rights
Each subject was informed about the purpose and the nature of the study. The subjects were informed that their participation is totally voluntary and the confidentiality and anonymity were assured.
2.5.4. Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for scientific research review in Faculty of Nursing of Menoufia University. Ethical considerations were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2013). All participants received written and oral information about the study. Before the interviews took place, the participants signed a written consent and were ensured confidentiality. The heads of the departments in all the surgical departments were informed about the study and agreed to let their nurses be interviewed during work hours at work or another place of the nurses’ choosing.
2.5.5. Validity and Reliability
Compliance, knowledge, practice, and barriers items showed an acceptable Cronbach α, 0.75, 0.80, 0.73, and 0.75 respectively.
2.5.6. Pilot Study
The tools were administered to 50 nurses in a pilot study, the panel of experts approved all the sections of the tools, as well as the scoring systems to evaluate its applicability. Minor rewording for some items was made to improve readability and understandability for practice section, as it was adopted.
The questionnaire was distributed to the nurses working in the surgical department in the previously mentioned hospitals for filling it.
The questionnaires were completed by nurses in their surgical departments
3. Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS [28] version 21. The sum of scores for the items in the compliance, knowledge, and practice, parts were calculated. Frequencies of responses were determined. Differences between nurses’ compliance were measured using the independent sample T test and analysis of variance test. The F-test of association was conducted to analyze the frequencies of nurses’ responses.
4. Results
From 600 questionnaires were distributed, only 400 returned completed, a response rate of 66.6%. The participants were from Shebin El-Koom University Hospital (175 participants), Shebin El-Koom Teaching Hospital (130), Quwesna Central Hospital (45), Berkt El-Saba Central Hospital (30), Ashmoon General Hospital (20). Respondents were different genders, age, and years of experience.
Table 1 shows that about two thirds of the studied sample were females (65.8%), more than one third (39.0%) of the sample were in the age group of 20 - 30 years and more than half (56.0%) were having bachelor degree in nursing. Regarding Work experience in surgical ward, it is indicated that, (44.8%) were having 1 - 5 years experience in surgical ward. As well as, it indicates that (81.5%) of nurses did not attend surgical site infection prevention guidelines training programme previously.
Table 2 describes frequency of nurse’s responses concerning compliance of surgical site infection prevention guidelines. It is evident that, among 400 nurses, limited compliance with the surgical site infection prevention guidelines was obvious in several topics. Three quarters (75.0%) of the nurses reported that they never ensure patients bathe or shower and (77.3%) never limit the number of people and doors being opened, and (69.0%) never check wounds for infection and use standard dressings on primary wounds.
Table 3 indicated that, nurses’ compliance mean scores were in low level with a mean of 13.01 (SD = ±3.00), and majority (84.75%) of the nurses were classified in low compliance, (13.25%) in moderate compliance, and (2%) in high compliance.
Table 4 describes frequency of Incorrect and Correct Knowledge regarding
Distribution of demographic characteristics of the studied sample (N = 400)
Items
No.
%
Sex
Male
137
34.3
Female
263
65.8
Total
400
100.0
Age
20-
156
39.0
30-
129
32.3
40-
89
22.3
50+ year
26
6.5
Total
400
100.0
Mean SD
39.08
±8.98
Work Experience in Surgical Ward
<1 year
76
19.0
1-
179
44.8
5-
114
28.5
10+ years
31
7.8
Total
400
100.0
Educational Level
Diploma
147
36.8
BA
224
56.0
M.A.
29
7.3
Total
400
100.0
Attended Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines Training Programme Previously
Yes
74
18.5
No
326
81.5
Total
400
100.0
Nurses compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines
Nurses Compliance with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines
Never
Sometimes
Always
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
A. Before Surgery
1) Ensure patients bath or shower
300
75.0
59
14.8
41
10.3
2) Do not shave patients
274
68.5
54
13.5
72
18.0
3) Only use antibiotics when recommended
255
63.8
67
16.8
78
19.5
4) Use chlorexidine alcohol) based antiseptic solutions to prepare skin
169
42.3
212
53.0
19
4.8
5) Surgical hand preparation should be performed by scrubbing with either a suitable antimicrobial soap or water or using a suitable alcohol) based hand rub before donning sterile gloves
277
69.3
83
20.8
40
10.0
B. During Surgery
6) Limit the number of people and doors being opened
309
77.3
50
12.5
41
10.3
7) Ensure all surgical equipment is sterile and maintain asepsis throughout surgery
297
74.3
84
21.0
19
4.8
C. After Surgery
8) Do not continue antibiotics to prevent infection
258
64.5
82
20.5
60
15.0
9) Check wounds for infection and use standard dressings on primary wounds.
