Wilkinson, P. B. et al. (2006). Optimization of Array Configurations and Panel Combinations for the Detection and Imaging of Abandoned Mineshafts Using 3D Cross-Hole Electrical Resistivity Tomography. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 11, 213-221.
https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG11.3.213

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Some Experiences of Resistivity and Induced Polarization Methods on the Exploration of Sulfide: A Review

  AUTHORS: Claire Dusabemariya, Wei Qian, Romuald Bagaragaza, Ajibola Richard Faruwa, Mossad Ali

  KEYWORDS: Resistivity, Induced Polarization, Chargeability, Sulfides, Mineralization

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, Vol.8 No.11, November 13, 2020

  ABSTRACT: Sulfide minerals are a group of compounds with the presence of sulfur. This group’s most abundant and economically members are pyrites, pyrrhotite, chalcocite, galena, sphalerite, and the group of copper sulfides minerals. Resistivity and Induced Polarization (IP) methods, which play an essential role in mineral exploration, showed great success in sulfide exploration. This paper started on reviewing sulfide formation by giving details which help to understand their genesis better. To make the reader understand the procedures and appropriate mineral exploration methods, we have briefly covered the theory, the basic principles of resistivity and IP methods, and different investigation techniques using one, two, and three-dimensional surveys. Based on many electrical surveys, we discussed with examples of resistivity and IP methods applied to the exploration of sulfide deposits: the data inversion and interpretation of the geophysical signatures of most of the sulfide deposits in various geological environments were analyzed and end by showing both successful surveys and limitations of the methods.