SCIRP Mobile Website
Paper Submission

Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.


Contact Us >>

WhatsApp  +86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
Paper Publishing WeChat
Book Publishing WeChat

Article citations


Ministère de l’éducation, des Loisirs et du Sport (MELS) (2006). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise. éducation préscolaire. Enseignement primaire. Fran?ais langue d’enseignement. Chapters 4-5. Electronic version.

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: The Incidence of Philosophy on Discursive and Language Competence in Four-Year-Old Pupils

    AUTHORS: Marie-France Daniel, Jean-Charles Pettier, Emmanuèle Auriac-Slusarczyk

    KEYWORDS: Discursive and Language Competence, Childhood, Argumentative Discourse, Philosophical Dialogue

    JOURNAL NAME: Creative Education, Vol.2 No.3, August 9, 2011

    ABSTRACT: Can philosophical dialogue foster the developmental process of certain language and discursive capabilities, such as decentering and abstraction, in four-year old children? And if so, to what extent? In this paper, the authors examine discursive and language competence in a group of four-year-old children during a four-month philosophical praxis (experimental group), compared to that of a group of five-year-old children that experienced no philosophical praxis (control group). The analysis was conducted using two instruments: 1) for discursive competence, the typology of exchanges put forward by Daniel et al. (underlying criteria include the presence/absence of a common problem to solve, centering/decentering of thinking, complexity of interventions and cognitive skills, etc.) and 2) for language competence, the language markers that emerged from the transcripts (“I”, “we”, “he – particular”, “they – general”, “you”.) These two instruments contributed to situating the children’s discourse within a process of increasing complexity related to decentering and abstraction. Results indicate that the children in the experimental group engaged in diversified exchanges (three types: anecdotal, monological, dialogical) with a predominance of the monological type and the use of language markers related to the general “they”, while the children in the control group engaged in anecdotal exchanges with a predominant use of “I”.