Received 27 October 2015; accepted 21 December 2015; published 24 December 2015

1. Introduction
The aim of this paper is to present a series of results obtained in relation to a particular class of Nakayama algebras. We will begin by recalling the fundamental notions and results of standarly stratified and almost hereditary algebras theory, which will be our main tool.
The concept of standardly stratified algebras emerged as a natural generalization of quasi-hereditary algebras. The class of quasi-hereditary algebras was introduced by Cline, Parshall and Scott in connection with their study of highest weight categories arising in the representation theory of semisimple complex Lie algebras and alge- braic groups.
We present our first result, which allows to obtain the main theorem of the article as an immediate con- sequence.
Theorem 1. Let L be an algebra, such that all non trivial quotient of indecomposable projective has infinite projective dimension, then L is not a standardly stratified algebra for any order of simple modules, unless
is the subcategory
.
Later, we introduce some notions of uniserial algebras and uniserial modules. In section 4, we introduce Nakayama algebras, also known as uniserial generalised Algebras that are studied by Tadasi Nakayama in [1] . In his short notes, as Nakayama called his publication, it was proposed to make some observations to his previous publication about Frobeniusians Algebras, whose first part was published in 1939 at Annals of Mathematics.
We conclude by presenting a special class of Nakayama algebras, for which is the main result of this paper that we quote below:
Theorem 2. There is no simple order of simple modules for which the cyclical Nakayama Algebras with rela- tions
(i.e.
) are standardly stratified or costandardly stratified.
2. Projective Dimension, Injective Dimension and Global Dimension
The following concepts will allow us to define the notions of projective dimension, injective dimension and global dimension; which we will be very useful in demonstrating the fundamental result of this paper.
Definition 1. Let M be an L-module. A projective resolution of M is a complex P whit
for
in 

where
is a projective module for
. It should also satisfy that the map
is an epimorphism and
.
It is possible show that being L a K-algebra, it follows that every
has a projective resolution in
. More generally , if an abelian category A has enough projectives, then every object M in A has a pro- jective resolution.
Definition 2. Let M be an L-module. A minimal projective resolution of M is a projective resolution of M such that
, the homomorphism
is a projective cover
and
is a pro- jective cover of M.
Dually we define concepts injective resolution and minimal injective resolution. Is possible also prove that if L is a finite dimensional algebra then all module in
has a minimal projective resolution and minimal injective resolution in
. The concepts of projective dimension, injective dimension and global dimension for a L-module M are as follows.
Definition 3. Projective dimension of L-module M is the number
such that there is a pro- jective resolution,
![]()
M of length n and M does not have projective resolution of length
. If M does not admit a finite projective resolution, then by convention the projective dimension is said to be infinite.
Dually it has the injective dimension of a L-module M.
Definition 4. Let L be an finite dimensional K-algebra. The global dimension
is the supremum of the set of projective dimensions of all L modules, i.e.
.
3. Standarly Stratified Algebras and Quasi-Hereditary Algebras
Let R be a commutative Artin ring and L a basic Artin algebra over R. As further we assume full subcategories of
, unless otherwise stated. We consider K-algebras of finite dimension basic and indecomposable, where K is an algebraically closed field and by the Gabriel theorem,
, where Q is a finite quiver and I is an admissible ideal.
The principal results of this section can be find in [2] - [8] .
Definition 5. Let L be a Artin algebra and
such that
,
. We denote:
1.
the class of
for wich there is a chain of submodules with
.
2.
the subcategory on
of modules are direct summands of modules in
.
In the following we consider that L denote an
-algebra together with a fixed ordering on a complete set
of primitive orthogonal idempotents (given by the natural ordering of indices). Note that con- sider the system e is equivalent to consider an order established of set of all simple L-modules not isomorphic
to
(we know to be L an Artin algebra has a finite number of L-modules).
Definition 6. Let M be a L-module. A normal series in M is a sequence of submodules
.
The number t is called the length of the series. The quotients
are called factors of the series. A series
of composition is a normal series whose factors are simple modules, i.e., a normal serie which can not be refined to another longest.
If X is a L-module, we denote by
the number of factors isomorphic to
in composition series X, ie, the multiplicity of
as composition factor of X.
For
, let
be the simple L-module, which is the simple top of the indecomposable projective
.
Definition 7. Standard module
, for
, is the maximal factor module of
without composition factors
, for
. Dually for
, module coestndar
is the maximum submodule
without composition factors
, for
. Let
be the full subcategory consisting of all
. In similar way, we introduce
, and so on.
Note that the above definition implies that
to
and module
. Dually, it has that
to
and module
.
