^{*}

^{*}

In this paper we shall obtain some interesting extensions and generalizations of a well-known theorem due to Enestrom and Kakeya according to which all the zeros of a polynomial P(Z =α
_{n}Z
^{n}+...+α
_{1}Z+α
_{0}satisfying the restriction α
_{n}≥α
_{n-1}≥...≥α
_{1}≥α
_{0}≥0 lie in the closed unit disk.

The following results which is due to Enestrom and Kakeya [

THEOREM A. Let

be a polynomial of degree n, such that

then does not vanish in.

In the literature [2-5] there exist some extensions and generalization of Enestrom-Kakeya Theorem. Joyal, Labelle and Rahman [

THEOREM B. Let

then the polynomial

of degree n has all its zeros in

Recently Aziz and Zarger [

THEOREM C. Let

be the polynomial of degree n, such that for some k ≥ 1,

then P(z) has all its zeros in

The aim of this paper is to prove some extensions of Enestrom-Kakeya Theorem (Theorem-A) by relaxing the hypothesis in various ways. Here we shall first prove the following generalization of Theorem C which is an interesting extension of Theorem A.

THEOREM 1.1. Let

be a polynomial of degree n. If for some positive numbers k and with k ≥ 1, and

then all the zeros of P(z) lie in the closed disk

If we take in Theorem 1.1 we obtain the following result which is a generalization of Corollary 2 ([

COROLLARY 1. Let

be a polynomials of degree n. If for some positive real number

then all zeros of P(z) lie in

REMARK 1. Theorem 1.1 is applicable to situations when Enestrom-Kakeya Theorem gives no information. To see this consider the polynomial.

with is a positive real number. Here EnestromKakeya Theorem is not applicable to P(z) where as Theorem 1.1 is applicable with and according to our result, all the zeros of P(z) lie in the disk.

which is considerably better than the bound obtained by a classical result of Caushy ([

where

Next, we present the following generalization of corollary 1 which includes Theorem 4 of [

THEOREM 1.2. Let

be a polynomial of degree n. If for some positive number and for some non-negative integer

then all the zeros of P(z) lie in

Applying Theorem 1.2 to P(tz), we get the following result:

COROLLARY 2. Let

be a polynomial of degree n. If for some positive numbers t and with,

where is a non negative integer then all the zeros of P(z), lie in

If we assume a_{0} > 0, in Theorem 1.2, we obtain.

COROLLARY 3. Let

be a polynomial of degree n. If for some positive numbers and for same non-negative integer

then all the zeros of P(z) lie in,

Finally we present all following generalization of Theorem B due to Joyal, Labelle and Rahman which includes Theorem A as a special case.

THEOREM 1.3. Let

be a polynomial of degree n, It for some positive number and for some non-negative integer

then all the zeros of P(z) lie in

REMARK 2. For, Theorem 1.3 reduces to Theorem B.

PROOF OF THEOREM 1.1. Consider

then for we have

this shows that if then, if

therefore all the zeros of F(z), whose modulus is greater than 1 lie in the closed disk

But those zeros of F(z) whose modules is less than or equal to 1 already satisfy the Inequality (6).

Since all the zeros of P(z) are also the zeros of F(z). therefore it follows that all the zeros of P(z) lie in the circle defined by (6). Which completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.

PROOF OF THEOREM 1.2. Consider

therefore, for and,we have

Therefore all the zeros of F(z) whose modulus is greater than 1 lie in the circle.

But those zeros of F(z) whose modulus is less than or equal to 1 already satisfy the Inequality (9).

Since all the zeros of P(z) are also the zeros of F(z), therefore it follows that all the zeros of P(z) lie in the circle defined by (9). This completes the proof of Theorem 1.2.

PROOF OF THEOREM 1.3. Consider

therefore, for we have

Proceeding similarly as in the proof of Theorem 1.2, we have

therefore all the zeros of F(z) whose modules is greater than 1 lie in the circle

But those zeros of F(z) whose modulus is already satisfy the (11). Since all the zeros of P(z) are also the zero of F(z), therefore it follows that all the zeros of P(z) lie in circle defined by (11) and hence Theorem 1.3 is proved completed.

The authors are grateful to the refree for useful suggestions.