Percutaneous Intervention of CTO Lesion and Non-CTO Lesion in Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion


Background: With the improved lifestyle of people, the incidence of coronary artery disease is gradually increasing. Approximately 15% - 20% of patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization had one or more chronically occluded coronary arteries. Method: The patients who were diagnosed with chronic total occlusion (CTO) in our hospital within one year period have been included. They were initially divided into two groups based on angiographic reports: single vessel disease (SVD) and non-single vessel disease (non-SVD) group, then into optimal medical therapy (OMT) group, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) group. Finally, PCI group is further divided into PCI of CTO lesion (CTO PCI group) and PCI of non-CTO lesion (non-CTO PCI group). Results: A total of 261 patients were enrolled as CTO patients, mean age was 62.83 years, 70.1% were male patients. The incidence rate of common risk factors was hypertension (64.4%), followed by smoking (48.3%), diabetes (34.5%) and hyperlipidaemia (27.2%). SVD, DVD and TVD were present in 39 patients (14.94%), 81 patients (31.03%) and 141 patients (54.02%) respectively. Comparing the long term efficacy, the rates of MACE and non-target vessel revascularization were higher in CTO PCI than non-CTO PCI group, and were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The rates of target vessel revascularization, CABG and all cause death were also lower in CTO PCI group, but were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The rates of MACE, non-target vessel revascularization, CABG and all cause death are lower if PCI is successfully performed in CTO patients. CTO PCI success also improves quality of life, decreases myocardial ischemia induced angina, and overall improves long term efficacy.

Share and Cite:

Adhikari, B. , Wang, S. , Li, C. , Wang, Y. and Liu, Q. (2019) Percutaneous Intervention of CTO Lesion and Non-CTO Lesion in Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion. World Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 9, 600-611. doi: 10.4236/wjcd.2019.98052.

1. Introduction

Coronary artery disease is the most common form of heart diseases. Among the patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization, the CTO is found in approximately 15% - 20% of patients, the prevalence is much higher among individuals with history of coronary artery disease [1] [2] [3] [4] . Pathologically, CTO is the result of atherosclerotic changes in coronary artery causing increased plaque burden leading to complete occlusion of the artery with time. It is also defined as 100% stenosis of coronary artery diagnosed by coronary angiography with TIMI flow grade 0 [5] [6] [7] . The duration of occlusion should be more than 3 months, which can be estimated via initial onset of symptoms, or increased frequency of angina or previous history of myocardial infarction or total occlusion revealed by coronary angiography. The chronic total occlusion is basically a slow process. Long term ischemia promotes collateral circulation. The relatively patent collateral is like 90% of stenosis [8] . However, myocardial ischemia can occur when the oxygen demand is more, and patient can feel angina or clinical manifestations of cardiac insufficiency. Long term myocardial ischemia leads to myocardial necrosis, myocardial remodelling and cardiac dysfunction which can affect the quality of life and prognosis. Early management is important in improving these symptoms. The treatment of CTO includes medical therapy, PCI and CABG. Recently, with improvements in PCI related tools and techniques, especially the use of drug eluting stents and increased operator’s experience, CTO PCI success rate is increasing, while, complication rate is decreasing. CTO revascularization by PCI improves patient’s quality of life [9] [10] [11] , myocardial function [12] - [17] , and decreases need for CABG and mortality [18] [19] [20] [21] . Several factors influence CTO PCI. They include CTO duration, length of occlusion, proximal end morphology, calcification, and collateral circulation. Many scoring systems have been established to assess CTO PCI success. The most commonly used is J-CTO score [22] . In this study, we have evaluated the procedural and clinical efficacy after PCI of CTO lesion and non-CTO lesion in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion. Similarly, the baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic characteristics and procedural characteristic of CTO patients were also discussed.

