Received 23 October 2015; accepted 22 February 2016; published 25 February 2016

1. Introduction
The theory of ordinary homogeneous linear differential equations of the second order, containing a large parameter, is well established [1] - [4] . The aim of this paper is to investigate detailed analytical solutions of equations of the form;
(1.1)
where
is
and
is a real parameter. We shall investigate the behaviour of solutions of this differential equation, and the stability of the origin as
. Without loss of generality, we take
First, we make the following remarks:
a) Any second order linear ODE of the form;
can be reduced to
by a suitable transformation.
b) Furthermore, any equation of the form
is conservative. We shall demonstrate this shortly. This will help us in our asymptotic stability analysis.
c) In Equation (1.1) if we take;
then, we have the well known Sturm-Liouville problem;
(1.2)
where
,
is positive and of class
and
.
Introducing the new variables;
(1.3)
If we suppress the variable t for the moment, it then follows that;
![]()
Therefore
![]()
Since
, then
, and after transforming the interval
into
, with further algebraic manipulations, the ode (1.2) becomes;
(1.4)
where
(1.5)
is a continuous function of
. It can be shown that the solutions of (1.3) satisfy the Volterra integral equation;
(1.6)
where
and
are arbitrary.
and
have the same value, and the same derivate, at
. The solution to the integral Equation (1.5) can be obtained by successive approximation in the form;
(1.7)
where;
![]()
Assuming that the function
is bounded, i.e., there exists a constant M such that
, then, one can show by induction that;
![]()
In the case of a finite interval
, it follows that (1.7) is uniformly convergent for
, and is also an asymptotic expansion of
as
. Unfortunately, the
is very difficult to compute. Other approximations for large
may be obtained from formal solutions, and these are usually divergent.
2. Formal Solutions
Let us now consider the general ode;
(2.1)
If
is a formal power series in
with coefficients which depend on x, then two linearly independent solutions of (2.1) may also be represented by a formal power series in
. However if the formal expansion of
in powers of
contains positive powers of
, then the formal expansion of x will be a Laurent series. We shall discover that in the case that
, as a function of
, has a pole at
, we can still construct formal solutions.
In (2.1), we shall assume that
is of the form;
(2.2)
where the
are independent of
, and
Furthermore, we assume that
does not vanish in the interval over which t varies. We shall adopt a first formal solution of the form;
(2.3)
Substituting (2.3) into (2.1), with the convention that
for
and
for
and also for
All summations may then be assumed over all the integers, and we obtain
![]()
Picking out the coefficients of
we obtain;
(2.4)
.
This first condition arises when
Setting
in (2.4) we obtain;
![]()
It then follows that;
(2.5)
(2.6)
.
Consequent upon these relations, we may restrict our summation to
in the first sum in Equation (2.4). Now for
in (2.4) we get;
(2.7)
and when we replace n by
in (2.4) we obtain
(2.8)
![]()
It is now obvious that Equation (2.3) satisfies (2.1), provided that
and
satisfy (2.5) to (2.8).
In these equations, empty sums (i.e. those with upper limit
we may choose a branch of
, and then (2.5) determines
up to an additive constant. Moreover,
, and hence (2.6) determines
recurrently, up to an additive constant in each. Equation (2.7) determines
up to a constant factor, and (2.8) determines
recurrently, up to an additive con-
stant multiple of
in each. Corresponding to the two branches of
, we obtain two formal solutions of the form (2.3).
3. Another Formal Solution
A second type of formal solution is given by
(2.9)
Substituting (2.9) into (2.1) we get;
![]()
Equating coefficients of
,
(2.10)
(2.11)
(2.12)
There are two linearly independent formal solutions of this type. The obvious connection between these two types of formal solutions can be seen from the fact that equations (2.10) and (2.11) are identical with (2.5) and
(2.6), and
is the formal expansion of
.
3.1. Remark
In the foregoing, we have assumed that
as a function of
, has a pole of even order at
. If the pole is of odd order, then no solution of the form (2.3) or (2.9) exists, and instead of powers of
, we must expand in powers of
.
3.2. Asymptotic Solutions
We shall now demonstrate that under certain assumptions, the differential Equation (2.1) possesses a fundamental system of solutions which are represented asymptotically by the formal solutions obtained in preceding section. It actually does not matter whether we compare solution of (2.1) with
![]()
where the
and
satisfy (2.5) to (2.8), or with
![]()
where the
satisfy (2.10) to (2.12), for the q’s and
’s can be so chosen that the ratio of these two expressions is
.
