Barão, V.A., Delben, J.A., Lima, J., Cabral, T. and Assunção, W.G. (2013) Comparison of Different Designs of Implant-Retained Overdentures and Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prosthesis on Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible—A Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 46, 1312-1320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Biomechanical Analysis of Implant Assisted-Overdentures with Variations in the Attachments Systems

  AUTHORS: Eduardo Vedovatto, Jose Vitor Quinelli Mazaro, Humberto Gennari Filho, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho, Caroline Cantieri de Mello, Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos

  KEYWORDS: Dental Implants, Complete Denture, Overdentures

  JOURNAL NAME: Materials Sciences and Applications, Vol.6 No.8, August 5, 2015

  ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the stress patterns on the peri-implant zone and residual alveolar ridge in different overdenture attachment system designs by the photoelasticity method. Four attachments systems were tested: O-ring, ERA, Bar-clip, and Bar-clip/O-ring association. The prostheses were loaded with 100 N in five pre-determined points and the photoelastic model was evaluated by a circular polariscope. The anterior load, O-ring, and ERA showed better stress distribution in relation to the bars systems, which presented stress levels surrounding implants. The molar load, Bar-clip/O-ring association, presented the biggest stress concentration on the peri-implant region in relation to the others. When the second molar was loaded, there was a concentration of stress in the alveolar ridge in all situations analyzed. Within the limitation of this “in vitro” study, it could be concluded that there were biomechanical differences among the attachments systems analyzed, principally between isolated and the bars systems. The O-ring showed better stress distribution and the Bar-clip/O-ring showed higher stress concentration.