<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2024.1211056</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSS-137952</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Early Cognitive Skills Through the Setting of Play-Design
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meryem</surname><given-names>Yalçın</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Esin</surname><given-names>Fakıbaba Dede</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara, Türkiye</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>10</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>837</fpage><lpage>844</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Considering the educational role that play activity undertakes in the early childhood, it is critically important for the multi-dimensional development of the children. It is also effective on improving their problem-solving skills and positive experiences. Space design and toy selection play an important role among the dimensions to be considered in the play therapy process. Play is main process effective benefits from instruments and toys for children to develop functional thoughts and behaviors. Cognitive and Behavioral Development is frequently used for children’s psycho-motor, cognitive, social, emotional, language and personality development. As a result, the concepts of accessibility/ergonomics, security, aesthetics, personal space, creativity, order, compulsion, hierarchy and autonomy were addressed in terms of the child-design relationship, and the importance of children playing an active role was emphasized by designing flexible, transformable with rich physical stimuli that supported the development of imagination, curiosity and creativity. Within the scope of the study, play-design relationship is discussed by focusing on how the act of children behavior and learning can be supported.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Play</kwd><kwd> Design</kwd><kwd> Early-Childhood</kwd><kwd> Cognitive Development</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>According to Froebel (1904), “Play is the greatest reflector of in-dividual development in early childhood”. Play includes real-life experiences and elements related to them in children’s lives. Children learn to express themselves and socialize by displaying their curiosity and creativity very openly through play. In other words, children rediscover the environment they live in while playing. Montessori, Piaget, Vygotsky and Waldorf Play Theories included in the study address child development from different aspects. According to Parry and Archer (1974), play has two aspects; the first is to keep children in the play area; the second is the educational aspect of play. Versatility and the ability to respond to the changing mental needs of the child are the most important educational points for play areas. Therefore, the instrument which the play is played is equally important as the play in child development (Gibson, 1986). Because the effect of this design on the physical, mental, social, sensory and psycho-motor development of children is quite important. Children’s stimulation and experience affect children’s development and perception providing the opportunities. Therefore, children’s development and needs should be well understood and the design instruments should be structured with the right stimuli in terms of child requirements, and the child-play relationship should be designed in terms of stimuli and experiences in which the child can be active. It is based on the child’s learning and experience. In addition, the main purpose in child development is to create opportunities which children can explore their ideas, offer flexible, thought-provoking diversity, and meet their psychological needs (Poyraz &amp; Dere, 2003). The experience that play provides: Stimulation, Creativity, Encouraging, Challenging, Motivation, Imagination, Multi-Purpose, Critical Thinking, Socialization (G&#252;rb&#252;z at al., 2021; Hughes, 2009; Read, 2007; Alqudah, 2003; Moore et al., 1996). Play Design: child development, developmental characteristics, anthropometric and psychosocial data, age-gender, Functional objectives; Comfort, Aesthetic, Warmth, Easy Usage, Colors, Softness, Adaptability, Luxurious (Hughes, 2009; Alqudah, 2003; Korpella et al., 2002; G&#252;r And Zorlu, 2002). And finally, Ergonomics, Size, Hygiene, Healthy, Accessibility, Sensitivity, Flexibility, Security. All these objective of design criteria that should be considered when creating a play.</p><p>A rich content play experience designed considering the differences of each child can establish relationships through the areas of interest they have acquired. It is emphasized that the idea should be consistency in qualitative experience criteria and the style of interaction design should be specified (Dudek, 2012).</p><p>Hypotheses:</p><p>H1: There will be a difference in design criteria between designers and child development experts in terms of cognitive evaluations;</p><p>H2: There will be a difference in the functional design criteria between child development experts and designers play instruments.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Children Cognitive Development and Design Theories</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Design Theories</title><p>Children recognition of objects, the concept of learning’s has revealed through “Experimental Psychology” that there is a close connection between the learning processes and levels of children and the environment. The fact that the stimuli created by the physical and social environment turn into an experience, discovery and learning for children (Dudek, 2012; G&#252;r &amp; Zorlu, 2002; Weinstein, 1987; Moore et al., 1996). Many theories have developed regarding these learning processes and concepts. According to one of these, critical theory, critical pedagogy can challenge the everyday activities and practices that people are familiar with, exploring the relationship between power and knowledge (Sanoff, 1995).</p><p>Ecological systems theory is a system that interconnects the experiences of individuals with an environmental perspective on child development. The physical content of the play design is based on the concrete stages of the experience. According to Moore at al. (1996) physical content, physical elements, design-supporting and impressive elements affect the user psychologically (Korpella at al., 2002). Experience uses metaphor or theme infrastructure elements with the perspective of the design concept supporting the physical content. Effective psychological content is concise, strong, reflects all sensory elements and is like all comprehensible equipment (Pallasmaa, 2005).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Play as An Early Learning Setting</title><p>Development is a multifaceted and complex process. Children constantly grow, change and improvement. It would be correct to interpret this process holistically because each developmental area affects each other (Day &amp; MIidbjer, 2007). For Piaget, development is a process of change in which children, which is discovering their world, revise their knowledge in a way that more closely matches reality and thus reach a state of balance between their knowledge and the nature of the physical and social world. Vygotsky (1978) viewed development as a socially transmitted process and argued that children acquire knowledge and skills through dialogues with more skilled and experienced members of their society. From the moment a child is born, they change and progress in different aspects. It is possible to talk about many different parameters for this process to proceed healthily without interruption. One of the key elements of development, especially in early childhood, is learning. In childhood, the response to learning motivation occurs primarily through play. Play is one of the most effective teachers of a child’s development period. It plays a major role in children’s fun, learning, relaxation, growth, and self-discovery. To sum up, play is an indispensable tool for children’s Stimulation, Creativity, Encouraging, Challenging, Motivation, Imagination, Multi-Dimensional, Critical Thinking, Socialization development. Therefore, the educational aspect of play activity is of critical importance, especially in early childhood. It is inevitable that play activities that contribute to all areas of child development will be one of the basic learning tools of a well-organized learning and behavior setting. Play greatly affects the child’s mental, physical, emotional and social development.