We now fix a positive integer N, and set;
(3.1)
with
, and for each j, the
satisfy (2.10) to (2.12). These coefficients are completely determined by
, and certain derivatives of these functions, and we shall say that the
are sufficiently often differentiable if all the derivatives entering the determination of the
exist and are continuous functions of t. We allow t to vary over a bounded and closed interval
, and
over a sectorial domain
. We have the following theorem.
3.3. Theorem
Let S and I be as defined above then for each fixed
is a continuous function of t over I; If
(3.2)
Uniformly in t and
, as
in S, where the
are sufficiently often differentiable in I, and
(3.3)
, then the differential equation
(3.4)
possesses a fundamental system of solutions,
and
, such that
,
(3.5)
Proof
Top establish the existence and asymptotic property of
, we substitute
(3.6)
in Equation (3.4) to get
(3.7)
where
(3.8)
uniformly in t and
in S, by (3.2) and (2.10) to (2.12). Equation (3.7) may be written as
![]()
By two successive integrations, and a suitable choice of the constants of integration, we obtain;
(3.9)
where
![]()
Since
is an increasing function, we have
and
.
The existence of
follows immediately from the theory of Volterra integral equations, or can be established by successive approximations. From (3.8) and (3.9), we have
, uniformly in t and
in S. Furthermore
is differentiable, i.e.
![]()
and
![]()
This proves (3.5) for
. The proof for
is very much similar, except that b rather than a, must be chosen as fixed limit of integration in the integral equation.
4. Application
The methods of the last two sections can be applied to prove the asymptotic formulae for the Bessel functions [1] , viz;
1) ![]()
2) ![]()
3) ![]()
Equation (1) holds for
, uniformly in
if ![]()
Equations (2) and (3) hold for
uniformly in
if ![]()
We observe that the functions;
are solutions of the differential equation
(3.10)
This equation is of the form (3.4) with
all other
vanishing identically. The points
are singular points of (3.10) and
is a so called transition point at which the condition (3.3) is violated for any value
.
5. Stability Analysis
In Section 1.0, we claimed that any equation of the form
is conservative. It turns out that such systems are characterized by closed curves in the phase plane. For the former equation, we only need to show that it possesses a Hamiltonian H, such that
.
Let us begin by multiplying the equation
by
, i.e.,
(3.11)
Observing that
![]()
Hence (3.11) becomes
![]()
![]()
Thus, the required Hamiltonian is
.
The Bessel differential equation
![]()
can be recast in vector form as
![]()
Clearly the origin (0, 0) is the only critical point and the corresponding Hamiltonian is;
![]()
We use the above Hamiltonian to construct a Lyapunov function given by;
![]()
with
and
. We note that
, furthermore;
![]()
Thus
. Since
, it follows that
and hence the origin is asymptotically stable for all
and
.
6. Numerical Investigation of Asymptotic Solutions
In what follows, we employ the Runge-Kutta algorithm provided by MathCAD [5] software to obtain a numerical solution for large values of
.
6.1. MathCAD Runge-Kutta Algorithm
We define the following for the MathCAD algorithm.
t0: = 0.2 t1: = 10 Solution interval endpoint
Initial condition vector
N: = 1500 Number of solution values on [t0, t1]
Derivative function
S: = rkfixed (ic, t0, t1, N, D) Runge-Kutta algorithm.
T: = S<0> Independent variable values.
X0: = S<1> First solution function values.
X1: = S<2> Second solution function values.
Remark: X0 represents solution values x satisfying the Bessel ODE, while X1 represents the derivative of X0 i.e.
. S
represents the jth column vector in the solution matrix S, j = 0, 1, 2 (Figure 1).
6.2. Simulations
6.3. Observations
For
solutions no longer exist as they become unbounded. From the graphs shown, it is clear that the given Bessel differential equation is very sensitive to the parameter
, and as
the effect is to increase the oscillations until the solutions become unstable and die out. Furthermore, the phase portrait depicted shows that the Bessel differential equation represents a conservative system. This is clearly evident from the closed curves. However for
, the phase portrait no longer appears like a closed curve but more like an explosion from the centre.
6.4. Conclusion
In this work, we have studied asymptotic solutions of equations of the type
, where
is a large parameter. We have shown that equations of this form represent a conservative system, meaning that they possess a conserved quantity, namely the Hamiltonian which is computed. As a special example, we consider the
Bessel differential equation
for which the behaviour of the solutions as well as
the stability of the origin is investigated numerically as the parameter grows indefinitely.