_{1}

^{*}

Recently, many seminal papers deal with the syntheses, stability and superconducting properties of super-hydrides like LaH
_{10} or YH
_{10} under high pressure, reporting critical temperatures near room temperature. In the first run one will assume that the involved metal atoms contribute a number of 3 electrons to the pairing pool corresponding to their valence. However, another possibility may be that the cationic valence is somewhat smaller, for instance only 2.29, resulting in a nominal electron number per cation of σ
_{0} = 0.229 ≈ 3/13 instead of 0.3. Then, we will have a numerical equality to the optimum hole number in the cuprate high-
*T*
_{c} superconductors, a number that reflects the fractal nature of electronic response in superconductors. However, if one still keeps up the oxidation state of +3 of lanthanum, one will need 13 hydrogen atoms to match the optimum σ
_{0}. Such composition may be found at the phase boundary between the observed LaH
_{10} and LaH
_{16} phases. Partial ionic replacement is suggested to shift the super-hydride composition into the σ
_{0} optimum. Micro-structural phenomena such as multiple twinning and ferroelastic behavior as observed with cuprates may also influence the superconductivity of super-hydrides. Finally, epitaxial growth of super-hydrides onto a specially cut diamond substrate is proposed.

Excitingly, different groups of outstanding researchers independently synthesized and investigated super-hydrides of lanthanum respectively yttrium, and found superconducting transition temperatures only less below room temperature with T_{c} around 250 K, when applying high pressure [_{2}S)_{2}H_{2} [_{3}S in the cavities of a zeolite to reduce the applied high pressure could not be realized as yet [^{3+} or Y^{3+}, if we still use the usual valence. In this short contribution we pose the question, how many electrons per hydrogen within the super-hydride actually contribute to the conventional superconducting pairing scenario and whether the electronic response in such superconductors is of fractal nature.

Looking at the recent results, then a guide for experimenters was given by the published relationship between mean cationic charge and critical temperature, when extrapolating the depicted branch for conventional superconductors of

Many other researchers have contributed to the growing field of super-hydrides, and the reader may follow their valuable work summarized in the references above.

This article deals with the question of the optimal charge of pairing electrons in super-hydrides of lanthanum and yttrium and discusses the influence of the width of structural layers. It furthermore proposes chemical substitutions to enhance superconductivity and suggests suitable substrates for epitaxial growth of super-hydrides to reduce the applied pressure. Attention is drawn to micro-structural phenomena, possible multiple twinning of super-hydride phases or the role of interfaces. Finally, the beauty of the 32-membered hydrogen cage around lanthanum in LaH_{10} is looked at separately, where the structure projection down the [

Turning first to unconventional superconductivity of the high-T_{c} cuprates, an optimum number of holes resulted in the unique number σ_{0} = 0.229. This number can also be confirmed for the family of FeAs-based superconductors [^{5} [

σ 0 = 8 π φ 5 = 0.2296 , (1)

where φ = ( 5 − 1 ) / 2 = 0.6180339887 … is the golden mean.

The interpretation of a fractal nature of electronic response in superconductors is consistent with generated d-wave fractal patterns in unconventional superconductors as a consequence of antiferromagnetism, documented by scanning tunneling microscopy [

The fractal-hierarchical structure of electrons entangled in pairs obviously determines this optimum near a quantum critical point that can be linked also with the universal fractal constant δ_{1} = 8.7210972… of the renormalized quadratic Hénon map (remember the quadrilateral layer structure of the cuprates or the tetragonal respectively cubic crystal structures of the super-hydrides) [

σ 0 ≈ 2 δ 1 = 0.2293. (2)

