SCIRP Mobile Website

Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.


Contact Us >>

WhatsApp  +86 18163351462(WhatsApp)
Paper Publishing WeChat
Book Publishing WeChat

Article citations


Heard, A., Green, R. and Eakins, P. (2009) The Formulation and Introduction of a “Can’t Intubate, Can’t Ventilate” Algorithm into Clinical Practice. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 64, 601-608.

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: A Comparison of Blind and Laryngoscopic Insertion of the EasyTube

    AUTHORS: Julia C. Caldwell, David P. De Korte, Renee E. Doll, Sonia J. Vaida

    KEYWORDS: Airway Management, Supraglottic Airway Devices, EasyTube

    JOURNAL NAME: Open Journal of Anesthesiology, Vol.5 No.8, August 31, 2015

    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The EasyTube is a disposable, polyvinyl-chloride, double-lumen, supraglottic airway device, which allows ventilation in either esophageal or tracheal position. The EasyTube may be positioned into the esophagus blindly or using a laryngoscope. Methods: Our study compared blind versus laryngoscopic-guided esophageal EasyTube insertion. Thirty two anesthesiologists inserted an EasyTube, size 41 Fr, into a mannequin, by using a blind and a laryngoscopic technique in a 2 × 2 crossover design. Results: No statistically significant difference in the time to achieve an effective airway was found: 23.9 ± 6 seconds for the blind and 29.5 ± 7.6 seconds for the laryngoscopic-guided technique. Conclusion: EasyTube insertion was equally successful with or without a laryn-goscope in a mannequin when used by anesthesia providers.