Nutritional Contribution of Some Senegalese Forest Fruits Running across Soudano-Sahelian Zone ()
1. Introduction
In Sahel zone particularly Senegal, despite protection directive; development programs (FAO, 1999a [1]; Ministère, 2005 [2]) and some domestication endeavors (Kalinganire, Weber, Uwamariya, & Kone, 2007 [3]; Koné, Kalinganire, & Doumbia, 2009 [4]); the natural forested plantings are constantly degraded and the edible resulted products are becoming rare (FAO, 1999b [5]; Perera & Baldwin, 2001 [6]). The reasons of this unusualness is essentially due to anthropogenic pressure (Faye, Diatta, Samba, & Lejoly, 2009 [7]). However in Senegal, some results showed that the annual regression rhythm during 1991-1999 was attenuated (Allemande, 2005 [8]). Many studies showed the various potentialities of forest plants in the country planning (Faye, Diatta, Samba, & Lejoly, 2009 [7]), soils fortification (Giner et al., 2000 [9]; Samba, C. Camire, & Margolis, 2001 [10]), combustibles source (Allemande, 2005) [8], field sown with fodder crop source (Samba, C. Camire, & Margolis, 2001) [10], pharmacological use (Keita, Arnason, Baum, & Marles, 1999 [11]; N’Diaye, Kéita, & Martin, 2003 [12]; Soloviev, Niang, Gaye, & Totte, 2004; UICN, 2006 [13]) and food (FAO, 1999 [1], 1999 [5]).
These forest plants are socio-economically important and non-neglected. The most exploited organs are the fruit. In Senegal, takings from forest fruits in 1990 represented 30%, about 457,000 Euros (Itef, 1991) [14].
The lists of forest fruits spontaneously used and commercialized have been given in many studies and protecttion programs for forest plants (Ambé, 2001 [15]; N’Diaye, Kéita, & Martin, 2003 [12]; UICN, 2006 [16]). Nevertheless, the nutritional interest is not specified excepted for some major fruits of high economic importance including Adansonia digitata (Cissé et al., 2009 [17]; Gabar, Sakho, Dornier, Cissé, & Reynes, 2006 [18]), Ziziphus mauritiana (Muchuweti, Zenda, Ndhlala, & Kasiyamhuru, 2005 [19]; Ugese, Baiyeri, & Mbah, 2008 [20]), Vitellaria paradoxa (Ugese, Baiyeri, & Mbah, 2008) [20], Balanites aegyptiaca (Abdel-Rahim, El-Saadany, & Wasi, 1986) [21] and Tamarindus indica (UgeseBaiyeri, & Mbah, 2008) [20].
Any result on nutritional aspect of the forest fruits, such as Ficus gnaphalocarpa L., Cordyla pinnata (Lepr. ex A. Rich.) Milne-Redh, Sarcocephalus latifolius (Sm.) E. A. Bruce and Icacina senegalensis Adr. Juss., concerning this article has been published or reported. The aim of the article paper is to (1) study the nutritional values of these forest fruits by biochemical analysis, and (2) give off some possible ascribable applications.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Biological Materials
Matured sample fruits (Table 1) were harvested during their maturation periods and were made up into different batches. Species of fruits used were Ficus gnaphalo-
Table 1. The different samples used in this work.
carpa, L., Cordyla pinnata (Lepr. ex A.Rich.) MilneRedh. and Icacina senegalensis Adr. Juss; all harvested in Kaffrine’s region (center of Senegal), in soudano-sahélienne zone. The species of Sarcocephalus latifolius (Sm.) E.A. Bruce were from Kédougou and Ziguinchor regions, south of Senegal (Sudanese zone).
Sample Preparations
Acidity dosage, vitamin C dosage, proteins dosage, and total minerals determination were realized on pulps isolated in crude state. Other samples were used after removing their pericarps and the edible parts were freeze drying for lipids dosage, soluble sugars dosage, simple sugars and trace elements’ determination.
