Orthogonal Stability of Mixed Additive-Quadratic Jensen Type Functional Equation in Multi-Banach Spaces ()
1. Introduction
In 1940, Ulam [1] proposed the stability problem of functional equations concerning the stability of group homomorphisms. Suppose that
is a group and that
is a metric group with the metric
. Given
, does there exist a
such that if a mapping
satisfies the inequality

for all
, then a homomorphism
exists with
for all
?
The case of approximately additive functions was solved by Hyers [2] under the assumption that G1 and G2 are Banach spaces. In 1978, Rassias [3] proved a generalization of the Hyers theorem for additive mappings. The result of Rassias has provided a lot of influences during the past more than three decades in the development of a generalization of the Hyers-Ulam stability concept. This new concept is known as Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of functional equation.
The stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors and there are many interesting results concerning this problem. A large list of references can be found in [4] -[11] .
Pinsker [12] characterized orthogonal additive functional equation on an inner product space. The orthogonal Cauchy functional equation

in which
is an orthogonality relation, is first investigated by Gudder and Strawther [13] . In 1985, Rätz [14] introduced a new definition of orthogonality by using more restrictive axioms than Gudder and Strawther. More- over, he investigated the structure of orthogonally additive mappings. Rätz and Szabό [15] investigated the pro- blem in a rather more general framework.
In [16] , Kenary and Cho proved the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of mixed additive-quadratic Jensen type functional equation in non-Archimedean normed spaces and random normed spaces. In this paper, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the following mixed additive-quadratic Jensen type functional equation:
(1)
in multi-Banach spaces.
The notion of multi-normed space is introduced by Dales and Polyakov [17] . This concept is somewhat similar to operator sequence space and has some connections with operator spaces and Banach lattices. Motivations for the study of multi-normed spaces and many examples are given in [17] . Also, the stability problems in multi-Banach spaces are studied by Dales and Moslehian [18] , Moslehian et al. ( [19] - [21] ) and Wang et al. [22] .
Now, let us recall some concepts concerning multi-Banach space.
Let
be a complex normed space, and let
. We denote by Ek the linear space
consisting of k-tuples
, where
. The linear operations on Ek are defined coordinate wise. The zero element of either E or Ek is denoted by 0. We denote by
the set
and by
the group of permutations on k symbols.
Definition 1.1 ( [17] ) A multi-norm on
is a sequence
![]()
such that
is a norm on Ek for each
,
for each
, and the following axioms are satisfied for each
with
:
(A1)![]()
;
(A2)![]()
;
(A3)![]()
;
(A4)![]()
.
In this case, we say that
is a multi-normed space.
Suppose that
is a multi-normed space and take
. We need two properties of multi-norms which can be found in [17] .
(a)![]()
;
(b)![]()
.
It follows from (b) that, if
is a Banach space, then
is a Banach space for each
; in this case,
is a multi-Banach space.
Now, we state two important examples of multi-norms for an arbitrary normed space E (see, for details, [17] ).
Example 1.2 ( [17] ) The sequence
on
defined by
![]()
is a multi-norm called the minimum multi-norm. The terminology “minimum” is justified by property (b).
Example 1.3 ( [17] ) Let
be the (non-empty) family of all multi-norms on
. For
, set
.
Then
is a multi-norm on
, which is called the maximum multi-norm.
We need the following observation which can be easily deduced from the triangle inequality for the norm
and the property (b) of multi-norms.
Lemma 1.4 [17] Suppose that
and
. For each
, let
be a sequence in E such that
. Then for each
, we have
.
Definition 1.5 [17] Let
be a multi-normed space. A sequence
in E is a multi-null
sequence if, for each
, there exists
such that
.
Let
. We say that the sequence
is multi-convergent to x in E and write
.
if
is a multi-null sequence.
There are several orthogonality notations on a real normed space available. But here, we present the orthogonal concept introduced by Rätz [14] . This is given in the following definition.
Definition 1.6 Suppose that X is a vector space (algebraic module) with dim
, and
is a binary relation on X with the following properties:
1) Totality of
for zero:
,
for all
;
2) Independence: if
and
, then x and y are linearly independent;
3) Homogeneity: if
and
, then
for all
;
4) Thalesian properity: if P is a 2-dimensional subspace of X,
and
, which is the set of nonnegative real numbers, then there exists
such that
and
.
The pair
is called an orthogonality space (resp., module). By an orthogonality normed space (normed module) we mean an orthogonality space (resp., module) having a normed (resp., normed module) structure.
