Some Hybrid Systems of Chiral Schiff Base Zn(II) Complexes and Photochromic Spiropyrans for Environmental Ion Sensing ()
1. Introduction
Many machines incorporate electronic components and integrate circuits for their appropriate functionality, which are essential for modern society [1] . Besides conventional miniaturization of logic circuits made of silicon semiconductors, new attention has been attracted to the molecular logic circuits using molecules and molecular assemblies as next-generation high-performance logic circuits [2] [3] . The response speed by using an optical signal is expected to exceed conventional electrical signals, which is significant point for next-generation research and design of molecular logic circuits for an optical signal. In designing logic circuits optical organic molecules [4] -[7] , biomolecules (DNA [8] [9] and proteins [10] -[12] ), and organic/inorganic hybrid materials [13] , especially metal complexes [14] have been employed. Containing photochromic dyes showing their color changes by photoisomerization and functional metal complexes may be one of the promising strategies. In this context, some ideas for constructing logic circuits based on molecular assemblies have been proposed by using metal complexes and photochromic dyes. Great attention has been paid to use weak intermolecular interactions between each component of multifunctional logic circuits of molecular assemblies.
Previously, we have proposed “photoresponsive solvatochromism” [15] in hybrid system consisting of azobenzene derivatives and chiral Schiff base Ni(II), Cu(II), or Zn(II) complexes showing various stereochemical changes (by thermal phase transition), paramagnetism in solutions, and potential functions as chiral catalysts. Additionally, we have reported that increasing optical anisotropy of not only azobenzene but also chiral Schiff base complexes after polarized UV (and visible) light irradiation was detected by polarized electronic and IR spectroscopy [16] . In general, molecular orientation (long-axis) of azobenzene is gradually aligned to perpendicular to the direction of electric vector of polarized UV light accompanying with reorientation or photoisomerization to the cis-form.
In this work, we have prepared three new and one known Schiff base Zn(II) complexes, Zn-secBu, Zncyclohexyl, Zn-2-naphtyl, and Zn-1-phenyl (Figure 1) and have investigated their absorption and fluorescence spectra sole components and hybrid systems with photochromic 1,3,3-trimethylindolino-6’-nitrobenzopyrylospiran (SP) [17] -[20] before and after UV or visible light irradiation. In addition, we have constructed threecomponent hybrid systems of Schiff base Zn(II) complexes with SP, and Zn(II) or Cu(II) ions in methanol solutions. Moreover, we have also investigated their absorption and fluorescence spectra before and after UV or visible light irradiation to discuss spectral changes of the intensity of fluorescence bands of Zn(II) complexes and/ or SP (MC) by doping Zn(II) or Cu(II) ions in order for metal ion sensing [21] -[23] by concentration of doped metal ions.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
All reagents including chiral amines are products of Wako or TCI. Other chemicals were analytical pure and were used as received without further purification. Solvents were used as received from Kanto or Aldrich with
Figure 1. Structures of chiral Schiff base Zn(II) complexes and photoisomerization of SP (MC).
out further purification or drying. The known complex [24] [25] (Zn-1-phenyl having R-1-phenylethylamine moiety) was prepared according to the literature procedure.
2.2. Synthesis of Zn-secBu
To a solution of salicylaldehyde (0.48 g, 4.0 mmol) dissolved in methanol (70 mL), S-sec-butylamine (0.51 g, 4.0 mmol) was added dropwise and stirred at 313 K for 2 h to give rise to orange solution of ligands. Zinc(II) acetate dehydrate (0.44 g, 2.0 mmol) and NaHCO3 (0.17 g, 2.0 mmol) was added to the solution and stirred for 2 h. After filtration, yellow plate-like single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained. Yield 0.78 g (69.6%). Anal. Calc. for C22H28N2O2Zn: C, 63.23; H, 6.75; N, 6.70%. Found: C, 63.62; H, 6.69; N, 6.64%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 541w, 769w, 869w, 980w, 1975w, 1112w, 1160s, 1212w, 1301w, 1413w, 1442s, 1518w, 1616s (C=N), 2934w, 2975w, 3054w, 3429s. m.p. 535 K (decomposition).
