The Mean Residual Lifetime of (*n* － * k* + 1)-out-of-*n* Systems in Discrete Setting ()

Maryam Torabi Siahboomi

Department of Statistics, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

**DOI: **10.4236/am.2014.53046
PDF
HTML
4,774
Downloads
6,615
Views
Citations

Department of Statistics, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

In real life, there are
situations in which the lifetime of the components of a technical system (and hence
the lifetime of the system) is discrete. In this paper, we study the residual life, a (*n －** **k* + 1)-out-of-*n* system under the assumptions
that the components of the system are independent identically distributed with
common discrete distribution function *F*. We define the
mean residual lifetime (MRL) of the system and under different scenarios
investigate several aging and stochastic properties of MRL.

Share and Cite:

M. Siahboomi, "The Mean Residual Lifetime of (*n* － * k* + 1)-out-of-*n* Systems in Discrete Setting," *Applied Mathematics*, Vol. 5 No. 3, 2014, pp. 466-477. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.53046.

1. Introduction

In recent years, researchers in reliability theory have shown intensified interest in the study of stochastic and reliability properties of technical systems. The -out-of- system structure is a very popular type of redundancy in technical systems. A -out-of- system is a system consisting of components (usually the same) and functions if and only if at least out of components are operating. Hence, such system fails if or more of its components fail. Let denote the component lifetimes of the system and assume that represent the ordered lifetimes of the components. Then it is easy to argue that the lifetime of the system is where denotes the, the order statistics corresponding to 's,. Under the assumption that 's are continuous random variables, several authors have studied the residual lifetime and the mean residual lifetime (MRL) of the system under different conditions. Assuming that at time at least components of the system are working, the residual lifetime of the system can be defined as follows:

(1)

Among the researchers who investigated the reliability and aging properties of the conditional random variable, under various conditions and for different values of and, we can refer to Bairamov et al. [1], Asadi and Bairamov [2,3], Asadi and Goliforushani [4], Li and Zhao [5] and Zhang and Yang [6]. The extension to coherent systems has also been considered by several authors; see, among others, Li and Zhang [7], Navarro et al. [8], Zhang [9,10], Zhang and Li [11], Asadi and Kelkin Nama [12], and references therein.

Recently Mi [13] considered the situation in which the components of the system had discrete lifetimes and investigated some of aging properties of the system. The aim of the present paper is to study the MRL of -out-of- system under discrete setting. For this purpose, we assume that are nonnegative integer valued random variables denoting the lifetimes of the components of an -out-of- system. Furthermore, we assume that, are independent and have a common probability mass function

and survival function

The hazard rate of the components, denoted by and, is defined as follows:

One can easily show that the survival and probability mass functions can be recovered from the hazard rate, respectively, as follows:

The MRL function of the components, denoted by, plays an important role in reliability engineering and survival analysis. Assuming each component of the system has survived up to times, the MRL function of each component is defined as

It is not difficult to show that the survival function can be represented in terms of as below:

The reset of the paper is organized as follows :

We first assume that at time all components of the system are working and obtaining the functional form of the mean of. This is in fact the MRL of the system, denoted by, under the condition that all components of the system are operating at time. It is shown that when the components of the system have geometric distribution, is free of time. Then, we prove that if the components of the system have increased failure rate, is a decreasing function of. It is also shown that when the components of two independents are ordered in terms of hazard rate ordering, under the condition that all components of the two systems are alive, their corresponding MRLs are also ordered. The results are then extended to the case where at least components of the system are operating. In this case, we obtain the functional form of the MRL of the system, denoted by. It is shown that can be represented as the mixture of, where the mixing function is

We prove that in the case where the components of the system have increased hazard rate, then is decreasing in time. However, it is shown, using a counter example, that when the components of the system have decreased hazard rate, it is not necessarily true in general that is increasing in time.

The function, mentioned above, has its own interesting interpretation. It shows the probability that there are exactly failed components in the system, , given that at least components are working at time. Several properties of are also investigated.

2. The Mean Residual Life Function of System at the Component Level

In this section, we consider a -out-of- system and assume that the components of the system have independent discrete lifetimes with common probability mass function and survival function, where. Let also be the order statistics corresponding to 's. In what follows, first, we assume that at time, all the components of the system are working, i.e.. The residual lifetime of the system, under the condition that all components of the system are working at time, is (see Asadi and Bairamoglu [3]).

