Goff, P. A., & Epstein, L. M. (2011). The faces are different, but the story is (mostly) the same: Expanding Symbolic Racism Theory to immigration policy and anti-Latino bias. In press.

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Illegitimacy is Dangerous: How Authorities Experience and React to Illegitimacy

  AUTHORS: Phillip Atiba Goff, Liana Maris Epstein, Avital Mentovich, Kavita S. Reddy

  KEYWORDS: Legitimacy; Law Enforcement; Public Policy; Power

  JOURNAL NAME: Psychology, Vol.4 No.3A, March 29, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Research on legitimacy has focused on subordinate groups to the exclusion of authority figures. The present research explores how authorities experience concerns with their own legitimacy. We do so in the context of law enforcement asked to enact a legitimacy-challenging policy: cross-deputization (requiring police to enforce immigration laws similar to Arizona’s SB1070).We expect that authorities’ perceptions of their own legitimacy rest on two factors: a) their own judgments of policies they enforce; and b) how they imagine subordinates would react to the enforcement of those policies. We examine the role of these factors on officers’ sense of anxiety and physical safety. Results reveal that officers’ feelings of safety are driven both by their own views and, to a greater extent, by how they imagine subordinates would react to the policy. These results demonstrate the importance of police legitimacy to officers’ perceptions of their own safety, a vital factor in maintaining low levels of police/community conflict.