^{1}

^{*}

^{2}

^{2}

^{3}

^{3}

An experimental study of the nonlinear changes in refractive index and transmission coefficient of single-crystal ZnSe:Fe
^{2+}, fabricated through the Fe-diffusion method, at long-pulse (~300 ns), sub-mJ, 2.94-
m
m Z-scan probing is reported. As well, a theoretical model based on the generalized Avizonis-Grotbeck equations is developed and applied for straightforward fitting of the open- and closed-aperture Z-scans, obtained for ZnSe:Fe^{2+} with different Fe^{2+} centers concentrations. The modeling results reveal that the contributions in the absorption and refractive index nonlinearities of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} are “common” resonant-absorption saturation (the minor part) and pulse-induced heating of the samples (the major part), which are strongly dependent on Fe^{2+ }concentrations. Large values of the index change (>~10^{-3}) and partial resonant-absorption bleaching (limited by ~50%), both produced via the thermal effect mainly, are the features of the ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples inherent to this type of excitation.

Single-crystal Fe^{2+}-doped ZnSe is currently the subject of extensive studies since it demonstrates capability of being used as an effective laser medium for the spectral region ~4.0 - ~5.0 µm [^{2+} centers, created after doping ZnSe with Fe, which possess of a broad resonant-ab- sorption band spanned from ~2.5 to ~4.5 µm, relevant for pumping by conventional lasers based on Er^{3+}-doped materials [^{2+} as a passive Q-switch cell for ~3-µm Er^{3+}-doped lasers [^{2+} behind its functioning as a laser or Q-switch element. However certain gaps still exist in the knowledge of some of the featuring ZnSe:Fe^{2+} properties. For instance, the nonlinear-optical characteristics of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} were under scope in a very few works and limited by the studies of resonant-absorption saturation at ~3-µm pumping [_{12}. Meanwhile, there is no―as far as we know―any data about the mechanisms and values of nonlinear refractive-index Dn in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} at ~3-µm excitation. The other problem, insufficiently addressed to date is quenching of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} fluorescence, in terms of Fe^{2+} lifetime reduction in regard to temperature and Fe^{2+} concentration, at in-band excitation [

In the present work, the single-beam Z-scan technique [^{2+}. This technique was successfully applied from the 90-ies for studying versatile nonlinear materials possessing different kinds of amplitude and phase optical nonlinearities. Usually, Z-scan experiments comprise a set of single-beam measurements, allowing determination of the quantities that attribute the nonlinear response of a medium to excitation. The ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples we deal in the present study have been obtained via the diffusion method, allowing embeding Fe^{2+} centers into the ZnSe matrix in high concentration [^{2+} at sub-mJ pulsed 2.94-µm probing by means of the Z-scan technique. [Note that the sole work [^{2+}, was targeted at a study of its nonlinear transmission only, not Dn.] In Section IV, we model the problem of propagation of pulsed ~3-µm radiation through ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, where the two key nonlinearities are addressed, stemming from saturation of the resonant transition ^{5}E→^{5}T_{2} (Fe^{2+}) and from light-induced heating. In Section V, we discuss the results and reveal the main laws that obey the studied optical nonlinearities, inherent to this type of ZnSe:Fe^{2+ }excitation. The conclusions are formulated in Section VI.