Despite the differences in theory and experiment between conventional and unconventional superconductors we should search for similarities between them regarding the perfect tuning through the optimum numbers of charge carriers involved in their pairing. Turning to the super-hydrides formed by cages of hydrogen around large metal atoms like La. The usual oxidation state of lanthanum should be +3. However, also the oxidation states of +1 respectively +2 have been observed for La bound to hydrogen [_{c} superconductors, a number that reflects the fractal nature of electronic response in superconductors. However, if one still keeps up the +3 oxidation state, σ_{0} electrons per hydrogen atoms can be adapted, when their number would be 13, because σ_{0} can be represented as a quotient of the two Fibonacci numbers 3 and 13

σ 0 ≈ 3 / 13 (3)

Two phases of composition LaH_{10} and LaH_{16} have been experimentally confirmed [_{13} may actually exist. A topotactic intergrowth of the (111) plane of cubic LaH_{10} or the (001) plane of rhombohedral LaH_{10} with the (001) plane of hexagonal LaH_{16} is likely, possibly connecting the two phases by a common 6-ring of hydrogen atoms. Also multiple twinning as frequently observed in zeolites can lead to the required composition. The a-axis lattice parameters for rhombohedral LaH_{10} and hexagonal LaH_{16} are nearly identical (3.66 Å compared to 3.68 Å [

Semonov et al. [_{c} versus the hydrogen atom number n(H) of lanthanum hydrides by a parabola. The maximum of the parabola yielded a composition of about LaH_{11} (_{13} as the intended optimum.

The few experimental points can also be represented by an asymmetric Gaussian or Cauchy distribution function [_{12} or even LaH_{13} composition. From density arguments this is the more likely solution.

In _{3}S, showing the branch of n-type superconductors besides the p-type branch. The blue curve fits the σ > σ _{0} branch of n-type superconductors according to the simple relation _{}

T c ( K ) ∝ ( 447.8 ± 16.7 ) ⋅ e − σ , (4a)

or finer adjusted T c ( K ) ∝ ( 553.8 ± 18.3 ) / ( e σ + 8 7 ⋅ σ ) . (4b)

If one calculates the average charge over all atoms, avoiding in the case of super-hydrides the terms cation or counterion, then for LaH_{12} the mean charge would yield the optimum of σ = σ_{0} = 0.23.

However, it remains open how pure hydrogen under very high pressure can be treated within this scheme. Molecular dissociation of H_{2} near 500 GPa could lead to superconductivity around 356 K [_{c} ≈ 356 K for super-hydrides can be estimated matching well the predicted one for pure hydrogen.

The mean cationic charge c> (in units of holes) of unconventional superconductors is limited to the asymptotic value of (see _{}

< q c > asymp ≈ 13 δ 1 (5)

This may underline once again the fractal nature of unconventional superconductivity.

The critical temperature of unconventional superconductors is obviously inversely proportional to the distance of copper atoms in the CuO_{2} plaquette [

Indeed, the super-hydrides are such smart compounds. This can be verified with crystallographic data given by Kruglov et al. [

In

If one focuses on such small slab distances, the smallest one is found for LaH_{10}with a very high expected critical temperature around 286 K. Only YH_{10} is reported to have higher T_{c} than LaH_{10}. This may be explained with the pronounced smaller ionic radius of Y^{3+} compared to La^{3+} and therefore an even

Phase | Space Group | Lattice Parameters [Å] | Slab Width [Å] | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|

LaH_{2 } | P6/mmm | a = 2.80 c = 2.72 | 2.80 2.72 | [ |

LaH_{3 } | Cmcm | a = 2.74 c = 6.03 | 2.74 | [ |

LaH_{4 } | I4/mmm | a = 2.76 b = 10.69 c = 2.80 | 2.74 2.80 | [ |

LaH_{10 } | R 3 ¯ m | a = 3.66 c = 8.53 | c/3 = 2.84 | [ |

LaH_{10 } | Fm 3 ¯ m | a = 5.1019 | 2.551 | [ |

LaH_{12} | Fd3m | a = 6.64 | a/2 = 3.32 a ⋅ 2 /4 = 2.35 | This work |

LaH_{16 } | P6/mmm | a = 3.68 c = 3.70 | 3.68 | [ |

smaller slab width for YH_{10}. The effective ion radius of Y^{3+} under ambient conditions is r(Y^{3+}) = 1.011 Å [^{3+}) = 1.15 Å. The quotients of T_{c} values compared to the reciprocal of the corresponding radii yield similar values

