^{1}

^{1}

^{*}

^{2}

This paper examines a boundary layer flow over a continuously moving heated flat surface with velocity

Studies on heat and mass transfer in boundary layers over continuously moving or stretching surfaces have been increasing due to their wide variety of applications in manufacturing processes such as glass-fibre production, metal extrusion, materials-handling conveyors and paper production.

One of the earliest studies on boundary-layer flow past moving surfaces was initiated by Sakiadis [

Studies on free-stream effects on boundary-layer flows over moving or stretching surfaces included the work of Abdelhafez [

The current study investigates a boundary layer flow over a moving surface in a streaming flow with a temperature dependent dynamic viscosity,. The Ling and Dybbs [

In Section 2, we formulate the problem. In Section 3, boundary layer equations are reduced to the self-similar form. In Section 4, numerical solutions for the self-similar boundary layer equations are presented and discussed and conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

An incompressible flow past an infinite surface continuously moving with velocity in a streaming flow with velocity and with temperature dependent viscosity, is investigated. The fluid is of density, thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity (at constant pressure). The boundary layer equations are

The boundary conditions for this flow are

for a flow over an impermeable surface.

The following temperature dependent viscosity model due to Ling and Dybbs [

where is a constant, is the constant reference viscosity in the absence of heating. The case corresponds to the constant viscosity situation.

The basic flow is rendered in non-dimensional form through setting

where is the reference velocity (Afzal et al. [

.

In non-dimensional form, the Lings-Dybbs model becomes

where is the dimensionless dynamic viscosity and is the variable viscosity parameter. The case is equivalent to the case corresponding to constant viscosity.

From the equation of continuity we have

where the parameter reduces to the pressure gradient parameter

We assume power-law variations in the free-stream velocity and wall velocity of the form so that.

and. The dimensionless similarity boundarylayer equations take the form

with boundary conditions

where

The parameter is the Prandtl number and is the Eckert number. The flow is self-similar if one of the following is satisfied:

1. n = 0 for any Ec.

2. Ec = 0 for any n (negligible viscous dissipation).

remarks We have assumed that both the wall and the free stream move in the same direction so that. The case when is corresponds to a wall moving in an otherwise quiescent fluid, corresponds to flow over a stationary wall and is equivalent to so that the wall and the freestream move with the same speed. When, the wall moves faster that the free-stream while the case when corresponds to the free-stream moving faster than the wall.

The surface shear stress and surface heat transfer are represented using the local skin friction factor, , and the local Nusselt number, , respectively defined as

The coupled self-similar boundary layer Equations (3) and (4) together with the boundary conditions (5) are solved numerically using a shooting method coupled with the fourth-order Runge-Kutta scheme.

The results presented here are for the cases when. Self-similar solutions were obtained for two cases. Case one is the flow viscous dissipation and. Case two corresponds to the case with but without viscous dissipation effects.

Figures 2 and 3 show that the effect of varying the fluid viscosity variation parameter on the temperaturedependent dynamic viscosity, and the streamwise velocity, within the boundary layer. At any location within the boundary layer decreases with increase in the viscosity parameter,. The boundary layer thickness is found to decrease with increase in. The parameter is a measure of fluid viscosity variation.

The effect of varying viscous dissipation parameter, , and the velocity ratio on the temperature distribution in the boundary layer is shown in Figures 4 and 5.

The skin-friction is presented as a function of in Figures 6 and 7. These figures show the effect of varying on the local skin friction coefficient for the case when and. For the case when , the local skin friction coefficient is positive and hence the fluid exerts a dragging force on the wall. For this case, increasing results in increase in the skin friction coefficient. For the case when, the local skin friction coefficient is negative, which is an indication that the wall drags the fluid. Also, increasing results in a decrease in the skin friction.

In

The results shown in

negative, changing sign to positive for. This explains the results observed in

The effect of varying on the velocity and temperature distribution within the boundary layer is presented in Figures 10 and 11 for the case when wall is moving faster than the free-stream. The results show that velocity boundary layer thickness decreases with increase and that the temperature peaks decrease with increase in. This shows that the increasing results in a decrease in heat transfer from the wall to the fluid.

A self-similar boundary layer flow has been presented

for a flow over a continuously moving heated surface in a fluid with temperature dependent viscosity. The selfsimilar equations were solved numerically and the results are presented in graphs.

In this study the effects of varying the viscosity variation and the velocity ratio are investigated for the case when the surface moves in the same direction as the free-stream.

For low enough values for the velocity ratio ξ, the local heat transfer is found to be negative, indicating the heat transfer from the wall to the fluid is greatly enhanced near the wall as the Eckert number increases. This is seen in the temperature distribution profiles where temperature peaks are observed adjacent to the wall.

For the case when the wall moves faster than the fluid, the skin friction coefficient is negative, indicating that wall drags the fluid. The reverse occurs for the case when where the skin friction is positive and hence the free-stream exerts a dragging force on the boundary layer.