</p><p>Considering the educational role that play activity undertakes in the early childhood, it is critically important for the multi-dimensional development of the children (Bell, 2002; 2006). In relation to this, the interactive characteristics of the designed objects and spaces, which take place, come to the fore. Since the</p><p>opportunities of interaction establish in childhood directly affect physical and mental development, should shape the design criteria appropriate with their development. Such as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; both play spaces are designed for stimulating cognitive development. Both of them are for playing boxes where children learn accorging to their themes through play. The variety of stimuli encountered by the child through their surroundings interacting provides supportive and holistic development. They have to encounter in the physical and social environment turn into experience, discovery and learning for children. Therefore, the more the experiences in the early childhood are differentiated, the better development in various areas are supported.</p><p>The study mainly focused on play through design for early development. As a result, the concepts of Stimulation, Creativity, Encouraging, Challenging, Motivation, Imagination, Multi-Dimensional, Critical Thinking, Socialization were addressed in terms of the child-design relationship, and the importance of children play an active role was emphasized by designing flexible, transformable with rich physical stimuli that support the development of imagination, curiosity and creativity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Within the scope of the study, play-design relationship is discussed by focusing on how the act of children behaviour and learning that can be supported.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><p>This study is supported by literature research on play and its design criteria on children’s mental development. Thus, in line with the answers given and the research con-ducted, the design criteria of play will be determined. The research environment was collected by applying a survey technique in order to evaluate the play and design criteria of child development and designer experts in Ankara in 2022-2023 as an expert opinion. The reliability statistic of Cronbach’s Alpha Test result was 0.83 with 9 participants.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Demographic changes of the participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Demographic Changes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Men</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Under-graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 - 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46-above</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Designer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pre-K Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Experience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >11 and above</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the experts who were chosen from designers and Pre-k teachers contributed to the survey, 23 have a graduate degree were 41 have under-graduate degree of these, 21 have 1 - 5 years of professional experience, 19 have 6 - 10 years, and 24 have 11 years or more of professional experience.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mental Contributions, play and children development</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Objectives</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Children’s Mental Development and Play</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Experience</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under-graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 and More</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stimulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 (0.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50 (0.76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84 (0.37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58 (0.59)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25 (0.79)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Creativity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43 (1.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 (0.62)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Encouraging</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 (0.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Challenging</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 (1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73 (1.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92 (1.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Motivation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 19 (0.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 25 (0.79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 24 (1.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 19 (0.89)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imagination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 (1.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 (1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38 (1.27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multi- Dimensional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 (1.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21 (0.88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Critical Thinking</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 38 (0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 54 (0.65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 24 (1.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 43 (0.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 29 (0.85)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Socialization</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75 (0.53)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 (0.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54 (0.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83 (0.56)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, with the Criteria of Stimulation, Creativity, Encouraging, Challenging, Motivation, Imagination, Multi-Purpose, Critical Thinking, Socialization. The design criteria that structure the play benefits; were evaluated. In this section, there was a homogeneous distribution among the participants and the values obtained were high. The mentioned values were found important by both designers and child development experts.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Functional objectives of play and children development</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Objectives</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Function and Play</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Experience</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under-graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 and More</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Comfort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 (1.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73 (1.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 (1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 (0.46)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aesthetic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43 (1.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Warmth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 (0.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 (1.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Easy Usage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 (1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. 86 (0.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73 (1.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 19 (0.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. 52 (0.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.05 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Softness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 (1.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72 (1.20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84 (1.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91 (1.41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69 (1.28)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adaptability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09 (0.86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11 (0.83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21 (0.78)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.04 (1.01)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Luxurious</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.64 (1.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 (1.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. 14 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88 (1.