Promotion of Maple Bridge Experience in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area under the Background of Non-Unitary System

The Maple Bridge experience should be based on the national and regional reality of the new era in order to realize innovative development. The deep integration development of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao is an important opportunity to break the dilemma of harmonious governance between the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao. In order to solve the legal problems of promoting the experience of Maple Bridge under different legal sources and economic and social backgrounds, we should promote the integration and development of the folk norms of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao under the background of non-unitary system. Aiming at regional stability, we can release the non-institutionalized civil contract and the efficiency of trade rules governance, and form an effective link mechanism from information sharing, public participation to interest coordination, and deep cooperation.

Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area is the most special, and its promotion in the Bay area has the most significant impact on the regional stability and development.
In the Bay Area, the Maple Bridge experience remolds the "geographical relationship" based on the social order through the bottom-up path of development to achieve self-management with the background of three different law systems.
Its core characteristics are life, popularity, spontaneity, implementation and operation. During the revolutionary period, China formed conventions on anti-Japanese patriotism and support for the front lines; Article 24 of the Constitution after the founding of the people provided the implementation of the rules of the Convention among the masses; represented by the Convention on Civilization of the Citizens of the Capital City, one after another, various localities issued the citizens convention with patriotism, law-abiding and good faith as the core, and constantly revised it in line with the progress of the national strategy.
Grass-roots mass autonomous organizations also launched corresponding con-

The Perspective of Non-Institutionalized Civil Contracts and Industry Rules
The Maple Bridge experience, which is based on grass-roots social organizations, is recognized by members of the community as a code of conduct and a custom agreement, in the protection of production and in public welfare matters. Releasing non-institutionalized civil contract and the governance effectiveness of industry rules with regional stability is the goal of bay area governance. And

Bay Area Department Cooperative Governance
The cooperative governance of Grand Bay abroad is mainly focused on the construction of the Bay area Protection and Development Committee and the inter-departmental cooperative governance platform, so as to effectively prevent Government Association with its positive impact on the reform and improvement of related public services [1]. On this basis, through integrated emergency management and multiple dispute resolution paths, we can achieve the overall strategic cooperation of public services.

Standardization of Management of Cross-Border Cooperation in Bay Area
Foreign bay area governance focuses on the aspect of interstate agreement and judicial cooperation, but the influence of federalism on regional social conflict settlement mechanism has not been fully considered [2]. It is generally accepted that by perfecting the main body and the process of making the interstate agreement and guaranteeing the corresponding legal effect of the agreement, we can realize many public objectives, including cooperative governance and interstate cooperation. As a result, the government further strengthens the administrative agreement in the important role of interstate cooperation, and promotes the development of cross-regional dispute resolution mechanism on this basis.
Taking environmental disputes as an example, Los Angeles signed the sewage treatment contract (paid share) and memorandum of air quality management area AQMD, which promoted the timely resolution of disputes and contradictions from the level of standardization [3].

Bay Area Social Cooperative Governance
The management of social cooperation in Bay area is a key link in the construction of dispute resolution mechanism. In China, we should grasp the special social structure, respect the people-centered development, and form all-round development social governance, including economy, ecology and society's progress.
However, in foreign countries, the management of Bay area focuses on the evaluation of public-private cooperative economic benefits and the civil litigation.
Especially, it emphasizes that combining with the property right system to mo-

The Particularity of Maple Bridge Experience Promotion in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area and Its Main Problems
The core of the promotion of the Maple Bridge experience in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area is to solve the dilemma of cross-regional cooperative governance under "one country, two systems" (especially the problem of cross-legal cooperation governance), and to effectively prevent the behavior of circumvention of cross-legal system. Therefore, this paper focuses on the legal problems of synergy and systematicness in the promotion of Maple Bridge experience in the three places.

The Relationship between Inter-Government Cooperation and Social Governance
In

The Relationship between Local Solution of Social Contradictions and Judicial Cooperation
Under "one country, two systems", the three places of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao have different sources of law, which respectively apply different legal norms. Intertwined with the issue of autonomy, the problems of cross-regional Maple Bridge experience promotion are complicated and face many conflicts. One of the most intractable, that is, the use of the three different sources of law to commit circumvention behavior. In this case, it is difficult to resolve disputes effectively by only resolving contradictions in separate places. Actually, under this condition, it is very important to realize the solution of social contradictions and the effective connection of judicial cooperation. Specifically in the criminal field, the mainland of China adopts a system of statutory evidence, with the territoriality as the principal, protectionism and universal jurisdiction supplementary. Hong Kong adopts a system of free evidence, which is based on the judicial principle of following precedents with the application of the national laws of the place where the crime took place. The use of free psychological evidence and legal evidence in Macao, the prohibition of analogy, and the strict application of the principle of territoriality will possibly lead to the emergence of phenomena such as escaping from heavy sentences (fleeing to places of light punishment). Moreover, it is easy to cause unbalance between crime and punishment under the sovereignty of a unified state. In order to solve this problem, this paper integrates the existing functions of the Maple Bridge experience and judicial cooperation, and makes the promotion of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Grand Bay Area Maple Bridge experience more orderly by clarifying the legal effect of the cross-regional agreement.

The Specific Path and Countermeasures for the Promotion of Maple Bridge Experience in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macau
The the establishment of coordination mechanism based on public-private cooperation to provide guarantee for cross-regional maple bridge experience promotion, and provide intellectual support for cross regional cooperation and decision-making consultation.

Bay Area Information Sharing Mechanism
The timely resolution of social contradictions and disputes cannot be separated from the construction of an accurate and effective information sharing mechanism. From the point of view of essence and social attributes, it is necessary to form an effective connecting mechanism from information sharing, public participation, coordination of interests, and in-depth cooperation in order to enhance the systematic and coordinated mechanism of resolving social conflicts and disputes. As pointed out in the White Paper on the Practice of "One Country, Two Systems" in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the stability and security of the Special Administrative Region cannot be separated from state support.

Bay Area Referral and Work Interface Mechanism
In the framework of the Constitution and the Basic Law, we will remove ob- stacles to institutional mechanisms, start with the establishment of a cohesive mechanism, establish a strict system of hierarchical convergence of classification and hierarchy, and form a division of labor between institutions and affairs (power and financial power) from power operation to responsibility system design (authority and responsibility unification) systematized program support.
Specifically, on the one hand, it is necessary to establish a notification mechanism with the Bay Area Development Committee to promote the coordination of supervision, inspection, supervision, implementation, and accountability; On the other hand, at the level of communication, public participation, coordination of interests, and in-depth cooperation, we will seize the issues behind the issue of regional integration and development, and form synergies between governance concepts, systems, and public opinion. This also constitutes the actual guarantee of the effectiveness of the experience promotion of Maple Bridge in the Bay Area.

Bay Area Interest Coordination Mechanism
We will take social stability and development as the guiding principle, jointly discuss and jointly build, form a mechanism for coordinating interests of "new types of cooperation and participation in governance", and truly form a mechanism for inter-government coordination, market coordination, and social coordination. Through the organic combination of cooperation between governments and social cooperation, we will form a coordination mechanism in the Gulf Area, clarify the corresponding lists of obligations and responsibilities, and promote the corresponding innovation of risk warning and conflict prevention mechanisms. In order to realize the normalization, the rule of law, and the insti-

Conclusion
The

Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.