Ando, W., et al. (2012) Ovine Synovial Membrane-Derived Mesenchymal Progeneitor Cells Retain the Phenotype of the Original Tissue That Was Exposed to in Vivo Inflammation: Evidence foe a Suppressed Chondrogenic Differential Potential of the Cells. Inflammation Research, 61,599-608.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00011-012-0450-x

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Why Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cell Heterogeneity in Specific Environments? —Implications for Tissue Engineering Applications Following Injury or Degeneration of Connective Tissues

  AUTHORS: David A. Hart

  KEYWORDS: Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells, Cell Heterogeneity, Tissue-Specific Heterogeneity, Tissue Engineering

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Vol.7 No.8, June 26, 2014

  ABSTRACT: Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSC/MPC) from a variety of tissue sources (bone marrow, adipose tissue, fat pads, synovial membranes, synovial fluid, skin, muscle and periosteal tissue) have been widely applied for tissue engineering applications to generate replacements for injured or degenerated tissues. Alternatively, they have also been injected as free cells in an attempt to facilitate in vivo repair. Nearly all studies reported have used mixed cell populations of MSC/MPC, usually defined by cell surface phenotypes and/or functional ability to differentiate towards multiple cell lineages. Using more detailed cell surface phenotyping and limiting dilution approaches to isolate individual MSC/MPC clones have indicated that such mixed cell populations are very heterogeneous. In addition subsets of cells from different sources may have epigenetic modifications. While it is clear that MSC/MPC cells exhibit heterogeneity, the question of why this is the case has not been well addressed. This review will address some of these issues, as well as provide some insights into the implications when using such diverse cells for tissue engineering applications.