^{1}

^{*}

^{1}

^{*}

^{2}

^{2}

As we all know, cyclic gas injection is one of the most effective development methods to improve condensate oil recovery. When dealing with the calculation of the reserves, the injection-production differences and water influx create great influence on the accuracy. Based on the existing research, we proposed a new material balance equation which considered the differences of composition between produced and injected fluids and the effect of water influx, and a solution was provided in this paper. The results of the method are closer to the actual situation because they are built on the law of conservation of mass, and the using of curve fitting method can not only avoid the use of water influx coefficient but also obtain the water influx rate and reserves at the same time. The YH-23 gas condensate reservoir is taking as a typical subject to do the research, which has been exploited by cycle gas injection for 14 years. Three different methods are used to calculate the reserves, and the results show that the method proposed in this paper has minimum error of 2.96%.

Classical material balance method is one of the fundamental tools of reservoir engineering. It can be used to determine original gas-in-place and recoverable reserves [

Gas cycling is a way that dry gas is separated from the produced well fluids and then injected to keep the pressure. The injected gas contains only light components, but produced well flow contains both light and heavy components. Although produced and injected fluids are both hydrocarbon fluids, there is a huge differentia in composition. When using material balance equation to determine the original gas-in-place of gas condensate reservoirs, the expression of two fluids must be separated, and otherwise the result is unreliable [

In gas condensate reservoirs with edge-bottom water, water influx is one of the key parameters for determination of development scale and production plan [

In this paper, we build a new method and solution, which can be used to determine reserves and water influx rate. The method is applicable to condensate gas reservoir developed by cyclic gas injection, which reflects the influence of water invasion and injection-production differences.

According to the law of conversation of mass, the underground reserves can be determined by subtracting the produced oil and gas from the amounts of original reserves and dry gas injection combined, molar number is used to describe the relationship because it can’t be influenced by temperature and pressure, the equation can be expressed as Equation (1).

where, n_{i}_{ }is the mole number of initial reserves; n_{j} is the mole number of underground remaining reserves; n_{ij} is the mole number of cumulative injected gas; n_{p} is the mole number of cumulative production.

The equation of authentic gas is

where, p_{i}, Z_{i}, V_{i} are the formation pressure, deviation factor and pore volume under the original condition respectively, p_{sc}, Z_{sc}, T_{sc} are the pressure, deviation factor and absolute temperature under the standard condition respectively, G is the original condensate gas geological reserves, R is universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature of reservoir.

Two phases, gas and liquid, exist in the formation when the bottom-hole pressure is lower than dew-point pressure, yet the two-phase deviation factor will be adopted to take place of single-phase deviation factor. The molar volume of underground hydrocarbon is:

The mole number of cumulative injected gas is:

where, V_{j} is the pore volume in the process of production; V_{ij} is the volume of injected gas; Z_{2} is the two-phase deviation factor.

Produced condensate gas will become dry gas and condensate oil after the separator, translate the number of condensate oil as gas volume [

Plug the above equations in Equation (1), which is:

In the above equations, G_{Lp} is the cumulative production of condensate gas which includ dry gas and conversion volume of condensate oil, GE_{o} is conversion volume of condensate oil, n_{o} is the cumulative production of condensate oil.

As a non-ignorable factor in water drive gas reservoir, we must consider the influence of water invasion in the application of material balance method. With the exploitation of gas reservoir, water from water bodies flows into stratum, part will output and the rest still remain in the pore space. If we neglect the elastic expansion volume of rock and bound water, there is an equation about voids volume:

Assuming that hydrocarbons exist as vapor phase in the strata under the original condition, the original pore volume of gas can be written as

Then,

where, W_{e} is the cumulative water influx rate, W_{p} is the cumulative production of water, B_{w} is the water volume factor, B_{gi} is the original oil volume factor.

Combine Equation (6) with Equation (9), then the expression is:

Reinjection ratio is volume ratio of injected dry gas vs. total produced gas. Research and practice show that with the increase of reinjection ratio, some medium weight hydrocarbons transfer from oil to gas, the recovery of condensate oil improved. The volume ratio of accumulative production of dry gas vs. condensate gas is R_{v}, and K is the reinjection ratio, therefore, we get Equation (11).

We define an apparent reinjection ratio as

With the growing water influx, the nonlinear degree of Equation (12) becomes higher. Change the equation as a linear relationship of

There are many methods can be used to obtain water influx [

There is a statistical relationship between

We define

Assuming a series of A, B values to seek an optimal fitting between the measured values and the predicted ones. When the deviation value is the minimum, we get the best fitting. Using the values of A and B can calculate the reserves and water influx.

Least squares method is widely used in curve fitting. To solve Equation (17) is equivalent to solve Equation (18).

