<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2012.311209</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-24388</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Symmetry Restoration by Acceleration
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aolo</surname><given-names>Castorina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marco</surname><given-names>Finocchiaro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Catania, Catania, Italia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>INFN Sezione di Catania, Università di Catania, Catania, Italia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>castorina@ct.infn.it(AC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1703</fpage><lpage>1708</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>September</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>October</day>	<month>3,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The restoration of spontaneous symmetry breaking for a scalar field theory for an accelerated observer is discussed by the one-loop effective potential calculation and by considering the effective potential for composite operators. Above a critical acceleration, corresponding to the critical restoration temperature, 
  T<sub>c</sub>, for a Minkowski observer by Unruh relation, 
  i.e. a<sub>c</sub>/2π=T<sub>c</sub>, the symmetry is restored. This result confirms other recent calculations in effective field theories that symmetry restoration can occur for an observer with an acceleration larger than some critical value. From the physical point of view, a constant acceleration mimics a gravitational field and the critical acceleration to restore the spontaneous symmetry breaking corresponds to a huge gravitational effect which prevents boson condensation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Unruh Effect; Symmetry Breaking; Symmetry Restoration; Accelerated Frames</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In quantum field theory in flat space-time a spontaneously broken symmetry can be restored above some critical temperature [1-3]. On the other hand, whenever the background geometry is endowed with a black-hole or an event horizon, the related vacuum physically behaves like a thermal bath of quanta with a temperature, <img src="1-7500849\5fbd468e-8fa6-46ff-a288-709ba01d3443.jpg" />, proportional to the surface gravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref4">4</xref>]. Therefore one expects that symmetry restoration occurs also in strong enough gravitational fields, i.e. near a horizon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref5">5</xref>]. On the other hand, the near horizon approximation of a black-hole metric corresponds to a Rindler metric, i.e. the metric of&#160; an observer with constant acceleration, a, equal to the surface gravity and Unruh [6,7] showed that for any accelerated observer there is an intrinsic thermal nature of the ground state: he/she feels a thermal bath with temperature<img src="1-7500849\34a769e4-0880-40a8-b79d-af344b152472.jpg" />. Moreover, a broken symmetry can be also restored if a classical external field strength (a magnetic field, for example) exceeds a critical value. Infact a particle coupled with an external field suffers a proper acceleration depending on the field strength.</p><p>The previous discussion clearly indicates that a restoration of the symmetry can occur for an observer with an acceleration larger than some critical value independently on the specific dynamical mechanism that produces the acceleration.</p><p>Indeed in Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref8">8</xref>] it has been shown that for the Nambu-Jona Lasinio (NJL) model in an accelerated frame, the chiral symmetry (broken for<img src="1-7500849\60385d10-3951-4d05-9697-40f6684d181e.jpg" />) is restored for acceleration larger than a critical value<img src="1-7500849\4a23c6c3-4b8f-4743-aae7-d391523584c9.jpg" />, corresponding to<img src="1-7500849\a39d4816-ae00-4146-b0e6-c87a942704ae.jpg" />, where <img src="1-7500849\506f495b-f187-4dc3-aca7-f0982c12c790.jpg" /> is the critical temperature for the restoration of the symmetry due to standard (flat space-time) thermal fluctuactions. In Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref9">9</xref>] the behavior of quark and diquark condensates as seen by an accelerated observer has been studied and critical values of the acceleration for the restoration of chiral and color symmetries have been estimated. The dissociation of mesons, described as rotating string in Rindler space, by acceleration has been analyzed in ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref10">10</xref>] with the conclusion that above a critical acceleration<img src="1-7500849\b9cd3ca8-b16e-4e4c-8fab-be85ee1fecec.jpg" />, where <img src="1-7500849\25d6dd95-5a32-4d4d-ba76-96bff8106a25.jpg" /> is the string tension and <img src="1-7500849\aa5fae7b-2c65-43e5-8aab-089b8e6bc0a1.jpg" /> is the angular momentum, mesons undergo