2. Method

We have conducted an observational analysis of consecutive patients with chronic total occlusion of at least one native coronary artery CTO diagnosed by coronary angiography performed by interventional experts of cardiology department of the First Hospital of Jilin university from Jan 2016 to Dec 2016. The inclusion criteria were patients requiring non-emergency PCI to treat a 100% occlusion of a coronary artery, defined as CTO by CAG showing total occlusion of one vessel, TIMI grade 0, and diameter of occluded vessel > 2.5 cm. The evidence of myocardial ischemia of >3 months duration obtained from angina onset or previous ECG testing or previous coronary angiography. The exclusion criteria were CAG showing TIMI ≥ 1 coronary flow or with occlusions known to be of less than three moths duration, previous history of stroke for 6 months, severe renal insufficiency, haemorrhage, coagulation disorder, previous CABG history, allergy to contrast, aspirin or clopidogrel. Non-CTO lesion was defined as ≥70% stenosis of major vessels. CTO PCI success is defined as residual stenosis < 50% after PTCA of target lesion, and <30% stenosis after stenting with TIMI 3 and without any complications. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included cardiac death, STEMI, non-STEMI, cardiac tamponade, recurrent symptoms requiring urgent repeat target vessel revascularization (either PCI or CABG). Peri-procedure MI was defined as elevation of serum troponin level by more than five times the 99th percentile of the upper limit of normal in patients with normal baseline values, or rise in troponin level of >20%, if the baseline values were elevated. All these patients initially divided into two groups based on angiographic report: single vessel disease (SVD) group and non-single vessel disease (non-SVD) group. Then, they were divided into optimal medical therapy (OMT) group, PCI group and CABG group. PCI group further divided into PCI of CTO lesion (CTO PCI group) and PCI of non-CTO lesion (non-CTO PCI group). CTO PCI group has PCI success group and PCI failure group. PCI success group was treated by either PTCA or stenting. Optimal medical therapy included antiplatelet medications, beta-blocker, renin-angiotensin system blockers, nitrates, calcium channel blocker, and aggressive lipid lowering therapy. The medication regimens of all patients were considered optimal, with doses as allowed by heart rate, blood pressure, and symptoms in the absence of justifiable relative contraindications. Decision to perform bilateral injection and a retrograde approach, in addition to the type of wire, microcatheter, and use of intravascular ultrasound and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, were all left to physician discretion. Drug eluting stents were used in all patients. Study variables were divided into baseline clinical characteristics, angiographic characteristics, procedural details, procedural complications and long term clinical outcomes. Each patient was followed up at 12 months and 24 months. Follow up methods included outpatient follow up, messaging or telephone follow up. Follow up included primary study endpoints. Primary study endpoints were MACE, target vessel revascularization, non-target vessel revascularization, CABG and all cause death. Secondary endpoints were post-procedure MI, coronary perforation, in-stent thrombosis, bleeding, access site complications, and contrast nephropathy. Finally, data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 software and applying t test and chi square test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Result

A total of 261 patients enrolled as CTO patients, mean age was 62.83 years, 70.1% were male patients. The common risk factors were hypertension (64.4%), followed by smoking (48.3%), diabetes (34.5%) and hyperlipidaemia (27.2%). Baseline clinical characteristics of all CTO patients were included in Table 1. The mean LVEF of CTO patients was 55.34 ± 8.96. The lipid profile included TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C and were 6.35 ± 29.63, 2.18 ± 1.64, 2.80 ± 1.12, and 1.04 ± 0.23 respectively. Based on angiographic findings, all CTO patients were divided into two groups: single vessel disease (SVD) group and non-single vessel disease (non-SVD) group. The non-SVD group included double vessel disease (DVD) and triple vessel disease (TVD). SVD group further divided into medical therapy group (4 patients) and PCI group (35 patients). The most commonly chronically occluded lesion was seen in right coronary artery 111 (42.5%), followed by LAD 91 (34%), and LCX 59 (22.6%). Two coronary arteries were found to have occluded in 16 (6.13%) patients. Right radial approach was the most common approach for coronary angiography (Table 2 shows the angiographic characteristics of all CTO patients). J-CTO score was done for each patient and found score of 1 was most common that accounted 42.14%. The J-CTO score was determined by assigning 1 point to each independent predictor of revascularization difficulty. These predictors included blunt stump, calcification, bending, occlusion length > 20 mm and previously failed attempt.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of all CTO patients.