2.3. Synthesis of Zn-Cyclohexyl
To a solution of salicylaldehyde (0.48 g, 4.0 mmol) dissolved in methanol (70 mL), R-1-cyclohexylethylamine (0.29 g, 4.0 mmol) was added dropwise and stirred at 313 K for 2h to give rise to orange solution of ligands. Zinc(II) acetate dehydrate (0.44 g, 2.0 mmol) and NaHCO3 (0.17 g, 2.0 mmol) was added to the solution and stirred for 2h. After filtration, yellow plate-like single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis containing two methanol molecules as crystalline solvents were obtained. Yield 0.83 g (79.6%). Anal. Calc. for C32H46N2O3Zn (with one methanol molecules): C, 66.71; H, 7.95; N, 5.16%. Found: C, 66.93; H, 7.86; N, 5.16%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 665w, 775w, 883w, 1030w, 1145w, 1303w, 1375s, 1453s, 1539w, 1614w (C=N), 1668w, 2324w, 2639w, 3407w. m.p. 567 K (decomposition).
2.4. Synthesis of Zn-2-Naphtyl
To a solution of salicylaldehyde (0.48 g, 4.0 mmol) dissolved in methanol (70 mL), R-1-(2-naphtyl)ethylamine (0.69 g, 4.0 mmol) was added dropwise and stirred at 313 K for 2 h to give rise to orange solution of ligands. Zinc(II) acetate dehydrate (0.44 g, 2.0 mmol) and NaHCO3 (0.17 g, 2.0 mmol) was added to the solution and stirred for 2 h. After filtration, yellow precipitates were obtained. Unfortunately, single crystals suitable for Xray analysis could not be grown. Yield 0.90 g (72.2%). Anal. Calc. for C38H28N2O2Zn: C, 74.32; H, 5.25; N, 4.56%. Found: C, 73.94; H, 5.42; N, 4.71%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 476w, 601w, 668w, 720w 750w 824w, 862w, 1031w, 1146w, 1376s, 1460s, 1534w, 1608w (C=N), 1653s, 1700s, 2321w, 2355w, 2649w, 3745w. m.p. 615 K (decomposition).
2.5. Physical Measurements
Elemental analyses were carried out with a Perkin-Elmer 2400II CHNS/O analyzer at Tokyo University of Science. Thermal analysis was performed on a Rigaku TG8120 and α-alumina was used as the reference sample (TG-DTA), where the heating rate was 10 K∙min−1 in the range of 313 - 673 K. IR spectra were recorded on a JASCO FT-IR 4200 plus spectrophotometer. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a JASCO V-570 spectrophotometer at 298 K. CD spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-820 spectrophotometer at 298 K. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on a JASCO FP-6200 spectrophotometer at 298 K. Photo-irradiation was carried out with D2 light source for 200 - 350 nm (with a visible cut filter) and Xe light source 350 - 800 nm (with a UV cut filter). Single crystals were glued on top of a glass fiber with an epoxy resin to measure the diffraction data. Intensity data were collected on a Bruker APEX2 CCD diffractometer with graphite monochromated MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Data analysis was carried out with a SAINT program package. The structures were solved by direct methods with a SHELXS-97 and expanded by Fourier techniques and refined by full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 using the program SHELXL-97. An empirical absorption correction was applied by a program SADABS. All non-hydrogen atoms were readily located and refined by anisotropic thermal parameters. All hydrogen atoms were located at geometrically calculated positions and refined using riding models.
2.6. Crystallographic Data for Zn-secBu (CCDC 812096)
C22H28N2O2Zn, crystal size 0.15 mm × 0.15 mm × 0.12 mm, Mw = 417.83, tetragonal, space group P43212, a = b = 7.3166(6) Å, c = 40.326(3) Å, V = 2158.8(3) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalc = 1.286 mg/m3, F(000) = 880, R1 = 0.0392, wR2 = 0.1264 (2656 reflections), S = 1.046, Flack parameter = 0.03(3). (where R1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|. Rw = (Σw(|Fo| − |Fc|)2 /Σw|Fo|2)1/2, w = 1/(σ2(Fo) + (0.1P)2), P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3).
2.7. Crystallographic Data for Zn-Cyclohexyl (CCDC 812095)
C32H46N2O4Zn, crystal size 0.23 mm × 0.15 mm × 0.13 mm, Mw = 590.09, monoclinic, space group P21, a = 8.6963(14) Å, b = 20.765(4) Å, c = 17.512(3) Å, β = 100.254(2)˚, V = 3111.8(9) Å3, Z = 4, Dcalc = 1.255 mg/m3, F(000) = 1256, R1 = 0.0456, wR2 = 0.1144 (12335 reflections), S = 0.790, Flack parameter = −0.007(11) (where R1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|. Rw = (Σw(|Fo| − |Fc|)2/Σw|Fo|2)1/2, w = 1/(σ2(Fo) + (0.1P)2), P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3).
