Salinity in soil or water in arid and semi arid regions can severely limit crop production, since the high amount of NaCl contributes to specific ion effects of Cl -, Na+ or both, and to antagonistic effects on nutrient elements. Affected by salt stress, most of the cultivated plants do not fully express their growth potential, which lowers their economic value. Crambe (Crambe abyssinica) is an oil plant of the cruciferous family and it is believed that crambe has great potential to figure as raw material for biofuel; however, literature is not abundant about the effects of salinity in crambe production. This work was carried out in order to evaluate the effects on the development and productivity of crambe irrigated with saline waters under greenhouse conditions. Treatments resulted from the combination of two factors: salinity of irrigation water (ECw) in five levels (1.03-control, 2.5, 4.0, 5.5, and 7.0 dS ·m -1) and two types of salts (NaCl and NaCl + CaCl2) with three replications, totaling 30 experimental plots. At the end of the experimental period, soil samples from each plot were collected for chemical and salinity of soil saturation extract analyzes. Salt types did not affect plant parameters. However, the salinity levels presented significant effects on the all plant parameters, decreasing their values with the increase of the salt dose. Salinity levels of the solutions used for irrigation in this study affected the growth of plants and grain yield of crambe. Regarding the type of salts, a higher concentration of Na was observed for NaCl solutions at 2.5, 4.0 and 5.5 dS ·m -1 salinity levels.
Salinity in soil or water is one of the major stresses and especially in arid and semi arid regions; salinity can severely limit crop production. In many irrigated areas of the world, farmers are forced to use saline water to irrigate their crops due to inadequate supplies of fresh water [
Other ions that contribute to soil salinity include
salts of these ions occur in highly variable concentrations and proportions. They may be indigenous, but more commonly they are brought into an area in the irrigation water or in waters draining from adjacent areas [
Nutrient imbalances may result from the effect of salinity on nutrient availability, uptake, and partitioning within the plant or may be caused by physiological inactivation of a given nutrient, raising the internal requirement of the plant for that essential element. Salinity stress has stimulatory as well as inhibitory effects on the uptake of some macro and micronutrients by plants. The uptake of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu generally was increased in crop plants under salinity stress [
Affected by salt stress, most of the cultivated plants do not fully express their growth potential, which lowers their economic value. Saline soils contain soluble salts in quantities that affect plant growth adversely. The lower limit for a saline soil has been set conventionally at an electrical conductivity of 4 dS∙m−1 in the soil saturation extract. Actually, sensitive plants are affected at half of this salinity, and the highly tolerant ones can resist at about twice this salinity [
Crambe (Crambe abyssinica) is an oil plant of the cruciferous family native of the Mediterranean region from Ethiopia to Tanzania for ornamental purposes and with high economical value, especially in Central Asia and the Aral Sea region; however, it is cultivated in tropical and subtropical regions [
Crambe is a low input crop when compared with many other oil crops that can be cultivated. This offers potential to reduce the use and hence environmental burden of fertilizers and water. According to [
The industrial oils to be produced in genetically engineered plants are not intended for food use and must therefore not enter the food or feed chain. Crambe naturally contains up to 60% of erucic acid, a suitable long chain fatty acid for conversion into the fatty alcohols needed in the production of several of the wax ester types, which disqualifies it for food production. Crambe is already a high yielding oil crop, presenting similar yield as spring rapeseed. Moreover, crambe presents the advantage of being cultivated wherever rapeseed is grown [
In Brazil, researches on the culture of crambe began in 1995 in Mato Grosso do Sul Foundation, Mato Grosso do Sul State, to evaluate its behavior in the formation of soil cover [
Based on the facts described above, in addition to the lack of specific literature about the effects of saline waters used for irrigation on crambe plants, this work was carried out in order to evaluate the effects on the development and productivity of crambe irrigated with saline waters under greenhouse conditions.
The experiment was carried out between September and December 2013 in a greenhouse located in the Academic Unit of Agricultural Engineering at the Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG), Brazil, situated at 7˚12'88''S and 35˚54'40''O, with an average altitude of 532 m.
The soil, after being air-dried and sieved, was chemically analyzed by [
After chemical characterization, the soil was placed in pots with a capacity of 15 dm3 and submitted to a basic fertilization following the recommendation of [
The volume of water required to achieve the soil at field capacity was determined based on the amount of available water in the soil determined in the laboratory.
