摘要：本文基于现实生活语料，对反讽性话语的命题意义和隐含意义之间的关系进行深入的探讨，认为“所言与所意相反”不是反讽性话语唯一的意义特征，反讽性话语的命题意义与隐含意义还可以相异，甚至可以相同。在此基础上，本文提出反讽的工作定义，并进一步提出反讽性话语的限制性条件，以期深化对“反讽性话语”本质的认知。

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: The Propositional Meaning, Implicature, and Restrictive Conditions of Ironic Discourse

  AUTHORS: Qianjun Luo

  KEYWORDS: Ironic Discourse, Propositional Meaning, Implicature, Working Definition, Restrictive Conditions

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Access Library Journal, Vol.12 No.5, May 30, 2025

  ABSTRACT: Based on real-life linguistic data, this paper delves into the relationship between the propositional meaning and implicature of ironic discourse. It argues that “the opposition between literal meaning and intended meaning” is not the sole semantic feature of ironic discourse; instead, the propositional meaning and implicature may also diverge or even coincide. Building on this analysis, the paper proposes a working definition of irony and further identifies restrictive conditions for ironic discourse, aiming to deepen the understanding of its nature.