2.8. Computational Methods
All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09W software Revision A.02 (Gaussian, Inc.) [34] . The gas phase geometry optimizations were carried out using PM6 functional. The vertical excitation energy was calculated with the ZINDO method based on the singlet ground state geometry.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Characterization of Zn(II) Complexes
Figure 2 and Figure 3 exhibit crystal structures of Zn-secBu and Zn-cyclohexyl, respectively. The asymmetric unit of Zn-cyclohexyl contains two crystallographically independent molecules and solvents that have been omitted from the figures. Unfortunately, suitable single crystals of Zn-2-naphtyl could not be obtained. Both Zn-secBu and Zn-cyclohexyl complexes afford a compressed tetrahedral trans-[ZnN2O2] coordination geometry, which are similar to the analogous Schiff base Zn(II) complexes [24] [25] . Only for Zn-secBu complex, the central Zn atom is located on the center of symmetry. Most of them are within normal values for Schiff base Zn(II) or other related complexes [15] [24] [25] . No characteristic intermolecular interactions could be observed in the crystals.
Figure 4 depicts CD and absorption spectra for Zn(II) complexes. Because of absence of d-d bonds due to d10 electronic configuration, all absorption spectra appeared π-π* bands at 270 and n-π bands at 360 nm. While the corresponding CD bands were observed as split bands at 270, 330, and 380 nm reflecting the sign derived from chirality of amines.
Figure 2. Crystal structures of Zn-secBu. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (˚) are as follows: Zn1-O1 = 1.9129(18), Zn1-N1 = 2.014(2), C1-N1 = 1.282(6), O1-Zn1-O1* = 120.73(14), O1-Zn1-N1 = 96.85(9), O1-Zn1-N1* = 113.50(8), N1-Zn1-N1* = 116.82(13).
Figure 3. Crystal structures of Zn-cyclohexyl. Solvents are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (˚) are as follows: Zn2-O4 = 1.921(3), Zn2-O3 = 1.937(3), Zn2-N3 = 2.002(3), Zn2-N4 = 2.004(3), Zn1-O2 = 1.909(3), Zn1-O1 = 1.928(3), Zn1-N2 = 1.995(3), Zn1-N1 = 2.001(3), N1-C9 = 1.468(6), N2-C16 = 1.292(6), O4-Zn2-O3 = 117.35(13), O4-Zn2-N3 = 111.21(15), O3-Zn2-N3 = 95.76(14), O4-Zn2-N4 = 96.92(15), O3-Zn2-N4 = 112.49(15), N3-Zn2-N4 = 124.68(12), O2-Zn1-O1 = 115.33(13), O2-Zn1-N2 = 96.75(15), O1-Zn1-N2 = 111.81(15), O2-Zn1-N1 = 111.48(15), O1-Zn1-N1 = 96.30(14), N2-Zn1-N1 = 126.37(12).
Figure 4. The CD and absorption spectra of Zn(II) complexes as 0.1 mM methanol solutions.
Figure 5 shows florescence spectra of Zn(II) complexes. The excitation wavelengths are set to be λex = 270 and 360 nm based on the absorbance spectra. For both excitation wavelengths, identical blue florescence peaks are observed around 440 - 450 nm for all complexes. Complex having more extended π-conjugate amine ligands (the order is Zn-2-naphtyl > Zn-1-phenyl > Zn-cyclohexyl > Zn-secBu) show more intense peak.
In order to confirm assignments of transitions, we compared with experimental and calculated absorption spectra (not shown) and their comfortable consistency. For all complexes, main component of relatively weak n-π* peaks around 380 nm and intense π-π* peaks around 250 nm may be transitions between two orbitals in salicylaldehyde moieties and C=N groups, if any. For example, Figure 6(a) shows orbitals associated with π-π* or n-π* transitions of Zn-secBu. Predominant bands in a short wavelength region are assigned to be HOMO−1 to LUMO, HOMO to LUMO+1, and HOMO to LUMO+1 transitions. For Zn-cyclohexyl, π-π* bands are similarly composed of relatively intense HOMO−3 to LUMO, HOMO−2 to LUMO+1, HOMO−1 to LUMO+2, and HOMO to LUMO+3 transitions, while n-π* bands are composed of HOMO−1 to LUMO, HOMO−1 to LUMO+1, and HOMO to LUMO transitions. On the other hand, in the case of Zn-1-phenyl (and Zn-2-naphtyl) incorporatingconjugate systems in amine moieties, n-π* bands are composed of intense HOMO−1 to LUMO, HOMO−1 to LUMO+1, and HOMO to LUMO+1 transitions in salicylaldehyde moieties only, while π-π* bands are composed of LUMO+2 to LUMO+6, LUMO+3 to LUMO+7, LUMO+4 to LUMO+8, and LUMO+5 to LUMO+9 transitions in not only salicylaldehyde but also π-conjugate amine moieties. Additionally, Figures 6(b)-(d) depict all ground and excited molecular orbitals which are associated with predominant π-π* or n-π* bands for Zn-cyclohexyl, Zn-1-phenyl, Zn-2-naphtyl, respectively. Including the x-, y-, and z-coordinates, spatial distribution of molecular orbitals are also shown.