Setup: The experimental setup is shown in

We used as probe the output beam of a flash-lamp pumped actively Q-switched (using an electro-optical LiNbO_{4} cell) Er^{3+}:YAG laser (1), oscillating in the regime of giant pulses at a wavelength of 2.94 mm. The laser operated at a low repetition rate, 0.5 Hz (a single laser pulse per a flash-lamp shot), ensuring minimal thermal effects in the cavity and, correspondingly, high stability of the output parameters (pulse energy and pulse width). Pulse duration t_{P }was fixed (290 ns) in experiments. The laser beam’s spatial distribution was made (using an intra-cavity diaphragm,) to be TEM_{00} mode and its polarization was set (by the active element’s wedging) almost linear (~1:100). A small portion of the beam was deflected by a CaF_{2} plate (2) for monitoring the pulses with a pyro-receiver (3), while its major part was passed in between “folded” Al-reflectors (4) and (5) and focused by a CaF_{2 }lens (7) (with a focal distance of 30 cm) into a ZnSe:Fe^{2+} sample (8). The beam waist in the focus was measured to be w_{0} = 75 mm. Neutral filters (6) placed in front of the lens allowed varying pulse energy, delivered to the tested sample. Energy of a single pulse, transmitted by the sample, was measured by a pyro-receiver (12), identical to the reference one (3) (note that decay time constants of both the pyro-receivers exceeded 1 ms, which ensured the measured parameter being pulse energy). Open- and closed-aperture Z-scans were obtained by translating the sample along Z-axis around the beam waist, Z_{0} (±2.5 cm). When measuring closed-aperture Z-scans, a circular pinhole (9) with a diameter of ~0.6 mm (transmission, ~3%) was placed in front of receiver (12), whereas when measuring open-aperture Z-scans the pinhole was removed from the beam. Neutral filters (10) and a scattering plate (11) were set in front of receiver (12) to avoid its saturation and to homogenize the beam’s distribution on the receiver’s sensitive head. ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples were placed on a motorized stage, movable along the laser beam. Each experimental Z-scan point was obtained after averaging over 10 laser pulses, ensuring accuracy of the measurements better than 5%. Signals from the pyro-receivers were recorded using an acquisition board, arranged in the KAMAK’s standard, equipped with a PC; the PC also controlled Z-shifting of the stage with a ZnSe:Fe^{2+} sample. In advance to Z-scan experiments, signals from the pyro-receivers have been calibrated by a

calorimeter (placed in the scheme instead of the sample). Pulse energy (E_{p}) was preserved to be less than 0.58 mJ in the experiments, since at higher pulse energies optical breakdown sporadically happened when ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples (especially the one with the highest Fe^{2+} concentration) were passed through the focus.

The nonlinear (pulse-energy dependent) changes in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} transmission coefficient and refractive index were determined from the measurements of open- and closed-aperture Z-scans, T_{0}(Z) and T_{1}(Z)/T_{0}(Z) (hereafter Z is the longitudinal coordinate of a sample at its translating along the optical axis). A signal from pyro-receiver (12) in the absence of pinhole (9) gave us, after dividing by input energy (a signal from pyro-receiver (3)), open-aperture Z-scan transmittance. Closed-aperture Z-scan transmittance was obtained by a similar way but with the pinhole placed in front of receiver (12), by means of dividing the measured transmission by the T_{0}(Z)- value. For an absorbing medium (our case), Z-scans T_{0}(Z) and T_{1}(Z)/T_{0}(Z) contain the information about the nonlinear transmission (absorption) and refractive index, respectively. In the present study, we paid most of attention to monitor the nonlinear changes in transmission and in refractive index (Dn) of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} in function of incident pulse energy (E_{p}).

Samples: Samples of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} were obtained at room temperature through the diffusion process under conditions for the thermodynamic equilibrium of solid ZnSe, solid Fe, and S_{ZnSe}?S_{Fe}?V vapors in evacuated quartz ampules at a He atmosphere; see e.g. Refs. [^{2+} samples, which gave rise to different average concentrations of Fe^{2+} dopants; see ^{2+} plates were polished at both sides, resulting in ~1-mm thick final samples, with total thicknesses of the areas enriched with Fe^{2+}-centers being 150 - 250 µm. Note that these thicknesses are much less than the confocal parameter’s value, z_{0}~0.6 cm, which validates the “thin sample” approximation [

The linear (“small-signal”) transmission spectra of the samples were recorded using a spectrophotometer; the results are demonstrated in ^{2+} (transition: ^{5}E→^{5}T_{2}) centers. No other features were detected in the spectra, apart an increase of attenuation in the VIS, originated from the ZnSe matrix’s band-gap. It is seen that concentrations of Fe^{2+} centers (proportional to extinctions in the ~3-µm band) differ by orders of value in the samples.