T_{c}(YH_{10})/T_{c}(LaH_{10}) = 1.132; r(La^{3+})/r(Y^{3+}) = 1.137 (6)

The change of ionic radii due to high hydrogen coordination is compensated by the use of their ratio. For comparison, the slab width for superconducting H3S in the Im 3 ¯ m space group (No 229), lattice parameter a = 2.9840 Å [

The proportionality of T_{c} can be recast in a very simple relation when considering structural slabs d besides the mean charge σ (supporting data see Addendum).

T c ( K ) ∝ 1030 ⋅ e − σ ⋅ d − 1 . (7)

An analysis of the pre-factor with a dimension discussion will be given in a forthcoming paper, including the Fermi speed of the charge carriers, the permittivity of the compounds and the Compton wavelength. The relation (7) is displayed in

Developments in future could be approaches to reduce the too high pressure by growing the clathrate super-hydride clysters on a suitable, but inert surface structure with lattice parameters slightly less than that of the clathrate itself to generate chemical pressure. The crystal structure of LaH_{10} was reported to be cubic in the Fm 3 ¯ m space group with a lattice parameter of a = 5.1019(5) Å [

is a = 3.56679 Å, giving for the [_{2} direction and 5 ones in the a_{3} direction, you find identity at 19.2078 Å= 4∙4.8019 Å distance. When cutting a (110) diamond plate at an angle of 21.8˚, you can make a promising substrate. The cut is parallel to the ( 2 2 ¯ 5 ) diamond lattice plan. Besides, assuming that a lower synthesis pressure is needed by epitaxial growth, one could work with a less elaborated pressure apparatus. The pressure dependence of the lattice parameter of diamond up to 40 GPa can be found in reference [

Besides this possibility the partial substitution of La^{3+} or Y^{3+} by the comparably large Ca^{2+} ion may be considered to study the effected trend. The ionic radius of eight-coordinated Y^{3+} seems to be the most promising with r_{[8]} = 1.011 Å [_{10} and CaH_{12} in equal atomic parts (no phase separation expected), then all possible combinations of the mean charge of q = 2.5 with the number n(H) of H atoms would shift the σ = q/n(H) values towards the proposed optimum of σ_{0}. The result could be a superconductor with a critical temperature fairly above room temperature synthesized by well reduced pressure.

Finally, one finds thallium with a question mark in reference [^{3+} (less toxic than Tl^{1+}) should be interesting too because of its similar ion radius and ionic charge compared to Y^{3+}, when the Tl^{3+} oxidation state is stable to hydrogen under high pressure. A gain in the superconducting response of the order of the ionic radii ratio of r(Y^{3+})/r(Tl^{3+}) = 1.011/0.89 = 1.136 may be suggested compared to YH_{10}.

The optimum charge per hydrogen may also be accomplished through the partial fluoride replacement or interstitial addition according to LaH_{9.1}F_{0.9} or LaH_{10}F_{0.7} that resulted for both cases in σ = 0.23. However, the high formation energy of LaF_{3} will make such substitution unlikely.

In view of the same cations that are liable to generate very high critical temperatures, a mutual stimulation of the research between unconventional superconductors and conventional ones could be thought of. Common of both compound classes are the same optimal number of electrons or holes and the inverse proportionality to structural slab widths respectively CuO_{2} plaquette distances. The same optimal cationic charge and inverse proportionality to structural units such as CuO_{2} plaquettes respectively slab widths are common for both substance classes. The occurrence of multiple twinning together with ferroelastic behavior, observed incuprates, may be suspected even with super-hydrides, despite their high symmetry [

