Expression of HER Receptor Proteins in Prostate Adenocarcinoma; A Perspective from North Central Nigeria

Introduction: Members of the Human Epidermal Receptor [HER] family of receptor tyrosine kinases, such as HER2 and EGFR proteins are overexpressed in several epithelial malignancies and serve as effective therapeutic targets in cancer management. However, their role in prostate cancer development has been sparingly explored and with contrasting findings. Notably their relationship with prostate cancers cases seen in Sub-Saharan Africa is yet to be explored. Design: A retrospective study involving histologically diagnosed cases of adenocarcinomas of the prostate. Cases were classed according to the WHO/ISUP Gleason Prognostic groups [G1 G5]. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using monoclonal antibodies for HER2 and EGFR, while in situ hybridization employed DNA probes for the corresponding genes. Scores of +2 and +3 were regarded as positive for both antibodies, while a target gene: centromere ratio of >2 was set as the threshold for amplification. Results: A total of 44 cases were included in the study. The acinar type was the commonest morphologically, with Gleason group 5 [Gleason scores 8 10] accounting for close to half of the cases [47.7%]. The HER2 antibody stained negatively in the majority of cases [93.2%], being positive in only 3 [6.8%] of cases seen. High level expression of EGFR [+2/+3] was observed in 25% of cases, low level expression was identified in 6 [13.6%] cases. All HER2 positive malignancies displayed overexpression of EGFR. In situ-hybridization revealed the absence of high level amplification for both HER2 and EGFR, while polysomy was not detected in any of the cases. ConHow to cite this paper: Ajetunmobi, O.I., Drebber, U., Buettner, R., Dzuachii, O.D., Vhritherire, R.A., Oguntunde, O.A., Raphael, O.S. and Odujoko, O. (2019) Expression of HER Receptor Proteins in Prostate Adenocarcinoma; A Perspective from North Central Nigeria. Open Journal of Pathology, 9, 58-70. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpathology.2019.9 3007 Received: May 19, 2019 Accepted: July 23, 2019 Published: July 26, 2019 Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access O. I. Ajetunmobi et al. DOI: 10.4236/ojpathology.2019.93007 59 Open Journal of Pathology clusion: The overexpression of EGFR in prostate cancers has been demonstrated in a native African population, affirming its suitability for targeted therapy. Overexpression of HER2 in prostate cancer is inconstant, and amplification of the HER2 gene is less frequent than as compared to malignancies of the Breast and Ovary. There’s a need for a standardized protocol for assessing HER2 in prostate cancer.


Introduction
The HER receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases [RTK] includes proteins such as Epidermal Growth factor Receptor [EGFR], HER2/c-erbB2, HER3, and HER4. They represent the most extensively studied group of the RTKs especially with regards to their roles in normal mammalian development, physiology and formation of human cancers. Following ligand binding, these receptors undergo conformational changes such as dimerization and autophosphorylation their intrinsic tyrosine kinase residues. These events activate downstream intracellular signaling pathways such as the Ras/Raf/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), the Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)-Akt, PLCγ/PKC, STAT and recently the Par6-atypical pathways. These pathways subsequently trigger transcription of numerous genes influencing major cell processes such as cell proliferation, survival and neoplastic transformation [1] [2] [3] (Figure 1).
Notably, EGFR and HER2 are overexpressed in many solid tumors, and their co-expression leads to an additive/super-additive effect. Their activation is by ligand binding in the physiologic state, however, molecular aberrations could lead to ligand independent activation. Notably dysregulation of these receptor proteins has been implicated in several epithelial and non-epithelial malignancies. Gene amplification of HER2 has been found in up to a third of breast cancers, while amplification of the EGFR gene is found in 40% of Glioblastoma multiforme [GBM] and 5% -10% of non-small cell lung carcinomas [NSCLCs] [1] [2]. Overactivity and overexpression of these proteins have also been implicated in the formation of malignancies of the Skin, Genitourinary tract, gastrointestinal tract, Head and Neck and Prostate. Our grasp of their complex function and molecular regulatory networks has fuelled the development of revolutionary therapeutic options in the management of cancers over the last decade [4].
Pharmacologic entities inhibiting these receptor pathways have proven to be effective methods of providing targeted therapy in a number of malignancies. The HER2/neu protein has been demonstrated to be an effective target in molecular therapy of metastatic cancers of the breast and stomach, via the use of monoclonal antibodies [e.g. Transtuzumab] specific for the Her-2/neu protein [4] [5]. Similarly, the use of monoclonal antibodies such as Cetuximab and the  tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Gefitinib and Erlotinib, targeting EGFR has been rewarding in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, as well as cancers of the colon, pancreas and the prostate [6].
Prostate cancer [Pca] is the 2 nd commonest cause of malignancy related death in males globally. Its incidence is increasing worldwide and has attained the status of a disease of public health importance, being the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men worldwide [7] [8]. The sub-Saharan African region is accounting for increasing proportion of new cases, rising from 56% in 2008, to 70% by 2030 [9]. Records from the two institutional cancer registries in Makurdi, North central Nigeria, infer that the prostate is the number one site of malignancies in males within the region. As a localized pathology, treatment can be easily implemented using surgery and radiotherapy, however progression to advanced stage/grade of disease transforms PCa into life-threatening, refractory illness. Despite benefiting from advances in therapeutic approaches employing Surgery, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Hormone therapy, mortality remains high accounting for more than 300,000 deaths annually across the globe. One key reason for this is the genomic complexity/heterogeneity of this malignancy as well as the programmed progression from an androgen dependent phase (AD-PCa) to an androgen-independent phase (AI-PCa) over time. Effective therapeutic options are few and far between in this hormone refractory state, which has a median survival of less than 12 months [9] [10].
In the search for novel therapies for advanced prostate cancer, potential over-  blocks were applied as inclusion criteria, hence only 44 of these cases were selected for the study. Data regarding age and Gleason score were obtained from the cancer registries and surgical pathology records of these institutions. Routine Hematoxylin and Eosin slides were reviewed by two pathologists (A.O.I.) and (D.D.) to affirm the presence of primary malignancy, assign Gleason scores while also documenting other histologic features such as morphologic type, perineural infiltration, and vascular invasion.