276
69.0
72
18.0
51
12.8
Score of nurses compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines
Score of Nurses Compliance with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines
No.
%
f-p-Value
Low Compliance
339
84.75
363.90***
Moderate Compliance
53
13.25
High Compliance
8
2.00
Total (Mean + SD)
13.01 ± 3.00
Knowledge regarding surgical site infection prevention guidelines for nurses
Knowledge regarding Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines for Nurses
Incorrect
Correct
No.
%
No.
%
A. Preoperative Measures
1) Preoperative timing for preoperative bathing
280
70.0
120
30.0
2) Optimal surgical antibiotic prophylaxis
295
73.8
105
26.3
3) Hair removal
314
78.5
86
21.5
4) Surgical site preparation
308
77.0
92
23.0
5) Surgical hand preparation
335
83.8
65
16.3
B. Perioperative and/or Intraoperative Measures
6) Enhanced nutritional support
239
59.8
161
40.3
7) Perioperative discontinuation of immunosuppressive agents
287
71.8
113
28.3
8) Perioperative oxygenation
282
70.5
118
29.5
9) Maintaining normal body temperature (normothermia)
266
66.5
134
33.5
10) Use of protocols for intensive perioperative blood glucose control
299
74.8
101
25.3
11) Maintenance of adequate circulating volume control/normovolemia
322
80.5
78
19.5
12) Drapes and gowns
345
86.3
55
13.8
13) Wound protector devices
306
76.5
94
23.5
14) Incisional wound irrigation
285
71.3
115
28.8
15) Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy
258
64.5
142
35.5
16) Use of surgical gloves
264
66.0
136
34.0
17) Changing of surgical instruments
265
66.3
135
33.8
18) Antimicrobial) coated sutures
268
67.0
132
33.0
19) Laminar airflow ventilation systems in the context of operating room ventilation
286
71.5
114
28.5
C. Postoperative Measures
20) Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis prolongation
313
78.3
87
21.8
21) Advanced dressings
298
74.5
102
25.5
22) Antibiotic prophylaxis in the presence of a drain and optimal timing for wound drain removal
284
71.0
116
29.0
surgical site infection prevention guidelines for Nurses: which shows the overall responses of the participants to knowledge questions indicate that the participants have little knowledge about the surgical site infection. Responses of the nurses to the five questions of pre-operative measures shows that majority of them responded incorrect, as well, minority of nurses answered correct for perioperative and/or intraoperative measures questions, moreover, concerning postoperative measures questions, it is clear that, only (21.8%) of nurses answered correct for the question asking about the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis prolongation.
From Table 5, it is clear that most of the nurses have poor knowledge about surgical site infection, as about two thirds of nurses (65.5%) were in the low level of knowledge with mean knowledge score of (6.00 ± 5.97).
It is obvious that minority of nurses always practiced the ten items of surgical site infection prevention guidelines in Table 6. As only (5.8%) of nurses always practiced washing hands before and after changing wound dressing touching the surgical site, (6.0%) of them always practiced advising their patients to take preoperative showering bathing with anti-microbial agent, (8.3%) always use an aseptic technique during surgical wound dressing, and (9.0%) always use sterilized dressing material for cleaning surgical wound dressing.
Table 7 shows the levels and the mean total score of Nurses practice with surgical site infection prevention guidelines. It is clear from this table that, most of the nurses have poor practice about surgical site infection, as about three quarters of nurses (74.5%) were in the low level of practice with mean practice score of (14.71 ± 4.65).
In Table 8, concerning Barriers of Compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines, about two thirds (59.0%) of nurses agree that, lack of a professional model, nurses do not have enough time (64.0%), and some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities (60.0%), are the most barriers facing them with surgical site infection prevention guidelines.
