Delotte, J., Mialon, O., Bouaziz, S., et al. (2011) Is there a real place for robotics in proximal tubal surgery? Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 39, 509-510. doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.07.001

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Role of robotic assistance in the learning of laparoscopy: Comparison of novice students’ results in two FLS trials

  AUTHORS: Mélanie Frigenza, Jérôme Delotte, Eric Fontas, Daniel Benchimol, André Bongain, Jean Breaud

  KEYWORDS: Da Vinci; Learning Curve; Medical Student; Laparoscopy

  JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.3 No.2, March 21, 2013

  ABSTRACT: Background: To investigate the learning curve of “robotic surgery” versus “conventional laparoscopy” in two trials of the FLS program in a population of medical students with no experience in laparoscopy. Methods: A prospective trial. Students, all novices in training and surgical practice, were randomized into 2 groups: the “traditional laparoscopy” group and the “robotic assistance” group. Students were evaluated during two tests from the FLS: peg transfer and intracorporeal knot tying. Results: The median laparoscopic knot completion time was significantly lower in the “robotic surgery” group (p = 0.038). Conclusions: Robotic assistance training in neophytes is effective in improving the completion time of laparoscopic knots.