After all, there are promising cage structures in both classes, for instance the superconducting bucky ball compounds [_{12} or YH_{12} clathrate structure, grown onto a suitable substrate, is considered to be near the possible optimum of electronic charge. The faujasite prototype consists of sodalite cages (truncated octahedra, [4^{6}6^{8}]) distanced by sixfold double rings (polyeder notation [4^{6}6^{2}]), whereas the cages in LaH_{10} are not “sodalite-like”, but consist of [4^{6}6^{12}] polyhedra, where such truncated dodecahedra are further connected by four-membered double rings [_{x} = 6.84 g∙cm^{−3} for an assumed composition of LaH_{12}. Then the cubic lattice parameter for an assumed face-centered faujasite-type LaH_{12} super-hydride with space group Fd 3 ¯ m and Z = 4 formula units would yield

a = Z ⋅ M D x ⋅ N L 3 = 6.64 Å, (8)

where M is the molar weight and N_{L} is Loschmidt’s constant. A general site with

multiplicity 92 would be occupied by hydrogen. Mean distances between hydrogen atoms were found to be 0.84 Å. However, if evaluating superconducting properties, this structure type may less fortunate than the LaH_{10} one. When considering the number of available electrons per hydrogen together with the width of the structural slab of d = 3.32 Å, a possible critical temperature of about 260 K can be estimated. However, if choosing the smaller value of d = 2.35 Å, the critical temperature would yield about 340 K.

Another cage structure, the silicon clathrate Ba_{7.2}Si_{46} [^{2+} by K^{+} or Rb^{+} to adapt the optimum of σ_{0}. In addition, the present author recommends the synthesis of La_{3.5}Si_{46} or La_{4.6}C_{60}.

Besides the great success with super-hydrides, experimental physicists should not lose sight of the further development of unconventional superconductors via routes proposed earlier [

If one deals with polyhedral structures, the symbol [ Σ p i f i ] is used, denoting a convex polyhedron with polygon multiplicities p_{i} of faces f_{i}. The number of edges e of the polyhedron counts as

Σ e = 1 2 Σ p i f i (9)

Applying Euler’s topologic invariant for convex polyhedra [

Σ c + Σ f − Σ e = 2 , (10)

the number of corners c yields [

Σ c = 1 2 Σ p i ⋅ f i − Σ f i + 2 . (11)

Using the polyhedron symbol [4^{6}6^{12}] for LaH_{10} one counts Σc = 32 hydrogen atoms around the lanthanum ion. From number theory this beautiful cage with 32 corners is highly interesting due to the fact that the number 32 is near the Fibonacci number 33. With this assessment, this prototypic cubic cage could be considered as being near chaos. In case of the observed LaH_{10+x} variant [_{10} is projected down the [

The LaH_{10} cage structure, optimized by few ionic replacements, is the recommended candidate to reach best superconducting properties, but YH_{6} is interesting too because of lower synthesis pressure [_{12} structure could deliver higher T_{c} values depends on synthesis progress.

Large cations such as Ba^{2+} or La^{3+} play an important but different role in superconducting materials. Whereas the large Ba^{2+} in cuprates, for instance, is able to accumulate hole carriers in its vicinity [_{0} ≈ 3/13. A nominal composition of LaH_{12} or even LaH_{13} may be existent onto the phase boundary between the observed phases LaH_{10} and LaH_{16}, respectively. The number σ_{0} reflects excellently the fractal nature of the electronic response leading to superconductivity. Therefore, some ionic substitutions were recommended to reach optimum superconducting results by trying to synthesize not pure but more complex super-hydrides. Synthesis options were recommended such as La_{0.5}Ca_{0.5}H_{10}, Y_{0.5}Ca_{0.5}H_{10} or Y_{0.3}Na_{0.7}H_{6}. In addition, a potential faujasite-type super-hydride structure of composition LaH_{12} (YH_{12}) was proposed.

