Fatigue Behaviour of Silicon Carbide and Fly Ash Dispersion Strengthened High Performance Hybrid Al 5083 Metal Matrix Composites

Fatigue is a major issue concerning the use of aluminium composites in structural applications. Fatigue leads to weakening of material majorly due to the strain bands formed in the material when it is subjected to repeated loading; the damage that occurs due to fatigue is a progressive and localized one. The fatigue may occur at a stress limit much lesser than the ultimate stress limit of the composite specimen. Henceforth in the current work, fatigue behaviour of silicon carbide and fly ash dispersion strengthened high performance hybrid Al 5083 metal matrix composites are evaluated. The main purpose of fatigue characterisation is to distinctly evaluate the life cycle of components that are fabricated from metal matrix composites and eventually develop a framework model for the significant study of fatigue strength of the structure with persistent striations all along the interstitials of aluminium- silicon carbide-fly ash interfaces. Fatigue is a stochastic process rather than a deterministic one that gives a considerable scatter, even among samples of similar composition with the tests carried out in some of the critically controlled environments. Hence there is a need for statistical validation of the results to authenticate the data collected. Thus in the current work, analysis of variance is carried out to establish the authenticity of the results and validate them. The results and plots are presented with suitable rationale and inferences.

• Fatigue
• Aluminium
• Silicon Carbide
• Fly Ash
• Statistical Validation

1. Introduction

The utilization of silicon carbide (SiC) particulate-reinforced aluminum matrix composites as a substitute of solid aluminum combinations in auxiliary applications, particularly in the aviation and automobile industry, is ending up noticeably progressively alluring. This is a direct result of their predominant quality; however, the fatigue of the aluminium silicon carbide composites, at lower stress cycles is a matter of concern. The fatigue conduct of the above mentioned composites is commanded by the interface between the aluminum lattice and the SiC particles. While reinforcing of silicon carbide depends on the load transfer at the interface, durability is affected by the conduct of the split at the limit between the matrix and the reinforcement, henceforth, a lot of research is conducted to overcome this influence by the unwinding of pinnacle worries close to the interface in view of the plastic deformation at fracture [1] [2] . As a result, the non- versatile conduct of the composite is critically examined by researchers, i.e. the fatigue behavior, and furthermore the fractography is evaluated in view of the justification of the inferences made. These progressions comprise of isolation and precipitation caused by the heat treatment that is anticipated to radically influence the fatigue behaviour of the Al/SiC composites [3] .

The reaction of the basic component to fatigue is very much important for some applications. On account of metal matrix composites (MMCs), the fatigue conduct varies from that of unreinforced metals in a few ways. On account of particle reinforced metals, various reviews have concentrated on understanding the impact of the strengthening molecule on the network microstructure and the relating impact on the fatigue conduct of the MMCs [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] . The size and weight percentage of the reinforcements are likewise influencing the fatigue life. Now and again, it has been observed that the fatigue behaviour may improve by the addition of fly ash as reinforcements [9] [10] . The association of various structures in view of the nearness of the reinforcements may prompt antagonistic consequences for the fatigue life. The fatigue quality of silicon carbide (SiC_P)-strengthened A359 aluminum matrix composites has been answered to be for the most part impacted by the thermo-mechanical synthesis of the composite. Late reviews have talked about the impact of heat treatment on the interfacial quality and the mechanical properties of silicon carbide (SiC_P)-strengthened A359 aluminum matrix composite [11] . The outcomes demonstrated the interrelation between the heat treatment, the matrix reinforcement interface quality and the characterization of static properties of the composite. Further to the static properties, the heat treatment is normal to be of huge significance for the dynamic conduct of these materials. The objective of this study involved the characteristic evaluation of fatigue properties of aluminium composites for varying percentages of silicon carbide and fly ash particulates and statistically validating the same for checking its authenticity.

2. Materials and Its Characteristics

Aluminium AA 5083 alloy with exceptional performance in extreme environments and highest strength among non heat treatable alloys is processed along with the class C Fly ash (Requirements matching ASTM C618 standards) and 35 micron to 50 micron size silicon carbide enroute stir casting. The properties of each of the materials chosen and process parameters selected for development of composite material are as given below in the following Tables 1-4.

The silicon carbide and fly ash particulates are observed and their micrographic images are obtained at a magnification of 500× and 7 kV acceleration voltage in an Hitachi make SU-3500 scanning electron microscope with a low vacuum premium SE detector setup. The SEM images clearly given an inference of the mesh size of each of the particulates taken, the size of silicon carbide particulates vary in the range of 30 microns to 50 microns, whereas the size of fly ash flakes vary in the range of 5 microns to 25 microns with some flakes having sizes more than 50 microns and extending up to 100 microns (Figure 1).

