<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jss
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Social Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-5952
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-5960
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jss.2025.1311023
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jss-147391
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics, Social Sciences 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Humanities
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Staff and User Attitudes and Behaviors toward Digital Supply Chain Technology Adoption in Zimbabwe’s Public Health Sector: Awareness, Acceptance, and Readiness
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Takesure
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kudai
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Management Sciences Department of Public Management and Economics, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     30
    </day> 
    <month>
     10
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    11
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    370
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    389
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      18,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      18,
     </day>
     <month>
      November
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This systematic review explores staff and user attitudes and behaviors towards the adoption of digital supply chain technologies within the public health sector in Zimbabwe, focusing on awareness, acceptance, and readiness. The adoption of digital solutions is crucial for enhancing healthcare resilience and resource management in the face of infrastructural and economic adversity typical of developing economies. Despite the potential benefits—like improved transparency, efficiency, and supply chain resilience—adoption remains hampered by challenges like low digital literacy, infrastructural deficits, financial resource scarcity, and resistance to change. The review synthesizes existing literature, highlighting the central role of human factors, organizational culture, and policy environments in shaping technology adoption. The Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovations, and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology frameworks guided an integrated conceptual framework for the Zimbabwean context, with reference to individual attitudes and organizational readiness. Recommendations allude to a requirement for large-scale capacity-development programs, infrastructure investment, and visionary leadership in order to create an enabling environment for digitalization. Constraints such as poor network infrastructure, high costs, and socio-economic inequalities exacerbate disparities in digital access, sabotaging effective implementation. Conversely, government and international efforts to strengthen health logistics present opportunities for the use of emerging technologies such as blockchain to promote supply chain transparency and efficiency. The review identifies addressing attitudinal barriers, enhancing digital literacy, and developing enabling policies as key to successful technology adoption. Lastly, a combined approach comprising infrastructural development, targeted training, and stakeholder engagement is essential to unleash the transformational potential of digital supply chain solutions in the public health system in Zimbabwe to attain sustainable health outcomes in resource-limited settings.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Transparency
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Efficiency
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Corruption
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Procurement
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Capacity
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Attitudes
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The introduction of digital supply chain technologies is pivotal for enhancing the efficiency and resilience of public health systems, particularly in developing nations such as Zimbabwe, where access to essential medicines and health commodities is a strategic imperative (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-32">
     Lesego
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-32">
     et al., 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
     Lesego et al., 2024
    </xref>). However, the successful integration of these technologies hinges significantly on the readiness, awareness, and acceptance levels of the healthcare workforce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-61">
     Steenkamp et al., 2025
    </xref>). This systematic literature review aims to synthesize existing research on these factors, providing a comprehensive understanding of the human element in digital transformation within Zimbabwe’s public health supply chain sector. Specifically, this review will examine the psychosocial barriers to healthcare technology adoption, such as perceived usefulness, trust, and organizational readiness, that often delay implementation despite the potential for improved human development and well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-29">
     Lee et al., 2025
    </xref>). A critical assessment of current literature will therefore elucidate the multifaceted interplay between technological advancements and human factors, identifying key determinants influencing the effective deployment and sustained utilization of digital supply chain solutions in this specific context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-66">
     Tagwireyi, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-41">
     Mollel et al., 2023
    </xref>). This inquiry will focus on identifying prevalent digital technologies within the healthcare supply chain, analyzing their perceived benefits and drawbacks from the perspective of public health sector staff and users (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-36">
     Marić et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-9">
     Borges do Nascimento et al., 2023
    </xref>). Furthermore, it will explore the educational and training initiatives necessary to bridge digital literacy gaps and foster a more receptive environment for technology adoption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-1">
     Aboelmaged
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-1">
     et al., 2020
    </xref>). The review will also consider the policy and regulatory frameworks that either facilitate or impede the adoption of digital health supply chain innovations, drawing parallels with other low-resource settings to contextualize findings for Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-54">
     Ramanujapuram
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-54">
     &amp; Malemarpuram, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-3">
     Agarwal et al., 2020
    </xref>). The objective is to consolidate fragmented knowledge regarding digital technology adoption within humanitarian and public health supply chains, thereby addressing a critical gap in the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-36">
     Marić et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-34">
     Mahroof et al., 2023
    </xref>).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review</title>
   <p>This systematic literature review will critically analyze existing studies concerning digital supply chain technology adoption, specifically focusing on the human dimensions of awareness, acceptance, and readiness within public health contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-5">
     Altay et al., 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-58">
     Shrivastav &amp; Bag, 2023
    </xref>). The review aims to identify key facilitators and barriers to technology integration, drawing insights from both global literature and studies relevant to similar socio-economic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-30">
     Leonardo &amp; Santosa, 2024
    </xref>). This approach will involve a comprehensive search across multiple databases to capture a broad spectrum of research on digital transformation in humanitarian and health supply chains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-58">
     Shrivastav &amp; Bag, 2023
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-13">
     Chilicaus et al., 2025
    </xref>). The scarcity of adequately resourced supply chains in low- and middle-income countries underscores the importance of this investigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-62">
     Subramanian, 2020
    </xref>). Therefore, understanding the human factors influencing technology adoption in these settings is paramount for successful implementation and sustainable improvements in public health outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-65">
     Tadesse et al., 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Conceptual Framework</title>
    <p>This study’s conceptual framework integrates established models of technology acceptance and diffusion, tailored to the specific characteristics of digital supply chain technologies within a developing economy context, to elucidate the complex interplay of individual and organizational factors influencing adoption. It specifically draws upon elements from the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovations theory, and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to analyze user perceptions and organizational preparedness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-2">
      Adjei‐Bamfo et al., 2020
