Diao, B., Fall, B., Kaboré, F.A., Sow, Y., Sarr, A., Thiam, A., Fall, P.A., Ndoye, A.K., Ba, M. and Diagne, B.A. (2012) Anderson-Hynes Open Pyeloplasty: Which Indications in the Area of Laparoscopic Surgery? Progrès en Urologie, 22, 1010-1014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2012.08.274

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Anderson-Hines Open Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Pyelo-Ureteral Junction Syndrome: Results from 36 Cases

  AUTHORS: Anani Wencesl Severin Odzébé, Caryne Mboutol-Mandavo, Aristide Steve Ondziel Opara, Lucie Irene Patricia Ondima, Armel Melvin Ondongo Atipo, Rolland Bertile Banga Mouss, Prosper Alain Bouya

  KEYWORDS: Hydronephrosis, Pyeloplasty, Anderson Hynes, Open Surgery

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Urology, Vol.9 No.9, September 19, 2019

  ABSTRACT: Goal: To evaluate the results and complications of open pyeloplasty according to Anderson-Hynestechnic. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from 2000 to 2014. The study included 36 cases of opening the ureteropyelic junction operated pit syndrome according to Anderson-Hynes technique. Results: Lumbotomy was used in all patients. A pelvic pyelolithotomy for lithiasis was performed in two patients (5.5%) and unwinding of a lower polar pedicle in 3 cases (8.3%). The average duration of response was 119 ± 15 min. The average length of hospital stay was 11.2 ± 3 days. Patients were followed for a mean of 10 months. Thirty-five patients were asymptomatic and in one case lower back pain persisted. IVU to 6 months showed a permeable junction in 97.2% of cases. Seven patients (19.4%) had short-term complications. Ureteropelvic stenosis was the only complication in the medium and long term in one case (2.8%). The success rate of the Pyeloplasty was 97.2%. Conclusion: The open pyeloplasty as Anderson-Hynes remains the treatment of choice in our context SJPU with great results. The indications tend to decrease in favor of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.