^{1}

^{*}

^{2}

^{*}

We evaluate quantum Otto, Diesel and Brayton cycles employing multiple-state 1D box system instead of ideal gas filled cylinder. The work and heat are extracted using the change in the expectation of Hamiltonian of the system which leads to the first law of thermodynamics to quantum system. The first law makes available to redefine the force which is in fact not well defined in a quantum mechanical system and then it is applied to define the quantum version of thermodynamic processes, i.e. isobaric, isovolume and adiabatic. As the results, the efficiency of quantum Otto engine depends only on the compression ratio and will be higher than the efficiency of quantum Diesel which can decrease by the widening of expansion under isobaric process. The efficiency of quantum Brayton engine may reach maximum on certain combination between the wide of box under isobaric expansion and compression, under certain conditions. The amount of levels participated in the quantum heat engine system will potentially reduce the performance of the quantum heat cycles consisting isobaric process, but it can be resisted using isobaric process controller.

Present technology allows for the probing and realization of quantum mechanical systems of mesoscopic and even macroscopic sizes, which can also be restricted to a relatively small number of energy states [1,2]. It is thus important to study these quantum systems directly in relation to the thermodynamics system. The interplay between thermodynamics and quantum physics has been an interesting research topic since 1950s [3,4]. Studies of quantum thermodynamics not only promise important potential applications in technology and quantum information processing, but also bring new insights into some fundamental problems of thermodynamics, such as Maxwell’s demon and the universality of the second law [1,2,4,5]. Among all the studies about quantum thermodynamics, a central concern is to make quantum mechanical extension of classical thermodynamic processes and cycles of quantum heat engines [5-9].

Quantum heat engines produce work using quantum matter as their working substance. The principle conceptual difference between these and conventional heat engine is that in the quantum heat engine one is concerned with the discrete energy levels of particle [

Some studies on quantum heat engine focused on the quantum analogue of classical Carnot engine [6,7]. The quantum Carnot engine, employing a single quantummechanical particle, as a working substance, is confined to a 1D box potential instead of gas filled cylinder. The cycle consists of isothermal and adiabatic quantum processes that are close analogues to the corresponding classical processes. By formulating 2-state quantum system, the efficiency is analogue for the classical Carnot efficiency [

It is important to characterize how the behavior other multiple-state 1D box heat engines, that is quantum Otto, Diesel and Brayton engines. There is an interesting thing to Diesel and Brayton cycles, they consist of isobaric process, so we must redefine “pressure” (force), which has not been challenged yet to participate in the previous studies of 1D box system quantum engine [6,7,16] and is in fact not well defined in a quantum mechanical system [3,17].

In this paper, as an attempt to have an overview of 1D system of quantum heat engines, we evaluate quantum Otto, Diesel and Brayton engines which classically have an ideal gas as their working substance. Different from the previous papers according to quantum Carnot engine 1D system [6,7] and Otto like cycle for a two-level system [

We choose a quantum heat engines system, multiplestate 1D box system instead of ideal gas filled cylinder. 1D case is an interesting object which quantum mechanics textbooks usually start with them to illustrate some non-classical effects of the theory. The simplest onedimensional quantum mechanical system is a particle of mass m in region with potential is zero along L and otherwise is infinite [

The potential energy that touches the walls is infinite and in. The infiniteness potential ensures the particle cannot in fact penetrate them and gives the boundary conditions.

The boundary conditions and normalization requirement give us the discrete spectrum of eigenfunctions,

These eigenfunctions are associated with the eigenenergies

The state of system, described by a wave function, may be expanded in terms of an eigenfunctions set,

can be called as coefficient expansion. If the states and are normalized, the coefficients will have the normalization correction.

The quantum mechanical prescription for calculating the average of a dynamical observable in the state is written in the postulates. Specifically, for the energy we have the expectation value of Hamiltonian. If the probability to finding in a given measurement of energy is, then the average energy over measurements in the box is given by the expression

Here we have the interpretation of the square of modulus of coefficient, is the probability that measuring energy finds the value. So the energy of 1D system is

Here we assume, one of the walls, say the wall at x = L, is allowed to move an infinitesimal amount dL then the wave function, eigenfunctions and eigenenergies all can vary infinitesimally as function of L. As a consequence, the expectation value of Hamiltonian, Equation (6) also changes infinitesimally.

Force, in which has not been challenged in the previous studies of 1D box system quantum engine [6,7,17], is in fact not well defined in a quantum mechanical system [3,16]. Here, we redefine the force and energies of the system based on the phenomenological interpretation of the infinitesimally changing of the expectation value of Hamiltonian.