The Newton iteration method and the steepest descent principle are conventional solutions for unconstrained problem, but their application ranges are different. To solve this problem, we introduce the levy berg algorithms into the solution, which is a combination of the two methods.

where,

Plug the A value get from each iteration into Equation (17) to calculate the deviation, when the deviation reach the minimum, we get the optimal result.

The condensate gas reservoir of YH-23 located at the bottom of the paleogene and the top of the cretaceous, characterizing with high formation pressure, high dew pressure and high condensate oil content. The initial pressure is 56.11 MPa that is close to the critical state where saturation pressure is approach to maximum retrograde condensate pressure, and the phenomenon of retrograde becomes more obvious as pressure drops down. In order to maintain the formation pressure and enhance the oil recovery, cyclic gas injection has been lasting for 14 years. The temperature is 137˚C and gas bearing area is 24.5 km^{2} and the porosity is 13.9%. By the end of 2013, related production data are given in

With the method proposed in the paper, we get an optimal fitting of measured values and predicted values of the apparent relative pressure, the fitting-curve is provided in the

According to the method in this paper, the reserves can be obtained by parameter A, and the calculation formula is Equation (20). We use three different methods to determine the reserves, the proven geological reserve is provided as a counterpoint, the final results are shown in

Time | Pressure (MPa) | Deviation factor | Cumulative gas (10^{8} m^{3}) | Cumulative oil (10^{4} t) | Cumulative water (10^{4}^{ }t) | Cumulative gas injection (10^{8}^{ }m^{3}) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

2001 | 55.17 | 1.3713 | 9.7542 | 56.2596 | 0.0531 | 6.0687 |

2003 | 54.09 | 1.3587 | 25.2189 | 141.0658 | 0.1278 | 19.9743 |

2005 | 53.01 | 1.3418 | 41.8006 | 227.2167 | 0.2118 | 29.3444 |

2007 | 50.09 | 1.2995 | 60.6059 | 321.0892 | 0.2557 | 39.4014 |

2009 | 47.17 | 1.2730 | 83.9331 | 422.0353 | 3.0930 | 45.9593 |

2011 | 45.50 | 1.2530 | 105.9413 | 506.7552 | 9.2084 | 55.3029 |

2013 | 43.80 | 1.2388 | 131.9585 | 590.1109 | 16.3370 | 69.4387 |

A | B | E(A, B) |
---|---|---|

0.0049 | 1.368 | 0.067 |

As can be seen from

According to the Equation (8) and the Equation (15), the water influx rate can be determined by parameter B:

Related parameters of water invasion can be calculated, which were shown in

number | method | Condensate gas (10^{8} m^{3}) | Natural gas (10^{8} m^{3}) | Condensate oil (10^{4} t) | Error (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | Proven geological reserve | 196.22 | 176 | 1240.9 | / |

2 | Method considering injection-production differences [ | / | 232.20 | 1637.10 | 31.93 |

3 | Water drive material balance method [ | 218.94 | 196.38 | 1384.58 | 11.58 |

4 | Suggested method | 202.02 | 181.20 | 1277.58 | 2.96 |

Basic parameters | Result |
---|---|

The intensity of water invasion | 1.368 |

Water invasion volume factor | 0.238 |

The cumulative water influx rate (10^{4} m^{3}) | 1676.604 |

Maximum speed of water invasion (10^{4} m^{3}/month) | 21.247 |

average of only three meters while single well water cone up seven meters. We can use volumetric balance formula to obtain the cumulative water influx rate, which is 1021.65 × 10^{4} m^{3}, the prediction result of suggested method is 1104.42 × 10^{4} m^{3}.

In summary, we draw the following conclusions:

1) We infer a material balance equation for dynamic reserves of condensate gas reservoir based on the law of conservation of mass, considering the influences of water invasion and injection-production differences. The structure of equation is simplified by the reinjection ratio and water influx, which is similar to the form of general material balance equation for gas reservoir.

2) The application of the optimization method avoids the use of water invasion coefficient. The results show that the fitting error and the dispersion degree of measurements and predictions of the apparent relative pressure are minor, which prove that this method is in line with the actual situation of gas reservoir and accurate in the calculation of reserves.

3) The forecast results of water invasion about the real gas reservoir by the proposed method correspond with the results of well log interpretation. This indicates that the proposed method can predict the basic parameters of dynamic water invasion accurately as well as dynamic geological reserves.

YuXiong,LingWang,ZhongqianZhu,WeiXie, (2015) A New Method for the Dynamic Reserves of Gas Condensate Reservoir Using Cyclic Gas Injection Based on the Effects of Reinjection Ratio and Water Influx. Engineering,07,455-461. doi: 10.4236/eng.2015.77041