In experiments, ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples were placed almost perpendicularly to the probe beam’s propagation. The examples of nonlinear transmittance of samples 464, 422, and 474, measured without a pinhole in front of receiver (12) (i.e. open-aperture Z-scans T_{0}(Z)), and normalized ratio of the nonlinear transmittances, measured with and without the pinhole (i.e. closed-aperture Z-scans T_{1}(Z)), are shown by symbols in _{p} = 0.56 mJ), whereas the data obtained after proceeding similar Z-scans, measured at smaller pulse energies, are collected in _{0}(Z) and T_{1}(Z) arise, for all samples, in proximity to the beam waist where the pulse energy density is high. Note that a reference pristine (free from Fe^{2+} doping) ZnSe sample was also under test but no changes in Z-scans T_{0}(Z) and T_{1}(Z)/T_{0}(Z) were found in this case, which ensures an exclusive role of Fe^{2+} centers in the optical nonlinearities induced in ZnSe:Fe^{2+}.

In case of open-aperture Z-scans (see the left panel in _{0} at Z→0 is simply the result of Fe^{2+} centers’ resonant-absorption saturation. However an important detail should be noticed, i.e. that transmittance T_{0}(Z)―even near the focus―is much less than 100%. This indicates the presence of a source of additional nonlinear loss in the material, the effect explained, as it is demonstrated below, by shortening of Fe^{2+} lifetime via temperature increase under the action of pulsed excitation. Both the phenomena merely contribute in the transmission (absorption) nonlinearity of the samples but the latter contribution dominates at increasing concentration of Fe^{2+} centers: compare graphs (a), (b), and (c) in

The closed-aperture transmittances T_{1}(Z)/T_{0}(Z) (see the right panel in ^{2+} samples, also demonstrate drastic perturbations at Z→0. Magnitude of the parameter, characterizing the index nonlinearity, a peak-to-valley “oscillation” between the maximal, ^{2+} concentration (474, see ^{2+} concentration (see _{1}(Z)/T_{0}(Z) in all graphs reveals a positive nonlinear lens “created” in the samples. These facts can be only explained by the effect of considerable thermal lensing (an inhomogeneous increase of temperature) in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} at 2.94-mm excitation (the coefficient of thermal dispersion of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} is positive and large [

Figures 4(a)-4(b) (see symbols) reveal the experimental laws that the maximal open-aperture transmittances _{p}. These data were obtained from the dependences, similar to those presented in

These results testify for: 1) that resonant-absorption bleaching (i.e. an increase of _{p}) is incomplete in all samples (_{10} (see _{p}, thus indicating the dominant nonlinearity involved being thermal lensing rather than GSA saturation. The results of modeling, presented in the following section (see “plain” curves fitting the experimental dependences in

Propagation of a resonant pulse through ZnSe:Fe^{2+}. Propagation of a ~3-µm pulse through a ZnSe:Fe^{2+} sample can be modeled by employing the generalized Avizonis-Grotbeck equations [^{2+} sample by a pulse since an increase of temperature during excitation should ought to shorten Fe^{2+} lifetime (as the result, Fe^{2+} lifetime cannot be fixed at modeling but rather should be a parameter, dependent on pulse energy, accumulated and dissipated in the sample, and therefore on temperature’s growth; 2) the effect of experiencing by a pulse of “extra” loss in ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, an “alter-ego” for incomplete resonant-absorption bleaching of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} (which stems from the mentioned pulse-induced Fe^{2+} lifetime reduction); 3) the thermal-lens effect, thereby contributing in overall refractive-in- dex nonlinearity.

Basic equations: To describe propagation of a pulse at a wavelength resonant to ZnSe:Fe^{2+} transition ^{5}E→^{5}T_{2} at arbitrary ratio of the pulse duration to the Fe^{2+} centers upper level’s relaxation time, we employed the following equations:

We consider here a two-level scheme for Fe^{2+} centers with lower 1 (^{5}E) and upper 2 (^{5}T_{2}) levels, in accordance to the model of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} energy states; see e.g. Refs. [_{1} and n_{2} are the population densities of levels 1 and 2, respectively; τ_{r}(Τ) is the lifetime of the upper level, which depends on ZnSe:Fe^{2+} temperature Τ (see below); σ_{12} and σ_{21} are the cross-sections of absorption from level 1 to level 2 and stimulated emission from level 2 to level 1, respectively, for a given wavelength λ_{0 }within the Fe^{2+}-centers’ GSA-contour (considered to be homogeneously-broaden); I is the pulse intensity in photons/(cm^{2}∙s); and z is the coordinate running through ZnSe:Fe^{2+} (it should be not confused with Z-coordinate of a sample positioned as the whole with respect to the beam waist). In system (1a, 1b), the first equation describes the variation in populations of levels 1 and 2 with time and the second one―the variation in pulse intensity upon propagation in the sample. It is implicitly implied that^{2+} centers’ populations of levels 1 and 2 is equal to overall concentration of Fe^{2+} centers n_{0}, which holds at the absence of photo-induced processes (probably leading to variations in valence).

