SCIRP Mobile Website
Paper Submission

Why Us? >>

  • - Open Access
  • - Peer-reviewed
  • - Rapid publication
  • - Lifetime hosting
  • - Free indexing service
  • - Free promotion service
  • - More citations
  • - Search engine friendly

Free SCIRP Newsletters>>

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from SCIRP.

 

Contact Us >>

Article citations

More>>

Thomas, J., Sugrue, M., Curran, S., Furey, M. and Sugrue, R. (2013) Are Family Doctors Compliant with Breast Family History Guidelines? Advances in Breast Cancer Research, 2, 149-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2013.24024

has been cited by the following article:

  • TITLE: Failure to Engage in Breast Screening and Risk Assessment Results in More Advanced Stage at Diagnosis

    AUTHORS: Alison Johnston, Sharon Curran, Michael Sugrue

    KEYWORDS: Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Detection, Breast Screening, Breast Outcomes

    JOURNAL NAME: Advances in Breast Cancer Research, Vol.4 No.2, April 9, 2015

    ABSTRACT: Background: Although well established, population based screening and family risk assessment for breast cancer have come under increasing scrutiny. The concept of over diagnosis is increasingly cited in cancer publications. This study assessed the impact of failure to screen or risk assess patients attending with a new diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of 200 consecutive patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2010 and September 2012 at Letterkenny Hospital. Appropriate screening was defined as biennial in those aged 50 - 66 and in those 40 - 49 with moderate/high family history risk (NICE criteria or IBIS criteria). Patient demographics, screening history, diagnosis date and stage (TNM) weredocumented. Patients with previous breast cancer were not included (n = 17). Results: 200 consecutive patients, whose mean age was 61 (range 28 - 99), were studied. 112/200 (56%) met no criteria for screening or family history assessment, and 88/200 (44%) met criteria for either screening (in 56) or family history assessment (in 32). 61/88 (69.3%) meeting criteria did not have a mammogram or risk assessment. The stage of breast cancer was significantly earlier in those screened appropriately, with early stage cancer in n = 111/139 (79.9 %) and late in n = 28/139 (20.1%), compared with 38/61 (62.3%) and 23/61 (37.7%) in those failing to be screened appropriately (p = 0.01χ2df1). Conclusion:Failure to engage in breast screening and risk assessment resulted in more advanced stage at diagnosis.