dissociation. In this letter we discuss the restoration of spontaneous symmetry breaking for <img src="1-7500849\895cbd49-72f3-47b5-afcd-f0fdfb90143a.jpg" /> theory with similar results: above a critical acceleration, corresponding to the critical restoration temperature by Unruh relation, i.e. <img src="1-7500849\41fcd55f-0a38-430b-9ff9-d783cac970c5.jpg" />, the symmetry is restored. The calculations are based on the one-loop effective potential evaluation and its generalization for composite operators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref11">11</xref>] (CJTmethod) which gives the resummation of an infinite set of diagrams by self-consistent gap equations. Initially (Sec.1) we recall briefly some general features of a scalar field theory in Rindler metric. In Section 2 we discuss the one-loop calculation of the effective potential for <img src="1-7500849\8f8f9cbb-1f01-4422-8237-1c4595dbd58f.jpg" /> theory for an accelerated frame and the results by the CJT method. General considerations about the symmetry breaking due to acceleration and the Hawking-Unruh radiation are in the final section devoted to comments and conclusions. Lastly the effective action and effective potential methods for composite operators (CJT) are briefly reviewed in the appendix.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. <img src="1-7500849\2876f98a-741b-4b5a-8b01-c439e65d6541.jpg" />Theory in Rindler Metric</title><p>The action for the <img src="1-7500849\4267afed-0451-4a8d-b711-1abd9b3e2756.jpg" /> scalar theory in Rindler spacetimes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref12">12</xref>] can be written as follow:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11595"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\ad2aae52-b065-4a39-a5f0-a9220dd5904f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="1-7500849\02c780ed-d7dc-4fbf-87c0-3d58a68b8864.jpg" />, <img src="1-7500849\5b1c414f-41b3-469b-9e65-08bd92bb9393.jpg" />and the Rindler metric tensor <img src="1-7500849\9fa64bf4-d30d-4f13-9579-829bd8592b72.jpg" /> is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11596"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\62f84a71-7921-41e2-ae2b-5819e29048a6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the two Rindler wedge are causally disconnected from each other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref12">12</xref>] we restrict our consideration to the right Rindler wedge. Calculation in the left wedge can be performed in the same way. The Klein-Gordon equation for the scalar field <img src="1-7500849\1a6167ea-c1c7-4056-9e0f-45284b0913e7.jpg" /> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11597"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\5956fbe0-b5ef-4b78-9607-35b1c557abd1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the Fourier transform with respect to<img src="1-7500849\1b05212c-76cc-48e7-a567-cbe6897f0047.jpg" />:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11598"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\26f636f8-fc9a-4ba2-a385-91de1928a844.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the normalized solution turns out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11599"><label>, (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\b8c53f12-a4b7-49ee-a2d4-943d8324933d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where is the modified Bessel function of second kind and<img src="1-7500849\024ebe61-34eb-4a59-acba-820fdcd5ae3a.jpg" />. The two-point Green’s function of the free scalar field in the right Rindler wedge<img src="1-7500849\ad4c7df4-8fb5-4079-bf6e-a082942ee980.jpg" />, is defined by the equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11600"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\a7c64888-6b95-4094-834f-947389a9d0a3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Fourier transform of <img src="1-7500849\3ec760d3-0aac-4e80-a370-1d85d1197b47.jpg" /> with respect to <img src="1-7500849\a2819592-359b-4e08-a2b5-bec6f920a628.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11601"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\9e42c3d6-b15a-4cd4-9f04-c2e9827a40a0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11602"><label>. (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\4266cb3b-6f07-437e-91e3-870e5363d920.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By substituting back into Equation (6) one finds:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11603"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\fded89b4-6343-4968-bb1f-c8c780ba8ade.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11604"><label>. (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\5f9a14d3-d087-4077-b7b4-b2ab93bfc564.