Following the approach [_{sat}, experienced by phase φ of the pulse travelling in the sample (which is complementary to the resonant-absorption saturation process addressed by Equation (1) via Kramers-Kronig relations), can be written as:

where α_{0} is the small-signal absorption (GSA) of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} and δ and η are the coefficients that concern to the relations between the real ^{2+} susceptibilities in the ground (1) and excited (2) states at λ_{0}. Parameters δ and η are defined as follows:

and can be found similarly to [^{2+} absorption and fluorescence spectra are well-known for ZnSe:Fe^{2+}; see e.g. Refs. [_{P} is significantly bigger than passing time through the sample and that excited-state absorption (ESA) from state 2 to the above lying states is null.

For the case of a rectangular pulse with duration τ_{P}, system of Equations (1)-(2) is reduced to the equation that addresses variation in the pulse energy density

and to the equation for ε-dependent phase difference Δφ_{sat}:

where ^{2+} lifetime to pulse duration, ξ(Τ), are written as

and to the well-known equation (for intensities):

where

System of Equations (4)-(5) can be used for modeling of a pulse’s propagation through a medium with a single resonance (for an arbitrary ξ(Τ)-value). Specifically, Equation (4) addresses the interaction of pulsed radiation with the medium (and allows one to calculate the nonlinear change in transmission T_{0}(ε)), whilst Equation (5) addresses the phase change (and allows one to determine the nonlinear change in refractive index, Δn_{sat}(ε)).

Temperature impact: Furthermore, attention should be paid to an important issue (regarding ZnSe:Fe^{2+}), the mentioned strong dependence of lifetime of excited Fe^{2+} centers upon temperature. Apparently, the higher SSA α_{0} of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} and the bigger pulse energy E_{P}, the higher an increase of temperature ΔΤ ~ α_{0}E_{P} in the crystal (at neglecting thermal diffusion). As simple estimates show, heating of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples by 2.94-µm pulses can be, in our experiments, of the order of hundreds degrees. Thus, statements (i) and (ii) made above ought to be addressed by means of incorporating the dependence τ_{r}(Τ) into the model.

There are evidences to consider shortening of Fe^{2+} centers lifetime, or “fluorescence temperature quenching”, to originate from strong electron-phonon coupling [

where τ_{rad} is the radiative lifetime of Fe^{2+} centers, W_{0} is the parameter that stands for non-radiative relaxation (on ZnSe phonons), ΔE_{a} is the activation energy, and k_{B} is Boltzmann constant. The best fit of the known data for τ_{r}(Τ) [_{a} = 1750 cm^{−1}, 1/W_{0} = 0.1 ns, and τ_{rad} = 350 ns (at room temperature); see the plain curve in the figure.

Since both Equations (4)-(5) contain the terms dependent upon τ_{r}(Τ) (in fact, upon^{2+} (7) becomes a necessary modeling’s chain. Furthermore, heating of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} by radiation, resonant to the Fe^{2+ }GSA band, should also contribute in its refractive index nonlinearity. If a ~3-µm pulse propagates through ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, not only the “resonant” contribution in refractive index Δn_{sat}(ε) (associated with perturbations of Fe^{2+} energy levels―see Equation (4) (5)) arises, but also the “thermal” one Δn_{th}(ε) (stemmed from inhomogeneous heating of the sample). Assuming that for a ~300-ns pulse (our case) thermal diffusion in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} is negligible, the equation addressing the thermal effect can be written as:

where n, ^{2+}, respectively, and^{2+} sample in the form of Fe^{2+} fluorescence, is tiny (<1% [^{2+} during the pulse action, given by very low thermal diffusivity of ZnSe (^{?3}, C = 0.34 J・g^{?1}・K^{?1}, and Λ = 0.19 W・cm^{?1}・K^{?1} are density, specific heat, and thermal conductivity, respectively). An estimate for the heat’s diffusion length at t_{P}_{ }~300 ns (our case) is ~2 µm, which is much less than the spatial area where heat is generated, in turn estimated by the Z-scan beam radius w(Z) at the sample’s location (even at the focus it is measured by w_{0} =75 mm).