Table 2. Angiographic characteristics of all CTO patients (261).

A total of 222 patients was diagnosed either double vessel disease (DVD) or triple vessel disease (TVD). Information of 15 patients was missing or incomplete. 48 patients were managed with medical therapy, 22 patients advised for surgical consultation. Finally, 152 patients were planned for PCI management. Non-CTO lesion was intervened in 44 patients, while CTO lesion was intervened in 108 patients. All patients in non-CTO lesion group were successfully managed by PTCA. While, first attempt failed in 16 patients in CTO lesion group. Primary success achieved in 92 patients with PTCA in 4 patients and stenting in 88 patients. The right radial approach was still the commonest approach used in our centre both for CTO lesion and non-CTO lesion. The comparison between procedural characteristics of non-CTO lesion PCI and CTO lesion PCI was illustrated in Table 3. There was no statistical significance between these groups regarding arterial approach, number of stent used, diameter of stent, and length of stent. In CTO lesion group, the number of guidewires and microcatheter per procedure used was significantly higher. In hospital outcomes were considered as short term outcomes and these outcomes included lesion success,

Table 3. Comparison of Procedural characteristics of between CTO lesion group and non-CTO lesion PCI group.

procedural success, peri-procedural MI, coronary perforation, stent thrombosis, bleeding requiring transfusion, access site vascular complications and contrast induced nephropathy. Common vascular access complications included radial artery spasm, forearm hematoma, compartment syndrome, and development of pseudo-aneurysm, arteriovenous fistula and retroperitoneal hematoma. The comparison of in-hospital outcomes between CTO lesion group and non-CTO lesion group in non-SVD patients was included in Table 4, which showed complications were higher in CTO lesion PCI success group with maximal complications being access site vascular complication which was found in 7 (7.97%) patients.

Patients were evaluated at 1 year and at 2 years of their procedure. The enquiry was done on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, target vessel revascularization, non-target vessel revascularization, CABG and all cause death. MACEs included cardiac death, STEMI, non-STEMI, cardiac tamponade, recurrent symptoms requiring urgent repeat target vessel revascularization (either PCI or CABG). Target lesion revascularization indicated repeat percutaneous intervention of the treated lesion. Target vessel revascularization indicated repeat percutaneous intervention of the treated blood vessel. Restenosis was defined as narrowing to a diameter stenosis > 50% either within the stent or within 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent margin. The results were shown in Table 5.

Table 4. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes between CTO lesion group and non-CTO lesion group in non-SVD patients.

Table 5. 2-year follow up results of CTO and non-CTO patients.

Based on follow up results, the rate of MACE, target vessel revascularization, non-target vessel revascularization higher in non-CTO group. The all cause death and need for CABG were also found be higher in non-CTO group. That mean revascularization of CTO lesion has more beneficial effect on quality of life, myocardial function, long term survival, tolerance of future coronary events.