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Volumetric Dosages
The acidity was determined according to the normalized method NF V05-101 (Afnor, 1982) [22] the vitamin C by using the method of Dichloro-2,6 Phenol Indo Phenol referenced NF V 76-005 (Afnor, 1982) [22]. The nitrogen dosage by the method of Kjeldhal NF 03-050 (Afnor, 1982) [22] and proteins were calculated using 5.7 as coefficient. The total minerals were determined after 3 hours incineration at 550˚C according to V76-101 method (Afnor, 1982) [22].
2.2.2. Sugar Composition
The sugar composition was determined by Dionex DX600 HPLC, after using a volume of 80% ethanol for extraction. A CarboPac MA1 (4 × 250 mm; 7.5 μm) colon was used, and 0.6 to 0.8 of NaOH solution, with a 0.4 mL/min constituted the mobile phase.
2.2.3. Minerals Determination
After dry way mineralization at 500˚C, then desilication with fluorihydric acid of sample weights, the detection of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, copper, zinc and iron were realized by using a spectrophotometer of plasma radiation with inductive coupling of Varian-vista type.
2.2.4. Statistic Analysis
The analyses were repeated three times. The three sets of data were analyzed by SAS software (version 8.1, 2000; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).
3. Results and Discussion: Nutritional Composition of Different Fruits Samples
3.1. Total Soluble Sugars and Simple Sugars
Table 2 shows the amounts of total soluble sugars in different forest fruits’ samples used in this work.
The contents of total soluble sugars in these matured fruits are variable and significantly different (p < 0.05). Species of I. senegalensis and C. pinnata own high content of sugars 60.93 g/100 g and 50.93 (Table 2) respecttively in dry matter compared to F. gnaphalocarpa (18.83 g) and S. latifolius (24.53 g). The same trend was observed for fructose and saccharose except for glucose in which the content is statistically identical in C. pinnata and S. latifolius species (5.70 and 5.97 g/100 g in dry matter). The same conclusion in F. gnaphalocarpa and S. latifolius for the fructose contents of 9.87 and 9.80 g/100 g in dry matter respectively, was observed. Nevertheless, it’s important to mention that saccharose represents the essential total soluble sugar in C. pinnata (80.10%), S. latifolius (43.62%) and I. senegalensis (36.71%) compared to F. gnaphalocarpa in which only 4.05% of this disaccharide was found. In this last, fructose and glucose respectively 8.8 ± 0.70 g/100 g in dry matter (if 52.41% of total sugar) and 9.87 ± 0.67 g/100 g in dry matter (if 46.73% of total sugar) were obtained. Furthermore, C. pinnata and S. latifolius contain high amounts of total sugars compared to Adansonia digitata specie (20% and 32%) [23]. Moreover, compared to Ziziphus mauritiana [24], the fruit of I. senegalensis provide the same amount of sugar (between 56% and 65%). However, saccharose absence can be noticed in Z. mauritiana, replaced by galactose [25]. From these results, Cordyla pinnata can be selected as a good source of saccharose for food industry in comparison to sugar cane and beet. Furthermore, I. senegalensis constitute an advantage of diversified reducing sugars’ production (glucose and fructose) as well as non reducing sugars (saccharose).
Table 2. Total soluble sugars in different samples.
3.2. Proteins Content, Minerals, Vitamin C and Acidity
Table 3 shows the amounts of proteins, vitamins C, acidity (expressed as citric acid) and minerals.
Comparison between protein contents shows that S. latifolius present the best contributing of proteins by 17.02%. This rate is significantly higher when compared to C. pinnata (11.15%) and F. gnaphalocarpa (10.36%). In fact, the protein content of S. latifolius (belonging to our fruits’ target) is superior enough compared to common strawberry fruit (0.73%) [26], Z. mauritiana (11.8% MS) [24], A. digitata (between 1.8 and 2.7%) [23]. However, this amount of S. latifolius protein remains relatively low compared to Maerua pseudopetalosa (22.06%), a forest fruit [27]. C. pinnata and F. gnaphalocarpa protein contents are significantly identical (p < 0.05).
