Anterior Surgery in Multilevel Stenosis of the Lower Cervical Spine: Technical Indications and Personal Experience. 12 Years Follow-Up

Alessandro Landi, Nicola Marotta, Cristina Mancarella, Carlotta Morselli, Roberto Tarantino, Andrea Ruggeri, Roberto Delfini

Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Division of Neurosur-gery, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Roma, Italy.

DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.54027                

Abstract

Objective: cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a progressive degenerative cervical spine disease. During later stages of segmental degeneration, kyphosis of the cervical spine can occur and further compromise the spinal cord and nerve roots. Optimal surgical approach remains controversial. The choice to perform an anterior, posterior or combined approach depends on: sagittal alignment, number of involved levels, main compression localization, and clinical status. The anterior approach is recommended when compression involves primarily anterior horn of spinal cord. Methods: between January 2001 and December 2005, 121 patients (42 F, 79 M, mean age 62 years) were operated for cervical spondylosis (98 myelopathy, 23 radiculopathy). Anterior surgical approach was performed in 81 patients. 63 patients were operated performing multilevel discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and 18 patients performing corpectomy and fusion and anterior plating (ACCF). Preoperative documentation collected consisted of cervical X-ray (static-dynamic), cervical spine TC, cervical MRI. Clinical documentation permitted us to obtained clinical status of each patient based on JOA, NDI and VAS. A Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, 6 years, 12 years. Results: the fusion rate was calculated based on the static and dynamic X-ray (flexion and extension position), only a little percentage of patients underwent CT scan. There were no significant differences between ACDF and ACCF in clinical outcome at 6 years evaluated by VAS and NDI. The rate of fusion at 6 years for 2 levels ACCF (92%) was higher than that for 2 levels ACDF (86%) but is not statistically significative. Conclusion: classifying degenerative disease and biomechanics feature, preoperatively in necessary to guide the surgeon to choose the best anterior approach for cervical spondylosis.

Keywords

Corpectomy; Discectomy; Multilevel; Cervical Spine

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	P. G. Matz, P. A. Anderson, L. T. Holly, M. W. Groff, R. F. Heary, M. G. Kaiser, P. V. Mummaneni, et al., “The Natural History of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2009, pp. 104-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2009.1.SPINE08716
[2]	S. Nurick, “The Pathogenesis of the Spinal Cord Disorder Associated with Cervical Spondylosis,” Brain, Vol. 95, No. 1, 1972, pp. 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/95.1.87
[3]	V. H. Hillard and R. I. Apfelbaum, “Surgical Management of Cervical Myelopathy: Indications and Techniques for Multilevel Cervical Discectomy,” The Spine Journal, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2006, pp. S242-S251. 2006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.005
[4]	K. Hirabayashi, K. Watanabe, K. Wakano, et al., “Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spinal Stenotic Myelopathy,” Spine, Vol. 8, No. 7, 1983, pp. 693-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198310000-00003
[5]	R. D. Rao, K. Gourab and K. S. David, “Operative Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 88, No. 7, 2006, pp. 1619-1640. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00014
[6]	B. P. Witwer and G. R. Trost, “Cervical Spondylosis: Ventral or Dorsal Surgery,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2007, pp. S130-S136.
[7]	Q. S. Lin, X. H. Zhou, X. W. Wang, P. Cao, N. Tsai and W. Yuan, “A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Corpectomy in Patients with Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” European Spine Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2012, pp. 474-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1961-9
[8]	T. J. Stewart, R. P. Schlenk and E. C. Benzel, “Multiple Level Discectomy and Fusion,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2007, pp. S143-S148.
[9]	S. Chibbaro, L. Benvenuti, S. Carnesecchi, et al., “Anterior Cervical Corpectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Experience and Surgical Results in a Series of 70 Consecutive Patients,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2006, pp. 233-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.04.011
[10]	S.-D. Jiang, L.-S. Jiang and L.-Y. Dai, “Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2012, pp. 155-161.
[11]	K. Sevki, T. Mehmet, T. Ufuk, et al., “Results of Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Stabilization,” Spine, Vol. 29, No. 22, 2004, pp. 2493-2500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000145412.93407.c3
[12]	K. Yonenobu, T. Fuji, K. Ono, et al., “Choice of Surgical Treatment for Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Spine, Vol. 10, No. 8, 1985, pp. 710-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198510000-00004
[13]	D. Konya, S. Ozgen, A. Gercek, et al., “Outcome for Combined Anterior and Posterior Surgical Approaches for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2009, pp. 404-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.07.070
[14]	M. Kawakami, T. Tamaki, H. Iwasaki, et al., “A Comparative Study of Surgical Approaches for Cervical Compressive Myelopathy,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 381, 2000, pp. 129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200012000-00016
[15]	A. S. Hilibrand, G. D. Carlson, M. A. Palumbo, P. K. Jones and H. H. Bohlman, “Radiculopathy and Myelopathy at Segments Adjacent to the Site of a Previous Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 81A, No. 4, 1999, pp. 519-28.
[16]	A. R. Vaccaro, S. P. Falatyn, G. J. Scuderi, et al. “Early Failure of Long Segment Anterior Cervical Plate Fixation,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, Vol. 11, No. 5, 1998, pp. 410-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199810000-00008
[17]	S. W. Chang, U. K. Kakarla, P. H. Maughan, et al., “Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Plate Fixation: Radiographic and Clinical Results,” Neurosurgery, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2010, pp. 639-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000367449.60796.94
[18]	T. S. Ellison, M. B. Hartman and C. D. Brigham, “Fusion Rates for Two-Level ACDF? Plating versus Subtotal Corpectomy and Fusion,” The Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, New York, 25 October 1997.
[19]	M. Ikenaga, J. Shikata and C. Tanaka, “Long-Term Results over 10 Years of Anterior Corpectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy,” Spine, Vol. 31, No. 14, 2006, pp. 1568-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000221985.37468.0f
[20]	M. Hussain, A. Nassr, R. N. Natarajan, H. S. An and G. B. J. Andersson, “Corpectomy versus Discectomy for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spine Pathology: A Finite Element Model Analysis,” The Spine Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2012, pp. 401-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.025