     </xref>). This integrated framework will enable a comprehensive examination of how factors such as perceived usefulness, ease of use, social influence, and facilitating conditions collectively shape the adoption trajectories of digital supply chain technologies in Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-66">
      Tagwireyi, 2020
     </xref>). Furthermore, it incorporates the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental framework to account for the broader contextual influences impacting digital transformation within Zimbabwean logistics companies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-50">
      Orji et al., 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-72">
      Vu et al., 2025
     </xref>). This holistic approach will help to identify the specific barriers and enablers for widespread adoption, particularly considering the early stage of digital technology integration in many industrial sectors within developing economies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-50">
      Orji et al., 2020
     </xref>). The framework will also consider the interplay between these theoretical constructs and the practical realities of infrastructural limitations, skill gaps, and regulatory environments prevalent in such regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-59">
      Singh, 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-6">
      Attaran, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Factors Influencing Technology Adoption in Organizations</title>
    <p>A multitude of factors, ranging from individual psychological traits to organizational culture and external environmental pressures, collectively shape the trajectory of technology adoption within an organizational setting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-17">
      Díaz-Arancibia et al., 2024
     </xref>). These factors often include the perceived benefits of the technology, the availability of adequate training and support, and the alignment of the technology with existing organizational processes and goals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-69">
      Tavana et al., 2024
     </xref>). Furthermore, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology integrates several seminal models, specifying performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions as core predictors of both intentions to use and actual system usage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-19">
      Ðula
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-19">
      et al., 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-60">
      Srivastava et al., 2021
     </xref>). The Technology Acceptance Model further elaborates on this by emphasizing the connection between users’ perceived usefulness and ease of use in influencing their adoption behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-51">
      Qawqzeh
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-51">
      et al., 2025
     </xref>). These frameworks, however, often require adaptation and contextualization to fully capture the nuances of technology adoption in diverse operational environments, particularly concerning the interaction between humans and advanced technological systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-70">
      Toader et al., 2023
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-51">
      Qawqzeh et al., 2025
     </xref>). Moreover, organizational culture, leadership support, and effective communication strategies are pivotal in fostering an environment conducive to technology assimilation, thereby mitigating resistance to change and enhancing collective readiness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-10">
      Cagno et al., 2024
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Employee Attitudes toward Technological Change</title>
    <p>Employee attitudes are critically shaped by their perceptions of the benefits, risks, and personal impact of new technologies, directly influencing their willingness to engage with and integrate these advancements into their daily workflows. These perceptions are often mediated by factors such as job security concerns, skill obsolescence anxieties, and the perceived fairness of the implementation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-8">
      Barbu et al., 2025
     </xref>). However, perceived threats to job security are not uniform across all employees and can be influenced by individual and situational characteristics such as formal training, departmental roles, and the specific technology being introduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-71">
      Trenerry
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-71">
      et al., 2021
     </xref>). Moreover, a supportive organizational culture that prioritizes employee well-being and provides opportunities for reskilling can significantly mitigate negative attitudes towards technological change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-43">
      Muk
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-43">
      tamar &amp; Nurnaningsih, 2024
     </xref>). Conversely, positive attitudes, often fostered through transparent communication, perceived organizational support, and opportunities for upskilling, can accelerate the adoption process and enhance the effective integration of new systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-16">
      Daly et al., 2025
     </xref>). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology further highlights that effort expectancy, particularly in the initial stages, and social influence are critical drivers of adoption, with age and work experience also moderating these effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-26">
      Kim et al., 2024
     </xref>). Ultimately, the user’s attitude towards new technologies, significantly influenced by their comfort levels and perceptions of the innovation, plays a crucial role in their acceptance and integration within various operational contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-57">
      Shata &amp; Hartley, 2025
     </xref>). This underscores the necessity of investigating the specific psychological and social determinants influencing technology adoption within the unique socio-economic landscape of Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-55">
      Schlicher et al., 2022
     </xref>). This research seeks to bridge this gap by examining the interplay of awareness, acceptance, and readiness among staff and users in Zimbabwe regarding digital supply chain technologies.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. User Readiness for Digital Transformation</title>
    <p>Digital transformation readiness encompasses the preparedness of individuals and organizations to embrace, implement, and leverage new digital technologies to achieve strategic objectives. This readiness is not solely technical but also involves psychological dimensions, including employees’ individual innovativeness and their intrinsic motivation to adapt to new tools and processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-46">
      Nguyen et al., 2023
     </xref>). It also encompasses the organizational capacity to provide adequate training, resources, and a supportive environment that facilitates the seamless integration of digital solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-47">
      Noriega Del Valle et al., 2024
     </xref>). The propensity of individuals to embrace and utilize new technologies, known as technology readiness, is profoundly influenced by their levels of optimism and innovativeness, which serve as key motivational factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-11">
      Çetindamar
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-11">
      et al., 2021
     </xref>). Conversely, feelings of discomfort and insecurity can act as significant inhibitors to technology adoption, necessitating targeted interventions to build confidence and alleviate apprehension among users (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-47">
      Noriega Del Valle et al., 2024
     </xref>). Understanding the digital divide, characterized by disparities in infrastructure and knowledge, is therefore crucial for assessing overall readiness and formulating effective adoption strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-38">
      Mazwane
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-38">
      et al., 2023
     </xref>). In Zimbabwe, despite a relatively high technological adoption rate of 3.7 out of 5, the actual technological readiness remains lower at 2.8 out of 5, suggesting a disconnect between perceived adoption and effective utilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-35">
      Maphosa &amp; Maphosa, 2022
     </xref>). This disparity highlights the critical need for a deeper investigation into the underlying factors impeding genuine technological integration and optimal utilization within the Zimbabwean context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-39">
      Mhlanga et al., 2014
     </xref>). This study therefore delves into the attitudes and behaviors of staff and users toward digital supply chain technologies in Zimbabwe, specifically gauging their awareness, acceptance, and readiness for these advancements.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Digital Supply Chain in Developing Economies</title>
    <p>The unique challenges and opportunities within developing economies, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, significantly influence the adoption and integration of digital supply chain technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-28">
      Kuteyi
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-28">
      &amp; Winkler, 2022