The mineral contents are inversely proportional to the protein contents. Thus, S. latifolius presents the lowest value (3.38%) compared to F. gnaphalocarpa and C. pinnata respectively 4.63 and 4.91. The acidity, vitamin C and total minerals are significantly different form one sample to another. However, S. latifolius with the highest acidity content (402.43 mg/100 g) holds the best vitamin C content (1488 mg/100 g from Table 3); this richness is close to Acerola Malpighia punicifolia (1800 mg/100 g) [28] classified as the second fruit with highest vitamin C after camu-camu Myrciaria dubia [29]. In many local fruits including Z. mauritiana, A. digitata, Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx, and Detarium senegalensis, the vitamin C contents are respectively 405 mg/100 g [24]; 125 to 312 mg/100 g [23]; 58 to 63 mg/100 g; and 967 mg/100 [30]. The consumption of these fruits can cover the daily intake of vitamin C (between 42 mg/day and 93) [28] as shown in wild Thailand’s fruits [31]. From the later reference, we are leading researches on the antioxidant activities which can be improved by crudes fibers, total polyphenol content, total flavonoids in these forest fruits. However, the moderated consumption of S. latifolius has been suggested because, an exceed consumption of vitamin C engenders some gust intestine troubles [32], some oxalate crystal formation in the urinary system [33] and indeed red globulins hemophiliac [34].
3.3. Mineral Contents
The results of mineral contents in different samples are mentioned in Table 4.
Excepted for potassium (in Table 4), S. latifolius, F. gnaphalocarpa and I. senegalensis own high copper content (between 8.2 to 9.4 mg/kg), iron content (from range of 54.7 to 81.8 mg/kg in dry matter) and zinc content (between 10.1 to 25.6 mg/kg). Compared to C. pinnata, a weak profile of calcium elements, magnesium, copper, iron, and zinc was observed. Nevertheless, on one hand abnormal values for iron were noticed in C. pinnata samples (19 mg/kg in dry matter) and S. latifolia (184mg/kg in dry matter) samples; on another hand high deviation of zinc content in C. pinnata (3.9 mg/kg in dry matter) was also observed. The same results were obtained after many repetitions (three).
Sarcocephalus latifolius fruits contain more phosphorrus (0.214 g to 0.209 g) compared to other fruits in this study. The high contents of potassium were encountered in Cordyla pinnata and Ficus gnaphalocarpa (respectively 2.471 g and 2.333 g). Ficus gnaphalocarpa and Sarcocephalus latifolius contain the highest values of Calcium contents (0.612 g and 0.496 g) and Magnesium (0.210 g; 0.155 g). For sodium, the more important content were observed in Ficus gnaphalocarpa (0.028 mg) and Icacina senegalensis (0.018 mg) but still low compared to the reference. Finally for the copper (Cu), only Cordyla pinnata gave relatively low values, between 3.4 and 4.1 mg. The comparative table with other known forest fruits (Table 5) allows globally to deduce that all fruits in this study are good sources of mineral contents characterized by their richness in copper, iron and zinc; only sodium present a low content.
4. Conclusions
The results from this study show the important role expected from these forest fruits in the food equilibrium of local population in the different exploited zones. In fact, these fruits can cover the daily intake of vitamin C espe-
Table 3. Amounts of proteins, vitamins C, acidity and minerals in the different samples.
Table 5. Mineral comparison of the forest fruits in this study with other more recognized.
cially in S. latifolius (1488 mg/100 g); ensure non neglected contributing in copper, zing in S. latifolius, F. gnaphalocarpa and I. senegalensis; and constitute a good caloric source particularly in C. pinnata (177 kcal/100 g). For a better appreciation of the vitamin C, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content related to the antioxidant power can be measured. In addition, a comparative study of different activities expressed as DPPH radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power value and ascorbic acid equivalent anti-oxidant seems necessary. Therefore, researches in this area are conducting and the results will be published soon. Apart these positive contributions for food consumption of these forest fruit, many medicinal virtues have been recognized from reports or previous works. Thus, valorization and prevention of this biodiversity are particularly necessary for C. pinnata in which climatic hazard represents a serious threat for the high and economic potentiality in wood production.