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98 (1.)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the functional design criteria that structure the play; Comfort, Aesthetics, Warmth, Easy Usage, Colours, Softness, Adaptability, Luxurious were evaluated. In this section, there was a quite homogeneous distribution among the participants and the values obtained were high except Luxurious which were rated around 2.70 - 3.15. The mentioned values were found important by both designers and child development experts.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the Physical design criteria that structure the play; Ergonomics, Size, Hygienic, Healthy, Accessibility, Sensitivity, Flexibility, Security were evaluated. In this section, there was a quite homogeneous distribution among the participants and the values obtained were high. The mentioned values were found important by both designers and child development experts.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Physical criteria of play and children development</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Objectives</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Children Physical Development and Play</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Experience</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under-graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graduate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 and More</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ergonomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.61 (0.63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33 (0.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.63 (0.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25 (0.73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 21 (0.74)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.87 (0.34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.88 (0.43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.71 (0.61)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hygienic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84 (0.43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85 (0.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93 (0.26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92 (0.38)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Healthy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 38 (0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 54 (0.65)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 38 (0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 43 (0.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. 54 (0.65)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accessibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. 76 (1.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. 86 (0.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 (1.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16 (0.85)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sensitivity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64 (1.33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 (1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 (0.98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67 (1.20)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flexibility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92 (1.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 (1.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81 (1.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07 (0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19 (0.89)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Security</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79 (0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94 (0.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.88 (0.43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85 (0.36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92 (0.38)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The experience is a reflection of the physical content of the play design. The physical content of the experience plays and design is based on the concrete stages. It is important for children to play an active role in the action in terms of children’s cognitive skills. Therefore, in order to meet children’s developmental needs such as Stimulation, Creativity, Encouraging, Challenging, Motivation, Imagination, Multi-Purpose, Critical Thinking, Socialization, the formation for the differences in the body’s movements and postures should be considered by touching on how they think about the act of play they are in in their minds. In addition, stimulating children’s perception in many ways makes them intensely active for their cognitive skills.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.137952-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alqudah, Y. M. M. (2003). The Role of Playgrounds in Child Development. Postgraduate Seminar Ankara University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bell, S. (2002). Spatial Cognition and Scale: A Child’s Perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2002.0250</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bell, S. (2006). Scale in Children’s Experience with the Environment. In C. Spencer, &amp; M. Blades (Eds.), Children and Their Environments: Learning, Using and Designing Spaces (pp. 13-25). Cambridge University Press.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521232.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Day, C., &amp; MIidbjer, A. (2007). Environment and Children (pp. 21-38). Routledge.  
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080550978</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dudek, M. (2012). Spaces for Young Children: A Practical Guide to Planning, Designing and Building the Perfect Space. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Froebel, F. (1904). Pedagogics of the Kindergarten: Or His Ideas Concerning the Play and Playthings of the Child (p. 21). D. Appleton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (p. 72). Lawrence Erlbaum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gür, S., &amp; Zorlu, T. (2002). &amp;#199;ocuk Mekanlari (Children Spaces) (p. 65). Yem Yayinlari, Istanbul.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gürbüz, T. K., Dedeoglu, E. F., &amp; Yal&amp;#231;in, M. (2021). The Effect of Play Space Design Criteria on Early-Childhood Development. International Referred Journal of Architecture and Design, No. 22, 1-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hughes, F. P. (2009). Children, Play, and Development. Sage.  
https://doi.org/10.12968/nuwa.2009.7.4.1092689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korpella, K., Marketta K., &amp; Terry, H. (2002). Restorative Experience, Self-Regulation, and Children’s Place Preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 387-398.  
https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2002.0277</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, G. T., Lane, C. G., Hill, A. B., Cohen, U., McGinty, T., Jules, F. A., Work, L. L. et al. (1996). Recommendations for Child Care Centers. Center for Architecture and Urban Planning Research, University of Wisconsin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Two Languages of Architecture: Elements of a Bio-Cultural Approach to Architecture. In J. Pallasmaa (Ed.), Encounters: Architectural Essays (pp. 16-35). Rakennustieto.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parry, M., &amp; Archer, H. (1974). Pre-School Education (pp. 1-210). Macmillan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poyraz, H., &amp; Dere, H. (2003). Principles and Methods of Preschool Education. Ani Publications.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Read</surname><given-names> M. A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>. Use of Color in Child Care Environments: Application of Color for Wayfinding and Space Definition in Alabama Child Care Environments</article-title><source> Early Childhood Education Journal</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 233</fpage>-<lpage>239</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanoff, H. (1995). Creating Environments for Young Children. Bookmasters Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.137952-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Weinstein, C. S. (1987). Designing Preschool Classrooms to Support Development: Research and Reflection. In C. S. Weinstein, &amp; T. G. David (Eds.), Spaces for Children: The Built Environment and Child Development (pp. 159-185). Springer.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5227-3_8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>