The salts NaCl and CaCl2 were added to the local water supply, in order to obtain waters with different electrical conductivities (EC). The quantity of each salt (Q) was determined by the equation Q (mg∙L−1) = 640 × ECw (dS∙m−1), as [
Crambe seeds, cultivar Brilhante FMS, were provided by the MS Foundation, Office of Maracaju, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, and they were planted in plastic cups on a commercial substrate for the production of seedlings. After 13 days, the seedlings were transplanted into pots and irrigated with water supply for 14 days to ensure its full adaptation to the pots. Then, the irrigation with saline solutions of NaCl + NaCl and CaCl2 was started, which lasted 50 days until harvesting the plants. The irrigation with their respective treatments were conducted twice daily (07:00 a.m. and 04:00 p.m.) applying volumes ranging from 100 ml to 300 ml, based on previous work cited by [
During the experimental period (90 days) the plants were subjected to measurements of plant height, number of leaves and inflorescences and absence or presence of grains on three dates every 15 days. At the end of the experiment the plants were cut, separated in shoots, roots and grains, dried in an oven with forced air circulation at 65˚C for 72 hours and then weighed on a precision balance of 0.1 g.
At the end of the experimental period, soil samples from each plot were collected for chemical and salinity of soil saturation extract analyzes. Soil and plant data were evaluated using the statistical software SISVAR 5.0 [
Statistical analysis was performed separately on the basis of soil analysis: soil complex sorption (
tion in
pH H2O | E.C. | Ca | Mg | Na | K | H + Al | P | O.M. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1:2.5) | dS∙m−1 | -------------------------- mmol∙kg−1---------------------------- | mg∙dm−3 | g∙dm−3 | ||||
5.41 | 0.10 | 22.6 | 9.4 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 22.3 | 9.3 | 7.7 |
Source of variation | D.F. | Mean squares | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | EC(1) | Na(1) | K | Ca(2) | Mg(3) | P | Al(4) | O.M.(2) | ||
Salinity levels (N) | 4 | 0.013ns | 0.12** | 0.323** | 0.029ns | 0.23** | 0.04ns | 0.003ns | 0.019* | 0.023ns |
Linear | 1 | 0.011ns | 0.44** | 1.064** | 0.004ns | 0.79** | 0.002ns | 0.066ns | 0.002ns | 0.003ns |
Quadratic | 1 | 0.027ns | 0.000ns | 0.226** | 0.003ns | 0.03ns | 0.056ns | 0.005ns | 0.057* | 0.002ns |
Deviation | 2 | 0.006ns | 0.012ns | 0.001ns | 0.002ns | 0.05ns | 0.053ns | 0.054ns | 0.016ns | 0.001ns |
Salts (S) | 1 | 0.100** | 0.034* | 0.415** | 0.002ns | 0.01ns | 0.06ns | 0.012** | 0.008ns | 0.029* |
N × S | 4 | 0.008ns | 0.006ns | 0.106** | 0.008ns | 0.01ns | 0.04ns | 0.001** | 0.008ns | 0.041ns |
Treatment | 9 | 0.02ns | 0.52** | 0.23** | 0.001ns | 0.10** | 0.04ns | 0.002** | 0.009ns | 0.006ns |
Error | 20 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.0024 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.065 | 0.006 |
CV (%) | 1.99 | 8.23 | 10.89 | 12.91 | 9.49 | 29.41 | 0.39 | 7.01 | 11.08 | |
Mean | 5.00 | 0.827 | 0.983 | 0.385 | 1.62 | 0.76 | 3.846 | 1.15 | 0.737 |
D.F.: Degrees of freedom; ** and *: Significant at 1% and 5%, respectively; ns: Non-significant by F test; (1), (2), (3) and (4): Data processed in
Source of variation | D.F. | Mean squares | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | EC(1) | Na(2) | K | Ca(4) | Mg(3) | HCO3 | Cl(4) | ||
Salinity levels (N) | 4 | 0.02ns | 0.03** | 0.06** | 5.12** | 0.14** | 3.35** | 0.08ns | 0.26** |
Linear | 1 | 0.06* | 0.04** | 0.09** | 19.62** | 0.48** | 3.35** | 0.29ns | 0.825** |
Quadratic | 1 | 0.04ns | 0.01ns | 0.05** | 0.15ns | 0.01ns | 0.19ns | 0.02ns | 0.01ns |
Deviation | 2 | 0.04ns | 0.03** | 0.05ns | 0.35ns | 0.04ns | 0.38ns | 0.02ns | 0.04* |