Materials and Methods
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi.

Immunohistochemical Analysis
Fresh serial sections 3 -5 μm thick were made for immunohistochemical staining which was performed using the following monoclonal antibodies; Her2-neu Germany. Results were depicted using frequency tables, pie and bar charts.

Tissue Micro Array
Tissue microarrays were constructed for the purpose of conducting FISH analysis on the samples. A total of 32 biopsies were included in the arrays, 16 being excluded for technical reasons such as core size and diameter of neoplastic focus.
Using the Hematoxylin and Eosin slides, the areas with the most characteristic pathologic features were marked and were used to delineate the corresponding areas on the donor tissue blocks. A Beecher Instrument array was used to make punches 0.6 mm in diameter in the donor blocks. These donor cores were then transferred to a recipient tissue block constructed using an empty paraffin block. the Institute fur Pathologie, University Hospital Cologne. Briefly, 2 µm thick sections of FFPE, in a micro-array, were passed through a pre-treatment solution, deparaffinised and dehydrated using the VP2000 machine set at 75˚C. Two gene probes for detecting amplifications in the EGFR and Her2 genes (ZytoLight Spec EGFR/CEN7 and Zytolight Spec Her2/CEN17 respectively) were applied to the two appropriately labelled sections of the micro-array. Hybridization was performed in a Dako Cytomatic Hybridizer at a temperature of 37˚C over a period of 12 -14 hrs. A post hybridization buffer 2xSSC was applied to the micro-array, placed in a water bath at 56C for a total of 6 minutes. Following this, the DiaminoBenzidene chromogene was applied. The slides were viewed using a Leica DM 5500 B Fluorescent microscope utilizing oil immersion.

Results
A total of 44 cases of Prostate cancer were included in this study. The mean age was 64.9 ± 11.8 yrs, the median was 63 yrs, while the peak age of incidence/diagnosis was between 51 and 60 yrs. There were no cases diagnosed before the age of 40, as the age range was 44 -95 yrs.   showing EGFR positivity of 54.5% and 62.5% respectively. Sections containing adjacent areas of normal and hyperplastic prostatic acini showed strong positive staining in basal and luminal cells, whereas areas of malignant acini showed comparatively weaker expression of EGFR. Figure 3 All sections showing predominant ductal or mixed acinar-ductal morphology were negative for both EGFR and Her2 on immunohistochemistry.
A total of 32 samples were subjected to gene analysis by Fluorescent in situ Hybridization, and of these, only 16 gave perceptible signals for EGFR and only 12 for Her2-neu. None of these samples showed high level amplification of either the Her2 neu or EGFR genes. Figure 4 However, for Her2, low level amplification (defined as Her2/centromere 17 ratio of 1.5 -2.5) was observed in two samples. Polysomy was not observed in any of the FISH sections examined.