Using the standard techniques, one can easily show that

(2)

Hence the MRL function of the system, denoted by, can be obtained as follows

(3)

(4)

where

denotes the MRL function of a series system consisting of components,.

Example 2.1 Let the components of the system have geometric distribution with probability mass function

and survival function

We have

Note that the MRL of a system having independent geometric components does not depend on.

The distribution function of the order statistics can be represented in terms of incomplete beta function as follows (see David and Nagaraga [14]):

where

Hence the MRL function of the system can be represented as

(5)

This representation is useful to prove the following two theorems.

Theorem 2.2 If the components of the -out-of- system have an increasing (decreasing) hazard rate, then is decreasing (increasing) in.

Proof:

If denotes the hazard rate of the components, then is increasing (decreasing) if and only if for non-negative integer valued is decreasing (increasing) in. Now the result follows easily by representation (5).

The following example gives an application of this theorem.

Example 2.3 Let the components of the system have discrete Weibull distribution with survival function

Then the MRL of the system is decreasing for and increasing for.

Theorem 2.4 Let and be two -out-of- systems with independent components. Let the components of and have the probability mass function, and, survival functionsand; and hazard rates and, respectively. If, for, , then

, where and denote the mean residual life of and, respectively.

Proof: Note that, for, if and only if

The required result is immediate now from (5).

Khorashadizadeh et al. [15] studied discrete variance residual life function for one component.

Using the fact that

one can easily prove the following lemma.

Lemma 2.5

(6)

(7)

Using this, the variance of the residual life function of -out-of- system under the condition that all components are working can be derived in terms of.

Theorem 2.6 If, the variance residual life function and mean residual life function are related as

wang#title3_4:spProof:

We have

Using Lemma 2.5, we get the required result.

Now, we study the MRL of -out-of- system under the condition that at least components of the system are working. That is, we concentrate on,

First note that

where

and is a binomial random variable with parameters.

(8)

Equation (8) shows that is a convex combination of,. Note that is given by (2).

Example 2.7 Let denote the lifetimes of independent components which are connected in a -out-of- system. Let be distributed as discrete Weibull with

and

Then

and

Hence, the MRL is given by (8). Figures 1 and 2 show the graphs of in example 2.7 when, , for different values of and.

Remark 2.8 Let us consider again the condition random variable for which the survival function is given by (2). The representation (2) shows that is in fact the, the order statistics

Figure 1. The MRL of the system for the discrete weibull distribution with, , and from the top respectively.

Figure 2. The MRL of the system for the discrete weibull distribution with, , and from the top respectively.

form of a distribution with survival function. Hence using the result of David and Nagaraje [8]one can write

Hence

and

(9)

This indicates the MRL can be expressed in terms of simpler MRL which is in fact the MRL of series systems.

The following theorem gives bounds for.

Theorem 2.9 It is always true that

Proof: The proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.3 of [4] and hence is omitted.

The next theorem proves that when the parent distribution has increased hazard rate, increases in terms of time.

Theorem 2.10 If is increasing in, then is decreasing in.

Proof: In order to prove the result, we need to show that, for and fixed,

We have, from (8), after some algebra

But the first term in the above equality is positive by Theorem 2.2. Hence we just need to prove that the second term in the above equality is positive. Assume that and note that is an increasing function of. Then

After some algebraic manipulations, one can show that the numerator of the expression is equal to

(10)

It can be easily shown that for, (see, [2,3]). On the other hand, as

is an increasing function of, we have. This implies that the expression in (10) is non-negative and hence the proof is complete.

Remark 2.11 As it was already mentioned for a system with decreasing failure rate components, is increasing in time. This result, however, is not generally true for MRL. Figures 3 and 4 show the graphs of and in Example 2.7. As the graphs show that is a decreasing function of time, however, is an increasing function of for a period of time and then starts to decrease.

Remark 2.12 In the following, we show that has its own interesting interpretation. In fact, under the condition that the system is working at time, shows the probability that there is exactly component failure in the system. The mentioned conditional probability can be written as

Figure 3. The MRL of the system for the discrete weibull distribution with, , and.

Figure 4. The failure rate of the system for the discrete weibull distribution.

where for such that shows the odds of the event that a component has a lifetime less than. Also in the following, we study some properties of.