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The world line in Rindler coordinates of a uniformly accelerated observer with proper constant acceleration <img src="1-7500849\71e290d4-a9f1-487a-9769-6dcd17e43cc0.jpg" /> is given as,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11605"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\ff1c3e58-d91e-45ea-a523-43b50077aad3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and it has been generally proved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref7">7</xref>] that Euclidean two point functions in Rindler coordinates are periodic in the direction of time with period a.</p><p>Since the Euclidean Rindler spacetime has a singularity at <img src="1-7500849\67f2e3ce-e1f9-4294-a911-efee6f32b173.jpg" /> one requires that the period of the imaginary time is<img src="1-7500849\b259ce69-0ef4-490d-93f8-8baf017a9a07.jpg" />. With this particular choice the Euclidean formalism in Rindler coordinates coincides with the finite temperature Matsubara formalism and therefore the following substitutions will be necessary in evaluating the effective potential in the next sections:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11606"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\51679b94-7006-41f6-888c-a6f1287c1653.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11607"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\34fbbdad-80ab-46f1-aa38-9d433dd294dc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11608"><label>. (14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\a5dc9961-0aa8-49a3-90c7-03efd2c432ad.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Effective Potential for Accelerated Observer</title><p>Let us now study the effective potential for a Rindler observer when for a Minkowski observer the effective potential is assumed to possess a symmetry breaking solution. For classical constant field configuration, <img src="1-7500849\2781f09e-8b91-48de-8dbf-8e5d4301b003.jpg" />, the one loop effective action in Rindler coordinates turns out to be:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11609"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\5dc6667b-cdae-47a7-acbc-ff061c2b39e9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-7500849\0a2ab150-fb09-4059-9514-a73a601d7b9d.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500849\89aa7f9b-03d1-45f5-89c1-f0ecac41d3e4.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11610"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\fe9deccf-e08b-40de-8d4c-76077ba3a014.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The effective potential (<img src="1-7500849\144651e2-0764-4271-8d77-51cfa606848a.jpg" />,<img src="1-7500849\7234d5a8-62a8-4ef9-97f3-fd985c733b92.jpg" />) is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11611"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\be2117dd-2ca6-45e1-84d7-df6cc9a8d18d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and by the following relation,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11612"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\6fdc6361-bce4-4d60-be35-cad503ca5560.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="1-7500849\7c6b8777-3fa5-4549-b802-8b9aaf98667b.jpg" /> is defined by previous Equations (7)-(10) with the substitution, <img src="1-7500849\bbf6c241-7ccc-4c16-b1ce-e3228da742d9.jpg" />it turns out to be</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11613"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\97cf6b3c-7010-4b89-a53e-fc815d9c68d6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In Euclidean space with the periodic boundary condition in Equations (12) and (13) and by introducing the Fourier transform of the Green’s function, Equation (7), the previous equation gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11614"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\0d2a7af3-0d24-4af0-ba4d-7c283ecd09b4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11615"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\a4add653-0755-4a0b-8be1-f4cc6c396341.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <img src="1-7500849\114007c4-d5cd-4f65-ab97-8bef87a62468.jpg" /> is now solution of the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11616"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\44dd4537-53de-4f6e-9d40-c13ec881195b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which, according to Equation (5) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11617"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\31b60211-695b-49d7-b640-f1880e75ac78.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the world line in Rindler coordinates of a uniformly accelerated observer with proper constant acceleration <img src="1-7500849\5f411a57-47cb-4b6d-8b71-6050d787707a.jpg" /> is given by Equation (11), one sets <img src="1-7500849\8871ca28-e174-4523-aca2-244653863293.