<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2015.68116</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-57912</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A “Hard to Die” Series Expansion and Lucas Polynomials of the Second Kind
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ierpaolo</surname><given-names>Natalini</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paolo</surname><given-names>E. Ricci</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Roma, Italia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>International Telematic University UNINETTUNO, Roma, Italia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>natalini@mat.uniroma3.it(IN)</email>;<email>paoloemilioricci@gmail.com(PER)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1235</fpage><lpage>1240</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>10</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  We show how to use the Lucas polynomials of the second kind in the solution of a homogeneous linear differential system with constant coefficients, avoiding the Jordan canonical form for the relevant matrix.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Homogeneous Linear Differential Systems with Constant Coefficients</kwd><kwd> Exponential Matrix</kwd><kwd> Lucas Polynomials of the Second Kind</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is well known that an analytic function f of a matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the matrix polynomial obtained from the scalar polynomial interpolating the function f on the eigenvalues of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (see e.g. the Gantmacher book [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref1">1</xref>] ), however, in many books (see e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref2">2</xref>] ), the series expansion</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1253"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is assumed for defining (and computing)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. So, apparently, the series expansion for the exponential of a matrix is “hard to die”.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the spectrum of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Denoting by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1254"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the polynomial interpolating <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e. such that:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1255"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If the eigenvalues are all distinct, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>coincides with the Lagrange interpolation polynomial and (1.2) is the Lagrange-Sylvester formula. In case of multiple eigenvalues, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Hermite interpolation polynomial, and (1.2) reduces to Arthur Buchheim’s formula, generalizing the preceding one.</p><p>This avoids the use of higher powers of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the Taylor expansion (1.1). In any case, the possibility to write<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, in an easy block form, requires not only the knowledge of the spectrum, but even the Jordan canonical form of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is necessary to compute the eigenvectors and moreover the principal vectors, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defective. A known machinery which implies a lot of computations.</p><p>In the following, we show how to proceed in connections with the matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which appears in the solution of the vectorial Cauchy problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1256"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We propose an alternative method, based on recursion, using the functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which are essentially linked to Lucas polynomials of the second kind (i.e. the basic solution of a homogeneous linear recurrence relation with constant coefficients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref4">4</xref>] ), and to the multi-variable Chebyshev polynomials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Another Taylor series will be used, but using only functions of the invariants of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, not explicitly all powers of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is worth to recall that the knowledge of eigenvalues is equivalent to that of invariants, since the latter are the elementary symmetric functions of the former (with alternate sign).</p><p>Up to our knowledge, this is the first time that polynomials are used to solve this kind of differential problems, furthermore our method has the advantage to avoid computation of higher powers of the matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The solution of the considered problem is given in terms of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> functions of the invariants of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. These functions are polynomials, independent of the Jordan canonical form of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and can be computed recursively, avoiding the knowledge of eigenvectors and principal vectors. Moreover, if the matrix is real, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> functions are real as well, and possible complex eigenvalues does not affect the form of solution.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Homogeneous Linear Differential Systems with Constant Coefficients</title><p>It is well-known that a higher order differential system can be always be reduced to a first order system, hence we will limit ourselves to considering such type of systems.</p><p>For simplicity, we start off with the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1257"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1258"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>assuming<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, (otherwise the system is trivial), and put by definition:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1259"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the following, consider the Cauchy problem with initial conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1260"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Looking at the first equation in (2.1), we note that since the right hand side is (real or) complex analytic, the solution is (real or) complex analytic as well. Deriving side by side, we find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1261"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Eliminating <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> between the first equation in (2.1) and (2.3), since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1262"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This procedure can be iterated, obtaining, for example</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1263"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In general we find the same recursion satisfied by the powers of the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref6">6</xref>] , i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1264"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are essentially Lucas polynomials of the second kind (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref3">3</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref7">7</xref>] ), defined by the recurrence relation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1265"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the initial conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1266"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is easily shown that the second function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the same recursion (2.5).</p><p>As a consequence, putting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1267"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and using Taylor expansion, the solution of the Cauchy problem (2.1) - (2.2), can be found in the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1268"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The above result can be put in vectorial form, in order to be generalized.</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Introduce the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1269"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then, the solution in vectorial form reads</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1270"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that the convergence of the vectorial series in any compact set K of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is guaranteed, since the components of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are polynomials of weight not exceeding<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and consequently are bounded in K.