     </xref>). These challenges often include inadequate infrastructure, limited financial resources, and a lack of skilled personnel, while opportunities arise from the potential for leapfrogging traditional development stages and addressing inefficiencies in existing supply chains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-49">
      Ogah &amp; Onuoha, 2022
     </xref>). For instance, humanitarian logistics in developing regions frequently grapples with disruptions due to poor infrastructure, underscoring the potential for digital solutions to enhance resilience and efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-7">
      Baffoe &amp; Luo, 2021
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Furthermore, the recent COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical need for robust, technology-driven logistics solutions in developing economies to manage complex supply chains effectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-63">
      Sumbal et al., 2023
     </xref>). In this context, technologies like blockchain, despite facing adoption challenges at the individual level, offer considerable promise for enhancing transparency, traceability, and overall efficiency within these intricate supply networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-52">
      Queiroz &amp; Wamba, 2018
     </xref>). The increased demand for digital solutions, including Industry 4.0 and IoT-based cyber-physical systems, highlights the potential for digital supply chains and Logistics 4.0 to improve visibility, consumer responsiveness, and flexibility in these dynamic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-28">
      Kuteyi
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-28">
      &amp; Winkler, 2022
     </xref>). However, the successful integration of digitalized logistics practices in low-income countries requires careful consideration of local contexts and infrastructure limitations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-65">
      Tadesse et al., 2021
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Challenges and Opportunities in the Zimbabwean Public Health Sector Context</title>
    <p>The Zimbabwean context presents a unique dichotomy, characterized by both significant barriers to digital technology adoption, such as macroeconomic instability and inadequate infrastructure, and nascent opportunities for leveraging digital supply chain technologies to foster economic growth and resilience (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-37">
      Mateko
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-37">
      , 2024
     </xref>). This duality necessitates a thorough investigation into the specific challenges encountered and opportunities available for implementing advanced digital solutions within its distinct operational landscape (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-45">
      Mupemhi
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-45">
      &amp; Muposhi, 2018
     </xref>). For instance, despite the acknowledged benefits of information and communication technology in procurement processes, adoption rates in public entities in Zimbabwe are hindered by financial constraints and skill shortages, underscoring the need for committed leadership and adequate resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-33">
      Mabhodha
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-33">
      &amp; Choga, 2021
     </xref>). Such challenges are often compounded by insufficient digital infrastructure, which can impede the seamless integration and operation of advanced supply chain systems, alongside a lack of skilled personnel necessary to manage these sophisticated technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-20">
      Habib et al., 2025
     </xref>). Furthermore, prevailing socio-economic factors like high social inequalities, informality, and corruption further complicate technology adoption in emerging economies such as Zimbabwe, impeding the effective deployment and utilization of digital tools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-34">
      Mahroof
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-34">
      et al., 2023
     </xref>). However, the proactive engagement of the Zimbabwean government and international organizations, as evidenced by initiatives to strengthen health sector supply chains, indicates a growing recognition of the strategic importance of technological advancement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-32">
      Lesego
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-32">
      et al., 2023
     </xref>). These efforts, encompassing improvements in infrastructure, training, and equipment, are crucial for overcoming existing limitations in public service supply chains within low-resource environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      Lesego
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      et al., 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-54">
      Ramanujapuram &amp; Malemarpuram, 2020
     </xref>). This ongoing commitment to enhancing public sector logistics, particularly within the health sector, presents a unique opportunity to assess the prevailing attitudes and behaviors towards digital supply chain technologies among key stakeholders in Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-22">
      Hove et al., 2024
     </xref>). This research, therefore, focuses on understanding the awareness, acceptance, and readiness for these technological advancements within this specific national context.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <p>To thoroughly investigate these aspects, a robust methodological framework was employed to capture the nuanced perspectives of various stakeholders. This study utilized a systematic literature review approach, meticulously synthesizing existing research to identify key themes, gaps, and emerging trends related to digital supply chain technology adoption in developing economies like Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-48">
     OBAZELE &amp; Osuji, 2025
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-44">
     Munyede &amp; Mapuva, 2020
    </xref>). The systematic literature analysis involved critical stages, including the precise definition of research questions and the formulation of a comprehensive search strategy with the following electronic databases systematically searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for grey literature. The search strategy incorporated a broad range of the following keywords: “(‘digital technology’ OR ‘e-health’ OR ‘m-health’) AND (‘supply chain’ OR ‘logistics management’) AND (‘public health’ OR ‘healthcare’) AND (‘Zimbabwe’ OR ‘developing country’ OR ‘low-income countr’) AND (‘adoption’ OR ‘awareness’ OR ‘acceptance’ OR ‘readiness’)” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-17">
     Díaz-Arancibia et al., 2024
    </xref>). This meticulous process ensured the inclusion of high-quality, relevant research that directly addressed the study’s objectives regarding attitudes and behaviors towards digital supply chain technology adoption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-27">
     Kshetri
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-27">
     , 2021
    </xref>). This methodology mirrors established systematic review frameworks, ensuring a structured and transparent process for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing relevant literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-68">
     Taufiq et al., 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-56">
     Selvanesan &amp; Satanarachchi, 2023
    </xref>). This structured approach facilitated the extraction of pertinent data points concerning the drivers and barriers to digital technology integration in public health supply chains, especially in contexts analogous to Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-65">
     Tadesse et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-53">
     Rafifing et al., 2025
    </xref>). The subsequent screening process involved title and abstract review, followed by full-text evaluation, to ensure that only studies directly addressing the research objectives were included in the final synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-42">
     Mugoni et al., 2022
    </xref>). This rigorous selection process aimed to minimize bias and enhance the reliability and validity of the synthesized findings.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <p>This section synthesizes the empirical findings from the systematic literature review, categorizing key barriers and facilitators influencing the adoption of digital supply chain technologies within the public health sectors of developing nations, with a specific focus on insights applicable to Zimbabwe. The analysis integrates findings on digital transformation, highlighting the complex interplay of technological, organizational, environmental, and human factors.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Identified Barriers to Digital Supply Chain Technology Adoption</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-"></xref>The systematic review identified critical barriers to the adoption of digital supply chain technologies in Zimbabwe’s public health sector, particularly in low-resource settings. Key obstacles include infrastructural limitations, such as inadequate digital infrastructure characterized by poor connectivity and unreliable electricity, alongside high costs for digital devices and internet access, which exacerbate the digital divide. Human capital deficits are also significant, with limited digital literacy among healthcare workers and resistance to change hindering technology deployment. Additionally, fragmented legacy systems and procurement inefficiencies complicate the integration process. Macroeconomic instability poses another challenge, restricting financial resources and strategic investments necessary for technology adoption. Financial constraints further limit public entities’ ability to invest in digital technologies. Socio-economic factors like social inequalities, informality, and corruption also impede effective implementation. Finally, a notable concern is the high failure rate of digital transformation initiatives, with around 70% failing to achieve their objectives due to these multifaceted challenges in the healthcare sector.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Identified Facilitators and Opportunities for Digital Supply Chain Technology Adoption</title>
