Borg, J. S., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences, Action, and Intention as Factors in Moral Judgments: An fMRI Investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 803-817.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Moral Judgment: Truth, Order and Consequence

  AUTHORS: Magda Osman

  KEYWORDS: Moral Judgment, Consequentialism, Dynamics, Updating, Moral Dilemmas

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.6 No.5, April 17, 2015

  ABSTRACT: Often we make snap moral judgments based on limited information. For instance upon reading a newspaper headline we very quickly decide on whether the implied outcome is good or bad. However, in situations like this we are also likely to revise our judgments when we read the main story and the conclusion of the article. One question yet to be answered is whether we adjust our moral judgments in a systematic way as we gain more details about a moral scenario. Two experiments (lab-based, online) addressed this question along with the influence of other factors on moral judgments (the origin of the moral scenario, the severity of the consequence of the scenario). Across both experiments, moral judgments were: 1) generally adjusted downwards as more information was presented; 2) more severe for headlines than the main story or the conclusion; 3) more severe for scenarios that were fabricated than real life stories; 4) more severe when the conclusion involved a severe consequence than a non-severe consequence.