4. Discussion

With the advancement in PCI related techniques and increased operator’s experience, success rate of CTO PCI has increased [23] [24] . CTO PCI success improves patients’ quality of life, decreases myocardial ischemia induced angina, improves heart function, prevents cardiac arrhythmias, and decreases need of anti-anginal medications and mortality [25] - [30] . This study showed long term prognosis of CTO PCI success patients was better. Four patients in OMT group expired and MACE rate was higher in this group. This is due to refusal of PCI treatment by the patient although they were indicated to PCI treatment or due to poor patient financial condition. Literatures reported only 1/3 of patients with CTO was intervened to their CTO lesion [2] , but, we have managed to almost 2/3 of patients by PCI except those with CTO PCI failure. DECISION-CTO trial [31] randomized 834 patients and divided into CTO PCI + OMT group and OMT group, follow up for 3.1 years and reported similar clinical efficacy and quality of life between these groups. According ACC/AHA appropriate use criteria, if patients had better symptomatic relief, better functional and quality of life, they were indicated to revascularization [32] . In recent years, tremendous progress in CTO PCI techniques experts has achieved high rates of procedural success [33] [34] . If there are high risk, complex procedure, high cost, high radiation, less symptomatic relief, those patients can be recommended medical therapy. Before undergoing CTO PCI, following things should be considered: 1) whether the patient had myocardial ischemia induced angina; 2) rate of CTO PCI success; 3) risk and complications of CTO PCI. Neither medical therapy nor percutaneous intervention is feasible in certain groups of patients with chronic total occlusion. Factors that favor surgical revascularization include multiple vessel involvement, poor LV function, total occlusions of native coronary arteries, and the availability of arterial conduits [35] . According to updated ACC guideline, class I indications for CABG include left main stenosis > 50%, stenosis of proximal LAD and proximal circumflex > 70%, triple vessel disease, double vessel disease with large area of viable myocardium in high risk area, disabling angina, ongoing ischemia in the setting of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction that is unresponsive to medical therapy [36] . In this study, we referred for surgical consultation to 22 patients who had triple vessel disease with one or more than one chronic total occlusion.

The main reason for failure of CTO revascularization is inability to cross the occlusion with guidewire [37] . Success of wire crossing mostly depends on operator’s skills and experience. However, in some cases, a balloon cannot cross the lesion after successful guidewire crossing and confirmation of guidewire placement into distal true lumen. Complex CTO PCI increases the risk of coronary artery perforation, higher radiation exposure, collateral vessel loss and contrast induced nephropathy recently [38] . In order to minimize the risk of contrast induced nephropathy, hydration protocol should be followed. Proper planning should be done to get higher CTO PCI success rate. The assisted modalities can be used in certain cases. These modalities include intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS), rotational atherectomy (RA), and excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) [39] [40] .

This study has certain limitation: the sample size is less, single-centered, short follow up duration. The possibility of selection bias inherent to the observational design of our analyses could not be avoided. In addition, two years of follow up were not sufficient to draw conclusions regarding the long term performances of CTO PCI. The selection of treatment strategy was influenced by patient characteristics and by patient and doctor preferences. The radiation exposure dose, operational duration and contrast dose were also not calculated, which could have significant impact on clinical and procedural outcomes of the patients.

5. Conclusion

The rate of MACE, non-target vessel revascularization, CABG and all cause death are lower if PCI is successfully performed in CTO patients. CTO PCI success also improves quality of life, decreases myocardial ischemia induced angina, and overall improves long term efficacy. If the patients improve with symptoms, functional ability and quality of life, revascularization of CTO can be considered. Optimal medical therapy can be considered if there is high procedural risk, complex procedure, high cost, increased radiation, and improved angina symptoms, proper planning should be considered before undergoing CTO PCI and assisted examinations (such as IVUS, RA and laser therapy) should be performed in selected cases, which will increase success rate and decrease complication rate.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


