1. Introduction
Recently, the fractional derivative has attracted a lot of attentions due to widely applied in various fields of physics and engineering. Fractional derivative is an excellent tool to describe memory and genetic characteristics of various materials and processes. Many phenomena in various fields of science and engineering such as control, porous media, electrochemistry, viscoelasticity, electromagnetic, etc. can be described by Fractional differential Equation (FDE). The evolution of effective and perfectly appropriate method for numerically solving FDEs has received great attention over the past years.
In this paper, we develop a new approach called Chelyshkov-tau method for solving Bagley-Torvik equation of the form
(1)
subject to the boundary conditions
(2)
where
represents mass of the thin rigid plate immersed in a Newtonian fluid,
is constant depending on area of the thin rigid, viscosity and density of fluid and
represents stiffness of the spring.
is a given function.
represents motion of the rigid plate. The questions of existence and uniqueness of the solution to this initial value problem have been discussed in [1] [2] , so there is no need to go into these matters here.
Several numerical and analytical methods of Equation (1) were considered by many authors, such as finite difference method [3] , collocation method based on Müntz polynomials [4] , Tau approximate [5] , Adomian decomposition method [6] [7] , variational iteration method [8] , the generalized block pulse operational matrix [9] , homotopy perturbation method [10] [11] , generalized differential transform method [12] , Legendre-collocation method [13] , Laplace transforms [14] , Fourier transforms [15] , eigenvector expansion [16] , fractional differential transform method [17] [18] , the fractional iteration method [19] , power series method [20] , Bessel collocation method [21] , wavelet [22] and the Haar wavelet method [23] .
Orthogonal polynomials play an important role in mathematics as well as in applications in mathematical physics, engineering and computer science. Chelyshkov polynomials are the most recent set of orthogonal polynomials. Chelyshkov polynomials have become increasingly important in numerical analysis. The efficiency of the method has been officially established by many researchers [24] [25] . With these backgrounds, we extend Chelyshkov-tau method for solving Bagley-Torvik equation of Equation (1).
The efficiency and accuracy of the numerical scheme is assessed on specific test problems. The numerical outcomes indicate that the method yields highly accurate results. The numerical solutions are compared with analytical and other existing numerical solutions in the literature.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 preliminarily provides some definitions which are crucial to the following discussion. In Section 3 we apply Chelyshkov-tau method for solving the model equation. In Section 4, we present numerical examples to exhibit the accuracy and the efficiency of the present method. where the numerical results presented in this paper are computed by Matlab programming. The conclusion is presented in the final section.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Basic Definitions of Fractional
In this section, we introduce the basic necessary definitions and primary facts of the fractional calculus theory which will be more used in this work [26] [27] .
Definition 1. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator
of order
on a usual Lebesgue space
is given by
Some characteristics of this operator are:
The Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative operator
is given by
where m is an integer, provided that
.
However, its derivative has Some drawbacks when we try to make a model for a real phenomenon using fractional differential equations. Therefore, we will provide a modified fractional differential operator
proposed by by Caputo [28] .
Definition 2. The Caputo derivative definition is defined as
(3)
Hence,
and m is the smallest integer greater than or equal to
. For the Caputo fractional derivative we have
(4)
It can be said when
, the Caputo differential operator matches with the integer-order differential operator.
For more details on fractional derivative definitions, theorems and its properties, you can see [26] [27] .
2.2. Some Properties of Chelyshkov Polynomials
We first review some important concepts and basics of the Chelyshkov function and conclude useful results that are important to this paper. Recently, these polynomials have established by Chelyshkov in [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] , which are orthogonal over the interval
, and are explicitly defined by
(5)
This gives the Rodrigues formula
and the orthogonality condition of Chelyshkov polynomials [32] is
(6)
Also it follows from this relation that
By using the Cauchy integral formula for derivative and the Rodrigues type representation, we can get the integral relation
such that the point
. lies in closed curve
.
