A Temporal Perspective on Learning Alliance Formation


When to enter the first learning alliance has strategic implications for firms’ long term success. However, research on timing of the first learning alliance is rare. As one of the few empirical studies on this issue, this paper aims to fill the gap by asking what the implications are when firms launch their first learning alliance at different points of time. Empirical results support the central proposition that if firms enter the first learning alliance too early or too late, they tend to rush into a second learning alliance in a short period of time. In the long run, they will lose the ability to innovate. Overall, this study has fundamental implications for organizational learning in particular and theory building in general.

Share and Cite:

M. Piao, "A Temporal Perspective on Learning Alliance Formation," American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2014, pp. 13-19. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2014.41003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. George and G. Jones, “The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building,” Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2000, pp. 657-684.
[2] E. Mosakowski and C. Earley, “A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2000, pp. 796-812.
[3] S., A. Stuart, and A. Zaheer, “Time Scales and Organizational Theory,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 4, 1999, pp. 725-741.
[4] L. Perlow, “The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1999, pp. 57-81.
[5] D. G. Ancona, G. Okhuysen and L. A. Perlow, “Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2001, pp. 512-529.
[6] T. R. Mitchell and L. R. James, “Building Better Theory: Time and the Specification of When Things Happen,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2001, pp. 530-547.
[7] S. Barley, “On Technology, Time and Social Order: Technically Induced Change in the Temporal Organization of Radiological Work,” In: F. A. Dubinskas, Ed., Making Time: Ethnographies of High Technology Organizations, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1988, pp. 123-169.
[8] Y. Kor and J. Mahoney, “Performance Outcomes of Resource Deployment Strategies, Top Management Experience and Corporate Governance,” Working Paper, University of Delaware and University of Illinois, 2001.
[9] D. A. Whetten, “What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, 1989, pp. 490-495
[10] R. Katila and G. Ahuja, “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1183-1194.
[11] M. Kotabe and K. Swan, “The Role of Strategic Alliances in High-Technology New Product Development,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, 1995, pp. 621-636.
[12] P.J. Lane and M.H. Lubatkin, “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 461-477.
[13] W. W. Powell, “Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries,” California Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1998, pp. 228-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165952
[14] J. A. Baum, T. Calabrese and B. S. Silverman, “Don’t go it Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups’ Performance in Canadian Biotechnology,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 267-294.
[15] W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1990, pp. 128-152.
[16] W. B. Gartner, J. A. Starr and S. Bhat, “Predicting New Venture Survival: An Analysis of ‘Anatomy of a StartUp,’ Cases from Inc. Magazine,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1999, pp. 215-232.
[17] B. L. Simonin, “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 7, 1999, pp. 595-623.
[18] S. A. Zahra and G. George, “Absoprtive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 185-203.
[19] D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, “The Myopia of Learning,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. S2, 1993, pp. 95-112.
[20] G. Ahuja and C. M. Lampert, “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, 2001, pp. 521-543.
[21] G. G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and J. E. McGee, “Linking Corporate Entrepreneurship to Strategy, Structure, and Process: Suggested Research Directions,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1999, pp. 85-104.
[22] G. Hamel, “Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, 1991, pp. 83-103.
[23] D. C. Mowery, J. E. Oxley and B. S. Silverman, “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 77-91.
[24] G. Dess, R. D. Ireland, S. A. Zahra, S. W. Floyd, J. J. Janney and P. J. Lane, “Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2003, pp. 351-378
[25] J. W. Altman and A. Zacharakis, “An Integrative Model for Corporate Venturing,” The Journal of Private Equity, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2003, pp. 68-76.
[26] S. A. Zahra, A. P. Nielsen and W. C. Bogner, “Corporate Entrepreneurship Knowledge, and Competence Development,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1999, pp. 169-189.
[27] P. Allison, “Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide,” SAS Publishing, Cary, 1995.
[28] W. H. Greene, “Econometric Analysis,” 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2000.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.