[1] Kahn, J.K. (1993) Angiographic Suitability for Catheter Revascularization of Total Coronary Occlusions in Patients from a Community Hospital Setting. American Heart Journal, 126, 561-564.
[2] Fefer, P., Knudtson, M.L., Cheema, A.N., et al. (2012) Current Perspectives on Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: The Canadian Multicentre Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. JACC: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 991-997.
[3] Tomasello, S.D., Boukhris, M., Giubilato, S., et al. (2015) Management Strategies in Patients Affected by Chronic Total Occlusion: Results from the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion. European Heart Journal, 36, 3189-3198.
[4] Ramunddal, T., Hoebers, L.P., Henriques, J.P., et al. (2016) Prognostic Impact of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Report from SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 9, 1535-1544.
[5] Stone, G.W., Kandzari, D.E., Mehran, R., et al. (2005) Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronically Occluded Coronary Arteries: A Consensus Document: Part 1. Circulation, 112, 2364-2372.
[6] Carlino, M., Magri, C.J., Uretsky, B.F., Brilakis, E.S., Walsh, S., et al. (2015) Treatment of the Chronic Total Occlusion: A Call to Action for the Interventional Community. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 85, 771-778.
[7] El Sabbagh, A., Patel, V.G., Jeroudi, O.M., et al. (2014) Angiographic Success and Procedural Complications in Patients Undergoing Retrograde Percutaneous Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: A Weighted Meta-Analysis of 3,482 Patients from 26 Studies. International Journal of Cardiology, 174, 243-248.
[8] Werner, G.S., Surber, R., Ferrari, M. and Figulla, H.R. (2006) The Functional Reserve of Collaterals Supplying Long-Term Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Patients without Prior Myocardial Infarction. European Heart Journal, 27, 2406-2412.
[9] Olivari, Z., Rubartelli, P., Piscione, F., et al. (2003) Immediate Results and One Year Clinical Outcome after Percuantous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occluions: Data from a Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study (TOAST-GISE). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 41, 1672-1678.
[10] Bruckel, J.T., Jaffer, F.A., O’Brien, C., Stone, L., Pmerantsev, E. and Yeh, R.W. (2016) Angina Severity, Depression, and Response to Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 28, 44-51.
[11] Rossello, X., Pujadas, S., Serra, A., et al. (2016) Assessment of Inducible Myocardial Ischemia, Quality of Life, and Functional Status after Successful Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion. American Journal of Cardiology, 117, 720-726.
[12] Melchior, J.P., Doriot, P.A., Chatelain, P., et al. (1987) Improvement of Left Ventricular Contraction and Relaxation Synchronism after Recanalization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion by Angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 9, 763-768.
[13] Sirnes, P.A., Myreng, Y., Molstad, P., et al. (1998) Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Wall Motion after Successful Recanalization of Chronic Coronary Occlusion. European Heart Journal, 19, 273-281.
[14] Danchin, N., Angioi, M., Cador, R., et al. (1996) Effect of Late Percutaneous Angioplastic Recanaliztio of Total Coronary Artery Occlusion on Left Ventricular Remodelling, Ejection Fraction, and Regional Wall Motion. American Journal of Cardiology, 78, 729-735.
[15] Baks, T., van Geuns, R.J., Duncker, D.J., et al. (2006) Preiction of Left Ventricular Function after Drug Eluting Stent Implantation for Chornic Total Coronary Occlusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47, 721-725.
[16] Van Belle, E., Blouard, P., McFadden, E.P., Lablanche, J.M., Baters, C., et al. (1997) Effects of Stenting of Recent or Chronic Coronary Occlusions on Late Vessel Patency and Left Ventricular Function. American Journal of Cardiology, 80, 1150-1154.
[17] Werner, G.S., Surber, R., Kuethe, F., et al. (2005) Collaterals and the Recovery of Left Ventricular Function after Recanalization of a Chrinc Total Coronary Occlusion. American Heart Journal, 149, 129-137.
[18] Mehran, R., Claessen, B.E., Godino, C., et al. (2011) Long Term Outcome of Percutanteous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 4, 951-961.
[19] Khan, M.F., Wendel, C.S., Thai, H.M., et al. (2013) Effects of Percutaneous Revascularization of Chornic Total Occlusions on Clinical Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Successful versus Failed Percutaneous Intervention for Chroinic Total Occlusion. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 82, 95-107.