Table 9 illustrates the correlation among Age, experience, compliance, Knowledge, and practice. It is shown from this table that there was a strong statistical significant correlation among Age, experience, compliance, Knowledge, and practice for nurses in relation to surgical site infection prevention guidelines.
Table 10 revealed that, there was no statistical difference among nurses who attended surgical site infection prevention guidelines training programme previously and who did not.
Total score of nurses knowledge with surgical site infection prevention guideline
Score of Nurses Knowledge with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines
No.
%
F-p-Value
Low
262
65.5
1377.68***
Moderate
90
22.5
High
48
12.0
Total (Mean ± SD)
6.00 ± 5.97
Nurses practice response regarding surgical site infection prevention guidelines
Nurses Practice Response regarding Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines
Never
Sometimes
Always
No.
%
No.
%
No.
%
1) I wash my hands before and after changing wound dressing touching the surgical site
138
34.5
239
59.8
23
5.8
2) I wash my hand before wearing the surgical glove
277
69.3
83
20.8
40
10.0
3) I perform pre-operative shaving right before surgery
272
68.0
84
21.0
44
11.0
4) I administer pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic within one hour before surgery
290
72.5
78
19.5
32
8.0
5) I advise my patient to take preoperative showering bathing with anti-microbial agent
265
66.3
111
27.8
24
6.0
6) I use sterilized dressing material for cleaning surgical wound dressing
255
63.8
109
27.3
36
9.0
7) I use an aseptic technique during surgical wound dressing
291
72.8
76
19.0
33
8.3
8) I Asses and monitor surgical site condition
251
62.8
110
27.5
39
9.8
9) I separate infected dressing from non-infected dressing
223
55.8
115
28.8
62
15.5
10) I use face mask during cleaning surgical wound dressing
233
58.3
118
29.5
49
12.3
Total score of nurses practice with surgical site infection prevention guidelines
Score of Nurses’ Practice
No.
%
F-p-Value
Low
298
74.5
1005.63***
Moderate
73
18.2
High
28
7.3
Total (Mean ± SD)
14.71 ± 4.65
Barriers of compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines
Barriers of Compliance with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines
2) Lack of supervision of hospital infection control committee
119
29.8
52
13.0
229
57.3
3) Inadequate knowledge about disinfection and sterilizing techniques
126
31.5
63
15.8
211
52.8
4) Lack of training about measures for the prevention of surgical site infection in hospital
120
30.0
61
15.3
219
54.8
5) Lack of providing Evidence) based recommendations on measures for the prevention of surgical site infection in hospital
133
33.3
41
10.3
226
56.5
6) Unsuitable nurse patient ratio
97
24.3
83
20.8
220
55.0
7) Lack of a professional model
106
26.5
58
14.5
236
59.0
8) Poor integration of research findings in practice
113
28.3
68
17.0
219
54.8
9) Nurses do not have enough time
78
19.5
66
16.5
256
64.0
10) Nurses lack required skills
113
28.3
66
16.5
221
55.3
11) Some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities
91
22.8
69
17.3
240
60.0
Correlation among age, experience, knowledge, practice, compliance
Items
Age
Experience
Knowledge
Practice
Compliance
Age
1.00
Experience
0.828**
1.00
Knowledge
0.273*
0.333**
1.00
Practice
0.367**
0.262**
0.384**
1.00
Compliance
0.313**
0.342**
0.094**
0.006**
1.00
Effect of attending surgical site infection prevention guidelines training programme previously on compliance score
Items
Mean
±SD
t-p-Value
Yes
13.01
3.00
0.98
No
12.81
3.00
ns
5. Discussion
Effective surgical site infection prevention requires redesigning systems to reduce barriers and to optimize prevention strategies and guidelines based on evidence-based processes of care; all nurses should comply with the surgical site infection prevention guidelines which are essential for lowering surgical site infection rate [29].