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500849\4d98dd4f-8293-46ce-8ba7-e83736e84baa.jpg" /> and by changing the integration variable in Equation (23) from <img src="1-7500849\61eda63d-199d-43e7-a12c-688b88fdf2a2.jpg" /> to<img src="1-7500849\901548ed-be72-4595-b65c-909113f44345.jpg" />, it turns out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11618"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\a082cb20-cd73-41d8-a295-a7ce32e0dd4a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By performing the sum on the Matsubara frequencies the final result for the effective potential is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11619"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\1077935c-ab49-4802-94c8-287b29de09a9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <img src="1-7500849\1089d3d3-88b2-47d7-9e75-8af7b44a677d.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500849\1de07e69-def6-416f-9f94-090f285134c3.jpg" /></p><p>In order to calculate the critical acceleration <img src="1-7500849\2b7d137e-2ae3-4bf8-bd11-ac7ebc5aa280.jpg" /> for symmetry restoration we will impose the following condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref3">3</xref>]:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11620"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\51dea467-6a7b-4e06-bff3-2957f01440c4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11621"><label>, (27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\62756fe4-86d9-4017-9fbb-f5af8926517b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where we set <img src="1-7500849\eb2bfefc-d809-49e6-96c6-cdb48a7b34e1.jpg" /> for notation convenience. The computation of the integrals is straithforward and one gets</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11622"><label>, (28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\01850ac4-af4e-49c4-81e4-fa6ec711073e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in complete analogy with the finite temperature case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref3">3</xref>]. Indeed by defining the renormalized mass to cancel the quadratic divergence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11623"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\70f26805-d274-4a4e-8210-49700b775b5a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the critical acceleration is obtained by the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11624"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\1711d36a-1a32-4350-bd3f-ff4e02468a47.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which, for large acceleration, gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11625"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\39de23d7-3cf7-40ee-84de-2863b997c212.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11626"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\f1c55b3d-ee67-487c-81d2-19a700b9e657.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in agreement with the one-loop calculation in Minkowski space-time at finite temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref3">3</xref>] (<img src="1-7500849\6f5663e0-b8f6-45cc-bd52-f2955b847573.jpg" />). The previous expression in brackets might be confusing. Hence let me briefly clarify it. As we know the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking is characterized by the existence of a non-vanishing vacuum expectation value of the field <img src="1-7500849\b1b681a7-a428-4226-9305-a9444064ee75.jpg" /> which minimize the effective potential<img src="1-7500849\141dd0e3-ead2-4208-a696-694ea0120c40.jpg" />. The (renormalized) mass square <img src="1-7500849\8f4409f3-d29e-4aae-a797-f3fd24295457.jpg" /> is defined as the functional second derivative of the effective action<img src="1-7500849\404e56e3-499e-4a53-894b-a3a352bfc97d.jpg" />. For classical constant field configurations <img src="1-7500849\664ebb8e-2455-4013-89ed-dd3ae241752d.jpg" /> we can define the effective potential as we did in Equation (17) and the mass is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11627"><label>. (33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\fc027c26-b6e2-447f-9d57-ef05243a8dab.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If the symmetry is unbroken then <img src="1-7500849\7869e50e-010c-4e49-af4c-34d7fc91c2e7.jpg" /> is a minimum for <img src="1-7500849\64111dce-8e3e-4839-b205-054e4b2a0603.jpg" /> and the second derivative is positive. However in our case the symmetry is spontaneously broken and the effective potential develops two symmetric non-vanishing minima while <img src="1-7500849\f9b3ecdc-3881-4c78-8765-c3f753cfbbbe.jpg" /> becomes a maximum. Then the fact that <img src="1-7500849\98e8c7f1-8e39-46a8-bbfc-40b6158f5d73.jpg" /> does not mean that the mass square is negative but simply tells us that we are computing the mass square in the wrong vacuum state i.e. in a field configuration which, because of symmetry breaking, is not the true vacuum state (the minimum) anymore (indeed it is a maximum and hence the second derivative is negative).