Dadrian, V. (1989). Genocide as a Problem of National and International Law: The World War I Armenian Case and Its Contemporary Legal Ramifications. Yale Journal of International Law, 14, 275-295.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Unresolved Jurisprudence of Crime against Humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

  AUTHORS: Moruf O. Mimiko, Olaposi A. Olaseeni, Akin Olawale Oluwadayisi

  KEYWORDS: Crime against Humanity, Systematic, Widespread, Civilian, Organizational and Policy

  JOURNAL NAME: Beijing Law Review, Vol.7 No.4, December 30, 2016

  ABSTRACT: Crime against humanity is one of international crimes. The “validity” of this crime as a criminal offence under International Criminal law can be traced to the Rome Statute, which by virtue of Article 7, makes it an offence. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a court saddled with the responsibility of interpreting and also bringing to book those who have violated international criminal laws. The paper therefore examines how the broad couching of article 7 has brought complexity into the jurisprudence of “crime against humanity” and how it has created interpretation problems; not only to the court, but to victims and accused persons. A good law must be concise, precise and must not be too broad. This article, therefore, argues that an appraisal of Article 7 will go a long way in clarifying the ambiguity created by this article.