Discussion
The age distribution in this study reflects findings in the United States and Egypt, where the average age of diagnosis was 66 yrs and 67.38 yrs respectively. However, in the United Kingdom the peak age range is in the >90 age group, in contrast to our observation of 51 -60 yrs. In line with observations in the above referenced studies, cases of Prostate Cancer were rare before the age of 40 yrs [17] [18] [19]. Pure ductal CA is a rare morphologic variant of prostate adenocarcinoma. Global estimates range from 0.5% to 6% of cases, and it is mostly seen in the elderly. Observations from this index study show that 2 cases (4.5%) of PCas were ductal and were seen at ages 44 and 57 [20].
In recent times, the World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted a 5 tiered division of Gleason scores into prognostic classes (Table 1). In a study in Egypt, 56.7% of PCa cases were high grade, with Gleason scores between 8 and 10, while 32.0% and 36.7% of cases were high grade in studies carried out in Ukraine and Lagos, Southwest Nigeria respectively [18] [21] [22]. Our observation of 47.7% falls into an intermediate position. In sharp contrast, 80% of prostatectomy cases in Iran had Gleason scores less than 7. It should be noted that there is an inherent tendency for higher grades in needle biopsies as sampling errors might result in an underestimation or overestimation of the Gleason grade [23]. Assessment of biochemical relapse, diagnosis of Androgen Independence and pathologic staging all present with significant logistic difficulties, as most patients present late OR are suboptimal for localized treatment i.e. radical prostatectomy with radiotherapy. Hence most diagnoses of PCa in Nigeria/Sub-Saharan Africa are made on needle biopsies [9].
The rate of EGFR overexpression in this study (25%), was lower than observations in Italy (36%) and Iran 59%, but higher than findings in Hamburg (18%). Furthermore, while there was an inverse relationship between EGFR expression and grade in this study, no correlation was seen between these parameters in Iran. In Italy however, 13% of cases displayed mutations in the EGFR Tyrosine Kinase domain, (similar to those found in patients with NSCLC) and all of these 13 cases had Gleason scores ≥ 7. The absence of Gene amplification in our study reflects findings in Hamburg, where only 0.25% of the 2446 cases showed amplification of the EGFR gene. However, low level gene copy number gains were observed in this study. Several studies have shown association between such low level gene copy number gains with positive IHC expression [14] [23] [24].
It is postulated that genetic factors affect EGFR expression on IHC. Some studies have demonstrated reduced expression of the receptor protein with advancing malignant behaviour while other reports have documented equivalent expression of EGFR in both benign and malignant prostate lesions. Incidentally, a mutant form of the EGFR {EGFRvIII} has been demonstrated to be expressed selectively in PCa and is indicative of an aggressive prostate cancer phenotype [25] [26]. These variable findings reflect two key issues; 1) Accurate definition of EGFR status is vital in prognostic stratification of PCa pts and selection for targeted therapy; 2) The need for larger, multi institutional studies assessing these oncogenes at the DNA, RNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the pattern of Her2 expression appears to change as Prostate cancer evolves from an androgen dependent to an androgen independent state. Experiments using human Prostate cancer cell lines showed increased expression in androgen independent states. This is believed to be due to selective growth and survival of Her2 expressing cells which normally do not require androgens.
Regardless of the aforementioned, a number of key studies have established the fact that Her2 is involved in the development of Prostate cancer, being also implicated in increasing invasiveness and facilitating vascular dissemination [11] [31] [32].
Several types of immunotherapies directed againstHer2 have shown promising clinical results, equally patients vaccinated with a HER2 polypeptide vaccine (AE37) showed improved overall survival. Immunization against specific oncogenes, represent an exciting prospect in personalized medicine and effective application could translate to life transforming results in oncology [32].

Limitations
The relative absence of demonstrable amplification of the selected oncogenes in this study is plausibly largely due to technical factors in the pre-analytical and analytical phases of the preparation of H & E sections. Data from the Biospecimen Research Network documented that, for FISH, whole sections were preferable to needle cores and ischemia time should not exceed 1 hr [33]. It cannot be guaranteed that these conditions were met for all specimens involved in this study. Inasmuch as rapid technological advancement is being made in molecular biology techniques, the process of preparing FFPEs is still central to achieving quality results with most procedures. In the same vein, tumor heterogeneity alongside the use of TMA on core needle biopsies would produce sampling errors, contributing to suboptimal results.
In conclusion, this is the first prostate cancer study to report the pattern of the expressions of EGFR and Her2 in a black African population, at both the level of the surface protein and the corresponding genes. Further studies including a larger number of cases, with a wider geographic spread across sub-Saharan Africa and data on biochemical relapse, are advocated. The identification of new reliable biomarkers that can predict progression to hormone refractoriness and serve as therapeutic targets is both urgent and essential.

Funding
This project was funded by a Technical Transfer Fellowship awarded by the International Union for Cancer Control [UICC]. Additional funding was provided by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital, Cologne.