    <p>The review highlights several facilitators and opportunities that can drive the successful adoption of digital supply chain technologies in Zimbabwe’s public health sector. Key enablers include strong, collaborative leadership and effective change management, with an emphasis on committed leadership and adequate resources to address financial and skill-related barriers. Engagement from the government and international organizations is also crucial, demonstrating a commitment to strengthening health sector supply chains through technological advancement. Technological benefits such as enhanced efficiency, improved inventory management, and transparent systems are emphasized, with user-friendly designs facilitating adoption. A human-centric approach is vital, underscoring the need for comprehensive training programs to enhance digital literacy, promote perceived ease of use, and demonstrate the value of digital systems. Providing incentives for regular tool usage and fostering a culture of acceptance among staff are essential for overcoming resistance to change. Lastly, systemic improvements, including supply chain integration, agility, and robust digital reverse supply chains utilizing technologies like blockchain and IoT, are critical in enhancing overall performance and resilience in public health management. Collectively, these factors represent a path forward for integrating digital supply chain technologies effectively.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-"></xref>4.3. User Attitudes and Readiness Landscape</title>
    <p>The review highlights that although staff and users in Zimbabwe show readiness to adopt digital technologies, actual acceptance and successful implementation depend on addressing key facilitators. User perceptions and organizational readiness play crucial roles in digital transformation. Employee attitudes toward change are influenced by their views on benefits, risks, and personal impact. Despite a relatively high perceived adoption rate, the country faces a lower level of technological readiness, indicating a gap between willingness and effective utilization, primarily due to infrastructural and human capacity challenges.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>This section delves into the interpretation of the synthesized findings regarding the awareness, acceptance, and readiness for digital supply chain technologies within Zimbabwe’s public health sector. It elucidates the implications of these findings for successful implementation and sustained utilization, rigorously connecting them to the integrated conceptual framework comprising the Technology Acceptance Model, Diffusion of Innovations theory, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental framework (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-2">
     Adjei‐Bamfo et al., 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The identified barriers and facilitators underscore a complex interplay of technological, organizational, environmental, and human factors, reaffirming the multifaceted nature of technology adoption in developing economies. This discussion highlights the critical need for a holistic approach that addresses not only procedural weaknesses but also underlying governance deficits, infrastructural limitations, and human-centric considerations to optimize resource allocation, improve public health outcomes, and strengthen the overall resilience of the healthcare system against future disruptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-18">
     Dolan et al., 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <sec id="s5_1">
    <title>5.1. Interpreting Barriers through the Conceptual Framework</title>
    <p>The systematic review unveiled several critical barriers hindering the successful integration and sustained utilization of digital supply chain technologies. These obstacles are not merely practical challenges but reflect profound influences on the constructs within our integrated conceptual framework.</p>
    <p>The pervasive issues of inadequate digital infrastructure, including poor network connectivity and inconsistent electricity supply, alongside high costs of digital devices and internet, directly undermine the Facilitating Conditions construct of UTAUT (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-50">
      Orji et al., 2020
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-72">
      Vu et al., 2025
     </xref>). Facilitating conditions, defined as the degree to which an individual believes that an organizational and technical infrastructure exists to support the use of the system, are foundational for technology adoption. In Zimbabwe’s public health sector, the absence of reliable infrastructure means that even if individuals perceive high Performance Expectancy or Effort Expectancy, the external conditions prevent actual use, leading to a gap between intention and behavior. This also strongly aligns with the Environmental Context of the TOE framework, where the external technological infrastructure and regulatory environment dictate the feasibility of adoption. From a DOI perspective, such infrastructural deficiencies heighten the Complexity of using digital tools, thereby hindering their Diffusion throughout the health system. The implication for Zimbabwe is that fundamental investments in national digital infrastructure are a prerequisite for any meaningful digital transformation in public health, as without them, user acceptance and readiness cannot translate into effective utilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-72">
      Vu et al., 2025
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The findings of limited digital literacy, skill deficits, and resistance to change among healthcare workers are critical from the perspective of TAM and UTAUT. Limited literacy directly impacts Perceived Ease of Use and Effort Expectancy; if a system is perceived as difficult to learn or use, individuals will be less likely to adopt it, regardless of its perceived benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-72">
      Vu et al., 2025
     </xref>). Resistance to change, as observed in similar regions, directly affects Attitude Toward Using and can diminish Behavioral Intention. This resistance may stem from a lack of Compatibility with existing practices or values, or a perceived threat to job security. The existence of fragmented systems and procurement inefficiencies speaks to the Organizational Context of the TOE framework, indicating internal structural and operational challenges that impede the seamless integration of new technologies and create a complex environment for their deployment. For Zimbabwe, this highlights an urgent need for comprehensive training programs tailored to different user groups, alongside robust change management strategies to foster a culture of acceptance and mitigate resistance by improving Effort Expectancy and demonstrating Perceived Usefulness.</p>
    <p>Macroeconomic instability, financial constraints, social inequalities, informality, and corruption largely fall under the Environmental Context of the TOE framework. These external conditions significantly constrain the resources available for technological investment and create an unpredictable operational environment. These factors also negatively impact Facilitating Conditions by limiting access to necessary resources and support for technology implementation. From a DOI perspective, financial constraints limit the Trialability and large-scale adoption of innovations. The implication is that even with strong political will and user readiness, the broader economic and governance landscape in Zimbabwe presents formidable hurdles that require high-level policy interventions and sustained investment beyond just the health sector to stabilize the Environmental Context for successful digital transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-21">
      Heeres et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The documented high failure rate of digital transformation initiatives (70%) signifies a critical gap in achieving anticipated Perceived Usefulness or Performance Expectancy. If previous implementations have failed, it can erode trust and reduce future Behavioral Intention to adopt new systems, regardless of their theoretical benefits. This also speaks to a failure in managing the Organizational Context during implementation, suggesting inadequate change management, resource allocation, or strategic alignment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-72">
      Vu et al., 2025
     </xref>). For Zimbabwe, this finding underscores the need for meticulous planning, realistic expectations, and adaptive implementation strategies that account for unique local challenges, rather than simply replicating models from developed contexts, to ensure that Performance Expectancy is met and to avoid negative Social Influence from past failures.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_2">