</p><p>In the following section, we will extend this solution to the general vectorial case.</p><p>Remark 2.1 Note that Equation (9) does not use all powers of matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, but only the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> functions of its invariants, which are simply computed by recursion, a worthwhile improvement of the computing cost.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The 3D Case</title><p>Now, we consider also the case of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1271"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with matrix<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1272"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we suppose<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(so that the system cannot be reduced to a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or trivial system), and put by definition:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1273"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We consider, the Cauchy problem with initial conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1274"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using the same technique as in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> case, we find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1275"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and by iterating the procedure we obtain, for example,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1276"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1277"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1278"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and so on. In general we find the same recursion satisfied by the powers of the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref6">6</xref>] , i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1279"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the generalized Lucas polynomials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref4">4</xref>] , defined by the recurrence relation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1280"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the initial conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1281"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The second and third function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the same recursion (3.4).</p><p>As a consequence, putting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1282"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1283"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and using Taylor expansion, the solution of the Cauchy problem (3.1) - (3.2), can be found in the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1284"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The above result can be put in the following vectorial form.</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Introduce the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1285"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then, the solution in vectorial form reads</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1286"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 3.1 Even in this case, the considerations of Rem. 2.1 still hold, showing a more convenient form of computing solutions of the Cauchy problem (3.1) - (3.2), with respect to traditional methods, as reported e.g. in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref2">2</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The General Result</title><p>Theorem 4.1 Consider the Cauchy problem for a homogeneous linear differential system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1287"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1288"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1289"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1290"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1291"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1292"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1293"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the invariants of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and recall the generalized Lucas polynomials <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, defined in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57912-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Suppose that the system cannot be reduced to a lower order system, so that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,.</p><p>Introduce the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1294"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then, the solution of problem (3.1) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1295"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof―The proof can be found by induction, considering the r vector</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57912-formula1296"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>composed of its first component <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a second component given by the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> vector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and applying the result from Section 2.</p><p>Note that the convergence of the vectorial series in any compact set K of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is guaranteed, since the components of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are polynomials of weight not exceeding<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and consequently are bounded in K.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>We have recalled that the exponential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of a matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be written as a matrix polynomial, obtained from the scalar polynomial interpolating <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the spectrum of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and then avoiding the Taylor expansion for the exponential matrix.</p><p>Furthermore, by using the functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and in particular the fundamental solution of a homogeneous linear recurrence relation, i.e. the generalized Lucas polynomials of the second kind, we have shown how to obtain the solution of the vectorial Cauchy problem (1) in terms of functions of the invariants of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, instead of powers of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. These functions are independent of the Jordan canonical form of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and can be computed recursively, avoiding the knowledge of eigenvectors and principal vectors. Moreover, if the matrix is real, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-7402780x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> functions are real as well, and complex eigenvalues do not affect the form of the solution.</p><p>Therefore, this is, in our opinion, a more convenient technique for solving problem (4.1).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>PierpaoloNatalini,Paolo E.Ricci, (2015) A “Hard to Die” Series Expansion and Lucas Polynomials of the Second Kind. Applied Mathematics,06,1235-1240. doi: 10.4236/am.2015.68116</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57912-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gantmacher, F.R. (1960) Matrix Theory. Chelsea Pub. Co., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirsch, M.W., Smale, S. and Devaney, R.L. (2003) Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems &amp; an Introduction to Chaos. Academic Press, Elsevier, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raghavacharyulu, I.V.V. and Tekumalla, A.R. (1972) Solution of the Difference Equations of Generalized Lucas Polynomials. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 13, 321-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1665978</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruschi, M. and Ricci, P.E. (1982) An Explicit Formula for f(A) and the Generating Function of the Generalized Lucas Polynomials. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 13, 162-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0513012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruschi, M. and Ricci, P.E. (1980) I polinomi di Lucas e di Tchebycheff in più variabili. Rendiconti di Matematica e delle sue Applicazioni, 13, 507-530.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ricci</surname><given-names> P.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1976</year>)<article-title>Sulle potenze di una matrice</article-title><source> Rendiconti di Matematica e delle sue Applicazioni</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 179</fpage>-<lpage>194</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57912-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lucas, é. (1891) Théorie des Nombres. Gauthier-Villars, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>