The current study explores the nurse’s compliance, Knowledge, and practices of surgical site infection prevention guidelines at Menoufia Governorate. The current study findings revealed that, among 400 nurses, limited compliance with the surgical site infection prevention guidelines was obvious in several topics. Three quarters (75.0%) of the nurses reported that they never ensure patients bathe or shower, and (77.3%) never limit the number of people and doors being opened, and (69.0%) never check wounds for infection and use standard dressings on primary wounds, moreover, nurses’ compliance mean scores were in low level with a mean of 13.01 (SD = 3.00), and majority (84.75%) of the nurses were classified in low compliance, (13.25%) in moderate compliance, and (2%) in high compliance. These findings are similar to other studies such as Aloush., et al., [30], Jahansefat et al., [31], and Narendranath et al., [32], who reported poor compliance among nurses. As well, Alhirish et al., [33] in Egypt, and Rizwan et al., [34] who reported a significant increase in nosocomial infection in Pakistan as a result of poor compliance with infection prevention guidelines.
On the other hand, our findings contradict those of several other studies. El-Saed et al., [35] reported a high compliance rate for nurses. Aysha et al., [36] found satisfactory compliance after implementation of a nursing care program, and Sherpa et al., [37] revealed higher compliance of nurses for the guidelines, including hand washing, and using sterile gloves.
In addition, the current study findings describe frequency of incorrect and correct knowledge regarding surgical site infection prevention guidelines for nurses and indicated that the participants have little knowledge about the surgical site infection. As the answers of the nurses to the five questions of pre-operative measures show that majority of them responded incorrect, as well, minority of nurses answered correct for perioperative and/or intraoperative measures questions, moreover, concerning postoperative measures questions, it is clear that, only (21.8%) of nurses answered correct for the question asking about the surgical antibiotic prophylaxis prolongation.
As well, it is clear that most of the nurses have poor knowledge about surgical site infection, as about two thirds of nurses (65.5%) were in the low level of knowledge with mean knowledge score of (6.00 + 5.97).
These results were in accordance with Sadaf., Shafqat, Hussain, 2018, [38] who concluded that, nurses had poor knowledge concerning surgical infection and this study revealed that the nurses’ information was poor regarding interference of surgical site infection. Responses of the nurses to knowing the simplest technique for pre-operative shaving indicated that the majority (50) were response to affirmative that show that they understand it and thirty four nurses were response to NO that was a negative response.
Other study conducted by Zucco, Lavano, Nobile, Papadopoli, Bianco (2019) [39], they reported that, only 53.8% knew that preoperative hair removal, if necessary, should take place shortly before surgery, and 28.9% of the sample did not know the right definition of “bundle”. Over three quarters of participants stated that they always perform hand antisepsis before and after biological sample collection while 9.7% considered that wearing gloves during this practice is sufficient to prevent SSI. Furthermore, 91% of nurses reported that they always performed hand antisepsis before and after invasive procedures. Their study findings highlight the areas that were most lacking in nurses’ training and for which targeted activities are needed. These data could support healthcare managers to implement interventions focused at enabling adherence to effective prevention practices to reduce risk to all patients.
Moreover, other study reported that when assessing knowledge on strategies for SSI prevention, more than two thirds (73%) of the participants knew that the appropriate time for shower or bath with an antiseptic agent is the day before surgery, but only 53.8% knew that preoperative hair removal, if necessary, should take place shortly before surgery. Moreover, 28.9% of the sample did not know the right definition of “bundle”. When nurses were asked to rate the effectiveness of some interventions for SSI prevention, dressing change if it is visibly soiled received the highest score (8.9) [39].
In addition, it is obvious that minority of nurses always practiced the ten items of surgical site infection prevention guidelines. As only (5.8%) of nurses always practiced washing hands before and after changing wound dressing touching the surgical site, (6.0%) of them always practiced advising their patients to take preoperative showering bathing with anti-microbial agent, (8.3%) always use an aseptic technique during surgical wound dressing, and (9.0%) always use sterilized dressing material for cleaning surgical wound dressing.
As well, most of the nurses have poor practice about surgical site infection, as about three quarters of nurses (74.5%) were in the low level of practice with mean practice score of (14.71 + 4.65).
These results were in accordance with Sadaf, Shafqat, Hussain, 2018 [38] who concluded that, the current study also revealed that the practice of the nurses regarding surgical site infection is not satisfactory. Most of the participants were agree 41 (35.1%) to the question that they wash hands before and after changing wound dressing, 23 (13.5%) were strongly agree, 30 (28.7%) were disagree and only 7 (4.1%) strongly disagreed which show that most of the participants have good practice regarding hand washing. Responses of the participants to another question that performing pre-operative shaving before surgery is necessary, in which 26 (26.9%) was agreed.
