Dervaux, P., Carlier, G., & Gérard (2004). How Student Teachers Report That They Handle Six Situations of Indiscipline? In M. Locquet, & Y. Léziart (Eds.), Sports and Artistic Cultures Formalization of Professional Knowledge. Practices, Teacher Education, Research (pp. 229-232). Rennes: University of Haute Bretagne, Rennes II.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Student Teachers’ Reactions Responding to Students’ Disruptive Behaviors: A Case Study in High School Education in Tunisia

  AUTHORS: Talel Maddeh, Souheil Hermessi, Nabila Bennour, Nizar Souissi

  KEYWORDS: Physical Education, Student Teachers, Educational Approach, Disruptive Behaviors

  JOURNAL NAME: Creative Education, Vol.6 No.11, June 26, 2015

  ABSTRACT: This article sets to study the reactions of student teachers towards students’ disruptive behaviors in high school. A delayed video-scopic analysis has been performed using the “Disciplinary Incidents Analysis System” (Brunelle, Brunelle, Gagnon, Goyette, Martel, Marzouk, & Spallanzani, 1993). A total of 1379 reactions to disruptive behaviors have been recorded in Tunisian student teachers enrolled in the last year of their teacher education in the License-Masters-Doctorate (LMD) system. The results show a clearly low level of student teachers’ intervention since they frequently opt for ignorance of disruptive behavior. In fact, a high predominance of the reaction “ignore” (56.9%) qualifies these interventions, while interactive reactions are seldom used (17.4%). Following these results, a readjustment is probably required in both the practical and theoretical parts of teacher education of Tunisian student teachers. This may occur by making teaching disruptive behaviors’ management at school part of the curriculum