Figure 5. The fluorescence spectra (λex = 270 and 360 nm) of Zn(II) complexes at 300 K as 0.0032 mM methanol solutions.
3.2. Fluorescence Intensity and Photoisomerization of Hybrid Systems of Spiropyrans and Zn(II) Complexes
Also as shown Figure 1, SP exhibits reversible photochromism by UV and visible light irradiation, namely colourless SP (the closed-ring form) converts to reddish violet (λ = 533 nm) MC (the open-ring form) exhibiting fluorescence peak at 612 nm (λex = 533 nm) after UV light irradiation [26] -[28] . Therefore, we examined spectral features of hybrid systems of SP (0.005 mM) and each Zn(II) complex (0.1 mM) in methanol solutions before (initial state, abbreviated as “int”) and after UV (abbreviated as UV) and visible (abbreviated as vis) light irradiation. Excitation wavelength for investigation was set as 270 and 360 nm suitable for fluorescence peak at 440 nm of Zn(II) complexes and 553 nm for fluorescence peak at 612 nm of MC. We could clearly observe both quenching of fluorescence intensity of Zn(II) complexes by MC or SP and their reversible changes accompanying by photoisomerization between MC and SP after UV and visible light irradiation.
Figure 7 shows fluorescence spectra of the hybrid system of SP and Zn-secBu accompanying with photoisomerization. The spectra λex = 270 nm indicated stronger fluorescence peaks of MC (UV) than SP (int or vis), which suggested quenching of SP was more effective than that of MC in this hybrid system. In contrast, the spectra λex = 360 nm indicated stronger fluorescence peaks of SP than MC, which suggested that quenching of MC was more effective than that of SP in this hybrid system. Anyway, the spectra λex = 533 nm exhibits similar behavior to the sole SP solution, namely only MC (UV) shows fluorescence bands, which suggest quenching of fluorescence intensity for mixed solutions is effectively detectable by mixed Zn(II) complexes as hybrid systems.
Similar measurements have been carried out for other SP+Zn-cyclohexyl, SP + Zn-1-phenyl, and SP+ Zn-2-naphtyl hybrid systems. All systems exhibited similar behavior to that of the SP + Zn-secBu hybrid system except for band features due to substituted groups and the degree of quenching against SP.
(a)(b)(c)
Figure 7. (a) The fluorescence spectra (λex = 270 nm) of SP (or MC) and Zn-secBu before (int) and after UV (UV) and visible (vis) light irradiation at 300 K in methanol solutions; (b) The fluorescence spectra (λex = 360 nm) of SP (or MC) and Zn-secBu before (int) and after UV (UV) and visible (vis) light irradiation at 300 K in methanol solutions; (c) The fluorescence spectra (λex = 533 nm) of SP (or MC) and Zn-secBu before (int) and after UV (UV) and visible (vis) light irradiation at 300 K in methanol solutions.
Generally, both steric and ionic interactions should be considered as quenching factors of fluorescence spectra. The steric interaction is an interactive phenomenon that a fluorescent process is lost and the excitation energy of the fluorescent molecule becomes oscillation energy by intermolecular collision of molecules [29] -[33] . In view of SP, that MC (the open-ring form) is more bulky than SP (the closed-ring form) suggested effective quenching of MC. Moreover, in view of Zn(II) complexes, experimental results indicated that the magnitude of quenching is (bluky) Zn-2-naphtyl > Zn-cyclohexyl > Zn-1-phenyl > Zn-secBu (small). On the other hand, the ionic interaction is an interactive phenomenon that it is smoothly absorbed to the extinct medicine ion, and a fluorescent process is lost the ionic interaction bonds to the chromophore that has the excitation dipole moment of the fluorescent molecule, and deprives of the excitation electron that change into fluorescence. Because MC is a dipolar ion, quenching by this factor is also more effective than that of SP. In view of Zn(II) complexes, this factor of quenching is effective when SP (the quenching species) and Zn(II) complexes (the chromophores) contacts appropriately and the contribution the chromophores is high for excitation. Therefore, the absorption at 360 nm is thought to have received the influence of the ionic interaction greatly because it becomes only π-π* transitions of the Zn(II) complex (salicylaldehyde moieties). The absorption at 270 nm is thought that the influence is distributed from two or more transitions, and the effect of extinct of the ion interaction weakens. The ionic interaction may be one of the main factors of such quenching, and the excitation energy that originates in π-π* transitions of the salicylaldehyde moieties have been absorbed from the above-mentioned in the fluorescence of the complex by 360 nm in excitation wavelengths. Therefore, it is forecast that the MC structure with the dipolar ion has improved extinct more. It becomes impossible for two or more transitional states to exist, and to say the cause of extinct indiscriminately in the fluorescence of the complex by 270 nm in excitation wavelength. In the result of a measurement, a fluorescent peak shifts to the short wavelength side in all Zn(II) complexes in the state after UV light irradiation. A part of transition energy is adsorbed from this by SP by the ionic interaction with SP, other transitions are excited as it is, and the possibility of appearing as fluorescence may be thought [35] [36] .