Salts (S) | 1 | 0.16** | 0.02* | 0.03** | 0.04ns | 0.02ns | 0.19ns | 0.04ns | 0.05* |
N × S | 4 | 0.07ns | 0.05ns | 0.03** | 0.43ns | 0.01ns | 0.38ns | 0.48* | 0.09ns |
Treatment | 9 | 0.03* | 0.06** | 0.05** | 2.46* | 0.07** | 1.68** | 0.26ns | 0.12** |
Error | 20 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
CV (%) | 2.41 | 6.74 | 15.93 | 15.14 | 7.86 | 9.67 | 22.84 | 4.10 | |
Mean | 4.59 | 0.28 | 0.028 | 6.093 | 1.735 | 6.07 | 1.676 | 2.05 |
D.F.: Degrees of freedom; ** and *: Significant at 1% and 5%, respectively; ns: Non-significant by F test; (1), (2), (3) and (4): Data processed in
The effects of salinity levels on soil complex sorption at the end of the experiment were significant to electric conductivity (EC), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), and aluminum (Al). In addition, the types of salts were significant for pH, EC, Na, phosphorus (P), and organic matter (O.M.). The interaction between salinity levels and types of salts was significant for Na and P (
The treatments used in this experiment also presented significant effects on the soil saturation extract at the end of the experiment (
Subsequently, the soil data were subjected to analysis of variance and to the analysis of the splitting factors, when it was necessary. For significant effects of the factor “salts”, the Tukey test was performed for comparison of means at 5% probability, while for the significant effects of salinity levels it was applied the regression analysis (
For the soil complex (
For soil salinity (
Plant data also were subjected to analysis of normality of the residuals by the method of Shapiro-Wilk and it was observed a need to transform the data in
Plants adversely affected by salinity grow more slowly and are, therefore, stunted. Leaves are smaller, but may be thicker than those of normal plants and chloride increases the elongation of the palisade cells, causing increased succulence. The leaves of salt-affected plants are often darker green than those of normal plants, but in crucifers thicker layers of surface wax cause a bluish-green cast. Stunting of fruits as well as leaves and stems occurs. Salt-affected plants may show no distinctive symptoms, and only comparison with normal plants reveals
Salt | Salinity levels (dS∙m−1) | Equation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.03 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | ||
pH | ||||||
NaCl | 5.04a | 4.92a | 4.90b | 4.84b | 5.00a | Y = 0.01x2 − 0.14 + 5.17 R2 = 0.8704* |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 5.09a | 5.04a | 5.09a | 5.03a | 5.03a | Y = 5.06ns |
EC | ||||||
NaCl | 1.02a | 0.87a | 0.88a | 0.85a | 0.67a | Y = −0.04x + 1.05 R2 = 0.8359** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.00a | 0.85a | 0.83a | 0.66b | 0.61a | Y = −0.06x + 1.05 R2 = 0.9594** |
Na | ||||||
NaCl | 1.16a | 1.23a | 1.37a | 1.13a | 0.60a | Y = −0.05x2 + 0.32x + 0.83 R2 = 0.9554** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.12a | 1.12a | 0.78b | 0.68b | 0.61a | Y = −0.09x + 1.25 R2 = 0.8987** |
Ca | ||||||
NaCl | 1.32a | 1.61a | 1.59a | 1.68a | 1.78a | Y = 0.06x + 1.33 R2 = 0.8282** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.34a | 1.62a | 1.53a | 1.78a | 1.93a | Y = 0.08x + 1.28 R2 = 0.8624** |
P | ||||||
NaCl | 3.81b | 3.83b | 3.80b | 3.83b | 3.84a | Y = 0.004x + 3.807 R2 = 0.4756* |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 3.89a | 3.86a | 3.87a | 3.87a | 3.83a | Y = −0.006x + 3.89 R2 = 0.6047** |
H + Al | ||||||
NaCl | 1.11b | 1.04a | 0.95b | 1.01b | 1.15b | Y = 0.01x2 − 0.14x + 1.25 R2 = 0.9238* |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.30a | 1.23a | 1.18a | 1.35a | 1.37a | Y = 1.29ns |
Means followed with the same letter within the same column do not differ statistically.
