Gottweis, H. (2006). Rhetoric in Policy Making: Between Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. In F. Fischer (Ed.), Handbook of Public Policy (p. 243). London: Taylor and Francis.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420017007.ch17

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Categories of Hegemonic Discourse in Contemporary China

  AUTHORS: Xinfa Yuan, Jiuquan Han

  KEYWORDS: Implicit Hegemonic Discourse, Rhetorical Political Approach, Categories, Contemporary China

  JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Applied Sociology, Vol.5 No.4, April 8, 2015

  ABSTRACT: Following the principles of rhetorical political approach and discourse-historic approach, this paper discusses the categories of how implicit hegemonic discourse (IHD) manipulators in contemporary China discursively justify their own special interests and mislead the dominated to “maintain consent” to the current hegemony pernicious to the future of Chinese civilization. And it is concluded that the collusion between corrupted officials, pirate businessmen and their patronized scholars is getting more and more solid and prominent. Therefore more hegemonic discourses would appear until an end is put by the practice of ruling the nation by law.