Practices of the Seasonal Migrant Workers’ Children in Play

Müge Artar

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.517176                

Abstract

Seasonal migrant and temporary agricultural labour is a form of employment emerging in the process of labour-intensive farming. Both academic studies and surveys conducted by various national/international organizations tried to address different dimensions and problem areas of the issue. They mostly focus on working and living conditions of the workers and child/female labour in these works. Still, these studies rarely focus specifically on the state of children aged 0 - 6 years in their early living and working environments. Throughout the period in which their families are engaged in seasonal works, these children share the same environment with adults, face same risks and receive no special care or attention. Given these facts, the objective of the study is stated as follows: “Exposing, through scientific methods, social, cognitive and developmental problems of 0 - 6-year-old children of families engaged in migrant-seasonal agricultural work of labour-intensive character and developing social policy suggestions for improving their life quality on the basis of findings to be obtained.” Within this framework, 7 to 10 days long field surveys were conducted with the participation of researchers from different disciplines in provinces and districts in order to conduct in situ observations on children aged 0 - 6 years. Participatory observation is adopted as the basic method in this survey. They mostly play with sand, inventing games by loading and unloading sand from a vessel or shaping it in some way. In two-child games children play together or parallel games. Also, gender preference is absent in this age group while choosing playing partners.

Keywords

Seasonal Migrant Workers, Play, Social Development, Cognitive Development

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Bloch, M. N., & Choi, S. (1990). Conceptions of Play in the History of Early Childhood Education. Child and Youth Care Quarterly, 19, 31-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01085553
[2]	Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[3]	Chafel, J. A. (1987). Developmental Processes and Policy Implications. Child and Youth Care Forum, 20.
[4]	Ertürk, Y. (1994). Kirsal Dönüsümve Hanehalki Gücü Kullan1m Biçimleri, Tar1m Haftas1 94 Sempozyumu. Ankara: ZiraatBankas1 Kültür Yay1nlar1.
[5]	Genelge (2014). Mevsimlik GeziciTar1m Isçilerinin Çal1smave Sosyal Hayatlar1n1n Iyilestirilmesi. http://www.csgb.gov.tr/csgbPortal/ShowProperty/WLP%20Repository/csgb/slogan/dosyalar/dokuman3
[6]	Johnson, J. E., Ershler, J., & Bell, C. (1980). Play Behavior in Discovery-Based and a Formal Education Preschool Program. Child Development, 51, 271-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1129621
[7]	Meisels, S. J. (1992). Doing Harm by Doing Good: Latrogenic Effects of Early Childhood Enrollment and Promotion Policies. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 155-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(92)90002-G
[8]	Nielson, D. C., & Monson, D. L. (1996). Effects of Literacy Environment on Literacy Development of Kindergarten Children. The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 259-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941327
[9]	Tekiner, Ö. (1997). Okulöncesi egitiminde yeni yaklas 1mlar. Okulöncesi Egitim Sempozyumu (30-31 May1s 1996, Ankara). Ankara: Ankara üniversitesi Bas1mevi.
[10]	Walsh, D. J. (1989). Changes in Kindergarten: Why Here? Why Now? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 4.
[11]	Y1ld1rak, N., Gülçubuk, B., Gün S., Olhan, E., & K1l1ç, M. (2002). Türkiye’de Gezicive Geçici Kad1n Tar1m Issçilerinin Çal1smave Yasam Kosullar1ve Sorunlar1. Uluslararas1 Çal1sma Örgütü Türkiye Temsilciligi. www.ilo.org/public/turkish/region/eurpro/ankara/publ/kadintarim.pdf
[12]	Y1ld1r1m, A. (1999). Nitel ArastY1ld1r1m, A.rma Yöntemlerinin Temel Özelliklerive Egitim Arast1rmalar1ndaki Yerive Önemi (Qualitative Research Methods: Basic Characteristics and Implications for Educational Research). Egitimve Bilim Dergisi, 2, 58-79.
[13]	Y1ld1r1m, A., & Simsek, H. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Arast1rma Yöntemleri (Research Methods in Social Sciences). Ankara: Seçkin Yay1nc1l1k.