    <title>5.2. Interpreting Facilitators and Opportunities through the Conceptual Framework</title>
    <p>Conversely, the identified facilitators offer clear pathways for successful adoption, reinforcing the importance of specific theoretical constructs in the Zimbabwean public health sector.</p>
    <p>Collaborative leadership, effective change management, committed leadership, and adequate resources are critical in fostering a conducive Organizational Context. Committed leadership and proactive engagement from the government and international organizations strongly influence Social Influence, where leaders’ endorsement and resource allocation encourage adoption among staff (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-21">
      Heeres et al., 2023
     </xref>). This also creates positive Facilitating Conditions by ensuring the availability of resources and support. The implication for Zimbabwe is that strong, visible leadership from both within the health sector and governmental bodies is crucial to champion digital transformation, allocate necessary funds, drive policy alignment, and positively shape Social Influence for technology adoption.</p>
    <p>The potential for enhanced efficiency and resilience, improved inventory management and information sharing, transparency, and traceability directly corresponds to Perceived Usefulness and Performance Expectancy. When users clearly perceive that a new technology will improve their job performance and achieve desired outcomes, their Behavioral Intention to use it increases. These benefits also represent the Relative Advantage of digital technologies over traditional methods. The emphasis on user-friendly system designs directly addresses Perceived Ease of Use and Effort Expectancy, making the technology less complex and thus more likely to be adopted. For Zimbabwe, focusing on demonstrating these tangible benefits and ensuring intuitive system designs is vital to garnering user acceptance and driving adoption by enhancing Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-3">
      Agarwal et al., 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The emphasis on adequate training and capacity building, the importance of perceived ease of use and demonstrated value, incentives for regular use, and fostering a culture of acceptance are all central to the individual-level constructs of the conceptual framework. Training directly improves Effort Expectancy and builds confidence, thereby enhancing Perceived Ease of Use. Demonstrated value reinforces Perceived Usefulness (TAM/UTAUT). Incentives act as strong Facilitating Conditions by providing resources or rewards that support technology use. Fostering a culture of acceptance impacts Social Influence and addresses issues of Compatibility. The implication is that a human-centered design approach to implementation in Zimbabwe, focusing on user needs, continuous support, and clear communication of benefits, will be more effective than a purely technology-driven approach, directly impacting individual Attitude Toward Using and Behavioral Intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-25">
      Khumalo &amp; Moloi, 2025
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-22">
      Hove et al., 2024
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The focus on supply chain integration, agility, and resilience, as well as robust digital reverse supply chains, relates to the Technological Context and overall strategic capabilities. These are the desired organizational-level outcomes that digital technologies are meant to achieve, enhancing the Perceived Usefulness/Performance Expectancy at an organizational level. For Zimbabwe, strategically leveraging technologies like blockchain and IoT can not only improve specific supply chain functions but also contribute to the overall resilience and agility of the health system, which is a critical Relative Advantage in a challenging operating environment. This demonstrates how technological advancements within the TOE framework drive Performance Expectancy at a macro level.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s5_3">
    <title>5.3. Connecting User Attitudes and Readiness to the Conceptual Framework</title>
    <p>The findings concerning user attitudes and readiness are particularly salient for validating and refining the conceptual framework within the Zimbabwean context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-21">
      Heeres et al., 2023
     </xref>). The observation that staff and users express a general readiness to adopt new digital technologies, yet actual acceptance and successful implementation are contingent on facilitators being addressed, directly illustrates the gap between Behavioral Intention (readiness/willingness) and Use Behavior (actual implementation) as theorized in UTAUT. This gap is precisely where Facilitating Conditions (e.g., infrastructure, training, resources) play their crucial role. A high Behavioral Intention cannot translate into actual usage if the necessary Facilitating Conditions are absent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      Lesego
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      et al., 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-67">
      Taruvinga et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The understanding that employee attitudes are shaped by their perceptions of the benefits, risks, and personal impact of new technologies aligns perfectly with TAM’s Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use, as well as UTAUT’s Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy. If the perceived risks (e.g., job security, complexity) outweigh the perceived benefits, Attitude Toward Using will be negative, hindering acceptance.</p>
    <p>Crucially, the disparity between Zimbabwe’s relatively high perceived technological adoption rate (3.7/5) and lower actual technological readiness (2.8/5) due to infrastructural and human capacity limitations provides empirical evidence for the moderating role of Facilitating Conditions in UTAUT. Individuals may be optimistic and innovative (Technology Readiness Index components), thus having a high Behavioral Intention to adopt, but a lack of supporting infrastructure, skills, or resources (poor Facilitating Conditions, negative Environmental Context) prevents them from translating that intention into effective utilization. This highlights that simply desiring to use technology is not enough; the supporting ecosystem, encompassing the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental contexts, must be robust (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      Lesego
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-31">
      et al., 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-67">
      Taruvinga et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>In summary, the empirical findings from Zimbabwe’s public health sector largely support the integrated conceptual framework. The identified barriers directly underscore weaknesses in Facilitating Conditions, adverse Environmental Contexts, and challenges to Effort Expectancy and Perceived Ease of Use. Conversely, facilitators highlight the importance of a strong Organizational Context, enhanced Perceived Usefulness/Performance Expectancy (TAM/UTAUT), positive Social Influence, and effective strategies to improve Effort Expectancy and Compatibility. The observed gap between perceived adoption and actual readiness vividly illustrates the critical mediating role of environmental and organizational factors in shaping individual technology adoption behaviors within a developing economy, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive, theoretically grounded approach to digital transformation.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This systematic review underscores the imperative for Zimbabwe’s public health sector to strategically address attitudinal and behavioral factors influencing the adoption of digital supply chain technologies. The findings highlight that a lack of robust digital infrastructure, limited digital literacy, and insufficient training are significant barriers to successful implementation, impeding the potential for enhanced efficiency and resilience in the healthcare supply chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-3">
     Agarwal et al., 2020
    </xref>). Therefore, a multi-faceted approach incorporating infrastructure development, comprehensive training programs, and fostering a culture of acceptance is essential for realizing the transformative potential of these technologies within the Zimbabwean context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-24">
     Karamagi
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-24">
     et al., 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-23">
     Kaboré et al., 2022
    </xref>). This includes overcoming challenges such as poor network infrastructure, inconsistent electricity supply, and high internet costs, which are prevalent in low- and middle-income countries like Zimbabwe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-37">
     Mateko
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-37">
     , 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-22">
     Hove et al., 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-4">
     Ahmed et al., 2025
    </xref>). Acceptance, readiness, and awareness among staff and users are critical, requiring ongoing engagement and education to bridge the gap between technological potential and practical application in resource-constrained environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-24">
     Karamagi
    </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-24">