The expectation value of Hamiltonian is the average energy over measurements of all members of the ensemble, it can be just called as the energy of the system. Under an infinitesimal process, the infinitesimally changes in the energy of Equation (5) are given by

It is the statement of the first law of thermodynamic to quantum mechanical systems [1-3,16]. The two terms of Equation (7) tell us that there exist two fundamentally different ways of change of the energy of system. The first term represents the change of state occupation or probability and the second term gives the change of energy levels.

We evaluate this two terms phenomenologically. At first, under an adiabatic process, the adiabatic theorem is invoked to obtain that energy levels are modiﬁed without changing their occupational probability [

While classically, this no heat transfer process of adiabatic process will lead to use the change of internal energy only to do work. According to 1D box, the volume decreases slowly from L to L-dL by application of an external force, so

Substitusion of Equation (8) into Equation (9) gives us the ensemble average of force,

The ensemble average of force F is the average of over all the states represented in the ensemble [

This change of energy has also been given in Equation (7). It has been defined previously the change of energy levels can be with the infinitesimally moving of the wall, the term will be related to the work done to the system. In other hand, the rearrangement of the system among the energy levelswhich lead to term, must therefore be related to the head supplied into the system,

The situation has also defined been formally using quantum manometer model [

Base on the force and the first law of thermodynamics to a quantum mechanics system, we can now describe some processes which are quantum analogues of classical thermodynamic processes.

A classical adiabatic process can be formulated in terms of a microscopic quantum adiabatic process. Because quantum adiabatic processes proceed low enough such that the generic quantum adiabatic condition is satisfied, then the population distributions remain unchanged. There is no heat exchange in the process, but work can still be nonzero according to equation. A classical adiabatic process, however, does not necessarily require the occupation probabilities to be kept invariant. For example, when the process proceeds very fast, and the quantum adiabatic condition is not satisfied, internal excitations will likely occur, but there is no heat exchange between the working substance and the external heat bath. This thermodynamics process is classical adiabatic but not quantum adiabatic [

In case, the internal energy is converted all into mechanical energy, the first law will be,

We use an assumption that the initial state of the system is a linear combination of n-eigen-states as stated in Equation (4). In this process, the size of the potential well changes as the moving wall moves. There is no transition between energy levels, it can be represented the absolute values of the expansion coefficient is invariant. Using adiabatic process we can construct the force as,

Equation (14) has been well used in the previous quantum Carnot engine 1D system [6,7]. This expression of force is not a general expression of force according to quantum system, it is just special cases according to adiabatic and isothermal processes, and will be only well used for Carnot cycle [6,7].

The eigen-states and the corresponding energy levels E_{n}, as the wall moves an infinitesimal amount dL, will be varying smoothly. Energy level does not independent to the wide of wall L, as described in

Each eigenvalue of energy E_{n} decreases as the piston moves out, so from Equations (3) and (5) we have the expectation value of Hamiltonian decreases as

The force exerted to the moving walls by the system, as stated in Equation (14) is given by

in accordance with the formulation as shown in Equation (10).

Many energy transfer processes are taken place in close system at constant pressure. These processes are said to be an isobaric process. In contact with a heat bath, the first law of thermodynamics is stated in Equation (7) as. The amount of heat input can be predicted with

which is used to change the internal energy and to do work under a constant force.

According to 1D system, the quantity of pressure is played by force, so the force remains constant along the isobaric expansion or compression processes,

Let us assume, initially, the system is in ground state, , and appropriates with the force. The heat input blows transitions between states, so the force will be. This constant force, isobaric, gives us information of the wide of wall after isobaric expansion or compression

which will be maximum when all of the eigen-states lay on the highest state, or.

In an isovolume process, the system is placed in contact with a heat bath. Classically, the pressure p and the temperature T are changing along this process. The constant volume assures no work along the process.

A quantum isovolume process has similar properties to that of a classical isovolume process. The occupation probabilities vary along a quantum isovolume process by the heat absorbed or released. The system changes at constant volume, dL = 0 (for 1D system), thus no work is done by or into the system. The heat input all will be used to raise the energy of the system so the first law can be stated as,

The internal energy goes up by the heat added into the system.

To study the conversion of heat into work, we must have at hand a process, or series of processes, by means of which such a conversion may continue indefinitely without involving any resulting changes in the state of the system. The series of processes in which a system is brought back to its initial state, that is, a cycle. Each of the processes that constitute a cycle involves either the performance of work or a flow of heat between the system and its surroundings, which consist of a heat reservoir at a higher temperature than the system and a heat reservoir at a lower temperature than the system [

Starting with a ground-state of 1D system of width L_{1}, the state is

It associates with the energy,

The initial state and energy Equations (21) and (22) will be changed quasistatically to go through the quantum cycles returning to these state and energy.