The overall phase change, experienced by a pulse, passing through ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, is the sum of the changes, “generated” by the GSA saturation and thermal effects (see Equation (5) and Equation (8)):

Z-scan formalism: At making numerical calculations, we assumed that the Z-scan beam is spatially Gaussian, i.e. that the following conditions at the sample’s entrance hold:

where r is the radius of the Gaussian envelope, w(Z) and _{0} = 0, _{0 }º w (Z_{0} = 0)], and ^{out} (z = L) and j^{out }(z = L)) were obtained and, consequently, the open- and closed-aperture transmissions:

where Kirchhoff integral is taken over a pinhole transmitting a small part of pulse energy ^{2+} were found as:

where L_{eff} is the effective thickness [

Parameters’ values employed at modeling: Thickness of two opposite layers enriched with Fe^{2+}, L = 2l (l is the thickness of a single layer), was estimated for each sample using the method [^{2+} diffusion time, and polishing conditions. Therefore L was varied in the modeling around these values (see e.g. ^{2+} concentrations n_{0}, SSA-values α_{0}, and passive losses γ were determined; see _{s} =0.08 J/cm^{2}) as defined by the value of the GSA cross-section _{0} = 2.94 µm), while the stimulated-emission cross-section was zeroed (σ_{12} = 0). The values of parameters δ and η, characterizing the relations between the real and imaginary susceptibilities of ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, were found from the absorption and fluorescence spectra of Fe^{2+ }centers [_{0} = 2.94 µm). Pulse duration at the samples’ incidence was fixed: τ_{P} =290 ns. To address the thermal effect in ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, the following quantities were taken: n = 2.43 and ^{2+} lifetime τ_{r} was accounted for by means of Formula (7).

The results of modeling (see plain curves in _{12}, nor the parameters δ and η.

Transmission (absorption) nonlinearity: First, the strongly limited absorption “bleaching” (i.e. the strongly reduced transmission T_{0}) at high pulse energies (see _{1}/T_{0}-oscillation, proportional to Δn (see ^{2+} samples under the pulse action (through the temperature-induced Fe^{2+} fluorescence quenching phenomenon; refer to ^{2+} upon pulse energy E_{P} is easily obtainable. Such dependences for samples 464, 422, and 474 are demonstrated in ^{2+} lifetime reduction at increasing Τ; refer to (7).

^{2+} in terms of optical density OD = ?ln(T_{0}) and pulse-induced loss, both normalized on the values of initial optical density OD_{0} = α_{0}L (see _{P}. The OD-values in

# | Optical density OD_{0} | Doped layers thickness 2l, μm | *Samllsignal absorption α_{0}, cm^{−1} | *passive loss γ, cm^{−1} | *Fe^{2+} average concentration n_{0}, cm^{−3} |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

464 | 1.3 | 135 ± 15 | 51 | 43 | 0.6 × 10^{20} |

422 | 3.1 | 165 ± 15 | 157 | 27 | 1.9 × 10^{20} |

474 | 6.2 | 240 ± 20 | 242 | 17 | 2.8 × 10^{20} |

^{*}Defined with accuracy given by the estimates for the samples’ thicknesses.

presented in ^{2+} lifetime reduction). [Note that all dependences shown in ^{2+} samples placed at the probe beam’s focus, Z_{0} = 0.]

It is seen that the normalized optical densities of the samples (see curves 1, 2, and 3), though decreasing at increasing pulse energy, do not approach zero, being instead limited by ~50%. Furthermore, the higher Fe^{2+} concentration in ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, the steeper is a decrease of OD vs. E_{P}. In turn, the normalized excessive losses in the samples (see curves 1', 2', and 3') largely increase at increasing pulse energy; moreover, the higher Fe^{2+} concentration, the higher is the loss magnitude (say, at E_{P} ~0.56 mJ the pulse-induced losses in samples 464 and 474 are measured by ~5% and ~40%, respectively). Presumably, these trends are an appearance of temperature-in- duced Fe^{2+} fluorescence quenching. To the best of our knowledge, the revealed laws were never reported for ZnSe:Fe^{2+}.