     et al., 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-12">
     Chidhau et al., 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <sec id="s6_1">
    <title>6.1. Recommendations</title>
    <p>Based on the critical barriers identified in the systematic literature review, the following recommendations are put forth to enhance awareness, acceptance, and readiness for digital supply chain technology adoption within Zimbabwe’s public health sector.</p>
    <p>The review highlighted inadequate digital infrastructure, including poor network connectivity and inconsistent electricity supply, alongside the high costs of digital devices and internet as significant impediments. These pervasive issues limit access to essential digital services and hinder effective technology operation. A primary recommendation involves strategic investment in resilient and scalable digital infrastructure to ensure consistent connectivity and functionality across all public health facilities. This includes improving access to reliable electricity and affordable internet, which are fundamental prerequisites for supporting any digital health initiatives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-64">
      Sylla et al., 2024
     </xref>). Such foundational improvements are vital for enabling the effective deployment of digital supply chain technologies, ensuring data integrity, and facilitating real-time information exchange across the health system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-14">
      Chilunjika
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-14">
      , 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-22">
      Hove et al., 2024
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The literature identifies limited digital literacy among healthcare workers and a general lack of skilled personnel necessary to manage sophisticated technologies, including technical programming expertise, as a significant human capital deficit. Concurrently, developing local technical programming expertise is crucial for the initial setup and sustained maintenance of digital systems, ensuring their long-term viability and adaptability within the Zimbabwean context (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-14">
      Chilunjika
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-14">
      , 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-22">
      Hove et al., 2024
     </xref>). Furthermore, sustained efforts in capacity building and training programs are essential to equip healthcare professionals with the requisite digital literacy and technical skills for the effective utilization of these advanced systems. This training must be tailored to address the specific needs of diverse user groups, encompassing not only clinical staff but also logistics and administrative personnel. These initiatives should focus on practical application and problem-solving within the digital supply chain ecosystem, promoting a sense of ownership and competence among the workforce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-3">
      Agarwal et al., 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The review noted resistance to change among healthcare workers and that despite readiness, actual acceptance and implementation hinge on perceived ease of use and demonstrated value. Fostering user engagement through proactive strategies is crucial for technology adoption and maximizing the impact of digital interventions. This approach can cultivate a culture of acceptance and readiness, critical for overcoming resistance to change and ensuring the sustainable integration of digital tools within routine operations. Providing incentives for regular use of new digital tools is also recommended to encourage sustained utilization in public health settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-40">
      Mogessie
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-40">
      et al., 2021
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-3">
      Agarwal et al., 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Underlying challenges such as fragmented legacy systems and existing procurement inefficiencies complicate the adoption process. Moreover, the effectiveness relies on user-friendly system designs. The recommendation is to prioritize the development and implementation of user-friendly system designs that are compatible with existing processes and integrate seamlessly where possible. This will directly address the complexity introduced by fragmented systems and improve the perceived ease of use, thereby facilitating adoption and reducing the burden on users (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-15">
      Chilunjika
     </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.147391-15">
      &amp; Uwizeyimana, 2024
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aboelmaged, M., Hashem, G.,&amp;Mouakket, S. (2020). Predicting Subjective Well-Being among Mhealth Users: A Readiness—Value Model. International Journal of Information Management, 56, Article ID: 102247. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102247
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adjei-Bamfo, P., Domfeh, K. A., Bawole, J. N., Ahenkan, A., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., Adjei-Bamfo, S. et al. (2020). An E-Government Framework for Assessing Readiness for Public Sector E-Procurement in a Lower-Middle Income Country. Information Technology for Development, 26, 742-761. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1769542
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Agarwal, S., Glenton, C., Henschke, N., Tamrat, T., Bergman, H., Fønhus, M. S. et al. (2020). Tracking Health Commodity Inventory and Notifying Stock Levels via Mobile Devices: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, No. 10, CD012907. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012907.pub2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ahmed, M. M., Okesanya, O. J., Olaleke, N. O., Adigun, O. A., Adebayo, U. O., Oso, T. A. et al. (2025). Integrating Digital Health Innovations to Achieve Universal Health Coverage: Promoting Health Outcomes and Quality through Global Public Health Equity. Healthcare, 13, Article 1060. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13091060
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Altay, N., Heaslip, G., Kovács, G., Spens, K., Tatham, P.,&amp;Vaillancourt, A. (2023). Innovation in Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Annals of Operations Research, 335, 965-987. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05208-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Attaran, M. (2020). Digital Technology Enablers and Their Implications for Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21, 158-172. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1751568
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baffoe, B. O. K.,&amp;Luo, W. (2021). South African Executives Propensity to Use, Diffuse, and Adopt the Humanitarian Logistics Digital Business Ecosystem (HLDBE). Sage Open, 11, 1-18. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047246
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barbu, A., Ichimov, M. A. M., Costea-Marcu, I. C., Militaru, G., Deselnicu, D. C.,&amp;Moiceanu, G. (2025). Exploring Employee Perspectives on Workplace Technology: Usage, Roles, and Implications for Satisfaction and Performance. Behavioral Sciences, 15, Article 45. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010045
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Borges do Nascimento, I. J., Abdulazeem, H., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L. et al. (2023). Barriers and Facilitators to Utilizing Digital Health Technologies by Healthcare Professionals. npj Digital Medicine, 6, Article No. 161. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cagno, E., Accordini, D., Neri, A., Negri, E.,&amp;Macchi, M. (2024). Digital Solutions for Workplace Safety: An Empirical Study on Their Adoption in Italian Metalworking SMEs. Safety Science, 177, Article ID: 106598. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106598
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Çetindamar, D., Abedin, B.,&amp;Shirahada, K. (2021). The Role of Employees in Digital Transformation: A Preliminary Study on How Employees’ Digital Literacy Impacts Use of Digital Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 7837-7848. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3087724
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chidhau, S., Mutizwa, B.,&amp;R. Muzama, T. (2021). The Impact of the Digital Health Interventions in Curbing COVID-19 in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Clinical Inventions and Medical Science, 3, 40-52. &gt;https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijcims-0301.203
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chilicaus, G. C. F., Licapa-Redolfo, G. S., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Corrales Otazú, C. D., Apaza Miranda, S. J., Flores Castillo, M. M. et al. (2025). Digital Transformation and Sustainability in Post-Pandemic Supply Chains: A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Technological Evolution and Research Patterns (2020-2024). Sustainability, 17, Article 3009. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073009
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chilunjika, A. (2024). Application of Fourth Industrial Technologies: A Case of Zimbabwe’s Mines. Insights into Regional Development, 6, 124-140.&gt;https://doi.org/10.70132/a2354787553
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chilunjika, S. R. T.,&amp;Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2024). Blockchain Technology for Health Information Management: A Case of Zimbabwe. Insights into Regional Development, 6, 59-73. &gt;https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2024.6.1(5)