Definition 8. An algebra L is said standardly stratified if
. If in addition to that, the endomorphism ring of each standard module is simple then we say that algebra is quasi-hereditary (i.e. standardly stratified algebras generalize the concept of quasi-hereditary algebras where we require the additional condition that the standard modules are Schur modules). Dually, if
we say that L is costandarly stratified.
Note that if L is standardly stratified the projective modules are in
. In addition, if L is quasi- hereditary the injective modules are
and
.
The following example will allow us to understand the theory discussed above.
Example 3.1. Let L be the algebra given by the following quiver whit relations
;
![]()
We have to:
and
![]()
It is not difficult to check that this algebra is standardly stratified and costandardly stratified only at orders for respective simple modules given below:
1. To order
all
are filtered.
2. To order
all
are filtered.
We denote by
the full subcategory of
defined by modules of finite projective dimension. The following result is in [8] which will be of great utility.
Proposition 3. Let L be an standardly stratified algebra, then
.
The following theorem is the first result that present us in this paper. It will allow us to obtain, as an immediate consequence, our main result.
Theorem 4. Let L be an algebra, such that all non trivial quotient of indecomposable projective has infinite projective dimension, then L is not standardly stratified algebra for any order of simple modules, unless
is the subcategory
.
Proof. It’s clear that
. Furthermore
is quotient of projective
. As we assume that all in- decomposable projective quotient has infinite projective dimension then
therefore
so L is standardly stratified in any order of simple modules.
4. Nakayama Algebras
Throughout, L is assumed to be a finite dimensional K-algebra, defined over an algebraically closed field K.
The principal results of this section can be find in [1] [9] [10] .
Definition 9. Let M be a L-module. Radical series M is defined as follows:
![]()
We agree to denote by
the radical series length of M.
We can define inductively soclo series for module M as:
![]()
![]()
where
is the quotient application, i.e.
![]()
We denote
the soclo series lenght of M.
Note that if
,
and furthermore it has to
. This clearly implies that the radical
series M is finite. How
, then
and
.
We can observe that
, then
if
and the soclo series
![]()
is finit.
Proposition 5. Let
, then
.
Definition 10. Let
, the Loewy lenght of M is defined by
.
Is necessary introduce new notion for define the Nakayama Algebras.
Definition 11. Let M be an L-module. We say that M is uniserial if M possesses exactly one composition series.
Lemma 4.1 Let M be an L-module. Next conditions are equivalents.
1. M is uniserial;
2. Radical series of M is a composition serie;
3. Soclo series of M is a composition serie;
4.
.
Definition 12. Let L be an K = - algebra. L is right serial if all right indecomposable projective is a uniserial L-module. Dually define us the left indecomposable projective notion.
If
denote the underlying quiver of L then,
Theorem 6. A basic K-algebra L is left serial izquierda if and only if for each vertex
in
there is at most one arrow that starts in
.
Corollary 1. A basic K-algebra L is right serial if and only if for each vertex
in
there is at most one arrow that ends in
.
Definition 13. The algebra L is a Nakayama Algebra if every projective indecomposable and every injective indecomposable L-module is uniserial.
It is possible to characterize Nakayama Algebras through its underlying quiver.
Theorem 7. A basic and connected algebra L is a Nakayama Algebra if and only if
it has one of the forms:
![]()
or (cyclical)
![]()
Proof. Immediately of Theorem 6 and Corollary 1.
5. Main Result
Let L be a Nakayama algebra. We denote
the Nakayama algebra with cyclical underlying quiver
with relations
.
In [11] , it shows that both
and
are not standarly stratified or costandarly stratified to any order of the simple modules, which motivates us to prove the following generalization of these results.
Theorem 8. There is no simple order of simple modules for which the cyclical Nakayama Algebras with rela- tions
(i.e.
) are standardly stratified or costandardly stratified.
Proof. It is easy to see that every projective module
has the same length and we also know that
has an only one composition series. Let M be a quotient of projective module
and consider the following short exact sequence,
.
Note that the length of L-module
is strict less than
, therefore
is not projective. Now the following short exact sequence is considered,
![]()
in which, again, we note us that the length of L-module
is strict less than
, therefore
is not projective.
Inductively, given a module
we choose a projective
and a surjection
. Let
, and let
be the composite
. Since
, this chain complex is a projective resolution of M,
. Then, through Theorem 12, the result is concluded.
□
Commentary 5.1. Generally Nakayama algebras that are not
may be standarly stratified or not to be, as we saw in Example 3.1.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Editor and the referee for their comments.