</p><p>Although the final result is as expected, the calculation in not entirely trivial. Moreover the determination of the critical acceleration from one loop effective potential suffers the same infrared problem of the finite temperature calculation related with the mode<img src="1-7500849\f9931ffe-c8c6-4a76-8218-cd41abaf5bb4.jpg" />. As well known, in finite temperature field theory a reliable evaluation of the critical temperature requires the resummation of an infinite subset of diagrams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref3">3</xref>]. This can be more easily done by considering the effective potential for composite operators (CJT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref11">11</xref>], extensively applied at finite temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref13">13</xref>], since the relevant, infinite, subset of diagrams is automatically resummed by the gap equations corresponding to the minimum conditions of the effective potential with respect to the relevant physical parameters in the theory. In the analysis of the spontaneous symmetry breaking and its restoration for <img src="1-7500849\97384bdf-9f4f-4449-ac62-ebcb67280ba2.jpg" /> theory by CJT method in the Hartree-Fock approximation (i.e. by considering the lowest order contribution to the gap equation) the relevant operators are <img src="1-7500849\2efbffab-ba18-4c77-bc74-ff877946b232.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500849\13e96733-c451-462d-98f8-7a5706aa86e9.jpg" /> and the corresponding parameters are the vacuum expectation value of the field and the mass in the two-point function. Calculations at finite temperature have been carried out in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref14">14</xref>]. Since the gap equation in the Hartree-Fock approximation correspond to one-loop selfconsistent calculation of the self-energy (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref14">14</xref>] for details) from our previous, explicit, oneloop calculation and from the complete analogy of the Green’s functions between a Minkowski observer at finite temperature and an accelerated observer with <img src="1-7500849\11fca03a-6f67-4765-a62b-d257faead499.jpg" /> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref7">7</xref>], it follows that a more reliable evaluation of the critical acceleration <img src="1-7500849\6fe8c36a-b592-4d2f-a470-9c42668a7ca8.jpg" /> with respect to the one-loop result in Equation (32) can be obtained by following the same analysis of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref14">14</xref>]. However the most interesting aspect is not the exact value of the critical acceleration but the restoration of the symmetry for an accelerated observer (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref7">7</xref>], Section 4, for a different point of view).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Comments and Conclusions</title><p>The restoration of chiral and color symmetries in the Nambu Jona-Lasinio model for an observer with a costant acceleration above a critical value [8,9] and the calculation performed in the previous section clearly indicate that one can restore broken symmetries by acceleration. Although the technical aspects of the previous calculations are sound, the physical mechanism of the restoration is unclear if one does not recall that a constant acceleration is locally equivalent to a gravitational field. The critical acceleration to restore the spontaneous symmetry breaking corresponds to a huge gravitational effect which prevents boson condensation as in the case of a non relativistic, ideal Bose gas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>More generally, the acceleration associated with the Hawking-Unruh temperature (and radiation) due to the observed gravitational fields is too small to produce measurable effects. There are very interesting attempts to find gravity-analogue of the Hawking-Unruh radiation [16,17] and, in our opinion, high energy particle physics seems the more promising sector to observe this effect. Indeed, a temperatute <img src="1-7500849\46615ec9-e0d5-4e7b-add2-d8a82209f6ee.jpg" /> MeV, corresponding to an acceleration <img src="1-7500849\370102b9-348e-46d9-aedb-d2a10f718d2c.jpg" /> can be reached in relativistic heavy ion collisions and the hadronic production can be understood as Hawking-Unruh radiation in Quantum Chromodynamics [18-20].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank H. Satz and D. Zappal&#224; for useful comments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Appendix: The Effective Action for Composite Operators</title><p>An efficient way to perform systematic selective summations is to use the method of the effective action for composite operators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref11">11</xref>]. In this case, the effective action is the generating functional of the two-particle ireducible (2PI) vacuum graphs (a graph is called two-particle irreducible if it does not become disconnected upon opening two lines). Now, the effective action<img src="1-7500849\eb2970e7-8fcc-4595-99da-819a63e78667.jpg" />, depends not only on<img src="1-7500849\ba0c06ba-a8af-40b3-b779-3df70369307c.jpg" />, but on<img src="1-7500849\1dc9fbb8-1155-45a2-9235-a605689d1d34.jpg" />, as