Another study was in accordance with our study such as Zucco, Lavano, Nobile, Papadopoli, Bianco, (2019) [39] stated that, over three quarters (75.2%) of participants stated that they always perform hand antisepsis before and after biological sample collection, while 9.7% considered that wearing gloves during this practice is sufficient to prevent SSIs. Furthermore, 91% of nurses reported to always perform hand antisepsis before and after invasive procedures (e.g. peripheral intravenous catheter insertion, urethral catheterization, etc.). A vast majority of respondents (93.2%) “always/often” reported the utilization of single-use protective equipment in patients with an infectious disease. Only (14.1%) of respondents reported the proper duration of antibiotic prophylaxis (<24 hours after surgery) in their unit (77%) of the sample self-reported that a wound culture was performed in case of SSI signs and/or symptoms. When investigating the replacement of the wound dressing, only 55.1% of the sample reported the correct frequency for changing of the dressing, and 61.9% of nurses reported the utilization of adhesive drapes.
Furthermore, concerning barriers of compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines, about two thirds of nurses agree that, lack of a professional model, nurses do not have enough time, and some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities, are the most barriers facing them with surgical site infection prevention guidelines. Aloush, et al., (2017) [30] their finding were in accordance with our study, as in their study, the Participants reported several barriers that prevented their compliance with the guidelines, especially lack of education, lack of a professional model, and poor integration of research findings in practice. They also stated that, (63%) of the participants, had received no education about the guidelines in their schools. This finding supports the significance of education in the improvement of nurses’ compliance, as reported in other studies [40] [41].
In relation to the correlation among age, experience, compliance, Knowledge, and practice, the current study indicated that there was strong statistical significant correlation among Age, experience, compliance, Knowledge, and practice for nurses in relation to surgical site infection prevention guidelines; indicating those older nurses who are more knowledgeable and practice, the more compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines. As well, our study indicated that, there was no statistical difference among nurses who attended surgical site infection prevention guidelines training programme previously and who did not.
These results were in accordance with Sadaf, Shafqat, Hussain, 2018 [38] who explained that, the link between Knowledge and practice is positive and association is critical. As well, Knowledge could be necessary that affects the performance. The study shows that nurses have poor Knowledge and practices concerning surgical infection this study reveals that the nurses’ knowledge was poor regarding interference of surgical site infection. In a study that was in accordance with our study, previous education with VAP, more years of experience, and was important factors seeming to increase nurses’ compliance. These findings highlighted the significance of education and training in the improvement of nurses’ compliance and quality of care, and support the reports from previous studies [31] [42].
6. Strengths and Limitations
· A major strength is that the current study evaluated nurses’ knowledge, practice, compliance and barriers of the guidelines of SSI.
· On the other hand, one limitation is the use of self-reported measures to evaluate nurses’ knowledge, practice, and compliance.
7. Conclusions
· Nurses working in the surgical related wards reported a low level of knowledge, practice and compliance regarding the prevention of surgical site infection guidelines.
· The most barriers of compliance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines that reported by nurses were: lack of a professional model, nurses do not have enough time, and some measures for the prevention of surgical site infection are not nurses’ responsibilities,
· The current study indicated that there was strong statistical significant correlation among age, experience, compliance, knowledge, and practice for nurses in relation to surgical site infection prevention guidelines.
8. Recommendations
· Evaluation of nurses’ and hospitals’ application of the guidelines is important to improve the quality of care.
· Education and training program should be conducted to improve nurses’ knowledge and practice in some areas using evidence-based practice.
· Improve compliance with the surgical site infection prevention guidelines through comprehensively modified and updated nursing curriculum to include the prevention of surgical site infection.
· Future studies are recommended to conduct observational measurement to enhance the reliability of the findings.
