Zapf, D., Escart ín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace. In S. Einarsen et al. (Eds.), Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 75-105). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Assessing Exposure to Bullying through Digital Devices in Working Life: Two Versions of a Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CBQ)

  AUTHORS: Sandra Jönsson, Tuija Muhonen, Rebecka Cowen Forssell, Martin Bäckström

  KEYWORDS: Cyberbullying Behaviour, Working Life, Psychometric Properties

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.8 No.3, February 27, 2017

  ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is two folded: 1) to analyze the reliability and validity of a cyberbullying behaviour questionnaire (CBQ) in working life and 2) to analyze the reliability and validity of a short version of a cyberbullying behaviour questionnaire (CBQ-S) in working life. A total of 3371 working adults (MAge = 49.85 years) in Sweden, and 238 (MAge = 35.61 years) in the USA participated in the study. The results of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) showed that the one-factor model had an excellent fit to data, and Cronbach’s alpha indicates that both scales are reliable. In addition, the criterion validity of the scales was demonstrated by significant correlations with the following theoretically relevant concepts: wellbeing, work engagement and intention to quit. The results of the study support the use of the CBQ and CBQ-S as reliable and valid measures of cyberbullying behaviour in working life.