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Daly, S. J., Wiewiora, A.,&amp;Hearn, G. (2025). Shifting Attitudes and Trust in AI: Influences on Organizational AI Adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 215, Article ID: 124108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124108
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Díaz-Arancibia, J., Hochstetter-Diez, J., Bustamante-Mora, A., Sepúlveda-Cuevas, S., Albayay, I.,&amp;Arango-López, J. (2024). Navigating Digital Transformation and Technology Adoption: A Literature Review from Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Countries. Sustainability, 16, Article 5946. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145946
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dolan, S. B., Alao, M. E., Mwansa, F. D., Lymo, D. C., Bulula, N., Carnahan, E. et al. (2020). Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Introduction and Adoption of Electronic Immunization Registries in Tanzania and Zambia: A Mixed Methods Study. Implementation Science Communications, 1, Article No. 38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00022-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ðula, I., Berberena, T., Keplinger, K.,&amp;Wirzberger, M. (2024). From Challenges to Opportunities: Navigating the Human Response to Automated Agents in the Workplace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article No. 1454. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03962-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Habib, M. M., Chowdhury, F., Sabah, S., Shuvo, T. F.,&amp;Raisa, R. (2025). Investigating the Technological Impact on RMG Supply Chain: A Post-Pandemic Scenario. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 15, 974-994. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2025.157046
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Heeres, T. J., Tran, T. M.,&amp;Noort, B. A. C. (2023). Drivers and Barriers to Implementing the Internet of Things in the Health Care Supply Chain: Mixed Methods Multicase Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e48730. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2196/48730
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hove, M. T., Ngwenya, H.,&amp;Madhazi, K. (2024). Digital Advisory Systems in Zimbabwean Agriculture: Opportunities and Constraints. Agricultural Sciences, 15, 1315-1339. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2024.1511072
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kaboré, S. S., Ngangue, P., Soubeiga, D., Barro, A., Pilabré, A. H., Bationo, N. et al. (2022). Barriers and Facilitators for the Sustainability of Digital Health Interventions in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, Article 1014375. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.1014375
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karamagi, H. C., Muneene, D., Droti, B., Jepchumba, V., Okeibunor, J. C., Nabyonga, J. et al. (2022). eHealth or E-Chaos: The Use of Digital Health Interventions for Health Systems Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa over the Last 10 Years: A Scoping Review. Journal of Global Health, 12, Article ID: 04090. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04090
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khumalo, M. H.,&amp;Moloi, T. S. (2025). Barriers to Digital Transformation in Gauteng’s Municipal Health Clinics. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 6, a282. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v6i0.282
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kim, Y., Blazquez, V.,&amp;Oh, T. (2024). Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies: Applying the UTAUT Model. Behavioral Sciences, 14, Article 1035. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kshetri, N. (2021). Blockchain and Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Developing Countries. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article ID: 102376. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102376
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kuteyi, D.,&amp;Winkler, H. (2022). Logistics Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa and Opportunities for Digitalization. Sustainability, 14, Article 2399. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042399
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, A. T., Ramasamy, R. K.,&amp;Subbarao, A. (2025). Understanding Psychosocial Barriers to Healthcare Technology Adoption: A Review of TAM Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and UTAUT Frameworks. Healthcare, 13, Article 250. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13030250
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Leonardo, M. C.,&amp;Santosa, W. (2024). Systematic Literature Review and Future Re-search Agenda on Change and Innovation Management Focusing on Technology Adoption and Digital Transformation. SSRN. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5004709 &gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5004709 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lesego, A., Were, L. P. O., Tsegaye, T., Idris, R., Morrison, L., Peterson, T. et al. (2024). Health System Lessons from the Global Fund-Supported Procurement and Supply Chain Investments in Zimbabwe: A Mixed Methods Study. BMC Health Services Research, 24, Article No. 557. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11028-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lesego, A., Were, L., Tsegaye, T., Idris, R., Morrison, L., Peterson, T., Elhussein, S., Antonio, E., Magwindiri, G., Dumba, I., Mtambirwa, C., Madzikwa, N., Simbi, R., Ndlovu, M.,&amp;Achoki, T. (2023). Lessons from the Global Fund-Supported Procurement and Supply Chain Investments in Zimbabwe: A Mixed Methods Study. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2662781/v1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mabhodha, S.,&amp;Choga, F. (2021). The Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) on Procurement Processes: Case of Zimbabwean Urban Councils (2009 to 2018). Open Journal for Information Technology, 4, 25-34. &gt;https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojit.0401.03025m
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mahroof, K., Omar, A., Vann Yaroson, E., Tenebe, S. A., Rana, N. P., Sivarajah, U. et al. (2023). Evaluating the Intention to Use Industry 5.0 (I5.0) Drones for Cleaner Production in Sustainable Food Supply Chains: An Emerging Economy Context. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29, 468-496. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-01-2023-0045
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maphosa, V.,&amp;Maphosa, M. (2022). Factors Influencing the Adoption of ICT for Remote Work among Zimbabwean SMEs: A Case Study of Bulawayo Metropolitan Province. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 9, 150-158. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.03.017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marić, J., Galera-Zarco, C.,&amp;Opazo-Basáez, M. (2021). The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Context of Humanitarian Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review. Annals of Operations Research, 319, 1003-1044. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04079-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mateko, F. M. (2024). Digital Technologies and Economic Development in Zimbabwe. Development, 67, 85-90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-024-00400-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mazwane, S., Makhura, M. N., Senyolo, M. P.,&amp;Ginige, A. (2023). Value Chain Digitalisation and Adoption Intention by Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy (PLAS) Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Sustainability, 15, Article 15590. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115590
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mhlanga, S., Msipa, C. M., Chikowore, T. R., Mbohwa, C., Gwangwava, N.,&amp;Goriwondo, W. M. (2014). Assessment of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation in Zimbabwean Companies and Readiness Tool towards a Strategic Success Framework. Southern African Institute of Industrial Engineering. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mogessie, Y. G., Ntacyabukura, B., Mengesha, D. T., Musa, M. B., Wangari, M., Claude, N. et al. (2021). Digital Health and COVID-19: Challenges of Use and Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 38, Article No. 240. &gt;https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.38.240.27948
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mollel, H., Mushi, L.,&amp;Nkwera, R. V. (2023). Assessments of Effectiveness of Technologies Utilizations in VIHSCM among Selected Health Facilities in Tanzania Mainland. medRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). &gt;https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.31.23297838 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mugoni, E., Nyagadza, B.,&amp;Hove, P. K. (2022). Green Reverse Logistics Technology Impact on Agricultural Entrepreneurial Marketing Firms’ Operational Efficiency and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 2, Article ID: 100034. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100034
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muktamar, A.,&amp;Nurnaningsih A, N. A. (2024). Breaking Barriers: Unraveling the Complexities of HR Tech Integration. Management Studies and Business Journal (Productivity), 1, 224-237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.62207/8c2wpp17