well. These two quantities are to be realized as the possible expectation values of a quantum field <img src="1-7500849\2cbf0833-453c-4e59-89f7-78300718dbcd.jpg" /> and as the time ordered product of the field operator <img src="1-7500849\adf7821b-decb-4e2e-8283-dbaf852308e9.jpg" /> respectively. There is an advantage in using the CJT method to calculate the effective potential in certain approximations as is, for example, the Hartree-Fock approximation of the <img src="1-7500849\2e70bdff-a84f-44b6-ba50-10ebf7eba35b.jpg" /> theory. Indeed, if we use an ansatz for a dressed propagator, we need to evaluate only the double bubble graph in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> (with lines representing dressed propagators), instead of summing the infinite class of daisy and super-daisy graphs. In order to define the effective action for composite operators, we can follow a path analogous to the one leading to the ordinary effective action. The essential difference is that the partition function depends also on a bilocal source<img src="1-7500849\880e5073-6f03-4030-9a92-08d5479773c3.jpg" />, in addition to the local source<img src="1-7500849\4fc7cb37-2d7d-4f20-9f31-6445100e0ca1.jpg" />. As an example, we consider the <img src="1-7500849\f8bc145c-783e-4c1c-a038-1a8af2082e9e.jpg" /> theory with Lagrangian:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11628"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\051a9415-1a7e-4d15-a6a3-119f06c5c9c5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref11">11</xref>], the generating functional for the Green functions in the presence of sources <img src="1-7500849\c33f79c5-c4b9-4a9c-a744-07bb84a248c5.jpg" /> and <img src="1-7500849\c31f0a7d-9b04-4c80-99aa-76cb68a995c8.jpg" /> is given by (we set<img src="1-7500849\f68222ea-3d00-44f4-90a7-ca439d73e3d4.jpg" />)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11629"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\52a8c712-66cf-4a22-bd87-0f9e080307f4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="1-7500849\cebe0275-b26e-44d1-8bc9-0530e5a1df9e.jpg" />, is the generating functional for the connected Green functions, while <img src="1-7500849\766fdf72-2fbe-431f-beea-e90f256e27de.jpg" /> is the classical action. The effective action for composite operators<img src="1-7500849\a334cdf5-5c4e-4ca6-9d74-bbf6bef71db2.jpg" />, is obtained through a double Legendre transformation of <img src="1-7500849\9df02d48-5354-447b-89b0-dd10d6fd25bc.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11630"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\97653065-8c12-4908-925c-f22e8dcf17a5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Physical processes correspond to vanishing sources, so the stationarity conditions which determine the expectation value of the field <img src="1-7500849\ae3911dd-2aef-45e3-a1cd-08626869776b.jpg" /> and the (dressed) propagator <img src="1-7500849\bafd2cc6-a453-47d2-a0f9-9341118e0d8c.jpg" /> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11631"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\c83946e8-4aea-4a8a-9b90-f83fd0579710.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11632"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\62b08537-8b0e-4d30-8e54-ba2fe513c7b8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As it was shown by in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.24388-ref11">11</xref>], the effective action <img src="1-7500849\1c3a5ef9-dd1e-44db-b795-f2220ed60455.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.24388-formula11633"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="1-7500849\e0ab5e81-fc92-478b-a22c-6bfb601eed21.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where in this last equation <img src="1-7500849\f3332662-a635-4dd2-818d-c209ca11eda9.jpg" /> is the sum of all two-particle irreducible (2PI) diagrams in which all lines represent full (dressed) propagators<img src="1-7500849\d3e38af7-ef9a-43d1-9a95-973cf2a982be.jpg" />, while <img src="1-7500849\446d1ceb-8fe9-4f72-9945-c01a4cba88b3.jpg" /> is the inverse of the tree-level propagator. When translation invariance is not broken it is sufficient to consider a classical constant field configuration<img src="1-7500849\dfd5dc41-a410-4d55-8173-0a1240131937.jpg" />. Under this assumption we can factorize an overall four-dimensional volume factor and define the effective potential for composite operators <img src="1-7500849\63b26454-50ee-411e-8ee3-f6153c11f87f.jpg" /> exactly as we did for the standard effective potential. Then the stationary condition are given by Equations (37) and (38) with <img src="1-7500849\fcbc6978-f9a1-4c73-a760-6a9cc4322a47.jpg" /> replaced by<img src="1-7500849\46762854-e581-49bc-a672-38d28e2b39f2.jpg" />.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.24388-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde, “Macroscopic Consequence of the Weinberg Model,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1972, pp. 471-474.  