· The hospital administrators need to conduct education and training programs to enhance knowledge of SSI prevention to improve the quality of nursing care in this area.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Mohsen, M.M., Riad, N.A. and Badawy, A.I. (2020) Compliance and Barriers Facing Nurses with Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines. Open Journal of Nursing, 10, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2020.101002
Abbreviations
Surgical Site Infections (SSIs);
Hospital-Acquired Infection (HAI);
Operating Room (OR);
Control and Prevention (CDC);
World Health Organization (WHO);
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
ReferencesBadia, J.M., Casey, A.L., Petrosillo, N., Hudson, P.M., Mitchell, S.A. and Crosby, C. (2017) Impact of Surgical Site Infection on Healthcare Costs and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review in Six European Countries. Journal of Hospital Infection, 96, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004Frances, L., Brigid, M., Wendy, C., Yu, L., Karen, W., Nicola, M., Shirley, M., Frances, O. and Andrea, P. (2018) Preventing Surgical Site Infections: Facilitators and Barriers to Nurses’ Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines—A Qualitative Study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28, 1643-1652.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14766Patil, V.B., Raval, R.M. and Chavan, G. (2018) Knowledge and Practices of Health Care Professionals to Prevent Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Health Care Centre. International Surgery Journal, 5, 2248-2251.Akhter, M.S., Verma, R. and Madhukar, K.P. (2016) Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Post Operative Patients at a Tertiary Care Centre in India. Journal of Wound Care, 25, 210-2, 214-7. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.4.210Mockford, K. and O’Grady, H. (2017) Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. Surgery, 35, 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2017.06.012Maria, Q., Jenny, L. and Sofia, A. (2019) Intraoperative Prevention of Surgical Site Infections as Experienced by Operating Room Nurses. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 14, Article ID: 1632109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2019.1632109Molina, G., Jiang, W., Edmondson, L., Gibbons, L., Huang, L.C., Kiang, M.V. and Singer, S.J. (2016) Implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist in South Carolina Hospitals Is Associated with Improvement in Perceived Perioperative Safety. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 222, 725-736.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.052World Health Organization (2014) Healthcare-Associated Infections: Fact Sheet.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/country_work/gpsc_ccisc_fact_sheet_en.pdfMagill, S., Hellinger, W., Cohen, J., Kay, R., Bailey, C., Boland, B., et al. (2012) Prevalence of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Acute Care Hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 33, 283-291.
https://doi.org/10.1086/664048Berríos-Torres, S.I., Umscheid, C.A., Bratzler, D.W., Leas, B., Stone, E.C., Kelz, R.R., et al. (2017) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. JAMA Surgery, 152, 784-791.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904Health Research & Educational Trust (2018) Surgical Site Infections Change Package: 2018 Update. Health Research & Educational Trust, Chicago, IL.Gaines, S., Luo, J.N., Gilbert, J., Zaborina, O. and Alverdy, J.C. (2017) Optimum Operating Room Environment for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. Surgical Infections, 18, 503-507. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2017.020Ding, S., Lin, F., Marshall, A.P. and Gillespie, B.M. (2017) Nurses’ Practice in Preventing Postoperative Wound Infections: An Observational Study. Journal of Wound Care, 26, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.28Qasem, M.N. and Hweidi, I.M. (2017) Jordanian Nurses’ Knowledge of Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Settings. Open Journal of Nursing, 7, 561-582.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2017.75043Allegranzi, B., Bischoff, P., de Jonge, S., Kubilay, N.Z., Zayed, B., Gomes, S.M., et al. (2016) New WHO Recommendations on Preoperative Measures for Surgical Site Infection Prevention: An Evidence-Based Global Perspective. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 16, e276-e287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-XAdeyi, O.O., et al. (2017) Drug-Resistant Infections: A Threat to Our Economic Future. World Bank Group, Washington DC.Liu, Z., et al. (2018) Intraoperative Interventions for Preventing Surgical Site Infection: An Overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012653.pub2Adriana, C. and Camila, S. (2017) Surgical Site Infection Prevention: An Analysis of Compliance with Good Practice in a Teaching. Journal of Infection Prevention, 18, 301-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177417703190Senay, K. and Ayse, B. (2017) Nurses’ Compliance with Isolation Precautions and the Affecting Factors. Applied Nursing Research, 38, 175-178.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.10.014Mellin-Olsen, J., McDougall, R.J. and Cheng, D. (2017) WHO Guidelines to Prevent Surgical Site Infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 17, 260-261.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30078-6Nordström, A. and Wihlborg, M. (2019) A Phenomenographic Study of Swedish Nurse Anasthetists’ and OR Nurses’ Work Experiences. AORN Journal, 109, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12582Berríos-Torres, S.I., Umscheid, C.A., Bratzler, D.W., Leas, B., Stone, E.C., Kelz, R.R., et al. (2017) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surgery, 152, 784-791.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904World Health Organization (2019) Global Guidelines on the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/250680/1/9789241549882-eng.pdfNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2019) Surgical Site Infection: Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection. NICE, London.