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Munyede, P.,&amp;Mapuva, J. (2020). Exploring Public Procurement Reforms in Rural Local Authorities in Zimbabwe. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10, 1-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i1.15156
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mupemhi, S.,&amp;Muposhi, A. (2018). Organisational Factors Influencing E-Business Adoption in Zimbabwe’s Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 10, 176-187. &gt;https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v10i2(j).2227
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nguyen, T. T. T., Hong, P. T. T., Ngọc, T. T.,&amp;Tran, Ł. T. (2023). Determinants of Employee Digital Transformation Readiness and Job Performance: A Case of SMEs in Vietnam. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21, 226-239. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.18
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Noriega Del Valle, M., Łaba, K.,&amp;Mayer, C. (2024). Unlocking Technology Acceptance among South African Employees: A Psychological Perspective. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 50, a2177. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2177
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Obazele, E. O.,&amp;Osuji, S. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing E-Government Procurement Systems for Sustainable Procurement Reforms: A Case Study of Edo State. International Journal of innovative inventions in Social Science and Humanities, 2, 147-166. &gt;https://doi.org/10.58806/ijiissh.2025.v2i8n07
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ogah, M.,&amp;Onuoha, R. (2022). Digital Supply Chain in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multi-Country Study. In O. Adeola, J. N. Edeh, R. E. Hinson,&amp;F. Netswera (Eds.), Digital Service Delivery in Africa (pp. 107-132). Springer International Publishing. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83909-3_5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Huang, S.,&amp;Vazquez-Brust, D. (2020). Evaluating the Factors That Influence Blockchain Adoption in the Freight Logistics Industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, Article ID: 102025. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qawqzeh, Y., Shraah, A. A., Rizwan, A., Sánchez-Chero, M., More, L. A. V.,&amp;Shabaz, M. (2025). Exploring the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Training for Sustainable Health and Occupational Safety in Industry 4.0. Scientific Reports, 15, Article No. 28930. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14173-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Queiroz, M. M.,&amp;Fosso Wamba, S. (2018). Blockchain Adoption Challenges in Supply Chain: An Empirical Investigation of the Main Drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 70-82. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rafifing, N., Mabina, A., Rafifing, L. W., Mosinki, J.,&amp;Mphale, O. (2025). Exploring the Impact of IoT and Blockchain on Supply Chain Management in Developing Countries. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 7, 202-223. &gt;https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v7i1.997
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramanujapuram, A.,&amp;Malemarpuram, C. K. (2020). Enabling Sustainable Behaviors of Data Recording and Use in Low-Resource Supply Chains. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (pp. 65-75). ACM. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1145/3378393.3402248
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schlicher, K. D., Reddehase, J.,&amp;Maier, G. W. (2022). Is a Match Better than No Match? On the Interaction of Demands and Support during Technological Change. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 824010. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.824010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Selvanesan, H.,&amp;Satanarachchi, N. (2023). Potential for Synergetic Integration of Building Information Modelling, Blockchain and Supply Chain Management in Construction Industry. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 28, 662-691. &gt;https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.035
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shata, A.,&amp;Hartley, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Communication Technologies in Academia: Faculty Perceptions and the Adoption of Generative AI. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article No. 14. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shrivastav, S. K.,&amp;Bag, S. (2023). Humanitarian Supply Chain Management in the Digital Age: A Hybrid Review Using Published Literature and Social Media Data. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31, 2267-2301. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-04-2023-0273
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, P. K. K. (2024). Measuring the Broader Value Proposition of Digital Transformation in Supply Chains. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 13, 16-24. &gt;https://doi.org/10.59160/ijscm.v13i1.6222
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Srivastava, D. K., Kumar, V., Ekren, B. Y., Upadhyay, A., Tyagi, M.,&amp;Kumari, A. (2021). Adopting Industry 4.0 by Leveraging Organisational Factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, Article ID: 121439. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121439
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Steenkamp, I., Peltonen, L. M.,&amp;Chipps, J. (2025). Digital Health Readiness—Insights from Healthcare Leaders in Operational Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey. BMC Health Services Research, 25, Article No. 240. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12129-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Subramanian, L. (2020). Enabling Health Supply Chains for Improved Well-Being. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21, 229-236. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1776091
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sumbal, M. S., Ahmed, W., Shahzeb, H.,&amp;Chan, F. (2023). Sustainable Technology Strategies for Transportation and Logistics Challenges: An Implementation Feasibility Study. Sustainability, 15, Article 15224. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115224
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sylla, B., Ouedraogo, B., Traore, S., Ouedraogo, O., Savadogo, L. G. B.,&amp;Diallo, G. (2024). Current Status of Digital Health Interventions in the Health System in Burkina Faso. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24, Article No. 171. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02574-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tadesse, M. D., Gebresenbet, G., Tavasszy, L.,&amp;Ljungberg, D. (2021). Assessment of Digitalized Logistics for Implementation in Low-Income Countries. Future Transportation, 1, 227-247. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp1020014
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tagwireyi, C. M. (2020). The Impact of Information Technology as a Driver for Improved Supply Chain Management in the Zimbabwean Retail Sector. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy&amp;Governance, 6, 103-108. &gt;https://www.thescholedge.org/index.php/sijbpg/article/download/661/570 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Taruvinga, T., Chingono, R. S., Marambire, E., Larsson, L., Olaru, I. D., Sibanda, S. et al. (2023). Exploring COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Healthcare Workers in Zimbabwe: A Mixed Methods Study. PLOS Global Public Health, 3, e0002256. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002256
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Taufiq, R., Warnars, H. L. H. S., Soeparno, H.,&amp;Oktavia, T. (2024). Adoption of Blockchain Technology for ASCM Solution: A Systematic Literature Review. TEM Journal, 13, 2758-2772. &gt;https://doi.org/10.18421/tem134-13
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref69">
    <label>69</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tavana, M., Schoenherr, T., Cheng, Y., Kumar, A.,&amp;Ngai, E. W. T. (2024). Digital Operations Research Models for Intelligent Machines (Industry 4.0) and Man-Machine (Industry 5.0) Systems. Annals of Operations Research, 342, 1041-1047. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06366-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref70">
    <label>70</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Toader, D., Toader, C., Boca, G., Toader, R.,&amp;Rădulescu, A. T. G. (2023). The Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Higher Education: The Impact of Leadership Readiness. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12, 133-155. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2023.60389
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref71">
    <label>71</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y. et al. (2021). Preparing Workplaces for Digital Transformation: An Integrative Review and Framework of Multi-Level Factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 620766. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.147391-ref72">
    <label>72</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vu, P. T., Nguyen, H. X., Pham, Q. T. T.,&amp;Nguyen, P. V. (2025). Unpacking the Enablers and Barriers to Digital Transformation in Vietnamese Logistics Companies: A Qualitative Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8, 4210-4218. &gt;https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.6271
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>