3.3. Applications for Sensing Metal Ions
After UV light irradiation to SP, MC can coordinate metal ions in solutions with acting the open-ring as chelate ligands. Therefore, we attempted to apply the hybrid systems [21] -[23] for sensing metal ions by using the intensity of characteristic fluorescence band of Zn(II) complexes. Doping Zn(II) and Cu(II) can be expected to increase or decrease the fluorescence intensity from ion-free SP hybrid systems mentioned above also by quenching mechanism. For example, for such experiments, hybrid systems of methanol solutions were prepared by mixing Zn-1-phenyl (0.002 mM), SP (0.005 mM) and free Cu(II) ion (0 mM, 0.005 mM, 0.02 mM, 0.035 mM, 0.05 mM). SP, MC, and free Cu(II) ion-doped MC showed absorption bands at 265 and 340 nm and at 265, 340, and 533 nm, and at 265, 340, 533, and around 770 nm (weak and broad Cu(II) band), respectively. Among the four Zn(II) complexes, Zn-1-phenyl provided the best results because of suitable intermolecular interactions due to steric factors. It should be noted that free Zn(II) MC exhibited a fluorescence band at 617 nm (λex = 553 nm). On the other hand, Zn(II)-coordinated MC show fluorescence at 619 nm (λex = 553 nm). The resulting calibration curves fluorescence peaks (λex = 360 nm) vs doped Zn(II) and Cu(II) ions are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. As for the hybrid system of Figure 8, a mixed solution of Zn-1-phenyl and Zn(II)-coordinated MC, excess free Zn(II) ion enhanced the intensity of the fluorescence band at 440 nm of Zn-1-phenyl (λex = 360 nm) as a function of concentration of Zn(II) ions. Contrary to it, when Cu(II) ion was added as the hybrid system of Figure 9, SP, the intensity of 430 nm was decreased furthermore.
4. Conclusions
In summary, we synthesized some hybrid materials of chiral Schiff base Zn(II) complexes and SP. We observed their fluorescence and absorption spectra after UV and visible light irradiation. Reversible changes of fluorescence intensity of Zn(II) complexes could be observed, which reflects molecular structures of Zn(II) complexes. The enhancing or quenching fluorescence peaks of Zn(II) complexes are also confirmed by doping Zn(II) or Cu(II) ion into the hybrid systems and calibration curves as a function of concentration of doped metal ions. Consequently, assuming input (excitation light) and output (fluorescence bands) as follows, the hybrid systems can act as a molecular logic circuit summarized in Table 1 and Figure 10.
Furthermore, we have also investigated substituent effects about aldehyde moieties [37] and ion sensing with
Figure 8. The concentration of doped Zn(II) dependence of fluorescence peaks at 440 nm (λex = 360 nm) MC and Zn-1-phenyl before (int) and after UV light irradiation at 300 K in methanol solutions.
Figure 9. The concentration of doped Cu(II) dependence of fluorescence peaks at 440 nm (λex = 360 nm) MC and Zn-1-phenyl before (int) and after UV light irradiation at 300 K in methanol solutions.
Table 1. A true or false table for the hybrid systems.
Figure 10. True or false logic circuits for the hybrid systems.
Scheme 1. The concept of the hybrid systems of Schiff base Zn(II) complexes and spiropyrans. (Left) salen-type, (Right) trans-type.
salen-type Schiff base Zn(II) complexes [38] except for this (original) report on substituent effects about amine moieties [39] . The concept of fluorescence detection and investigating factors (about substituents) of some hybrid systems is summarized in Scheme 1.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.