Refractive index nonlinearity: One more point deserving attention is the dependence of refractive-index nonlinearity Δn on pulse energy E_{P} (see _{P}) (_{P} becomes clear as mostly stemming from a temperature rise. Indeed, the thermal nonlinearity Δn_{th} is seen to dominate in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} index change. On the other hand, the “resonant” part Δn_{sat}, associated with the GSA saturation (via Kramers-Kronig relations), was found―when it was calculated separately―to saturate with increasing E_{P}. However, magnitude of this contribution is <5 × 10^{−5}, i.e. Δn_{sat} is always much less than Δn_{th} (>10^{−3} at the highest pulse energy).

The approach limitations: In spite of satisfactory agreement between the experimental data and theory, certain imperfections can be noticed in details: e.g. it is seen that with increasing Fe^{2+} concentration (in a sequence of samples 464→422→474), the shapes of the modelled Z-scans get deviated from the experimental ones; _{0}(E_{P});

A possible cause that stands behind the imperfection of the modeling is the assumption about homogeneity of Fe^{2+} distribution within the doped layers, which is no more than a rough approximation: in reality, Fe^{2+ }concentration profiles in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} fabricated by the diffusion method (our case) satisfy the errors’ function [^{2+} fluorescence quenching” [^{2+}. One more factor responsible for the mentioned deviations can be depression of the Fe^{2+} GSA-band at elevated temperatures (at high-energy excitation). This effect results in a fall of the GSA cross-section σ_{12} near λ_{0} =3 µm (see e.g. Ref. [^{2+} lifetime in ZnSe at high temperatures (<12 ns at Τ = 220˚C) [

It should be also emphasized that our model apparently disregards the known fact that at high temperatures (above 200˚C - 250˚C) ZnSe is chemically unstable and oxidizes into ZnO. The model’s prediction concerning an increase of temperature, established in ZnSe:Fe^{2+} under the pulse action, tells that T can be as high as 300˚C - 350˚C; however, this happens for the highest E_{P} (>0.55 mJ) and only for the sample with the highest Fe^{2+} content (474) and exactly at the bean focus; refer to ^{2+} at largely elevated T led to sporadic optical breakdown, happened near the focus at these conditions (see Section II). The absence or vanishing probability of optical breakdown in the samples with lower Fe^{2+} contents (422 and 464) is seemingly a demonstration that the highest temperatures induced in them (refer again to

Usefulness for future studies: We believe that, given by increasing interest to ZnSe:Fe^{2+} as to a perspective laser material for the spectral range ~4.5 - 5 µm (see e.g. reviews [^{2+} samples fabricated through the Fe-diffusion method [

We reported a study of the energy-dependent nonlinear transmission coefficient and nonlinear change in refractive index of mono-crystalline ZnSe:Fe^{2+}, fabricated by the diffusion method, at pulsed 2.94-mm Z-scanning. The experiments were fulfilled with a set of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} samples with different Fe^{2+} concentrations, at variable energy of a probe pulse and fixed pulse duration (290 ns). The following basic trends were found to exist. First, a dominant role of the pulse-induced thermal effect is established in the transmission/refractive-index nonlinearities of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} while there is little impact of the resonant-absorption saturation. Second, the thermal effect itself is manifested through: 1) Fe^{2+} lifetime reduction (temperature quenching) and 2) thermal lensing, with both phenomena associated to significant growth of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} temperature under the pulse action. The large values of refractive-index nonlinearity (of the order of 10^{−3}), partial resonant-absorption bleaching (not exceeding ~50%), and pulse-induced excessive loss (measured by tens of percent of the initial optical density of the samples) at maximal pulse energy (~0.55 mJ) are the main features revealed for this type of ZnSe:Fe^{2+} crystals.

This work was supported by the Russian Fund for Basics Research (Russia) through the Projects 13-02-01073а, 12-02-00641а, 12-02-00465а, and 13-02-12181 ofi-m, by the grant of President of Russian Federation for state support of the leading scientific schools of Russian Federation NSh-451-2014.2.