Table 1

Composition specification in weight percentage of elements

References

1. Schwartz, M.M. (1997) Composite Materials: Processing, Fabrication and Application. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

2. Ceschini, L., Minak, G. and Morri, A. (2006) Tensile and Fatigue Properties of the AA6061/20 vol.% Al2O3p and AA7005/10 vol.% Al2O3p Composites. Journal of Composite Science and Technology, 66, 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.044

3. Kaynak, C. and Boylu, S. (2006) Effects of SiC Particulates on the Fatigue Behaviour of an Al-Alloy Matrix Composite. Journal of Materials and Design, 27, 776-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.01.009

4. Hashim, J., Looney, L. and Hashmi, M.S.J. (2002) Particle Distribution in Cast Metal Matrix Composites Part I. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 123, 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00098-5

5. Prangnell, P.B., Barnes, S.J., Withers, P.J. and Roberts, S.M. (1996) The Effect of Particle Distribution on Damage Formation in Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites Deformed in Compression. Materials Science and Engineering A, 220, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(96)10461-5

6. Yotte, S., Breysse, D., Riss, J. and Ghosh, S. (2001) Cluster Characterization in a Metal Matrix Composite. Materials Characterization, 46, 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(01)00126-7

7. Bindumadhavan, P.N., Chia, T.K., Chandrasekaran, M., Keng, W.H., Nee, L.L. and Prabhakar, O. (2001) Effect of Particle-Porosity Clusters on Tribological Behavior of Cast Aluminum Alloy A356-SiCp Metal Matrix Composites. Materials Science and Engineering A, 315, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01989-4

8. Hong, S.J., Kim, H.M., Huh, D., Suryanarayana, C. and Chun, B.S. (2003) Effect of Clustering on the Mechanical Properties of SiC Particulate Reinforced Aluminium Alloy 2024 Metal Matrix Composites. Materials Science and Engineering A, 347, 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00593-2

9. Llorca, J. (2002) Fatigue of Particle- and Whisker-Rein-Forced Metal-Matrix Composites. Progress in Materials Science, 47, 283-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00006-2

10. Bonnen, J.J., You, C.P., Allison, J.E. and Jones, J.W. (1990) Fatigue Properties of SiC Particulate Reinforced Al-Alloys. Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Fatigue, Honolulu, 887-892.

11. Suresh, S. (1991) Fatigue of Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

12. Logsdon, W.A. and Lian, P.K. (1986) Tensile, Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Rate Properties of Silicon Carbide Whisker and Particulate Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 24, 737-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90246-8

13. Kumai, S., Yoshida, K., Higo, Y. and Nunomura, S. (1992) Effects of the Particle Distribution Fatigue Crack Growth in Particulate SiC/6061 Aluminium Alloy Composites. International Journal of Fatigue, 14, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(92)90086-R

14. Leinum, J.R., Pedersen, K. and Roven, H.J. (1992) Effects of Crack Direction on Fatigue Crack Propagation Mechanisms in an Uncrystallized AlM gSi Alloy. The Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Aluminium Alloys, Norway, 521-526.

15. Niklas, A., Froyen, L., Wevers, M. and Delaey, L. (1995) Acoustic Emission during Fatigue Crack Propagation in SiC Particle A1 Matrix Composites. Metallurgical and Material Transaction A, 26, 3183-3189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02669447

16. Shang, J.K. and Ritchie, R.O. (1989) On The Particle-Size Dependence of Fatigue-Crack Propagation Thresholds in SiC-Particulate Reinforced Aluminium Alloy Composites: Role of Crack Closure and Crack Trapping. Acta Metallurgical, 37, 2267-2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(89)90154-5

17. Davison, D.L. (1989) The Growth of Fatigue Cracks Through Particulate SiC Reinforced Aluminium Alloys. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 33, 965-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(89)90111-2

18. Kassam, Z.H.A., Zhang, R.J. and Wang, Z.R. (1994) Finite Element Situation to Investigate Interaction between Crack and Particulate Reinforcement in Metal Matrix Composites. Material Science Engineering, 203, 286-299.

19. Hasson, D.F., Crowe, C.R., Aheam, J.S. and Cook, D.C. (1984) Failure Mechanism in High Performance Materials. In: Early, J., Shives, R. and Smith, J., Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 14.

20. Guerra-Rosa, L., Moura Branco, C. and Radon, J.C. (1984) Monotonic and Cyclic Crack Tip Plasticity. International Journal of Fatigue, 6, 17-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(84)90004-5

21. Santhosh, N., Kempaiah, U.N. and Bhanupratap, R. (2016) Critically Damped Composite Plates for Structural Applications in Smart Cities. International Conference on Development of Smart Cities, Interface, Governance & Technology, Dr Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka, 9-10 September 2016, 31-34.

22. Santhosh, N., Kempaiah, U.N. and Venkateswaran, S. (2017) Vibration Mechanics of Hybrid Al 5083/SiCp/Fly Ash Composite Plates for Its Use in Dynamic Structures. Journal of Experimental & Applied Mechanics, 8, 11-18.

23. Design for Strength, Module-3, NPTEL Course Ware, IITKGP. http://nptel.ac.in/courses/112105125/pdf/Module-3_lesson-4.pdf

24. Stephens, R.I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R.R. and Fuchs, H.O. (2000) Metal Fatigue in Engineering. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.