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(72)90109-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Weinberg, “Gauge and Global Symmetry at High Temperature,” Physical Review D, Vol. 9, No. 12, 1974, pp. 3357-3378. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3357</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, “Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,” Physical Review D, Vol. 9, No. 12, 1974, pp. 3320-3341. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3320</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 43, No. 3, 1975, pp. 199-220. doi:10.1007/BF02345020 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Denardo and E. Spallucci, “Symmetry Restoration in Conformally Flat Metric,” Nuovo Cimento A, Vol. 64, No, 1, 1981, pp. 15-26. doi:10.1007/BF02773363  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. G. Unruh, “Notes on Black Hole Evaporation,” Physical Review D, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1976, p. 870.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.14.870</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. G. Unruh and N. Weiss, “Acceleration Radiation in Interacting Field Theories,” Physical Review D, Vol. 29, No. 8, 1984, p. 1656. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1656</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Ohsaku, “Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking and its Restoration for an Accelerated Observer,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 599, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 102-110.  
doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Ebert and V. Ch. Zhukovsky, “Restoration of Dynamically Broken Chiral and Color Symmetry for an Accelerated Observer,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 645, No. 2-3, 2007, pp. 267-274. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.12.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Peeters and M. Zamaklar, “Dissociation by Acceleration,” Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 801, 2008, p. 38. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/01/038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis, “Effective Action for Composite Operators,” Physical Review D, Vol. 10, No. 8, 1974, pp. 2428-2445. 
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2428</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. C. B. Crispino, A. Higuchi and G. E. A. Matsas, “The Unruh Effect and its Applications,” Reviews of. Modern Physics, Vol. 80, No. 3, 2008, pp. 787-838.  
doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.787</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Amelino-Camelia and S.-Y. Pi, “Selfconsistent Improvement of the Finite Temperature Effective Potential,” Physical Review D, Vol. 47, No. 6, 1993, pp. 2356-2362.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Castorina, M. Consoli and D. Zappalà, “Finite Temperature Hartree-Fock Approximation to λφ4 Theory,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 201, No. 1, 1988, pp. 90-94.  
doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)90086-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. M. Cavalcanti, P. Giacconi, G. Pupillo and R. Soldati, “Bose-Einstein Condensation in the Presence of a Uniform Field and a Point-Like Impurity,” Physical Review A, Vol. 65, No. 5, 2002, pp. 53-60.  
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.053606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Barcelo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, “Analogue Gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, p. 12. http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2011-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Iorio and G. Lambiase, “The Hawking-Unruh Phenomenon on Graphene,” Physics Letters B, Vol. 716, No. 2, 2012, pp. 334-337. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Castorina, D. Kharzeev and H. Satz, “Thermal Hadronization and Hawking-Unruh Radiation in QCD,” The European Physical Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2007, pp. 187-201. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0368-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Becattini, P. Castorina, A. Milov and H. Satz, “Prediction of Hadron Abundances in pp Collision at LHC,” Journal of Physics G, Vol. 38, No. 2, p. 25.  
doi:10.1088/0954-3899/38/2/025002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.24388-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Castorina, R. V. Gavai and H. Satz, “The QCD Phase Structure at High Baryon Density,” The European Physical Journal, Vol. 69, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 169-178.  
doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1653-y</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>