Nelson, S.P., Ramakrishnan, V., Nietert, P.J., Kamen, D.L., Ramos, P.S. and Wolf, B.J. (2017) An Evaluation of Common Methods for Dichotomization of Continuous Variables to Discriminate Disease Status. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 46, 10823-10834.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783

has been cited by the following article:

• TITLE: Why Quantitative Variables Should Not Be Recoded as Categorical

  AUTHORS: Antônio Fernandes, Caio Malaquias, Dalson Figueiredo, Enivaldo da Rocha, Rodrigo Lins

  KEYWORDS: Dichotomization, Inefficiency, Bias

  JOURNAL NAME: Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Vol.7 No.7, July 22, 2019

  ABSTRACT: The transformation of quantitative variables into categories is a common practice in both experimental and observational studies. The typical procedure is to create groups by splitting the original variable distribution at some cut point on the scale of measurement (e.g. mean, median, mode). Allegedly, dichotomization improves causal inference by simplifying statistical analyses. In this article, we address some of the adverse consequences of recoding quantitative variables into categories. In particular, we provide evidence that categorization usually leads to inefficient and biased estimates. We believe that considerable progress in our understanding of data analysis can occur if scholars follow the recommendations presented in this article. The recodification of quantitative variables as categorical is a poor methodological strategy, and scientists must stay away from it.