Anthropometric measurements at birth as predictor of low birth weight

Negar Sajjadian, Homdeh Shajari, Farnoush Rahimi, Ramin Jahadi, Michael G. Barakat
DOI: 10.4236/health.2011.312125                

Abstract

In developing countries, low birth weight (BW < 2500 grams) accounts for 60% - 80% of neonatal deaths. Early identification and referral of LBW babies for extra essential newborn care is vital in preventing neonatal deaths. Studies carried out in different populations have suggested that the use of newborn anthropometric surrogates of birth weight may be a simple and reliable method to identify LBW babies. previous studies reported correlation between birth weight to several anthropometric measurements and their predictive value. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between birth length, head, chest, and mid arm circumferences to birth weight. Methods: A cross sectional study has been conducted in SHARIATI Hospital in Tehran, from September 2008 to February 2009. All Consecutive full-term. Single ton, live born babies were included and anthropometric measurements carried out within 48 hours after birth by authors. Birth weight was measured by digital scale within the first 24 hours after delivery. Birth length by somatometer and head, chest, mid arm circumferences were measured 2 times by using plastic measuring tape. Result: Out of 500 newborn studied. 52.2% were male and 47.8% were female. The mean birth weight was 3195.4 ± 399.9 gram and 3.8% of newborns were low birth weight. It was evident a positive correlation of birth weight to all such anthropometric measurements with the highest correlation coefficient for chest circumference (r: 0.74). By ROC- AUC analyses, chest circumference (AUC = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97) and arm circumference (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95) were identified as the optimal surrogate indicators of LBW babies. The optimal cut-points for chest circumference and arm circumference to identify LBW newborns were ≥31.2 cm and ≥10.2 cm respectively. Conclusions: Chest and mid arm circumferences were the best anthropometric surrogates of LBW among studied Iranian population. Further studies are needed in the field to cross-validate our results. anthropometric values are simple, practicable, quick and reliable indicator for predicting LBW newborns in the community and can be easily measured by paramedical workers in developing nation.

Keywords

Low Birth Weight; Anthropometric Measurements; Neonatal Mortality

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	The world health report. The newoborn health that went unnoticed, perinatal mortality. A listing of available information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996.
[2]	Lawn, J.E., Cousens, S. and Zupan, J. (2005) Lancet neonatal survival steering team: 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet, 365, 891-900.
[3]	Gogia, S. and Sachdev, H.S. (2010) Home visits by community health workers to prevent neonatal deaths in developing countries: A systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 658
[4]	Blanc, A.K. and Wardlaw, T. (2005) Monitoring low birth weight: An evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83, 178-185.
[5]	United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2005) The state of the world’s children. New York.
[6]	Bang, A., Reddy, M.H. and Deshmukh, M.D. (2002) Child mortality in Maharashtra. Economic Political Weekly, 37, 4947-4965.
[7]	Darmstadt, G.L., Bhutta, Z.A., Cousens, S., Adam, T., Walker, N. and de Bernis, L. (2005) Lancet neonatal survival steering team: Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save? Lancet, 365, 977-998. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6
[8]	Mullany, L.C., Darmstadt, G.L., Coffey, P., Khatry, S.K., LeClerq, S.C. and Tielsch, J.M. (2006) A low cost, colour coded, hand held spring scale accurately categorises birth weight in low resource settings. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91, 410-413. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.088781
[9]	Ramaiya, C., Msamanga, G., Massawe, S., Mpanju, W. and Nywalle, E. (1994) Newborn’s arm circumference as screening tool of low birth weight in temeke pistric, peres salaam, Tunzania. Tropical and Geographical Medicine, 46, 318-321.
[10]	Naik, D.B., Kulkarni, A.P. and Aswar, N.R. (2003) Birth weight and anthropometry of newborns. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2003, 70, 145-146. doi:10.1007/BF02723742
[11]	Samal, G.C. and Swain, A.K. (2001) Calf circumference as an alternative to birth weight to predict low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatrics, 38, 275-277.
[12]	Gupta, V., Hatwal, S.K., Mathur, S., Tripathi, V.N., Sharma, S.N., Saxena, S.C. and Khadwal, A. (1996) Calf circumference as a predictor of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatrics, 33, 119-121.
[13]	Virdi, U.S., Jain, B.K. and Singh, H. (2001) Calf circumference for identification of low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatrics, 38, 934-935.
[14]	World Health Organization (1994) Multi-centre study on low birth weight and infant mortality in India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Southeast Asia Regional Office, World Health Organization, New Delhi.
[15]	Ahmed, F.U., Karim, E. and Bhuiyan, S.N. (2000) Mid-arm circumference at birth as predictor of low birth weight and neonatal mortality. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32, 487-493. doi:10.1017/S0021932000004879
[16]	Das, J.C., Afroze, A., Khanam, S.T. and Paul, N. (2005) Mid-arm circumference: an alternative measure for screening low birth weight babies. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin, 31, 1-6.
[17]	Ezeaka, V.C., Egri-Okwaji, M.T., Renner, J.K. and Grange, A.O. (2003) Anthropometric measurements in the detection of low birth weight infants in Lagos. The Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 10, 168-172.
[18]	Hossain, M.M., Habib, M. and DuPont, H.L. (1994) Association between birth weight and birth arm circumference of neonates in rural Egypt. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 61, 81-87. doi:10.1007/BF02753565
[19]	(1993) Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight. WHO collaborative study of birth weight surrogates. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 71, 157-163.
[20]	Mullany, L.C., Darmstadt, G.L., Jhatry, S.K. et. al. (2007) Relationship between the surrogate anthropometric measures, foot length and chest circumference and birth weight among newborn of sarlahi, Nepal. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61, 40-46. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602504
[21]	Hanimi, R.M. and Abhay T. (2005) How to identify neonate at risk of death in rural India: clinical criteria for the risk approach. Journal of Perinatology, 25, s44-s50. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211272
[22]	Kliegman, R.M., Jenson, H.B., Marcdanle, K.J. and Beharman, R.E. (2006) Nelson essentials of pediatrics. 5th Edition, Elsevier Saunders Press, Amsterdam.
[23]	Eghba, L.F. (2007) Evaluation of etiology of low birth weight. Iranian Pediatric Journal, 17, 27-33.
[24]	Bindu, N.R., Elizabeth, K.E., Varghese, G. and Varghese, S. (2006) Mid arm circumference (MAC) and body mass index (BMJ)―The tow important auxologic parameters in neonates. Journal of tropical pediatrics, 52, 341-345.
[25]	Seeramarddy, C.T., Chuni, N., Patil, R., Singh, D. and Shakya, B. (2008) Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborn: A hospital-based study. BMC Pediatrics, 8, 16. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-8-16
[26]	(1993) WHO Collaborative study of birth weight surrogates―Use of a simple anthropometric measurement to predict birth weight. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 71, 157-163.
[27]	Gupta, V., Hatwal, S.K., Mathur, S., et al. (1996) Calf circumference as a predictor of low birth babies. Indian Pediatrics, 33, 119-121.