[20] Jones, D.A., Weerackody, R., Rathod, K., et al. (2012) Successful Recanalization of Chorinc Total Occlusions Is Associated with Improved Long Term Survival. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 5, 380-388.
[21] Jang, W.J., Yang, J.H., Choi, S.H., et al. (2015) Long Term Survival Benefit of Revascularization Compared with Medical Therapy in Patients with Coronary Chorinic Total Occlusion and Well Developed Collateral Circulation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 8, 271-279.
[22] Morino, Y., Abe, M., Morimoto, T., Kimura, T., Hayashi, Y., Muramatsu, T., Ochiai, M., et al. (2011) Investigators, and Predicting Successful Guidewire Crossing through Chronic Total Occlusion of Native Coronary Lesions within 30 Minutes: The J-CTO (Multicentre CTO Registry in Japan) Score as a Difficulty Grading and Time Assessment Tool. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 4, 213-221.
[23] Galassi, A.R., Tomasello, S.D., Reifart, N., et al. (2011) In Hospital Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chornic Total Occlusion: Insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) Registry. EuroIntervention, 7, 472-479.
[24] Morino, Y., Kimura, T., Hayashi, Y., et al. (2010) In Hospital Outcomes of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Choric Total Occlusion Insights from the J-CTO Registry (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 3, 143-151.
[25] Safley, D.M., Grantham, J., Jones, P.G. and Spertus, J. (2012) Health Status Benefits of Angioplasty for Chronic Total Occlusions—An Analysis Form the OPS/PRISM Studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, E101.
[26] Joyal, D., Afilalo, J. and Rinfret, S. (2010) Effectiveness of Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. American Heart Journal, 160, 179-187.
[27] Safley, D.M., Koshy, S., Grantham, J.A., et al. (2011) Changes in Myocardial Ischemic Burden Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 78, 337-343.
[28] Farooq, V., Serruys, P.W., Garcia-Garcia, H.M., et al. (2013) The Negative Impact of Incomplete Angiographic Revascularization on Clinical Outcomes and Its Association with Total Occlusions: The SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, 282-294.
[29] Piscione, F., Galasso, G., De Luca, G., et al. (2005) Late Reopening of an Occluded Infarct Related Artery Improves Left Ventricular Function and Long Term Clinical Outcome. Heart, 91, 646-651.
[30] Cheng, A.S., Selvanayagam, J.B., Jerosch-Herold, M., et al. (2008) Percutaneous Treatment of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions Improves Regional Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow and Contractility: Insights from Quantitative Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 1, 44-53.
[31] Gutierrez-Chico, J.L. (2017) DECISION-CTO: A “Negative” Clinical Trial? Really? Cardiology Journal, 24, 231-233.
[32] Patel, M.R., Dehmer, G.J., Hirhfeld, J.W., et al. (2012) ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/ AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 59, 857-881.
[33] Morino, Y., imura, T., Hayashi, Y., et al. (2010) I-Hospital Outcomes of Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion Sights from the J-CTO Registry (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 3, 143-151.
[34] Bradley, H.S., Shuvy, M. and Hrindra, C.W. (2014) Revascularization of Chronic Total Occlusions, Time to Reconsider? JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 64, 1281-1289.
[35] Brener, S.J., Lytle, B.W., Casserly, I.P., et al. (2003) Predictors of Revascularization Method and Long Term Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Repeat Coronary Bypass Surgery in Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease and Previous Coronary Bypass Surgery. European Heart Journal, 27, 413-418.
[36] Eagle, K.A., Guyton, R.A., Davidoff, R., et al. (2004) ACC/AHA 2004 Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation, 110, e340-e437.
[37] Tsuchikane, E. (2003) Complex PCI: PCI for the Chroic Total Occlusion. Corona Interview, 2, 8-13.
[38] Holmes Jr., D.R. and Williams, D.O. (2008) Catheter Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: Past, Present, and Future. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 1, 60-73.
[39] Courtney, B.K., Nunce, N., Anderson, K.J., et al. (2008) Innovations in Imaging for Chronic Total Occlusion: A Glimpse into the Future of Angiography’s Blind Spot. European Heart Journal, 29, 583-593.
[40] Nissen, S.E. and Yock, P. (2001) Intravascular Ultrasound: Novel Pathophysiological Insights and Current Clinical Applications. Circulation, 103, 604-616.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.