Chelyshkov polynomials
provide a natural way to solve, expand, and interpret solutions. Actually, these polynomials can be expressed in terms of the Jacobi polynomials
by the following relation,
Let function
, square integrable in
, can be expressed in terms of Chelyshkov polynomials as
(7)
where the coefficients
are the unknown Chelyshkov coefficients and
are Chelyshkov orthogonal polynomials of the degree N such that
. Also,
(8)
Then we can convert the solution expressed by (7) and its derivative (8) to matrix form
(9)
where
and
if N is odd,
if N is even,
Theorem 1. For
defined in (5) then the finite series can be converted
into matrix form
(10)
where
(11)
Proof. The proof is straightforward using Equation (4).
3. The Description of Chelyshkov Scheme
Let us seek the solution of (1) expressed in terms of Chelyshkov polynomials as
Replacing each terms of (1) with the corresponding approximations defined in (7), (8) and (10) and we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2. If the assumed approximate solution of the boundary-value problem (1)-(2) is (3), the discrete Chelyshkov-tau system for the determination of the unknown coefficients
is given by
(12)
Equation (12), which can be written in the matrix form
(13)
where
The residual
for Equation (13) can be written as
(14)
As in a typical tau method [34] we generate N-1 linear equations by applying
(15)
The boundary condition is derived from Equation (2) and matrices for conditions are
(16)
Equations (15) and (16) generate
set of linear equations, respectively. These linear equations can be solved for unknown coefficients of the vector
. Consequently,
given in Equation (7) can be calculated..
4. Numerical Results
In this section, we apply the Chelyshkov-tau method to various problems which were collected from the open literature [13] [35] [36] [37] [38] . Our primary interest is to compare our method with other methods on the same problems. All computations were carried out using Matlab on a personal computer. In the examples, the maximum absolute error at points is taken as
Example 1: [21] Consider the linear BVP
subject to the boundary conditions
whose exact solution is
the approximate solution
by the truncated Chelyshkov polynomial for
is
Here, we have
(17)
By applying Equation (15) We obtain
(18)
By applying Equation (16), we have
(19)
(20)
By solving Equations (18)-(20), we get
Thus we can write
which is the exact solution.
Example 2: [13] [35] [36] Consider the linear BVP
with initial conditions
which is known to have analytical solution as
where
is the kth derivative of the Mittag-Leffler function with parameters
and
given by
and the
three-term Green’s equation. Let
,
and
.
Table 1 exhibits a comparison between the exact, the results obtained by using Chelyshkov tau for
with analogous results of Çenesiz et al. [35] for underlying the generalized Taylor collocation method (GTCM) and Setia [36] , who used second kind Chebyshev wavelet method (CWM) and with analogous results of El-Gamel and Abd El-Hady [13] for underlying Legendre-collocation method.
Figure 1 displays the estimated absolute error function for
with the present method.
Example 3: [13] [19] Now we turn to IVP
subject to the boundary conditions
whose exact solution is
Figure 1. Error plot between analytical and Chelyshkov results for Example 2.
Table 2 exhibits a comparison between the results obtained by using Chelyshkov tau for
with analogous results of Mekkaoui and Hammouch [19] for underlying the variational iteration method (VIM), the fractional iteration method (FIM) and with analogous results of El-Gamel and Abd El-Hady [13] for underlying Legendre-collocation method.
Figure 2 displays the estimated absolute error function for
with the present method.
Example 4: [38] Consider the linear BVP
where
and
and subject to the boundary conditions
whose exact solution is
Table 3 exhibits a comparison between the absolute errors obtained by using Chelyshkov tau for
with analogous errors of Rehman and Ali Khan [38] for underlying Haar wavelets method.
Figure 3 displays the estimated absolute error function for
with the present method.
Figure 2. Error plot between analytical and Chelyshkov results for Example 3.
Figure 3. Error plot between analytical and Chelyshkov results for Example 4.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, Chelyshkov operational matrix of fractional derivative has been derived. Our approach was based on the tau method. The proposed technique is easy to implement efficiently and yield accurate results. Moreover, only a small number of Chelyshkov polynomials is needed to obtain a satisfactory result. In addition, an interesting feature of this method is to find the analytical solution if the equation has an exact solution that is polynomial functions. Numerical examples are included and a comparison is made with an existing result.