Definition 1.7 Let X be a set. A function
is called a generalized metric on X if and only if d satisfies
(M1)
if and only if
;
(M2)
for all
;
(M3)
for all
.
Theorem 1.8 ([23] ) Let
be a generalized complete metric space. Assume that
be a stri- ctly contractive mapping with Lipschitz constant
. Then, for all
, either
![]()
for all nonnegative integers n or there exists a positive integer
such that
1)
for all
;
2) the sequence
converges to a fixed point
of J;
3)
is the unique fixed point of J in the set
;
4)
for all
.
2. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Mixed Additive-Quadratic Jensen Type Functional Equation
Throughout this section, let
, E be an orthogonality space and let
be a multi-Banach space. For convenience, we use the following abbreviation for a given mapping
,
![]()
for all
with
.
2.1. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Functional Equation (1): An Odd Case
In this section, using direct method, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional Equation (1) in multi- Banach space.
Definition 2.1 An odd mapping
is called an orthogonally Jensen additive mapping if
![]()
for all
with
.
Theorem 2.2 Suppose that α is a nonnegative real number and
is an odd mapping satisfying
(2.1)
for all
and
. Then there exists a unique orthogonally Jensen additive mapping
such that
(2.2)
for all
.
Proof. Replacing
by
in (2.1), we get
(2.3)
for all
since
. Replacing
by
in (2.3) and dividing both sides by
, we get
(2.4)
for all
since
. By using (2.4) and the principle of mathematical induction, we can easily get
(2.5)
for all
,
,
.
We now fix
. We have
![]()
where we have used the Definition 1.1 and also replaced
by
in (2.5). It follows that
is a Cauchy sequence and so it is convergent in the multi-Banach spaces F. Set
![]()
for all
. Hence, for each
, there exists
such that
![]()
for all
. In particular, by property (b) of multi-norms, we have
. (2.6)
We next put
in (2.5) to get
.
Letting
and using Lemma 1.4 and (2.6), we obtain
.
Let
and
. Considering Definition 1.6, we have
. Put
,
in (2.1) and divide both sides by
. Then, using property (a) of multi-norms, we obtain
![]()
for all
and
. Taking
, we get
![]()
for all
and
. Since f is an odd mapping, according to the definition of A, we know that A is an odd mapping. By Definition 2.1, the mapping A is an orthogonally additive mapping.
If
is another orthogonally additive mapping satisfying (2.2), then
![]()
Taking
, we get
. This completes the proof.
2.2. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Functional Equation (1): An Even Case
In this section, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the functional Equation (1) in multi-Banach space with the fixed point method.
Definition 2.3 An even mapping
is called an orthogonally Jensen quadratic mapping if
![]()
for all
with
.
Theorem 2.4 Suppose that α is a nonnegative real number and
is an even mapping satisfying
(2.7)
for all
and
and
. Then there exists a unique orthogonally Jensen quadratic mapping
such that
(2.8)
for all
.
Proof. Letting
in (2.7), we get
(2.9)
for all
since
. Replacing
by
and dividing both sides
by 4, we get
(2.10)
Let
and introduce the generalized metric d defined on S by
![]()
Then it is easy to show that
is a generalized complete metric space (see [5] , Lemma 2.1).
We now define an operator
by
.
we assert that J is a strictly contractive operator. Given
, let
be an arbitrary constant with
. From the definition of d, it follows that
![]()
for all
. Therefore
![]()
for all
. Hence, it holds that
, i.e.,
for all
. This means that J is a strictly contractive operator on S with the Lipschitz constant
.
By (2.10), we have
. According to Theorem 1.8, we deduce the existence of a fixed
point of J, that is, the existence of a mapping
such that
for all
. Moreover, we have
, which implies
![]()
for all
. Also,
implies the inequality
.
Let
and
. Considering Definition 1.6, we have
. Set
,
in (2.7) and divide both sides by
. Then, using property (a) of multi-norms, we obtain
![]()
for all
and
. Taking
, we get
![]()
for all
and
. Since f is an even mapping, Q is an even mapping. According to Definition 2.3, we know that Q is an orthogonally quadratic mapping.
The uniqueness of Q follows from the fact that Q is the unique fixed point of J with the property that there exists
such that
![]()
for all
. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor and the referee for their comments. Research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 11371119 and by Natural Science Foundation of Education Department of Hebei Province grant Z2014031.