In the following study, we apply the quantum version of the first law, force, energy and thermodynamic processes which have been defined in the section 2 to evaluate the behavior of quantum Otto, Diesel and Brayton cycles and formulate their efficiencies. We consider a case of system with n-eigen-states contributed to the wave function in the 1D box.

Otto engine is sequentially made up adiabatic compression, isovolume, adiabatic expansion and return to its initial state after undergoing the isovolume.

1D box quantum Otto engine operates under a cycle which is a quantum mechanical analogue to the classical Otto cycle [14,15,21,22].

The net work for a cycle is stated as,

According to Otto cycle, the net work is rendered by the quantum adiabatic compression and adiabatic expansion

Substitution Equation (18) into Equation (24) gives us the expression of the Otto cycle net work,

The width of 1D box parameter does not vary when the system is in contact with either bath. The parameter varies only during the adiabatic transitions from one bath to the other bath. This cycle may deliver work or receive work for appropriate choice of the parameters.

The heat inputs at a constant volume, and it can be obtained by the first law (Equation (20)),

The efficiency of this quantum Otto engine is the net work producer during the cycle, Equation (25) divided by the heat absorbed during the isovolume of process Equation (26). Using Equations (25) and (26), we have

where is the compression ratio. We can therefore eliminate the compression in Equation (27) in favor of the energy of system at the ends of either adiabatic process,

The obvious way to make the efficiency more efficient would be to use a higher compression ratio. This result corresponds to the classical Otto efficiency which is determined as a temperature ratio of the cold and hot baths [

A Diesel cycle is constructed out of an adiabatic compression and an adiabatic expansion interspersed between an isobaric compression and isovolume. The 1D box system quantum diesel cycle analogue to its classical cycle can be described in FL diagram of

Applying the first law to the closed system to each of the cycle yields the net work

The amount of heat taken in the system at constant force during process as given by the first law, Equation (19), is

The diesel efficiency can be obtained from Equations (29) and (30),

Equation (31) can be expressed as

where is compression ratio and is cut-off ratio. The efficiency of quantum Diesel engine decreases by the larger of cut off ratio [

Our multiple-state system apprises a special character under isobaric process contacting with a reservoir. It is expressed in Equation (21), more eigen-states constructing the state of system, the wall could be dilated more and the cut off ratio will go up. The increasing of cut-off ratio will tend to decrease the efficiency.

A comparison of Diesel efficiency and Otto efficiency shows that operating at the same compression ratio the Diesel efficiency, Equation (31), is always

less than Otto cycle, Equation (27), because the square bracket factor of Equation (31) is always larger than one. This Diesel efficiency will be as close to the quantum Otto efficiency as desired by making the cut off ratio close to one.

Brayton engine is constructed with adiabatic compression, isobaric expansion, adiabatic expansion and isobaric compression. The adiabatic processes, as in thermodynamics, are impermeable to heat; heat flows into the loop through the left expanding isobaric process and some of it flows back out through the isovolume process for Brayton. The 1D system Brayton cycle is described in

The force and energy in all stages of the cycle give us the total work,

While, the heat transfered into the system using the first law can be obtained with,

Then we have the efficiency of the quantum Brayton in

The efficiency of quantum Brayton engine varies on the compression ratio, and the both of expansion and compression box under isobaric processes. For fixed values of the compression ratio, the behavior of quantum Brayton efficiency can be shown by

of isobaric compression relates to the probability along isobaric expansion process, as stated in Equation (19),

The amount of levels participated in multiple-state quantum system potentially reduces the performance of our quantum Brayton engine, but it can be resisted using isobaric process controlling.

It has been shown that the efficiencies of 1D quantum heat engines are similar with classical ideal gas heat engines using the expectation value of Hamiltonian, an ensemble average taken over the multiple copies of the system, as the temperature, actually can be measured in energy units [

The multiple-state quantum heat engines behave that more eigen-states of the state will reduce the performance of the quantum heat engine. This result presents a confirmation that for the higher state quantum heat engine the work to be looser than that for lower sate system under certain condition [7,9]. The more eigen-states participated in the state can increase the isobaric expansion and vice versa for isobaric compression and it will decrease the efficiency. A controlling of isobaric processes should be done in order to achieve a maximum work, because the system must be brought to execute a reversible cyclic process.

The efficiency enhancement of our multiple-state quantum heat engines can be done by increasing compression ratio and controlling isobaric processes.

We would like to acknowledge M. F. Rasyid and W. S. Brams D. for their comments on our presentations in Conference on theoretical Physics and Non Linear Phenomena, UGM, Yogyakarta, Sepetember 2012 and Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, June 2012. We would also like to thank to the encouragement of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, ITS, via Laboratory of Theoretical Physics and Natural Philosophy (LaFTIFA).