http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG74NICEGuideline.pdfRaosoft (2004) Raosoft Sample Size Calculator [Computer Program]. Raosoft, Inc., Seattle, WA.WHO Surgical Site Infection Prevention Guidelines (2016) Web Appendix 1. Overview of Available Relevant Guidelines on Surgical Site Infecion Prevention.Sickder, H.K., Sae-Sia, W. and Petpichetchian, W. (2014) Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice Regarding Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Bangladesh.IBM (2012) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) [Computer Program]. IBM, Armonk, NY.Wilson J. ,et al. (2016)Guidance on Preventing Surgical Site Infection Nursing Times 112, 13-15.Aloush, S., et al. (2017) Compliance of Nurses and Hospitals with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Guidelines A Middle Eastern Survey. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 33, E8-E14.Jahansefat, L., Vardanjani, M.M., Bigdelian, H., Massoumi, G., Khalili, A. and Mardani, D. (2016) Exploration of Knowledge of, Adherence to, Attitude and Barriers toward Evidence Based Guidelines (EBGs) for Prevention of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Healthcare Workers of Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Units (PCICUs): A Quali-Quantitative Survey. Health Science, 5, 67-73.Narendranath, V., Nandakumar, B. and Sarala, K. (2017) Epidemiology of Hospital-Acquired Infections in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in India: A Cross-Sectional Study of 79401 Inpatients. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 4, 335-339.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20170063Alhirish, M.H., Asfour, H.I. and El-Soussi, A.H. (2016) Nurses’ Compliance of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing VAP in CCUs. Journal of High Institute of Public Health, 40, 475-496. https://doi.org/10.21608/jhiph.2010.20616Rizwan, M., Ikram, A., Zaman, G., Satti, L. and Ahmed, P. (2017) Surveillance of Device-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Hospital Infection, 95, 101-102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2016.10.012El-Saed, A., Al-Jardani, A., Althaqafi, A., et al. (2016) Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Rates in Critical Care Units in 3 Arabian Gulf Countries: A 6-Year Surveillance Study. American Journal of Infection Control, 44, 794-798.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.042Aysha, Z.M.S., El-Din, S.M.A., Attia, N.R. and Ibrahim, M. (2016) Efficacy of Implementing Nursing Care Protocol on the Incidence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit at Tanta Emergency Hospital. Journal of American Science, 12, 40-52.Sherpa, P.C., Chakrabarty, J. and D’Souza, P.J.J. (2016) Critical Care Provider’s Practices for Prevention of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5.Sadaf, S., Shafqat, I. and Hussain, A. (2018) Nurse’s Knowledge and Practice Regarding Prevention of Surgical Site Infection at Allied Hospital Faisalabad. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 9, 351-369. http://www.ijser.orgZucco, R., Lavano, F., Nobile, C.G.A., Papadopoli, R. and Bianco, A. (2019) Adherence to Evidence-Based Recommendations for Surgical Site Infection Prevention: Results among Italian Surgical Ward Nurses. PLoS ONE, 14, e0222825.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222825Akdogan, O., Ersoy, Y., Kuzucu, C., Gedik, E., Togal, T. and Yetkin, F. (2017) Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention Bundle that Contains Endotracheal Tube with Subglottic Drainage and Cuff Pressure Monitorization. The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 21, 276-281.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.01.002Hassan, Z.M. and Wahsheh, M.A. (2017) Knowledge Level of Nurses in Jordan on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Preventive Measures. Nursing in Critical Care, 22, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12273Jordan, A., Badovinac, A., Spalj, S., Par, M., Slaj, M. and Plancak, D. (2014) Factors Influencing Intensive Care Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Ventilator Associated Pneumonia and Oral Care Practice in Intubated Patients in Croatia. The American Journal of Infection Control, 42, 1115-1117.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.008