Salt | Salinity levels dS∙m−1 | Equation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.03 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 7.0 | ||
EC | ||||||
NaCl | 0.34a | 0.29a | 0.29a | 0.28a | 0.22a | Y = −0.016x + 0.353 R2 = 0.83** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 0.34a | 0.27a | 0.27a | 0.23b | 0.21a | Y = −0.020x + 0.352 R2 = 0.92** |
Na | ||||||
NaCl | 0.035a | 0.037a | 0.050a | 0.037a | 0.012a | Y = −0.002x2 + 0.017x + 0.017 R2 = 0.88** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 0.037a | 0.029b | 0.019b | 0.014b | 0.011a | Y = −0.004x + 0.040 R2 = 0.96** |
K | ||||||
NaCl | 5.04a | 5.45a | 6.16a | 6.33a | 7.10a | Y = 0.33x + 4.68 R2 = 0.97** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 4.63a | 5.86a | 5.39a | 6.57a | 7.51a | Y = 0.43x + 4.26 R2 = 0.85** |
Ca | ||||||
NaCl | 1.44a | 1.71a | 1.73a | 1.76a | 1.86a | Y = 0.06x + 1.462 R2 = 0.81** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.57a | 1.76a | 1.63a | 1.80a | 2.00a | Y = 0.06x + 1.51 R2 = 0.72** |
Mg | ||||||
NaCl | 5.39a | 6.21a | 5.84a | 6.54a | 6.76a | Y = 0.20x + 5.32 R2 = 0.78** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 4.60a | 5.66a | 5.99a | 6.46a | 7.22a | Y = 0.40x + 4.37 R2 = 0.96** |
HCO3 | ||||||
NaCl | 2.22a | 1.92a | 1.51a | 1.38a | 1.50a | Y = -0.13x + 2.24 R2 = 0.79* |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.36b | 1.55a | 1.80a | 1.98a | 1.44a | Y = 1.63ns |
Cl | ||||||
NaCl | 1.79a | 1.99a | 1.95a | 2.02b | 2.28a | Y = 0.06x + 1.73 R2 = 0.81** |
NaCl + CaCl2 | 1.78a | 2.04a | 2.07a | 2.21a | 2.36a | Y = 0.08x + 1.73 R2 = 0.94** |
Means followed with the same letter within the same column do not differ statistically.
Source of variation | D.F. | Mean squares | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shoots | Roots | Inflorescence(1) | Grain | SRR(2) | ||
Salinity levels (N) | 4 | 70.03* | 0.24ns | 50.045** | 3.9624** | 0.00073 ns |
Linear | 1 | 253.95** | 0.725* | 182.583** | 14.837** | 0.0022* |
Quadratic | 1 | 0.13 ns | 0.043 ns | 7.883 ns | 0.009 ns | 0.0002 ns |
Deviation | 2 | 7.68 ns | 0.085 ns | 1.676 | 0.198 ns | 0.0001 ns |
Salts (S) | 1 | 9.50 ns | 0.00 ns | 1.938 ns | 0.0232 ns | 0.00100 ns |
N × S | 4 | 14.20 ns | 0.21 ns | 0.153 ns | 0.2420 ns | 0.00090 ns |
Error | 19 | 16.43 | 0.09 | 2.770 | 0.6166 ns | 0.00034 |
CV (%) | 42.25 | 45.44 | 34.44 | 76.14 | 25.0 | |
Mean | 9.59 | 0.6906 | 4.8321 | 1.0313 | 0.074 |
(1)Data transformed in
the extent of salt inhibition [
The changes in metabolism induced by salinity are consequences of several physiological responses of the plant, such as changes in ionic balance, stomatal behavior and photosynthetic efficiency. The salt concentration increases in the cytoplasm and inhibits the enzyme activity of several metabolic routes and alternatively by the compartmentalization in the vacuole, the salts can be transported to the cell wall resulting in turn in dehydration of the cell. The high concentration of sodium or other cations in soil solution interfere with the physical condition of the soil or the availability of other elements, indirectly affecting plant development [
The shoot-root ratio increased with the salinity levels (
It is worth evaluating the development of crambe under saline conditions in salinity levels up to 7.0 dS∙m−1, taking into account the adoption of special measures to control salinity, as leaching of salts in the soil, as [
Salinity levels of the solutions used for irrigation in this study affected the growth of plants and grain yield of crambe. Regarding the type of salts, a higher concentration of Na was observed for NaCl solutions at 2.5, 4.0 and 5.5 dS∙m−1 salinity levels. It is worth evaluating crambe growth under salinity levels ranging up to 5.0 dS∙m−1, but adopting salt leaching from soil.