Novara, G., Artibani, W., Barber, M.D., et al. (2010) Updated systemic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral slings in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. European Urology, 58, 218-238. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: A retrospective comparative series comparing monarc and sparc suburethral slings

  AUTHORS: Andrew Foote

  KEYWORDS: Case Control Series; Female Urinary Incontinence; Suburethral Sling

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.3 No.9, November 29, 2013

  ABSTRACT: A Retrospective Comparative Series Comparing Monarc and Sparc Suburethral Slings. Introduction and Hypothesis: There are a number of suburethral slings used in current practice to treat female urinary incontinence. To date there has been a lack of larger comparative series. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of two types of suburethral sling. Methods: A retrospective comparative series comparing 113 consecutive Sparcsuburethral slings with 112 consecutive Monarc slings. Results: The success rate of SparcvsMonarc was similar at 6 weeks (96.1% vs 94.2%, NS) and at 6 months (96.0% vs 92.6%, NS). The Monarc procedure had less intraoperative bladder fenestrations & less postoperative urgency. Conclusions: Both procedures had a similar success rate, while the Monarc had less complications. Brief Summary: Both procedures had a similar success rate, while the Monarc had less complications of intraoperative bladder fenestration & postoperative urgency.