Redefining Technology Role in Education
Ali S. Al Musawi
DOI: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018   PDF    HTML     11,012 Downloads   22,373 Views   Citations


The paper is a conceptual attempt to explore the new roles of technology in education which has increasingly become more than a sole medium, as was its description in the past. Basically, the key idea is that technology, with the powers of ICT, in education has now three main roles, namely: a medium/resource, a management, and a delivery. These new roles, when combined, could set the stage for restructuring the education institutions in an innovative way that leaves the current education system in history.

Share and Cite:

Musawi, A. (2011). Redefining Technology Role in Education. Creative Education, 2, 130-135. doi: 10.4236/ce.2011.22018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Association for Educational Communications and Technology (2004). The meanings of educational technology, definition and terminology committee. Document #MM4.0 (1 June 2004).
[2] Alison, H., & Alison, G. (2010). Shifting paradigms: Teaching, learning and web 2.0. Reference Services Review, 38, 621-633. doi:10.1108/00907321011090764
[3] Garlikov, R. (n. d.). The Socratic method: Teaching by asking instead of by telling. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
[4] Garrido, S. (2002). Webstorming: Brainstorming in the web. In M. Driscoll and T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2002 (pp. 2601-2602). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
[5] Garson, G. David (2000). The Role of Technology in Quality Education. Retrieved 17 February 2011. AB&usg=AFQjCNGpExLngIPmkuKkBDUUriUkR5xbdA.
[6] Idrus, R. (2005). From Facilitation to the Transformation of Learning: From Pedagogy to Technogogy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Educational Technology Conference: Distance Education, 21-23 September 2005, Sakarya, Turkey.
[7] Kandlbinder, P. (2004). Reconstructing educational technology: A critical analysis of online teaching and learning in the university. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, School of Policy and Practice, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney.
[8] Kinuthia, W. Laurie, B. D., & Clarke, P. A. J. (2010). Development of pedagogical technology integration content knowledge in preparing mathematics pre-service teachers: the role of instructional case analyses and reflection, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18, 645-669.
[9] Kissane, B. (2003). Three roles for technology: Towards a humanistic renaissance in mathematics education, Murdoch University, Australia. Retrieved 17 February 2011. DA&ved=0CBUQFjAD&usg=AFQjCNHKJ0M9PnEbmThb1BogHE-K9ozFPg
[10] Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24-33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
[11] Landen, Mary (1997). The role of technology in education and training, Industrial and Commercial Training, 29, 230–235. doi:10.1108/00197859710190751
[12] Masood, M. (2004). A ten year analysis: Trends in traditional educational technology literature. The Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1.
[13] Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teacher College Record, 108, 1017-1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
[14] Kumar, S. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of the usefulness of web 2.0 in higher education: Survey development. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on e-Learning, Bari: the University of Bari.
[15] Rempel, P., Montgomerie, T.C., & Szabo, M. (1998). IT roles and competencies: Are we prepared for the 21st century. In Proceedings of ED-Media/ED-Telecom 98 (pp. 1133-1138). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
[16] Richard, B. (2009). The Effect of Web 2.0 on Teaching and Learning, Teacher Librarian, 37, 52-53.
[17] Roblyer, M. D. (2005). Educational technology research that makes a difference: Series introduction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5, 192-201.
[18] Rutz, E., Eckart, R., Wade, J. E., Maltbie, C., Rafter, C., & Elkins, V. (2003). Student performance and acceptance of instructional technology: Comparing technology-enhanced and traditional instruct- tion for a course in statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 133-140.
[19] Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2.
[20] Spence, M., & Haughey, M. (2005). Issues and challenges of instructional technology specialists in alberta colleges. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31, Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
[21] Topcu, A., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Effects of the asynchronous webbased course: Pre-service teachers’ achievement, metacognition, and attitudes towards the course. Educational Technology and Society, 11, 181-197.
[22] Vijayakumar, S. (2011). Using technology for brainstorming in a writing class: An innovative approach. Journal of Technology for English Language Teachers, 1.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.