Theorem 2.13 For is decreasing function of t and for, it is increasing function of t. Also, for

Proof: We have

(11)

which is obviously a decreasing function of (is a increasing function) since and. From (11), we easily conclude that and.

In this case, it is easily seen that is an increasing function of, and.

Theorem 2.14 The survival function can be uniquely determined by and, as follows:

(12)

wang#title3_4:spProof:

The result easily follows from the fact that for,

which gives (12).

Consider the vector. Obviously, is a probability vector. we can then prove the following theorem.

Theorem 2.15 For all,

Proof: In order to prove the result, we need to show that for,

or equivalently

This is equivalent to show that

or

(13)

But, as is increasing in, the bracket in the summations, for, is always negative. Hence the inequality in (13) is valid. This completes the proof of the theorem.

Theorem 2.16 Consider two -out-of- systems. Assume that the components of the systems have independent lifetimes, with survival function and, respectively and odds functions and, respectively. If for all, , then.

Proof: Asadi & Berred [16] proved that for fixed and is an increasing function of.

The assumption that implies, then

which is equivalent to say that for all and all,

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

[1] | I. Bairamov, M. Ahsanullah and I. Akhundov, “A Residual Life Function of a System Having Parallel and Series Structures,” Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2002, pp. 119-132. |

[2] | M. Asadi and I. Bairamoglu, “A Note on the Mean Residual Life Function of the Parallel Systems,” Communications in Statistics Theoy and Methods, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2005, pp. 1-12. |

[3] |
M. Asadi and I. Bairamoglu, “On the Mean Residual Life Function of the k-out-of-n Systems at System Level,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2006, pp. 314-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TR.2006.874934 |

[4] |
M. Asadi and S. Goliforushani, “On the Mean Residual Life Function of Coherent Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2008, pp. 574-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TR.2008.2007161 |

[5] |
X. Li and P. Zhao, “Stochastic Comparison on General Inactivity Time and General Residual Life of k-out-of-n Systems,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2008, pp. 1005-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610910801943784 |

[6] | Z. Zhang and Y. Yang, “Ordered Properties of the Residual Lifetime and Inactivity Time of (n - k + 1)-out-of-n Systems under Double Monitoring,” Statistics & Probability Letters, Vol. 80, No. 7-8, 2010, pp. 711-717. |

[7] |
X. Li and Z. Zhang, “Some Stochastic Comparisons of Conditional Coherent Systems,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2008, pp. 541-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asmb.715 |

[8] |
J. Navarro, N. Balakrishnan and F. J. Samaniego, “Mixture Reptesentations of Residual Lifetimes of Used Systems,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1097-1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1239/jap/1231340236 |

[9] |
Z. Zhang, “Ordering Conditional General Coherent Systems with Exchaneable Components,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 140, No. 2, 2010, pp. 454-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.029 |

[10] |
Z. Zhang, “Mixture Representations of Inactivity Times of Conditional Coherent Systems and Their Applications,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2010, pp. 876-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1239/jap/1285335415 |

[11] |
Z. Zhang and X. Li, “Some New Results on Stochastic Orders and Aging Properties of Coherent Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 59, No. 4, 2010, pp. 718-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2087431 |

[12] | M. Kelkin Nama and M. Asadi, “Stochastic Properties of Components in a Used Coherent Systems,” Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11009-013-9322-2 |

[13] | J. Mi, “Limit of Hazard Rate Function of Coherent System with Discrete Life,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2010, pp. 711-717. |

[14] |
H. A. David and H. N. Nagaraja, “Order Statistics,” 3rd Edition, John Wiely & Sons, New York, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471722162 |

[15] | M. Khorashadizadeh, A. H. Rezaei Roknabadi and G. R. Mohtashami Borzadaran, “Variance Residual Life Function in Discrete Random Ageing,” Metron, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2010, pp. 57-67. |

[16] |
M. Asadi and A. Berred, “On the Number of Failed Components in a Coherent Opereting System,” Statistics & Probability Letters, Vol. 82, No. 12, 2012, pp. 2156-2163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2012.07.010 |

Journals Menu

Contact us

+1 323-425-8868 | |

customer@scirp.org | |

+86 18163351462(WhatsApp) | |

1655362766 | |

Paper Publishing WeChat |

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.