The difference in the critical temperature between LaH_{10} (T_{c} = 286 K) and YH_{10} (T_{c} = 326 K) was traced back to the inverse dependence of the superconductive response from widths of dominant structural slabs. Furthermore, epitaxial growth of the hydrogen clathrates of La (Y) onto a ( 2 2 ¯ 5 ) diamond substrate is proposed to reduce the applied high pressure.

Last but not least, the potentially fractal nature of the phenomenon superconductivity, coined by the author [

The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Otto, H.H. (2019) Super-Hydrides of Lanthanum and Yttrium: On Optimal Conditions for Achieving near Room Temperature Superconductivity. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 9, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcmp.2019.91002

1) It is believed that lanthanum (yttrium) strips off three electrons and can therefore be termed a cation regardless of whether the formed super-hydride is classified as metallic. From La‒H distances of LaH_{10}, being about 2.12 Å respectively 2.21 Å, the radius of the highly coordinated lanthanum supports the picture of a “cation” with oxidation state 3+ and ionic radius r_{[32]} = d(La‒H) - 0.5∙d(H‒H) ≈ 1.6Å , while the covalent radius is already 2.07 Å.

2) There is a clear agreement as to denote zeolite cages or clathrate ones. Hydrogen clathrates of yttrium should serve as examples. The crystal structure of YH_{3} is formed by cages of 14 hydrogen atoms around Y, showing a regular rhombododecahedron with the polyhedron notation [4^{12}]. In YH_{6} one finds the cube-truncated octahedron as cage, a combination of the octahedron with the cube, assembling 24 hydrogen atoms, polyhedron notation [4^{6}6^{8}]. Only this cage is named after the mineral sodalite. Finally, in YH_{10} the hydrogen cage is a cube-truncated rhombododecahedron, a combination of the rhombic dodecahedron with the cube, polyhedron notation [4^{6}6^{12}]. Therefore, you need not classify all cages as sodalite-like.

3) Supporting data for verifying Equation (7).

Compound | Space Group | a (Å) | c (Å) | d (Å) | σ | T_{c} (K) | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

exp | calc | |||||||

Rb_{0.28}WO_{3 } | hexagonal | 7.4 | 7.6 | 4.272 | 4.91 | 2.0 | 1.8 | [ |

K_{0.3}ReO_{3 } | 7.335 | 7.48 | 4.244 | 4.85 | 3.6 | 1.9 | [ | |

K_{0.5}MoO_{3 } | tetragonal | 12.36 | 3.86 | 3.86 | 4.33 | 4.2 | 3.5 | [ |

BaPb_{0.75}Bi_{0.25}O_{3 } | Pm 3 ¯ m | 4.303 | 4.303 | 3.0 | 19 | 17 | [ | |

Ba_{0.6}K_{0.4}BiO_{3-δ } | 4.293 | 4.293 | 3.0 | 29 | 17 | [ | ||

Sr_{0.86}Nd_{0.14}CuO_{2 } | P4/mmm | 3.942 | 3.38 | 3.38 | 2.0 | 43 | 41 | [ |

H_{3}S | Im 3 ¯ m | 2.984 | 2.584 | 0.667 | 206 | 205 | [ | |

YH_{6} 150 GPa | Im 3 ¯ m | 3.605 | 2.400 | 0.5 | 260 | 260 | [ | |

LaH_{10} 150 GPa | Fm 3 ¯ m | 5.102 | 2.551 | 0.3 | 286 | 299 | [ | |

YH_{10} 150 GPa | 4.800 | 2.400 | 0.3 | 326 | 318 | [ | ||

LaH_{12} | Fd 3 ¯ m | 6.644 | 2.35 | 0.25 | - | 341 | [*] |

*This work.

[

[

[_{1-x}Bi_{x}O_{3} Systems. Solid State Communications, 17, 27-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(75)90327-0

[

[_{1-y}Nd_{y}CuO_{2}. Nature, 351, 549-551. doi.org/10.1038/351549a0

[_{2}S)_{2}H_{2} with High-T_{c} Superconductivity. Scientific Reports, 4, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06968

[

[